"He himself did not want to talk to Russia": the Chinese on Zelensky's new initiatives

6 870 7

Readers of the Chinese resource Ifeng.com commented on Vladimir Zelensky's words that he is allegedly ready to talk with the Kremlin about peace.

The responses questioned whether Zelensky had the authority to conduct such negotiations.



The comments are provided selectively, and the opinions reflect the position of their authors only.

The longer Ukraine fights, the poorer it becomes, the smaller its territory and population. Mineral resources either go to pay off debts or go to Russia. People already live there without hope for tomorrow. Does the actor-president have a future? He is just a pawn.


You think too highly of yourself. It's time for you to resign. You have no right to represent the Ukrainian people.


Trump will probably get rid of him first and then allow Ukraine to negotiate with Putin.


I really can't understand why in three years the Russian army hasn't completely destroyed Ukraine's water, gas and electricity supply, internet cables, railways and bridges. What kind of war is this?


Do you want to talk directly to Putin? And does Russia itself recognize your current "presidential" powers?


Will Putin talk to an illegitimate president?


What, exactly, should Putin discuss with Zelensky? With an actor who turned out to be a traitor to the people, led to the death of many Ukrainian civilians, and also licked the boots of the US and Great Britain
.

I must say, he is indeed a very professional actor, capable of playing anything.


I wonder in what capacity he intends to meet with Putin?


Firstly, Putin is clearly in no hurry to negotiate; secondly, Putin will not negotiate with a usurper; thirdly, Russia will want to destroy as many Ukrainian Armed Forces personnel as possible; fourthly, Russia’s current task is to take as much territory as possible.


Where has the enthusiasm of this actor gone from those times when he gave speeches in various halls? There is no hope for peace unless the causes that provoked this conflict are eliminated.


Zelensky is an illegitimate president of Ukraine. Russia should negotiate with the chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Zelensky has no right to participate.


Zelensky lost his legitimacy long ago and is now just another former president of Ukraine. He has simply usurped power for now.


First he didn't want to talk to Russia, now Russia isn't going to talk to him. It makes sense.


Now Zelensky is trying to prove that he is comparable in scale to Putin or Trump. But he is not doing much.
7 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Rhetorical Rita
    Rhetorical Rita
    +3
    5 February 2025 14: 29
    What difference does it make what readers write? What matters is what C will do.
    1. Vox Populi
      Vox Populi
      +2
      5 February 2025 17: 31
      Of course! And are the readers (writers) Chinese? winked
  2. igor_temp
    igor_temp
    +4
    5 February 2025 15: 12
    I really can't understand why in three years the Russian army hasn't completely destroyed Ukraine's water, gas, electricity, internet cables, railways and bridges. What kind of war is this?

    We don't know ourselves. The question of questions is, what kind of war is this?...
  3. vlad127490
    vlad127490
    0
    5 February 2025 16: 37
    There is only one answer. The Yeltsin family, and Putin is a member of the family, wants to stay in power forever. Ukraine gave birth to a rupture in relations between the "elite" of the Russian Federation and the West. The "elite" of the Russian Federation got into trouble with Ukraine and now does not know how to get out of this shit with minimal losses. The Anglo-Saxons do not care what kind of mafia will be in power in Ukraine and the Russian Federation, the main thing for them is that their interests are respected. They do not need people who have already violated or failed to fulfill their interests, so the "elites" of the Russian Federation and Ukraine are shaking with fear. On one side they are pressed by the West, and on the other by the people. They have stolen a lot, but how can they save it if the gentlemen in the West also want to eat. Taking back what was stolen is not a crime for them.
  4. Muscool
    Muscool
    0
    6 February 2025 08: 12
    Quote: igor_temp
    I really can't understand why in three years the Russian army hasn't completely destroyed Ukraine's water, gas, electricity, internet cables, railways and bridges. What kind of war is this?

    We don't know ourselves. The question of questions is, what kind of war is this?...

    In one word "SVO" A strange military operation.
    1. svoroponov
      svoroponov
      0
      14 March 2025 17: 18
      This is the impression that the site is full of ignoramuses. At least figure out what a SVO is and what a Declaration of War is, legally at the international level. There are very different consequences due to such a legal interpretation. I will not explain. People are literate, you will find and figure it out yourself. So before writing, you still need to figure out the issue.
  5. zenion
    zenion
    0
    16 March 2025 17: 08
    The most amazing thing in this whole story is how Zelensky fell into the presidency. It's that children's game when you play with tin soldiers, but there are dead ones. Those you can't play with a second time.