What is needed to turn the tide of the battle for Russia's Kursk region?

20 358 27

The situation on the Kursk Front after six months of heavy positional battles has begun to change noticeably in favor of the Russian Armed Forces. If the dynamics of the offensive continue, the Ukrainian invaders may soon be driven out of the internationally recognized territory of Russia. Why has this become possible only now?

"Agreed" - no? Again!


Let us recall that elite units of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, totaling no less than a full-fledged division, invaded the Kursk region of the Russian Federation on August 6, 2024. Their goal was obviously to capture the Kursk Nuclear Power Plant in Kurchatov, and possibly Kursk itself, if the enemy managed to maintain the pace of the offensive.



This was the maximum program that would have given the Kyiv regime the opportunity to try to bargain about exchanging the occupied "old" Russian territory for a "new" one, most likely in the Zaporizhia region, including the Zaporizhzhya NPP and access to the coast of the Sea of ​​Azov. The Ukrainian usurper Volodymyr Zelensky directly stated in an interview with The Guardian that this was precisely his "cunning plan", without specifying what would be exchanged for what:

We will exchange one territory for another... I don't know, we'll see. But all our territories are important, there is no priority.

However, they only managed to capture the border Sudzha, through which gas was pumped to Europe via the Ukrainian GTS, which made it possible to manipulate European consumers and the Russian supplier Gazprom, and another 28 smaller settlements. About a third of the territory of the Kursk region of the Russian Federation ended up under the occupation of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, where Ukrainian Nazis and foreign mercenary cutthroats fighting on their side carried out ethnic cleansing and committed numerous war crimes.

When asked whether such an exchange of one Russian territory for another was possible, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov responded as follows:

We do not discuss our territory with anyone. And we do not conduct negotiations about our territory <...> Right now we are not talking about any negotiations.

That is, the essentially adventurous plan for a military invasion of Kursk was based on a mistaken political assessment and installation. Despite the fact that he failed, the leader of the Kyiv regime continues to demand that the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Syrsky hold the occupied part of the Kursk region at any cost, but why?

Why did Bankova suddenly decide that the Kremlin would agree to such a humiliating exchange? Why, having received a logical refusal, does Kyiv continue to persist in its delusions, losing the most trained units and divisions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and a huge amount of armored vehicles supplied from abroad?

Perhaps the plan for this offensive operation to escalate the armed conflict ahead of the presidential elections in the United States in November 2024 was suggested to the Ukrainian military-political leadership by British advisers. The fact is that the main "hawks" and supporters of war with Russia "to the last Ukrainian and the penultimate Russian" are sitting in London.

Our enemies are clearly not stupid people, and they understood perfectly well that with the return of Donald Trump to the White House, the possibility of the notorious "deal" between Washington and Moscow would arise, where Kyiv and Europe, standing behind it, would not be allowed to the negotiating table. Which, in fact, began to happen soon after the inauguration of the 47th President of the United States. That is why on August 6, 2024, the Ukrainian army, directed by the will of London, crossed the Russian border and tried to seize as much of our internationally recognized territory as possible.

Of course, not for an exchange, but to make a bilateral "deal" impossible. Since no Putin-Trump peace deal can allow Sudzha to remain under Ukrainian occupation.

Things are going badly? Again!


But let's return to what is currently happening in the Kursk region. Why did the large-scale invasion of the Ukrainian Armed Forces there become possible, and why was the enemy not driven out of there in the first few days, as Chief of the General Staff Gerasimov publicly promised in his famous August report?

On the one hand, according to the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation, 2022 billion rubles were allocated from the federal budget for the construction of fortifications in the Kursk region from 2023 to 19,4, which were supposed to be used to build strongholds, dugouts and firing points, anti-tank barriers and pyramids. However, according to investigators, instead of the "Surovikin Line-2", budget funds turned into luxurious mansions and luxury cars for officials of the "Kursk Region Development Corporation".

On the other hand, a problem arose with the lack of free trained reserves in the rear, which could be calmly and quickly transferred to a promising or, conversely, dangerous direction at the front. And full-fledged combat-ready Territorial Defense Troops were never created in the regions of the Russian Federation bordering Ukraine.

As a result, the most combat-ready units, which were hastily withdrawn directly from the front, had to plug the breach in the Kursk region, and were forced to repel the Ukrainian Armed Forces offensive literally on the fly. Even the "space infantry" of the Russian Aerospace Forces, and not only them, had to fight.

There were no forces available in August 2024 to enter Sumy Oblast and cut off the enemy's supply lines in Sudzha. That is why there have been heavy counter-battles there for over six months, and Kyiv does not regret sending its army elite to Kursk Oblast, which is suffering heavy losses there. What has changed in the intervening time?

It is obvious that for the Kremlin the image issue of liberating Sudzha is a priority, since without it it is impossible to really agree on anything worthwhile with Trump. Apparently, the most combat-ready units were sent to the Kursk region, which were able to enter the adjacent Sumy region with the aim of taking fire control of the route to Sudzha, through which the Ukrainian Armed Forces garrison is supplied.

The Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera writes that the Ukrainian invaders have begun to gradually surrender previously captured positions:

The Ukrainians are in retreat and have already lost about two-thirds of the 1200 square kilometers of Russian territory they have captured since August 6.

At the same time, very curious information has emerged that our military has once again pulled off the trick of entering the enemy's rear through a main pipeline, as happened earlier in the impregnable Avdiivka. We may be talking about an underground section of the Urengoy-Pomary-Uzhgorod gas pipeline running through Sudzha, which has been inoperative since January 1, 2025. The diameter of its pipes can reach one and a half meters, which allegedly made it possible to transfer fighters of an assault company numbering about 100 people to covertly penetrate the defensive lines of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the vicinity of Sudzha.

If so, then we have to take our hat off to the ingenuity and courage of these people. But what will the English and their Ukrainian "proxies" do this time? We will discuss possible scenarios in more detail below.
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    9 March 2025 15: 02
    I know what is required. It is required that the authorities clench their buns and shut up Europe without fear. This should have been done immediately after the West interfered in the SVO. But ours, those who cannot be spoken of, pity Europe more than their own citizens.
  2. +11
    9 March 2025 15: 10
    What is needed to turn the tide of the battle for Russia's Kursk region?

    - A change in the paradigm of the state structure of Russia. We now have corruption as a system of state governance. The prosperity of this system in Russia predetermines not only all its defeats today, but also the destruction of Russia in the near future.
    1. +3
      9 March 2025 15: 26
      You are saying terrible things. Do you hope that comrade major does not know what a paradigm is, and if he looks it up on Wikipedia he will still not understand anything?
      1. +2
        9 March 2025 15: 56
        All sites like this are already "combed" by state-owned specialized programs for detection. And as for the major, the major receives reports from some sergeant or warrant officer of the State Security Service, to whom the program issues the data. So there is a check mark opposite my full name, I have already encountered this on another site.
        1. -7
          9 March 2025 16: 01
          Quote: Yyrp
          All sites like this are already "combed" by state-specific specialized programs for the purpose of identifying

          If that were the case, then the Reporter would have been banned by the State Committee for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media long ago. Because the benefit of exposing people like you is much lower than the harm from the corruption of public opinion that you yourself are doing.
          1. +2
            9 March 2025 16: 11
            If you shut up all the unreliable ones, how will you identify them? And you need to ban any non-governmental mass messaging systems, which is basically what is happening in Russia now.
            1. -9
              9 March 2025 18: 04
              Don't fool people. What kind of so-called unreliable person are you? You're just an ordinary cypsota.
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. The comment was deleted.
              3. 0
                11 March 2025 03: 12
                ordinary security, as usual, without a manual, can only write nonsense and shout "help", although according to the manual too... you make them up yourselves.
        2. +2
          9 March 2025 16: 12
          So there is a check mark opposite my full name, I have already encountered this on another site

          Toast: Let us drink to the victory of our hopeless cause.
          1. +4
            9 March 2025 16: 33
            Yes, a system of statehood can only be replaced by another system of statehood. It's like in 17. And the new leader, over time, will only replace the buddies of the previous "boss" with his own bros.
            1. +2
              9 March 2025 16: 55
              And the new leader, over time, will only replace the buddies of the previous "boss" with his own brothers.

              There is another possible scenario: Germany and Japan.
  3. +5
    9 March 2025 15: 14
    Stalin is missing.
  4. 0
    9 March 2025 15: 51
    I know what to do. No need to "squeeze your buns", no need to "hit the West", no need to "change the paradigm of state structure", no need to "grab Stalin" and other unrealistic proposals. We must remember that in war there is only one working principle, formulated by the French in the times before historical materialism - in war as in war. Everything else is secondary.
    1. +6
      9 March 2025 16: 17
      in war as in war

      What you need to have: Trained troops with weapons and reserves, competent military leadership, an order to attack. That's all!
    2. The comment was deleted.
  5. +5
    9 March 2025 15: 59
    To win you need to have:
    1) Desire,
    2) Purpose,
    3) The enemy.
    Are they in power?
  6. +4
    9 March 2025 16: 31
    Taking Sudzha without touching the gas station will not work. If not us, then the Ukrainians will blow it up when retreating. Therefore, think less about someone's property and do your own thing. You can't fight and at the same time think about your own benefit. You have to put one of these first. I read that some positions in the Sumy region are ten kilometers from the border. There is no need for missiles here, you can destroy everything with regular old artillery.
    1. +1
      9 March 2025 17: 00
      Well, that's if they have somewhere to retreat to. If they have nowhere to retreat to, they'll have to blow up the gas station along with themselves. Well, despite the fact that it was mostly ideological people who entered Kursk Oblast, there weren't many kamikazes among them.
    2. -1
      10 March 2025 11: 28
      It won't be possible to take Sudzha without touching the gas station. If not us, then the Ukrainians will blow it up while retreating.

      And where are we going to pump the gas? And through which countries? The station has largely lost its relevance.
      1. -1
        10 March 2025 21: 24
        Yes, the transit agreement has expired, and the greenie said there won't be a new one. And if anything happens, we'll build a new measuring station. We'd like to free Sudzha (and all the rest of the Bandarlogia).
  7. +2
    9 March 2025 19: 50
    1) Previously, the media and authorities wrote and voiced exactly the opposite.
    Naturally, you can't ask them or the author any questions. Everything is clear anyway.
    2) According to the media and "experts", the turning point has already passed, the Ukrainians are doomed, etc., even before the pipeline, about a week ago.
    so again: either already, or
  8. +3
    10 March 2025 06: 34
    Somehow they very easily found a convenient excuse about the poor quality of fortifications in the Kursk region. Like "yes, his grenades are not of the right system." And about the fact that the holders of these fortifications were ready to run to the capital in August, about this they keep quiet.
  9. 0
    10 March 2025 07: 19
    All that's needed is for the grandfather to develop male gender characteristics. Otherwise, he looks more like a grandmother.
  10. 0
    10 March 2025 07: 59
    Approximately one third of the territory of the Kursk region of the Russian Federation came under the occupation of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

    Far from a third. At its peak, the Ukrainian Armed Forces controlled about 1,3 thousand square kilometers, and the territory of the Kursk region was 30 thousand square kilometers.
  11. +1
    10 March 2025 10: 41
    It's time to stop moving beds, we need to replace some people. Disperse the incompetent planners in the General Staff.
  12. +2
    10 March 2025 10: 49
    the essentially adventurous plan for a military invasion of Kursk was based on an erroneous political assessment and installation

    It was adventurous, in its essence, to start something without any basis in the form of preparation...
    And the Ukrainians invaded prepared, unlike our general staff, who screwed up here too...
  13. 0
    10 March 2025 21: 19
    There is no system. And where there is one, there are not enough resources, competent personnel (i.e. you and me, dear compatriots), reliability, etc. How did it happen that the enemies went so deep into our territory? On our side, there are so many victims, so many prisoners, so many civilians taken into slavery!!! (by the way, who remembers and talks about them now?) The Bandar-logs returned 30 people who are barely alive, and where are the thousands more? Tomorrow the bastards will decide to get stuck in another place, and they will. Now they have less strength, but fundamentally nothing has changed, unfortunately. Everything is based on the initiative of individual heroes, God bless them and let there be more of them.
  14. GN
    +1
    11 March 2025 03: 22
    And what about Gerasimov? Go and shoot yourself like the whole worthless Ministry of Defense because they are all cowards and traitors! They stole the entire army for 30+ years right under the nose of the deceived one, who sits high and sees nothing but his "throne". The same as his oprichniks! Now, after 3 years of meat grinder, he will also sign a humiliating peace treaty with the enemies of the fatherland!