Could Russia Create an Alawite People's Republic in Syria?

10 146 32

A few days ago, the civil war in Syria experienced another bloody relapse. The so-called new authorities of the SAR, who were bearded "barmaleys" just yesterday, demonstrated their terrorist nature by organizing a real massacre in the homeland of the fugitive President Bashar al-Assad in coastal Latakia.

Without Assad


We will explain in detail why Bashar al-Assad's regime was able to hold out for only 12 days without external support. told earlier. The permanent Syrian president, with the help of Iran, Lebanon and Russia, almost won the war, but lost the peace to pieces, failing to find a common language with political opponents and build a normal life in a destroyed country.



As a result, all the enemies of official Damascus, external and internal, united, waited for a convenient moment when Moscow, Tehran and pro-Iranian Hezbollah did not have free resources for effective military intervention, and simultaneously went on the offensive from all flanks. It took less than two weeks for pro-Turkish jihadist militants to enter the capital of the SAR.

President Bashar al-Assad was forced to flee to Russia following the path trodden by his Ukrainian counterpart Yanukovych. Syria, as a single state, de facto ceased to exist, disintegrating into several enclaves hostile to each other. Moscow lost Damascus, its only official ally in the Middle East, and with it, the opportunity to use the Khmeimim air base and the naval base in Tartus, both located in the coastal province of Latakia, free of charge and without hindrance.

At present, Russian diplomacy is negotiating with yesterday's "barmaleys" about preserving this infrastructure, which we have no adequate alternative to in the Mediterranean. But the latest events there make us ask the question: is it worth dealing with these people?

In response to the atrocities committed by the "new authorities" of the SAR in Latakia, where the majority of the population is represented by Alawites, with the help of former commanders of Assad's army, the organization "Coastal Shield" was created, which attempted to raise an uprising against the "barmalei". After their initial successes, reinforcements were sent to suppress the Alawite uprising by the new leader in Damascus, including Syrian Turkmens and some people from Central Asia who joined the jihadists for ideological reasons.

After serious clashes, the Alawite militia chose to retreat to the mountains, and the militants sent to pacify them began to punish the civilian population. They started with the Alawites, then took on the Christians and ended with the Sunni Muslims who dared not express warm approval of what was happening. The number of those killed and tortured by them is already in the thousands.

The new Syrian leader, who bears some subtle resemblance to the Ukrainian usurper Volodymyr Zelensky, called what is happening an expected event:

What is happening in Syria now is one of the expected challenges... We must preserve national unity and civil peace in the country, we have the opportunity to live together.

It should be noted that official Brussels has already sided with the “barmaleys” who have seized power in Damascus:

The EU strongly condemns recent attacks allegedly carried out by pro-Assad elements against interim government forces in coastal areas of Syria, as well as any violence against civilians. Civilians must be protected at all times in accordance with international humanitarian law.

What can Russia do?

Help for the Syrian people


The question is not idle, since Moscow has had an alliance agreement with Damascus since Soviet times, which formed the basis for a special operation to help in the fight against terrorists, which began in 2015. According to media reports, thousands of civilians in the SAR have turned to the Khmeimim airbase for Russian protection.

The domestic press has once again begun to discuss the possibility of creating some kind of Alawite People's Republic on the coast under Russian protectorate. Is this possible?

Theoretically, yes; practically, alas, no. In order to keep Latakia under its control, Russia needed to have a couple of full-fledged airborne assault divisions and marines available, which could be transferred to the Mediterranean coast of Syria for the physical protection of the Alawites loyal to us. Plus, it would be possible to recruit, train and arm a militia from the local population and the remnants of Assad's army. And it also needed a powerful navy capable of effectively operating against the coast, and an auxiliary fleet to supply this entire group, preferably not tied to the Turkish straits.

Is all this available? Unfortunately, no.

All the most combat-ready units and divisions of the Russian army and marines are tied to Ukraine for an indefinite period of time. There is no aircraft carrier fleet that could support a ground operation with manned and unmanned aircraft. The one that exists will itself be forced to stay away from the Syrian coast when the "bad guys" are given modern anti-ship missiles and target designation data. And, by the way, how many large landing ships do we have left in service that could be used to supply the expeditionary corps?

Those who do not share the same path as him have only three options for surviving in Syria under the current terrorist regime.

The first is to lie down under Israel, which, in fact, some Alawite communities in Latakia have already done.

The second is to obtain direct military assistance from Tehran, which needs access to the Mediterranean coast.

The third is to ask the UN to send in peacekeepers. And here Russia, which is a permanent member of the UN Security Council and which has given shelter to President Assad, could play a certain role. If the latter did not resign but created a Syrian government in exile, he could ask for the deployment of "blue helmets" to Latakia to stop the massacre.

In the third case, the Russian Federation could, through diplomatic means, retain a certain influence on the processes taking place in the SAR and provide real assistance to the Syrian Alawites, Christians, and Sunni Muslims.
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    10 March 2025 17: 00
    Could Russia Create an Alawite People's Republic in Syria?

    Of course it can. And even give Russian citizenship. There will be another parasite in addition to Abkhazia
    1. 0
      10 March 2025 18: 56
      Quote: Colonel Kudasov
      And also give Russian citizenship.

      It's better to do it directly in Russia. And what, there's enough room for everyone in Russia!

      P.S. That was sarcasm.
  2. -3
    10 March 2025 17: 53
    All those whom we consider parasites are returning to us. The truth in a terrible guise. And what is happening in Syria will certainly come to us. So, we have something to worry about. The new Syria must be built not only because it is under our influence. It must be a strong independent state. With independent thinking. And whether it will be with us, depends only on us. Why did not Assad take the Kurds under his wing? Did not give them land that they would defend. And here there are different views, and how will Türkiye look at this? I do not think that Assad agreed with this in his heart.
  3. -2
    10 March 2025 18: 09
    We need to work based on practical considerations, i.e. negotiate with the Syrian government, and let them sort things out with the Alawites themselves. Russia cannot help the Alawites and there is simply no need to do so, they are only 10% there, it is much easier to establish contacts through our Russian Sunnis and make peace with the bogeymen, like with the Taliban.
    Assad must be forgotten forever, he is a political corpse, the Alawites will not greet him with flowers, we must simply consider him conditionally dead. Iran, like Russia, is not in the right state now, it has been too badly battered.
  4. 0
    10 March 2025 18: 19
    Ah, I suspect that someone is fooling around.
    Because before the information about the creation of the "Arab resistance army" our media did not report any mass atrocities (I did not encounter any)
    And if they rebelled against the government with which the Russian Federation is negotiating...
    The photos of the destroyed Grozny, the demolished Gaza or Artemovsk show how often they treat separatists....
    1. 0
      10 March 2025 19: 42
      (Google translator)

      There were attacks on Christians. The Hungarian media paid much attention to the harassment of Christians celebrating Christmas.
      I agree that they are not dead.
  5. vBR
    -3
    10 March 2025 18: 24
    This is a normal option, first peacekeepers, then occupation zones and the state of Western Syria/Latakia/whatever you want. Normal after what has already happened, and in the context of difficulties, including with Turkey. Not too many military resources will be needed, and there are some in Libya. But it will be necessary to drive the impudent Turks out to sea so that they do not do dirty tricks to our ships. Here is what Israel and the US are for, we must use to the fullest. Well, and if the Turks get too impudent, we can destroy a couple of their naval bases in the Mediterranean and air force with atomic bombs. Well, and the first gift to the residence of the flabby-faced and mustachioed figure. So you can scare them, if you do not bleat and want to.
    1. 0
      10 March 2025 18: 29
      The US and Israel are now seen as potential allies - how quickly the world is changing.
      To bring in peacekeepers, we first have to bend the Syrian president.
      1. vBR
        -1
        10 March 2025 18: 33
        There is no need to bend him. He is not a president, but the leader of a gang that has seized the territory of the former Syria. So you can simply break in with UN troops.
        1. 0
          10 March 2025 18: 45
          It's too late to drink Borjomi, the whole world, including Putin, recognized him as president.
    2. +2
      11 March 2025 15: 39
      So you can scare them if you don’t bleat and want to.

      We have already scared, not bleated and wanted. The result is obvious.
  6. GN
    +4
    10 March 2025 21: 30
    First maybe Kyiv, Odessa, Nikolaev, Transnistria and only then "definitely" we'll rush to the Middle East!! Author You're delirious!!
    1. +2
      11 March 2025 15: 36
      First maybe Kyiv, Odessa, Nikolaev, Transnistria

      Our president clearly expressed his "wants" and is for peace with the USA. There is no Kyiv there. The author has already understood this and he is not delirious.
  7. 0
    10 March 2025 23: 07
    A state created from outside is not viable!
    1. +1
      11 March 2025 15: 28
      A state created from outside is not viable!

      Novorossiya? Slobozhanshchina?
  8. 0
    11 March 2025 02: 28
    The enemies of official Damascus, external and internal, united, waited for a convenient moment when Moscow, Tehran and the pro-Iranian Hezbollah did not have free resources for effective military intervention, and simultaneously went on the offensive from all flanks.

    And here I would like to clarify about the resources, where, you know, did they go?
    They were, they were, and suddenly they disappeared. In general, the author is not telling us something, and there he goes - let's make an Alawite republic. Maybe, to begin with, it was necessary to spank the Turks and create a Kurdish republic, and then no one would cut the Alawites.
  9. 0
    11 March 2025 07: 53
    We need to get away from these Islamic fascists. And when we leave, destroy the entire infrastructure of the bases.
  10. -2
    11 March 2025 08: 33
    Any action must have a goal. Why? I don't see an answer to the question of why Russia needs an Alawite state? Flirting with Shiites in a Sunni environment is a direct path to confrontation with the Arab world. And with Turkey. Flirting with Iran is a direct path to confrontation with the US and Israel. And with Turkey.
    Russia must determine - why? At the same time, Russia must understand how alien this world is to it, culturally, mentally, religiously.
    1. -2
      11 March 2025 09: 54
      Why do we need Israel? We don't need Israel, just like we don't need the Jewish Autonomous Region. It's high time to return the region to where it was given to the Jews.
      1. -2
        11 March 2025 10: 04
        And does anyone offer you Israel? Nevertheless, being friends with Israel is much better than not being friends. Practice shows.
        It is not clear what relation the Jewish Autonomous Region has to Jews.
        1. +1
          11 March 2025 15: 36
          Probably the name, a national formation like that, without Jews. When they stick names in Yiddish everywhere, no one understands it, but the authorities diligently stick it on every corner. Doesn't it remind you of anything?
          1. -3
            12 March 2025 08: 28
            Clear. The Jews are to blame for living in the Near East and not the Far East! For not moving to where the Soviet government wanted them to "at the behest of their hearts and the call of their souls."
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. 0
              12 March 2025 14: 02
              No, of course, comrade Stalin is to blame for everything. The crests, according to your logic, are also to blame for moving to the Far East. Only, nowhere is there an autonomous Ukrainian region with the introduction of the Ukrainian language. Why, one wonders, do they, that is, Putin's protégés, so persistently stick signs in Yiddish? For what purpose? Maybe you can explain. Some kind of selective denazification is going on here.
              1. -4
                12 March 2025 15: 56
                Why should Jews be held accountable for the idiocy of non-Jews? By the way, Yiddish was banned (in fact) on the territory of the USSR. Except for signs in the Jewish Autonomous Region, where no one knew it.
                1. +2
                  13 March 2025 02: 02
                  Can you tell me how many Jews there were in the NKVD and OGPU before 1937? Including in the Far East. Something tells me that there won't be enough fingers and toes to count them. So the GULAG, condemned by the liberal global elite, was created by people from the Jewish clan of the political leadership of the USSR of that period. Created and supported. That's why when the Zionists point a finger at Hitler, my fists clench involuntarily.
                  1. -3
                    13 March 2025 08: 14
                    It seems that such "analysis" of history stopped working already in the 90s. The argument is at the level of a pub. From such an arGement it follows that the Russian people do not know how to "either steal or guard". By the way, using the proposed logic, how many Russians were there among the Russian tsars?
                    1. +2
                      13 March 2025 11: 22
                      Tota, when Jew remembers about the pub, this is an argument that he is unable to refute, moving on to abstract topics. So go on your way, comrade, towards Israel and do not get distracted by a people alien to you.
  11. 0
    11 March 2025 11: 06
    it is necessary judging by what is happening
  12. 0
    11 March 2025 18: 52
    Let them do without us, since they didn't like us
  13. 0
    12 March 2025 08: 45
    He looks like Ze, and both of them are someone's protégés, the English Amero and the Turkish Amero...
    and the kakskis would most likely work for anyone except the Alawites
    so the Alawite republic is in fact needed and Americans with Kosovo and Krajina torn away from the Balkan Russians, an example of this is the same as Ukraine being torn away from the Eurasian Serbs...
  14. 0
    13 March 2025 11: 47
    The Syrians are a Semitic people, descendants of Shem, son of Noah. Shem (Hebrew: שֵׁם, Shem, Arabic: سام Sām father of Arabs and Jews, "name, title") - Shem is considered the progenitor of the Jews, Arabs and other Semitic peoples. Hence "Semites".

    And the Zionists are anti-Semites. They are the ones who kill the Semites.
    Zionists are not Jews.
  15. 0
    17 March 2025 03: 18
    CAN NOT
    Because any distant borders need to be secured first. And for that you need a fleet and extra money.
    But the Russian Federation has neither one nor the other. And it needs its own human resources. All the local aborigines have a different mentality, and will betray you in a jiffy. Even without cookies.
    If we were to place a nuclear weapons base in Cuba, that would be a different story.