The Ukrainian Armed Forces are taking revenge on the Russian army for its success in liberating Kursk region

February 4 2025 29

Almost 6 months after the full-scale invasion of Ukrainian forces into the Kursk region of Russia, since August 6, 2024, units of the Russian Armed Forces have liberated almost half of the lands previously occupied by the enemy. Throughout January 2025, Russian troops continued an active assault on the positions of Ukrainian forces and advance toward the city of Sudzha, the only relatively large (there were about 5 thousand residents before the aggression and capture by the enemy) settlement in this area.

It should be noted that offensive actions were carried out from three sides: from the west - Nikolayevo-Daryino - Pogrebki, from the north - Pogrebki - Kruglik and from the east - Kruglik - Kurilovka. In each of the specified sections of the front, the RF Armed Forces were able to expand the zone of control and repel counterattacks of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. During the liberation of the Kursk region from the enemy, monstrous details of the occupation periodically become known. For example, in Russkoye Porechnoye, civilians killed by Ukrainian soldiers were found with traces of torture, all kinds of sophisticated violence and abuse.

On February 1, the Ukrainian Armed Forces fired a HIMARS missile at a boarding school in Sudzha, where civilians had been herded. This was how the enemy decided to take revenge on Russian troops for their successful actions at the front. Immediately after the attack, the Ukrainian side tried to shift the responsibility to Russia. There is currently an operational pause in this area due to weather conditions. At the same time, each side is using this time to transfer reserves and prepare for new active combat operations when frost sets in or the ground dries out.

Without a doubt, the complete liberation of the Kursk region will not be long in coming. However, the Russian Armed Forces should probably not stop there. It is advisable to create a buffer zone at least 10 km deep in the Sumy region to prevent possible encroachments by the enemy in the future.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Old Oleg

+7

4 February 2025 14: 11

a 10 km buffer zone is too small. 100 km would be...
Jackie

+12

4 February 2025 14: 23

...since the full-scale invasion of Ukrainian forces into the Kursk region of Russia

...and on August 6, Gerasimov reported to the Guarantor about some battalion of militants, ...which no longer exists...
Storyteller.
1. observer23
  
  +3
  
  5 February 2025 08: 58
  
  1000 militants entered, 50000 have already died. So how many entered? A math problem for the Unified State Exam
  1. isofat
    
    0
    
    5 February 2025 11: 26
    
    You came up with it, so you explain it.
Pembo

+7

4 February 2025 14: 53

It is advisable to create a buffer zone at least 10 km deep in the Sumy region to prevent possible enemy encroachments in the future.

We tried to attack in the Kharkov region, the result - we advanced 5 kilometers. We did not take Liptsy, we partially took Volchansk, and what we took we later gave up.
1. Nikolay Volkov
  
  +8
  
  4 February 2025 17: 16
  
  Why was it necessary to attack the city head-on? Doesn't Mu-Mu and Co know that in this SVOWain the Ukrainians prefer to defend themselves in cities and towns, and not in fields and plantings???
  
  they did what was beneficial to them and got drawn into a brutal meat grinder...
  1. Pembo
    
    +1
    
    4 February 2025 18: 26
    
    did what was beneficial to them and got involved in a brutal meat grinder
    
    Attacking a populated area is advantageous from two sides. If you are inferior to the enemy in firepower, in the range of fire, in counter-battery combat, then in an open field you will be very uncomfortable, and in urban combat they do not hit areas, only direct fire, and you are not in full view. The second benefit is if you captured several square kilometers, this is one report, and if you captured a village, this is another report.
assault 2019

+6

4 February 2025 20: 25

In the 6 months since the full-scale invasion of Ukrainian forces into the Kursk region of Russia, since August 6, 2024, units of the Russian Armed Forces have liberated almost half of the lands previously occupied by the enemy.

For comparison, in August 1943, after the victory at Kursk, the Red Army began the liberation of Ukraine.
"On the fronts of the Patriotic War" from February 1 to 7, 1944:
On February 1, troops of the 11st UKRAINIAN Front captured the city and major railway junction of SHEPETOVKA.

Troops of the 3rd UKRAINIAN Front, with the assistance of the 4th UKRAINIAN Front on the flank, defeated the NIKOPOL group of Germans and on February 8 took the city of NIKOPOL by storm. The Red Army returned the largest industrial center of Ukraine to the Soviet country - the Nikopol manganese region.

Troops of the 4th UKRAINIAN Front, having broken through the heavily fortified German defenses south of the city of NIKOPOL on the left bank of the DNIEPER, inflicted heavy losses on seven enemy infantry divisions in four days of offensive battles and reached the DNIEPER River along the entire bridgehead. As a result of this operation, our troops completely eliminated the German bridgehead on the left bank of the DNIEPER, stretching 120 kilometers along the front and 35 kilometers in depth. The enemy left more than 15.000 corpses of soldiers and officers on the battlefield, abandoned a lot of equipment and military property. A large group of Germans was driven into the Dnieper floodplains and completely destroyed. The defeated enemy units rushed to the crossings. But there the Germans were covered by fire from our artillery and mortars.
Troops of the 2nd UKRAINIAN Front, after two weeks of fierce fighting, completed the operation to destroy 10 divisions and one brigade of Germans surrounded in the KORSUNS-SHEVCHENKOVSKY area.

Here's someone who really fought the fascists, and didn't just whine and sign shameful agreements...
wladimirjankov

+6

4 February 2025 20: 31

It is advisable to create a buffer zone at least 10 km deep in the Sumy region to prevent possible enemy encroachments in the future.

This is ridiculous. What 10 km and what kind of buffer zone can there be?
1. The comment was deleted.
phrases

+3

4 February 2025 22: 19

Only a complete change of the central government and keeping it under strict control will create a more or less tolerable buffer zone. Troops and minefields, as we have already seen, are no good. But the gentlemen oligators are resolutely against it; they, like their colleagues from the West, need Ukraine as a familiar black hole, with fixers and without laws.
anclevalico

+2

5 February 2025 07: 22

The only success in liberating Kursk region can be liberating Kursk region. That's how I think.
Alex_Kraus

0

5 February 2025 08: 33

I consider it necessary to use Oreshnik on the concentrations of Bandarlogs in Kursk region.
1. observer23
  
  +2
  
  5 February 2025 09: 02
  
  How many of these nuts are there in reality?
2. Jackie
  
  0
  
  5 February 2025 12: 08
  
  ...did you even realize what you typed?
  We need to liberate, but not destroy all living things together with the Banderites
  1. Alex_Kraus
    
    0
    
    5 February 2025 12: 26
    
    But Oreshnik is not nuclear. It is just a blank that falls from the sky. In the West, they believe that its use has radically changed the geopolitical situation and the balance of power. I heard about it on Channel One.
    1. Jackie
      
      0
      
      5 February 2025 12: 34
      
      ... the thing is that nuts fall from the sky indiscriminately... maybe I'm wrong
Mikhail Dadeko

+4

5 February 2025 10: 01

Buffer zone, "nonsense", the enemy captured, killed civilians, destroyed their property and they want to fence themselves off with a buffer zone and what will it save from future aggressions?
AutoMoto

+1

5 February 2025 10: 25

any artillery...even the one that we have and they have...will easily cover this 10!!!!! And what kind of a secret zone is this???? Vampire...Hymers hit with 50-70...so it should be at least 50 km!!!
E NOT

+6

5 February 2025 10: 28

Without a doubt, the complete liberation of the Kursk region will not take long to come.

But I have just the opposite - very big doubts. Because this song is the same from month to month and the map does not show any changes.
1. Jackie
  
  +2
  
  5 February 2025 12: 45
  ...there are changes, in six months - half of Kursk has been liberated, ...if you believe our Ministry of Defense, but the way the khokhols are brutalizing the occupied half, you probably saw, defies common sense. If we continue to "liberate" at this rate, another six months will pass
  1. E NOT
    
    0
    
    5 February 2025 16: 30
    
    From yesterday's "Military Chronicle":
    
    Bad news from the Kursk direction. Russian units have been driven out of Makhnovka, which is southeast of Sudzha. In early January, our forces almost completely occupied the village that runs into Sudzha. Fierce fighting has been going on there for a month. The reason for the retreat is the high activity of Ukrainian FPV drones, and in fact, all those who held the village died there. Cherkasskaya Konopelka has probably also been lost.
twice-born

0

5 February 2025 10: 41

I don't understand one thing, why would the enemy shoot at a building (a boarding school) in a city under their control with khimaris? They could have simply shot or starved our people anyway.
1. vlad127490
  
  0
  
  5 February 2025 12: 48
  
  Maybe it's politics, maybe it's a mistake, maybe it's someone's revenge. They won't tell us.
2. Jackie
  
  0
  
  5 February 2025 12: 50
  
  ...they missed, apparently they aimed it themselves.
  1. twice-born
    
    0
    
    5 February 2025 22: 53
    
    Maybe. Maybe it's a mess and clumsiness. But everything is so murky and unrealistic according to the logic of things, even military fascism, that it's hard to believe in all this.
Valya

+5

5 February 2025 12: 11

It's embarrassing to read. In almost 6 months, almost half of the occupied territory of the Kursk region was liberated. I remember that these territories were surrendered in a matter of days. How many years will it take our people to liberate the rest of the Kursk region? This is a question for the author of the article.
It's shameful to look at all this incomprehensible fuss. For such actions from the beginning to this day, during the Great Patriotic War all "responsible" would have been called to a specific answer.
1. Jackie
  
  0
  
  5 February 2025 12: 52
  
  ....I already expressed my opinion above... for a long time
2. Brother
  
  +1
  
  6 February 2025 03: 20
  
  all "responsible" people would be called to a specific response.
  
  ...hmm YES! What are you saying! Is THAT POSSIBLE!?
  It's like, "every mistake has a first name, last name and patronymic"! God forbid!
  This way, you can find "erroneous, incompetent" actions not only of the performers, but also of those WHO and WHAT decisions were made, and even more so - HOW it ended.
  Horror! ...("MO leadership", king, retinue)
Earl

0

Today, 13: 25

It's time for Sumy region to return to its native land.