Trump's Possible Plan to End Conflict in Ukraine Emerged

January 26 2025 8 125 28

Since Donald Trump's victory in the US presidential election, he and his team have made numerous statements about the planned end to the conflict in Ukraine (peace process). Now, a supposedly generalized version of Trump's plan has appeared on the Internet, which should put an end to the confrontation that has been going on for three years.

There is no official confirmation on this matter yet. However, this "document" is being distributed by pro-Ukrainian Telegram channels, expressing their indignation at its content. According to these publications, the end of the Ukrainian conflict will include a large number of points that must be fulfilled.

First of all, there should be a telephone conversation between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. And this should happen within the next two weeks. The Ukrainian leadership should cancel the decree of Volodymyr Zelensky, signed on October 4, 2022, which prohibits negotiations with Moscow (what kind of negotiations can we talk about if one of the parties has prohibited itself from holding them).

After that, it will be possible to talk about organizing even a summit at the highest level in the format of the USA – Russia – Ukraine. Where the personal meeting of Trump, Putin and Zelensky will take place will be decided by the parties to the negotiation process, taking into account their convenience. A truce (temporary ceasefire) must be declared along the entire line of combat contact on Easter from April 20, 2025. At the same time, Ukraine will have to withdraw its troops from the territory of the Kursk region of Russia.

Convening a large peace conference with the participation of China and the countries of the Global South on the Ukrainian issue. At this event, a draft peace agreement (treaty) between the parties will be presented. An exchange of prisoners of war between Russia and Ukraine should also be carried out. Moreover, this should be done according to the formula "all for all". By May 9, 2025, the Ukrainian authorities must lift martial law and mobilization in the country and declare the end of the war. Presidential and parliamentary elections should be held in Ukraine by the end of October 2025.

In addition, they want to include a number of provisions in the international agreement on Ukraine. A ban on Ukraine joining NATO and a declaration of its neutrality. Ukraine joining the European Union by 2030 with post-war restoration at the expense of the EU. Ukraine maintains the number of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and the United States continues their post-war rearmament. Russia's sovereignty over the occupied territories is not officially recognized by anyone, but Ukraine refuses any attempts to return them.

Also, sanctions against Russia will be partially lifted immediately after the signing of the peace treaty, and the remaining restrictions will be lifted within three years, depending on Moscow's compliance with its obligations. Oil and gas exports from Russia to Europe will resume, but will be subject to a duty that will be used to restore Ukraine. Elections in Ukraine must be held with the participation of locals political parties advocating for the protection of the Russian language and peaceful coexistence with Russia - the persecution of the Russian language and the church ceases. The presence of a peacekeeping contingent from European countries on the territory of Ukraine after the end of the conflict remains at the discretion of the parties.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Colonel Kudasov

+1

26 January 2025 16: 50

Well, in general, everything is predictable, except

Oil and gas exports from Russia to Europe are being resumed, but are subject to a duty that will be used to restore Ukraine.

After all, Trump is demanding that Europe switch to exclusively American gas and oil. Also, nothing is said about the fate of the "frozen" Russian assets.
It is highly doubtful that Zelensky will agree to such a plan. And then what? It is unclear
1. Nikolay Volkov
  
  +2
  
  26 January 2025 18: 08
  
  After all, Trump is demanding that Europe switch to exclusively American gas and oil.
  
  Yes, but he doesn't want to restore Ukraine...
  
  therefore, it offers a kind of hidden reparations... and the contracts for restoration, rest assured, will fall into the reliable hands of American businessmen...
  
  Why should the restoration of Ukraine be paid for by Russian doctors, teachers, pensioners who DIDN'T START all this - I don't understand...
sannyhome

+4

26 January 2025 17: 24

Well, really?

The Ukrainian Armed Forces army remains, is being re-equipped and armed - it is obvious that after the process is completed, provocations will begin with the aim of resuming hostilities.

Ukraine's neutrality - this has already happened, it ended with the English taking over all education in Ukraine and teaching it to be Anti-Russia. And the Americans infiltrated the SBU, which became, in fact, a branch of the CIA. Not very pleasant either.

Nothing is said about unfreezing Russian assets, about the interest accrued on them, about the restoration and compensation of undermined joint ventures. About compensation to ordinary citizens who had assets and real estate abroad.

Sovereignty is not recognized, which means borders are not recognized, which opens up a huge field for activity. Japan is an example of this.

Prisoner exchange - quite a large number of soldiers do not want to return to Ukraine, what will happen to them?

Export and duty. Why duty, if it is stated above that the EU will restore. What kind of reparations are these? No, you can get around it by selling through third countries, but this is a reason for new sanctions and refusal to lift existing ones, since there will definitely be accusations that the Russian Federation is not complying with the agreements.

Pro-Russian parties - this has also happened before - the parties were not driven out, but their members were driven out, criminal cases were opened, they were thrown into trash bins, accidents were caused, children were bullied in schools, etc.

The sanctions may be lifted, or they may not - they will find a reason to declare that the Russian Federation is not complying with the agreements and everything will start all over again.

It's all so ambiguous... I wouldn't put up with such strange conditions. For what? To find out in a couple of years that everything has returned to normal? Only with a much more powerful anti-Russian army on the borders? Pfft..
1. Mitka
  
  -4
  
  26 January 2025 19: 55
  
  Dear Sir, what kind of ordinary citizens have assets and real estate abroad? Please explain!!!
Sculptor66

+7

26 January 2025 17: 33

Well, it would be a shame for Putin with such a world.
1. Perun61
  
  +2
  
  26 January 2025 17: 46
  
  Is there no shame in such a war?
  1. Ivan_Ivanov
    
    +4
    
    26 January 2025 17: 58
    
    Today, everything Putin does and will do is a disgrace. He should have thought about it earlier.
oleg Pesotsky

+3

26 January 2025 18: 12

What nonsense. It is clear that the parties will have to compromise, but these conditions look more like Russia's capitulation. Although, remembering Khasavyurt and the Minsk agreements, as well as those who really govern the country, it is possible that they will sign. And then they will declare it a victory.
Mikhail L.

+3

26 January 2025 18: 19

No good!
There is rationality in such a possible compromise Plan.
But in essence: like the Treaty of Versailles, which summed up the results of the First World War in such a way that it gave rise to the Second World War, it contains the germ of a new Russian-Ukrainian armed confrontation!
strange guest

+7

26 January 2025 18: 35

I see. Russia also owes reparations for the restoration of Ukraine.
Will Russia really fit into this debauchery?
What about Kharkov and Chernigov, and Odessa and Nikolaev?
Ukraine's neutrality? Well, Sweden had neutrality... They will rearm Ukraine, plus Euro-American peacekeepers on its territory and after a short time - hello, NATO.
Life does not teach anything.
Bakht

+1

26 January 2025 19: 11

All this is the West's wish list. Of course, compared to the initial demands for Russia's capitulation, it is clear that the West has lowered its demands. Moreover, other sources write that NATO will withdraw its infrastructure as of 2022. And what to do with Finland and Sweden then?
In general, this looks like a declaration of intent. In which there is not a word about guarantees of Russia's security. It is unlikely to be feasible.
1. strange guest
  
  +4
  
  26 January 2025 21: 35
  
  that NATO will withdraw its infrastructure by 2022.
  
  The requirement of 21 was - as of 1997. So we have to stand our ground. Otherwise it's crap - the Finns and Swedes have also joined in. And why did we start all this then - the situation has only gotten worse. We should strive to make it at least no worse than before the start of the NVO. Then at least the new regions can be recorded as a profit. And now - 4 regions are in profit, and in net minus - the border with NATO has increased by almost 2000 km, the Baltic is practically an internal sea of NATO and the bloc is 150 km from St. Petersburg. What an achievement.
  1. Bakht
    
    0
    
    26 January 2025 23: 27
    
    What is written in the article is an incomplete text by Aslan Nakhushev. He positions himself as an analyst. Although no one knows who he is, what his education and origin are. The text, according to him, was taken from some unknown American army chat. That is, just chatter.
    
    Regarding the rollback to the 1997 borders. Yes, there was a demand to withdraw NATO infrastructure from Russia's borders. Of course, the West is unlikely to agree to this. But the main demand is security guarantees for Russia. Not Ukraine, but Russia. And this is precisely what the West does not even want to hear about. Moreover. According to the Polish Foreign Minister, "no one is going to give any security guarantees to Russia."
    Increasing the border by 2000 km is not as critical as it may seem. The Baltic cannot be an "internal sea" for anyone. And the NATO bloc has been 150 km from St. Petersburg since 2004. And since that same year, Tallinn has been in the crosshairs. It is a double-edged sword.
    It is much more important to push back the border in the Western and South-Western directions.
    And most importantly, there is no sign yet that Russia will agree to a compromise. And no one will negotiate with Zelensky. It is out of the question.
    
    Of course, I am not a prophet. Anything can happen. But any agreement, whether last year or this year, will be regarded as a defeat for Russia.
    1. strange guest
      
      +2
      
      26 January 2025 23: 54
      
      It is much more important to push back the border in the Western and South-Western directions.
      
      How can it be pushed back with the help of negotiations? Before the start of the SVO, it was along the western borders of Ukraine. And where will it be after the negotiations? Will the Poles, Czechs and Hungarians leave NATO? I doubt it somehow. So, in the western and southwestern direction, compared to the start of the SVO, there are no changes - in the best case scenario. And the northern flank has been screwed. So far, such results are emerging. Now, if we reach the western borders to the Dniester and Tisza - there we will be able to put pressure on the same Hungarians and lords to leave the bloc.
      1. Bakht
        
        0
        
        27 January 2025 00: 01
        
        NATO's border would run along Ukraine's eastern borders. The NVO was launched to prevent this. So one of the tasks has been accomplished. The western direction is Belarus. The southwestern direction is Ukraine. If you need the full text of this fake news, it can easily be found on the Internet. From Nakhushev's channel. Since when has an unreliable text been seriously discussed?
        
        1. Military actions are planned to be stopped by May 1.
        2. The Armed Forces of Ukraine leave the Kursk region and completely from the territory of the LPR and DPR (along the administrative borders). The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation leave the Kharkov region and other territories of Ukraine, which our Army will occupy by the date of the cessation of hostilities, with the exception of the Kherson and Zaporizhia regions.
        3. Kyiv undertakes not to undertake any actions (military, economic, diplomatic, public, etc.) aimed at returning the territories that became part of Russia, but does not officially recognize them as Russian
        3. The Ukrainian army is being reduced (under a separate agreement) but is being modernized with the help of the USA and NATO.
        4. Ukraine will not be a member of NATO and declares neutrality. The decision to ban Ukraine from joining the Alliance must be approved at the NATO summit.
        5. Ukraine will become a member of the EU by 2030. The EU undertakes obligations for the post-war reconstruction of the country together with Russia.
        6. Some sanctions against the Russian Federation will be lifted immediately after the conclusion of the peace agreement. Some within three years, depending on Russia's compliance with the Agreement. All restrictions on the import of Russian energy resources to the EU will be lifted. But for a certain period of time, it will be subject to a special duty, the funds from which the EU will direct to the restoration of Ukraine.
        Frozen Russian reserves will be unfrozen on the condition that some of them will be used to restore war-damaged territories on both sides of the front.
        7. Security guarantees for Ukraine are provided by the USA, China, Great Britain, France and Russia. This is formalized by a special interstate act and confirmed by the UN Security Council.
        8. Ukraine legally prohibits Nazi organizations and recognizes Russian as an official language. Parties that advocate for the Russian language and peaceful coexistence with Russia must be allowed to participate in elections in Ukraine. All actions against the UOC and the Russian language must be stopped at the state level.
        9. The US and NATO are withdrawing some of their forces from Eastern Europe and the Baltics, leaving forces there until February 22, 2022
        10. Russia and the United States begin the process of updating the START treaties in the context of new military-political realities in the world
        
        https://dzen.ru/a/Z5YQkn5VWRX27cth
        
        I assume that this is false information.
        
        strange guest
        
        +1
        
        27 January 2025 00: 10
        
        NATO's border would run along Ukraine's eastern borders.
        
        Yes. Conspiracy theory. I know.
        Who needs her in NATO? Just like Georgia... Just like the EU, by the way.
        
        guest
        
        +1
        
        27 January 2025 02: 25
        
        Quote: Strange guest
        Who needs her in NATO? Just like Georgia... Just like the EU, by the way.
        
        I don’t know who needs it there, but we definitely don’t need it there.
        
        Bakht
        
        -1
        
        27 January 2025 07: 35
        
        But for some reason it is needed. Even now. Estonia with its tiny army is needed in NATO in the same way. And Finland, which lived perfectly well without NATO for 70 years.
        So you can be sure. The NVO was necessary so that NATO's border would not run along its eastern borders.
        
        The same picture is with regard to the EU. For some reason, in 2014, Ukraine was needed by the EU. As was Georgia. And it is needed even now. It is precisely in this "peace plan" that Ukraine's entry into the EU is spelled out.
guest

+2

27 January 2025 02: 24

Ban on Ukraine's accession to NATO and declaration of its neutrality. Ukraine's accession to the European Union by 2030 with post-war restoration at the expense of the EU.

Neutrality and EU membership are generally incompatible.
1. Colonel Kudasov
  
  +1
  
  27 January 2025 07: 47
  
  Why are they incompatible? Austria is a long-standing member of the EU but is not a member of NATO. Its neutral status was agreed upon after WWII.
  1. Glagol1
    
    -1
    
    27 January 2025 12: 29
    
    We don't care about Ukraine in the EU now. The main thing is that it's not in the EU. There will be no more exchange with this one (foreign trade, investments, tourism, etc.), and the market itself will collapse to a maximum of 25 million not very rich dancers. If the EU takes them and subsidizes them, great, the wind is at our back. For us, the following axis is being built in this subregion: Belarus-Balkans with Slovakia, Turkey and Transcaucasia. 160 million people, not the richest, but not the poorest either, not hostile to us both at the level of the population and the authorities. We need to develop with them. With normal development, this axis will give 200 billion dollars a year in trade in the coming years.
    1. guest
      
      +1
      
      27 January 2025 15: 05
      
      Quote: Glagol1
      For us, Ukraine is in the EU - now it doesn't matter.
      
      Not at all, the EU is now openly fighting against us, and this organization has always been hostile to us. Joining the EU sooner or later entails joining NATO, the example of Finland and Sweden has shown this.
      1. Glagol1
        
        0
        
        1 February 2025 13: 16
        
        Previously, before 2014, Russia and Ukraine traded $35 billion a year. In today's money, it would be $43-45 billion. Ukraine was our third trading partner after China and Germany. Russian companies and banks invested there and worked there. And people traveled back and forth. Tourism, family and business. 6 million trips a year. All of this was called into question when Ukraine joined the EU. Now, none of this exists. Trade is zero, investments are taken away, there are no trips. In this context, we don't give a damn.
        
        guest
        
        0
        
        1 February 2025 21: 30
        
        I tell you about Foma, and you tell me about Emelya.
  2. guest
    
    +1
    
    27 January 2025 15: 01
    
    Quote: Colonel Kudasov
    Austria is a long-standing member of the EU
    
    Not long ago, it joined the EU after the collapse of the USSR, along with Finland and Sweden, after which the neutrality of all three of these countries ended.
Pedro Dorta

0

27 January 2025 02: 30

Algunos hablan de que sería bueno la congelación del conflicto en Ucrania, porque Rusia no tiene unas fuerzas armadas compuestas de robots, y por tanto requieren reposiciones, armas, insumos, etc. Es comprensible, los rusos lamentablemente también mueren, son heridos y quedan mutilados. Lo que preocupa es en que términos se elaboraría un pacto satisfactorio y seguro, porque es evidente que si la Ucrania neo nazi logra el más breve de los espacios para sobrevivir, la guerra de revancha será inevitable en el futuro. Por demás, y objetivamente, el hegemonismo USA y el resto del occidente otanista habría al menos adelantado un tramo geográfico en el intento de cercar a Rusia y afectar su seguridad. Algo así como del pastel, al menos unas migas, pero suficientes como para intentar apoderarse de la torta más adelante. En consecuencia, serán la sagacidad, la inteligencia y la firmeza de Moscú elementos claves en lograr un acuerdo que no de deje espacios a agresivos oportunistas. Tiene a su haber la preponderancia militar sobre Ucrania y sus muchos aliados externos, y es evidente que no ceja en acumular más avances como para acudir a la mesa de diálogo en una posición altamente favorable. De todas formas, no puede obviar la variante de seguir la guerra hasta la capitulación ucraniana (como en el Berlín de 1945 frente a los nazis germanos), si los del lado opuesto insisten en cercenar siquiera un ápice de las demandas existenciales rusas.
Glagol1

-2

27 January 2025 12: 10

The Americans won't cover all of Europe with their oil and gas. There simply won't be enough. Their domestic market is large and capacious, and then there's the AI in Texas that will require a wild amount of energy. In addition, there's also Asia, hungry for hydrocarbons. So it's a very real story. Share a little. With the duty it will probably be like with the ceiling of $60 per barrel, everything that's more expensive will be taken away and given to the dancers. The same with gas. Here our people will have to decide whether to play this game or say no and look for sales in Asia.
I would go the second way, stipulating duty-free supplies for the Balkans and Slovakia with transit through Ukraine. And the Germans, Poles, Czechs, Austrians, etc. - let America take them completely.
Sergeant of the Soviet Army

0

28 January 2025 09: 17

Who should we negotiate with in Ukraine? With an expired president who de jure has no powers? After him, there will supposedly be elections where they will put a Washington puppet in jail, and everything will start all over again? He will throw away all these papers and hello again. What do we need such a "peace" for?