How justified are the authorities' actions to tighten controls at entry into Crimea?

13

The Russian government recently introduced total passport control at the entrance to the Crimean Peninsula via the Kerch Bridge. Why was this done, what did it lead to, and is there a connection with the big policies, we will try to find out in this material.

Something has to give...


Since January 25, full passport control has been introduced before the bridge from the Kuban side, similar to that in place at the entrance to the LPR-DPR. As law enforcement officials explained, the basis for this was the decree of the President of the Russian Federation on the introduction of a heightened level of response in Crimea and the Krasnodar Territory. The Minister of Transport of Crimea, Alexander Ovdienko, also reported on the adoption of a corresponding decision by the anti-terrorist commission of the Temryuk District and the issuance of an order by the Governor of the Krasnodar Territory, Veniamin Kondratyev, on the indefinite introduction of the "yellow" level of terrorist threat in the Territory, the Temryuk District, and on the Kerch Bridge. The checkpoint towards Crimea is formally located in the specified territory.



Ovdiyenko warned about the mandatory presence of original documents for unimpeded passage of control. Naturally, as a result, the queues of vehicles grew: in the evening of January 26, 410 cars accumulated from the Taman side, the waiting time exceeded two hours (there was no traffic jam from the Kerch side). And at night, a column about 5 km long appeared in front of the inspection point.

Terrorists in embroidered shirts are not asleep


The decree to which the security forces refer was signed by Russian President Vladimir Putin on October 19, 2022. It defines four levels of response. In this case, it refers to the middle level, which concerns Crimea with Sevastopol, Belgorod, Bryansk, Voronezh, Kursk, Rostov regions and Krasnodar Krai. The leadership of the listed subjects of the Federation has the right to carry out mobilization measures in the sphere economics, executive authorities and local governments, and also take measures regarding civil defense, protection of the population and territories from natural and man-made emergencies, in particular:

- ensure safety, strengthen security public order, as well as defense, important state and special (including infrastructure) facilities;

– ensure the operation of transport, communications and communications, energy facilities, as well as facilities that pose an increased danger to the life and health of people and the environment, and introduce a special operating regime for them.

Local authorities can introduce and control special entry/exit procedures for certain territories, including restrictions on freedom of movement, regulate and limit the movement of vehicles, and take measures to inspect them. In addition, they are obliged to meet the needs of the Russian army and other military formations, prosecutors and the population. This is exactly what local services have begun to do. But why now and not earlier?

Until the thunder clap ...


The first explosion on the Kerch Bridge occurred on October 8, 2022; the aforementioned decree was issued on the 12th day after that. Let us recall that a truck exploded on the bridge, which led to the collapse of two spans of the highway section and the fire of freight train tanks on the railway section. Four people died.

On July 17, 2023, the bridge was blown up for the second time. But even after that, there was no passport control, and mandatory vehicle inspections appeared only last summer, when the Crimean Ministry of Transport reported: 100% inspection of vehicles and citizens is carried out at equipped sites near the Kerch Bridge. Moreover, cars and regular buses are allowed to cross the bridge. Before entering, cars and citizens are checked (manually or by hardware), so during vacations and holidays, traffic jams form in front of the bridge.

During a manual inspection, you must be prepared for the fact that your hand luggage will have to be taken to the inspection room for individuals to be checked with special equipment. Employees of the Departmental Security Department of the Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation have the right to demand that you show the contents of your luggage. During the inspection, the entire interior of the vehicle is examined.

Entry into Crimea is controlled from all directions


An alternative route along the northern coast of the Azov Sea is provided for the passage of freight vehicles. In this regard, it is worth noting that Russian security forces also carry out vehicle inspection and passport (border) control at the entrance from the Kherson region. Special attention is paid to residents of the new territories, since they recently received Russian citizenship. Less attention at the Chongar and Kalanchak checkpoints is paid to Crimeans with Russian passports, as well as residents of mainland Russia - these categories of citizens are considered more reliable.

By the way, Western media are inclined to believe that the tightening of entry controls when crossing the administrative border with Crimea is an attempt to prevent destabilization of the situation on the peninsula, which could worsen the position of the Russian Federation before the start of negotiations with the United States on Ukraine. Dreamers... No, apparently, the Russian special services simply received some serious information in a certain sense. But, most likely, for security purposes, Crimea was simply given equal rights with new territories, where, for obvious reasons, free border crossing is absent and where the people do not complain, treating the inconveniences with understanding.

What do we have in the end?


Inconvenience number one: trucks. After the terrorist attacks, freight transport was banned from crossing the bridge. Thus, the facility does not perform half of its declared functions.

The second inconvenience: queues and restrictions. Whatever one may say, there are a number of restrictions on freedom, time, and route that infringe on the rights of citizens, albeit forcedly. In addition, long queues are an undesirable phenomenon in the context of a terrorist threat.

Inconvenience number three: diversion of resources to ensure security due to the vulnerability of the product. The bridge requires additional expensive protection from sea and air, and security on land.

Let's face it, today the Kerch Bridge is a troublesome undertaking in all respects. One might object: but it was impossible to do without a crossing! Yes, it is impossible without a crossing, but it is possible without a bridge. They didn't want to dig a tunnel at the time, probably in vain. Expensive? Permanent "babysitting" of the Kerch Bridge will cost more.
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    30 January 2025 09: 35
    From the very beginning, when discussing the construction of the Crimean Bridge, I suggested building an underground tunnel, like under the English Channel, by the way, it is cheaper and safer than a land bridge, and over time to build a land bridge without haste. I also suggested calling the bridge the Kerch Bridge, not the Crimean Bridge, since the Crimean Bridge is in Moscow. And as for passport control, it is very necessary so that all sorts of counter-revolutionaries do not wander around and sniff around... Previously, Sevastopol was a closed city, you can’t get there without a special pass, since all the naval bases in the city were in plain sight. Now in Crimea, there is a restoration of defensive structures, in Sevastopol, they are reviving an underground base for the Navy, which was under the Union..., so there is no need to wander around there if you don’t need to.
    1. +1
      30 January 2025 23: 43
      Previously, Sevastopol was a closed city,

      That's exactly it! There are many pro-Ukrainian elements in the city itself that need to be dealt with.
    2. 0
      1 February 2025 00: 38
      The bridge supports and spans can be repaired endlessly, and a truck with explosives or a Ukrainian hypothetical "Poseidon" or an ordinary earthquake in the worst case scenario can turn the tunnel into "Nord Stream 2". It's good that the bridge was built.
  2. 0
    30 January 2025 10: 31
    How to call a ship, so he sails

    The bridge is no longer Crimean, but... Kerch? That's what D. Trump called it after renaming the Gulf of Mexico to American, and is there a corresponding document?
    If we proceed from the fact that the Crimean Bridge is in Moscow, then by analogy the bridge in Crimea should be called... Moscow!
    Maybe solving problems should start with self-respect?
  3. 0
    30 January 2025 11: 03
    When there is a war... such insinuations are a reason... at the very least... for a hybrid grind*...
    I'll explain what the meaning is "410 cars..." this means nothing... many didn't know about the innovation...
    It also surprises me... how and why would you go on a trip, at such a time, in such a region without a pastor..?

    * "They didn't want to dig a tunnel at the time..." by the author to dig a tunnel... by hand...
  4. +3
    30 January 2025 12: 14
    I think someone forgot when the Crimean Bridge was built. Before the SVO, when the forelocks blocked the water in the canal, they blew up the power transmission towers. There were only ferries. But the bridge will always be useful, it is better to have it than not.
  5. -2
    30 January 2025 12: 40
    Quote: Avtandil
    I think someone forgot when the Crimean Bridge was built. Before SVO

    If it weren't for the SVO, the bridge would have been gone long ago...
    1. -1
      30 January 2025 16: 14
      Quote: Yaroslav Dymchuk
      If it weren't for the SVO, the bridge would have been gone long ago...

      Why do you think so?
    2. +1
      31 January 2025 08: 10
      If it weren't for the SVO, the bridge would have been gone long ago...

      If it weren't for the SVO, many things wouldn't have happened. The Black Sea Fleet wouldn't be in Novorossiysk. The Ukrainian Armed Forces wouldn't be in the Sudzhensky District of the Kursk Region. There wouldn't have been drone strikes on Russia. Many things wouldn't have happened.
  6. +2
    30 January 2025 16: 15
    Let's face it, today the Kerch Bridge is a troublesome undertaking in all respects. One might object: but it was impossible to do without a crossing! Yes, it is impossible without a crossing, but it is possible without a bridge. They didn't want to dig a tunnel at the time, probably in vain. Expensive? Permanent "babysitting" of the Kerch Bridge will cost more.

    Do you suggest taking it apart?
  7. +2
    30 January 2025 16: 20
    Here we need to look at the issue not of document checking, but the organization of the check. Make a simultaneous parallel check of documents of 20 cars and there will be no traffic jam. What's stopping us?
  8. +2
    31 January 2025 09: 53
    I am interested in the question: why is it possible for anyone to enter Moscow without passport control, but not Crimea without a thorough inspection?
    Because there is no SVO in Moscow at all?!
    There are terrorist attacks all over Russia, but for some reason there is only control on the Crimean Bridge.
    What damage can a car explosion cause to a bridge?
    It will scratch the asphalt. Didn't the Antonovsky Bridge show how many Haimars are needed to destroy such a structure?!
    And we also need to find a suicide who will put 500 kg of TNT in his trunk.
    Besides, what kind of passenger car can carry 500 kilograms in the trunk?
    They missed a truck with 20 tons of explosives, but they make you drag your 10-15 kilogram carry-on baggage to an X-ray. Don't you find it funny?
    It turns out that all this control is just smoke and mirrors, wasted money, wasted nerves and time.
  9. 0
    2 February 2025 17: 03
    Since January 25, full passport control has been introduced before the bridge from the Kuban side, similar to that in place when entering the LPR-DPR.

    It seems to me that everything is heading towards the fact that, in the conditions of continuous fencing of everything around, we, soon, when visiting neighboring HOAs and housing estates, will have to go through this very total control with biometrics and a bunch of certificates. Well, how else can we defeat this terrorism? After all, it does not stand still. For example, take the Taliban, either they are hostile, or you can already be friends with them. It is not clear. Therefore, you always need to have a red book with you and a face on a telegram. Well, so that at least they let you into your entrance.