Margarita Simonyan is confident that Odessa and Kharkov will remain under Kyiv's control after the end of the Second World War

January 13 2025 59 388 188

RT editor-in-chief Margarita Simonyan shared her vision of the end of the Ukrainian conflict after Donald Trump's inauguration. Information about the upcoming negotiations is being actively disseminated by Washington, however, according to the Kremlin, there are no concrete agreements on this matter yet.

Margarita Simonyan believes that the diplomatic process will begin soon after Trump takes office as US President. The RT editor-in-chief called for realism and stated that Odessa and Kharkov will remain under the jurisdiction of Ukraine. She is confident that the first results of the negotiations will be the freezing of the conflict along the current line of contact, although Russia may subsequently demand control over the regions of Novorossiya, included in our country according to the Constitution.

I think that realistically, what Trump and we can offer and agree to are the territories that are ours at the moment when these negotiations begin. We stop at the line of contact. Everything that is on this side of the line of contact is ours.

– Simonyan reasons.

In addition, according to the RT editor-in-chief, Moscow will receive guarantees of security and non-accession of Ukraine to NATO. Kiev will also have to commit to not "oppressing" the Russian-speaking population in the part of the country it controls.

It is worth noting that this position is at odds with the opinion of the Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev. The politician today pointed to the "far-fetched" theories of ending the Ukrainian conflict and emphasized that without official statements they are worthless. At the same time, the most popular version in the West about dividing Ukraine along the lines of the FRG and the GDR is unacceptable for Moscow.

In historical perspective, the so-called German option is possible only in the form of direct annexation of the remnants of the Little Russian lands of the former Ukraine to the "big" Russian Federation. And everyone understands this. Even zoological Russophobes like the disgusting Blinken and patented idiots like the yellow-haired Johnson

Medvedev is sure.

188 comments

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Kiril

+11

13 January 2025 20: 02

Does she have visions? - just like Vanga
1. Jackie
  
  +25
  
  13 January 2025 20: 40
  
  ...it would have been better if she had kept quiet
  1. bda lng
    
    -6
    
    14 January 2025 07: 15
    
    Maybe it's better not to say what you think, especially on the eve of negotiations. But in essence, she says realistic things. Yes, it is possible to miraculously take one of the large cities. But to take, for example, Odessa by storm, how do you imagine that? The only hope is that Zelensky's regime will suddenly fall with unpredictable consequences.
    1. bda lng
      
      0
      
      14 January 2025 09: 25
      
      Here's who put the minuses, tell me, is it possible to take Odessa by storm?
      1. Olga Taschilina
        
        +3
        
        14 January 2025 09: 51
        
        Odessa can be taken by storm. Kharkov is much more difficult, but it will also be Russian.
        
        Jackie
        
        -2
        
        14 January 2025 10: 48
        
        ...it’s impossible, Olga, for that we also need to liberate Kherson, time has been lost, I have already expressed my opinion below.
        
        Olga Taschilina
        
        +3
        
        14 January 2025 16: 06
        
        Peace is very easy to achieve. Frankly, I would agree to such a "deal" between Russia and the USA: we do not interfere with your claims to Greenland, and you forget about Ukraine and stop providing it with military aid.
        
        Jackie
        
        +1
        
        14 January 2025 16: 14
        
        ...hi, friend, I'm not against such a "deal", only OUR condition will not be raised
      2. Alexey Lan
        
        -1
        
        14 January 2025 10: 40
        
        It is possible to take it, but where to get trained troops with normal weapons for this? And Russia is not fighting with Ukraine, but with Ukraine + NATO. Plus there will be big losses, which are unacceptable. So Donbass and Kursk have been slowed down. The progress is insignificant. And the minuses were given by the followers of the Central Intelligence Agency and radical patriots who are ready to sacrifice the entire male population from their couches. Of course, if they hit, the situation can change dramatically. However, the adherents of the non-use of tactical nuclear weapons (the same supporters of the Central Intelligence Agency) will give minuses on this topic too.
        
        Jackie
        
        +2
        
        14 January 2025 11: 01
        
        where to get trained troops for this..
        
        No, more precisely... where to find smart generals.
        
        Olga Taschilina
        
        +5
        
        14 January 2025 11: 53
        
        And the minuses were put forward by the followers of the Central Intelligence Agency and radical patriots who are ready to sacrifice the entire male population from their couches.
        
        Don't be shy about using "Oreshnik". It's time to stop being shy. Or maybe I don't understand something... but Putin reminds me of Potemkin. Suvorov is not there. If it weren't for Suvorov, Izmail would not have been taken to this day. The army is disintegrating in inaction. This is evidenced by the case with Goodwin and Ernest and the case with the contract prisoner. I'm afraid that drugs have already appeared at the front and the trade is brisk.
        
        Alexey Lan
        
        -2
        
        14 January 2025 19: 31
        
        I'm afraid that drugs have already appeared at the front and trade is brisk.
        
        Vodka is the fuel of war. And it's good if it's only vodka. Not everyone in their right mind would want to attack the enemy's position.
      3. Jackie
        
        -2
        
        14 January 2025 10: 49
        
        ...here's a plus for you
      4. oleg Pesotsky
        
        0
        
        14 January 2025 17: 32
        
        It is impossible. And you were given minuses because people live in their cocoon created by the media. And it is very difficult to accept the real situation, it is easier to believe the rosy picture.
      5. Sergei Fonov
        
        +3
        
        14 January 2025 18: 40
        
        Dmitry B!
        I didn't give you any minuses, but you can storm Odessa, Kharkov, and any city. But for this you need a sufficient number of troops and weapons. At the moment we do not have this, and Trump will not wait for our power to increase. If the government intends to conclude an agreement quickly, there will be one set of results, if the war continues, there may be other results, but in the coming years. There is no need to expect breakthrough military actions after three years of mutual destruction literally on the spot. Unless we move on to another war, ruthless, harsh and possibly with other weapons, but that will be another war.
      6. Sultan Kogan
        
        +3
        
        15 January 2025 02: 29
        
        Why? We need to win the war, grind down most of the Armed Forces and achieve capitulation, then the Banderite regime will fall on its own. Any freeze means that there will be even more brutal military actions in the future. Minsk wasn't enough for us?
    2. Tatyana
      
      +12
      
      14 January 2025 09: 46
      
      According to the editor-in-chief of RT, Moscow will receive guarantees of security and non-accession of Ukraine to NATO. Kiev will also have to commit to not "oppressing" the Russian-speaking population in the part of the country it controls.
      
      Nonsense, equivalent to "Minsk-1", "Minsk-2", "Minsk-3", "Istanbul agreements"!
      Does she really believe this?!
      Or does she simply already know something and just can't openly say about the intention of the "upper crust" in Moscow to once again, under the guise of a dummy from the Russian "upper crust", betray Russia to the West with the results of the SVO - like the pro-Western liberal and head of the Russian Foreign Ministry Kozyrev - nicknamed "Mr. Yes!" - under Yeltsin!
      1. bda lng
        
        +1
        
        14 January 2025 09: 56
        
        Of course he doesn't believe it, why do people take words so literally?!
        I think that the leadership did not believe in the Minsk agreements, but played this game.
        There are no good options, the Great Game is endless, this is a long game. Sooner or later you have to negotiate.
        There is no need to exaggerate Russia's capabilities and there is no need to underestimate them. Military capabilities depend on the economy and vice versa. All this must be taken into account.
        
        Tatyana
        
        +3
        
        14 January 2025 10: 09
        
        Quote from bda-lng
        Military capabilities depend on the economy and vice versa.
        
        And also from the time not lost and missed, military and political professionalism and skill at the front and in the rear, faith in victory and devotion to the Motherland as one’s country and one’s people!
        
        Jackie
        
        0
        
        14 January 2025 10: 39
        
        ...I've already started to doubt your "political professionalism", Tanya.
        
        Jackie
        
        0
        
        14 January 2025 16: 18
        
        ...I don’t understand something, were you, maestro, sent here too?
        I still have a month of exile left, and you, my dear?
        
        Jackie
        
        +6
        
        14 January 2025 10: 41
        
        ...and don't you think, Dmitry, that the grandmaster blew game 22 and is now in time trouble?
        
        bda lng
        
        -1
        
        14 January 2025 13: 05
        
        Jackie (Egeny)
        Perhaps, it is possible. I, like you, do not have all the information to judge strictly. But we must be realistic. This war was forced upon us and it was not started out of a good life. Similar wars have been squandered by great powers in history more than once. But unlike many previous wars, this war is being waged, or at least there is a feeling, not only on the military front. The outcome will depend on the sum of the components. My advice is not to have high expectations, so as not to be disappointed. The Ukrainian issue has been resolved for several centuries. Do you really think that it will be resolved in three years?
        
        Jackie
        
        -2
        
        14 January 2025 13: 10
        
        Dima, of course I'm not under any illusions, I listened to Margarita again, well, nothing seditious, thoughts out loud, like all of us
        
        Olga Taschilina
        
        +1
        
        14 January 2025 11: 56
        
        Quote from bda-lng
        All this must be taken into account.
        
        We have to take this into account. The latest package of sanctions seems to be jaw-dropping.
        
        Alexey Lan
        
        0
        
        14 January 2025 19: 34
        
        There is no need to exaggerate Russia’s capabilities, and there is no need to underestimate them.
        
        There are problems in the economy, in the management of troops, in the defense industry through the roof, and only in the fall has the situation begun to slowly improve.
      2. Jackie
        
        +2
        
        14 January 2025 10: 46
        
        ...they know everything about Nightingale Rudolfovich, but only so that the Guarantor, once again, does not declare that "we were deceived again"
      3. sgrabik
        
        +6
        
        14 January 2025 12: 47
        
        The influence of the fifth column is immediately felt, I wonder what else all these liberal bastards are ready for, clearly ignoring the national interests of our country in favor of their purely personal mercantile profiteering interests.
    3. Jackie
      
      0
      
      14 January 2025 10: 37
      
      ...that's the point, Dmitry, why guess about something a couple of weeks before...
      I repeat, I'm tired of the chorus singing along "when the master arrives, Trump will judge us"
      We could have taken Odessa in the fall of 22, but at present we can only bypass it, and that with great difficulty, liberating Kherson and blocking the port.
      Dnepropetrovsk can wait, although the Garant knows better
      1. bda lng
        
        -3
        
        14 January 2025 12: 52
        
        Is Margarita from this choir, at least in this interview? The point is that it is possible to at least start negotiating with Trump as a businessman. Negotiating within the framework of at least a rational, generally accepted understanding of the results of the war, what you won, adjusted for the balance of power at the current moment. If we don't agree on the understanding of the balance of power, then goodbye. And who will say goodbye to whom is unknown, who has what trump cards up their sleeve. The Anglo-Saxons have at least one trump card - they live on islands.
        If we at least do not pretend that we are trying to reach an agreement, then the attitude of "friendly" countries may change. Many of these countries have their own "Ukraines" nearby, and no one needs Pandora's box. And the option of a quick collapse of our economy with the delights of isolation is extremely dangerous for us.
        If we didn't take Kharkov in '22, then we certainly didn't take Odessa. The army was different.
        
        Jackie
        
        -1
        
        14 January 2025 13: 00
        
        ...hello, the Army is the same, only we are learning now. They say that only fools learn from their mistakes, have the General Staff really become smarter?
        Rita is a smart woman, what she says is her business, another matter is how the Guarantor will behave
        
        bda lng
        
        -1
        
        14 January 2025 13: 22
        
        The Guarantor has a great responsibility. It is necessary to take into account literally thousands of factors and consequences, including the historical perspective. You can win a battle, but lose the war in a historical sense. How much of a legacy our ancestors have rashly given us, which we are now sorting out. It is not worth laying more mines that will explode in decades.
        Army. That's what I'm talking about - an army is people, and to fight you have to learn first, it takes time. And the nature of war has changed a lot.
        By the way, the common phrase is "from the mistakes of others" - show me at least one person who learned everything only from the mistakes of others, I don't know any.
        
        Jackie
        
        0
        
        14 January 2025 16: 27
        
        There was a time, but the wrong people were in power: Brezhnev's "stagnation", the hunchback's "perestroika" and EBN's "take as much sovereignty as you can"... and only under Putin did Russia rise from its knees.
        
        Olga Taschilina
        
        +2
        
        14 January 2025 15: 24
        
        They took what came into their hands. It didn't even need to be fought for. They could have taken more, but apparently there was no order to take. They passed by, pretending not to notice the people's desire to be with Russia.
        
        Alexey Lan
        
        0
        
        14 January 2025 19: 36
        
        The army was different.
        
        Yes, and most importantly, it is small in number.
    4. Leontrotsky
      
      +1
      
      15 January 2025 01: 15
      
      Well, how did they take large cities back in the Middle Ages? By siege. The same Odessa is surrounded, the lights are turned off, food supplies are stopped, access to water is blocked, in the case of Odessa, a humanitarian corridor can be organized through which civilians can leave the city and be filtered. Well, you wait for them to throw out the white flag. Or they will start eating rats.
  2. vik669
    
    0
    
    16 January 2025 21: 04
    
    It would be better to remain silent than to tell the truth!
2. Olga Taschilina
  
  -1
  
  14 January 2025 16: 04
  
  Frankly speaking, I would agree to such a "deal" between Russia and the USA: we do not interfere with your claims to Greenland, and you forget about Ukraine and stop providing it with military aid. That's the combination.
  1. Sergei Fonov
    
    +4
    
    14 January 2025 19: 02
    
    Olga!
    Do you seriously think that Russia's opinion on Greenland is important to Trump? Are we going to supply Denmark with weapons to fight the US?
shore72

+24

13 January 2025 20: 04

Here goes the first one, who would have doubted it. Every day there will be more and more such statements from our "elite". Well, the scum will wipe their faces and soon forget everything, just as they forgot everything that was sacred to us 30 years ago.
1. Roman070280
  
  +28
  
  13 January 2025 20: 15
  
  This is called warming up the goyim.
  Putin can't just come out and say something like that himself... first he needs to prepare the population...
  And then take Simonyan’s version as a basis, add the withdrawal of the Ukrainian Armed Forces from Kursk, and you can confidently declare it a victory.
  1. Dormidontov_Dormidont
    
    -1
    
    13 January 2025 21: 00
    
    Are you also a member of a Jewish support group, given the use of a specific term known to Russians from the movie?
  2. ser-pov
    
    +1
    
    14 January 2025 08: 44
    
    There are no words, only continuous swearing... Bastards, not the elite... Can't these morons understand that the people won't accept this? And I used to respect Simonyan.
    1. AdeptV
      
      +3
      
      14 January 2025 08: 54
      
      I never respected her, and what's more, I despised her.
    2. Patron
      
      +1
      
      14 January 2025 11: 02
      
      The people won’t accept it, but will obediently remain silent and grumble in the kitchen about how bad everything is.
2. bda lng
  
  -1
  
  14 January 2025 09: 30
  
  I ask without any mockery. What is your vision of how to act in Ukraine?
  I just really want to understand.
  1. shore72
    
    -1
    
    14 January 2025 09: 47
    
    Returning Soviet power to the peoples, Russian and Ukrainian, and dying for the money of the oligarchy, will not be in their own or Western need, right?
    1. bda lng
      
      -1
      
      14 January 2025 14: 32
      
      Well, let's say I would also dream of Soviet power, but it is impossible in the current reality. What should the Guarantor, as they call him here, do now?
      1. shore72
        
        +1
        
        14 January 2025 14: 44
        
        The so-called guarantor has already done everything. The fish is cooked, the guests take their places at the table in anticipation of the feast.
    2. Olga Taschilina
      
      -5
      
      14 January 2025 15: 27
      
      Take everything away from the people, like under Soviet rule, and give it to officials and wait for 1991 again. No, that's enough.
      1. shore72
        
        +4
        
        14 January 2025 15: 37
        
        Sorry, I didn't know that the Soviet government was torturing you like that.
    3. Leontrotsky
      
      +1
      
      15 January 2025 01: 42
      
      So the Ukrainian people, in fact, are not dying for their oligarchy. They are dying for the American one)))
  2. Leontrotsky
    
    +2
    
    15 January 2025 01: 25
    
    It's very simple. Go all the way. And in relation to "former" partners, use mirror methods, as Karaganov suggests, to go for escalation ourselves. Armageddon is five or six steps away.
    And NATO needs to be sobered up for them. For a start, it would be demonstrative to strike Rzeszow with the same Oreshnik. After all, the flow of weapons passes through it. Will they release Shedl missiles on the Russian Federation again? Strike one of the English ports with conventional weapons. Warn the States - in case of further escalation, their bases in Europe will be hit.
    Stop the European voyages of the Euro leaders. If they arrive, iron out the city center. Warn the residents in advance - as Scholz arrived - everyone get out, otherwise we are not responsible for their lives. After the fall of the independent - a referendum, who wants to be with the Russian Federation - will be with it. Who does not want to - will be in what remains of Ukraine. But with two or three Russian bases on its territory and a pro-Russian president.
3. Olga Taschilina
  
  +4
  
  14 January 2025 09: 54
  
  These stinking elites don't understand one thing: the electorate is not the same anymore. It has changed and you can't just pull the wool over its eyes anymore, and Simonyan has been doing one thing her whole life: pulling the wool over the eyes of both ours and yours. But...the electorate has changed.
4. unimog1
  
  +1
  
  14 January 2025 09: 55
  
  Lokhtorat does not forget, he never remembered what he was supposed to forget. In Yaroslavl, people already walk, due to the lack of cashless payments, that is, cash is already prohibited, at least in transport. The rest are sick with hostage syndrome. We with the khokhols are the first in the world. Victory will be ours.
5. Accidentally
  
  +3
  
  14 January 2025 09: 59
  
  We need to remind her that she crowed herself. If the elections are fair, she will be hanged on the first pole.
Colonel Kudasov

+3

13 January 2025 20: 11

One thing we can agree with Simonyan on is that the “German option” of dividing Ukraine is completely unacceptable for Russia.
1. Flight
  
  0
  
  13 January 2025 20: 18
  
  You've got something mixed up, regarding the German version, you need to agree not with the propagandist, but with the member of the Security Council.
BMP-2

+17

13 January 2025 20: 23

Margarita, when you talk about "what you think", it seems as if you don't think what you say!
1. Roman070280
  
  +5
  
  13 January 2025 20: 26
  
  I think she thought it through well.
2. serivolkf1
  
  -5
  
  13 January 2025 21: 58
  
  she does think with her head and quite well...
  1. Olga Taschilina
    
    +4
    
    14 January 2025 09: 56
    
    She always thinks with the completely opposite place.
3. ser-pov
  
  +3
  
  14 January 2025 08: 45
  
  She's delirious..
KLNM

+18

13 January 2025 20: 45

It's not about Simonyan's confidence that Odessa and Kharkov will remain under Kyiv's control, but about our too-thin guts at the moment, it's very difficult to perceive all this, why are we hammering the enemy for so long, with such military capabilities and advantages... In the Donetsk direction, we have covered 15 km in battles in a year from Maryinka to Kurakhovo, so count how much more there is to march. And the end of SVO on these borders, especially at the whim of Uncle Trump, who is somewhere overseas, will tell us... as he said, so it will be, I think that the citizens of the Russian Federation will consider the results of SVO a complete failure.
1. Latus
  
  0
  
  14 January 2025 16: 36
  
  It's just that Russia has been driven into a dead end by sanctions, freezing the conflict, oddly enough, is still a good result, because the prospects for continuation are even worse, a bad peace is always better, as they say. Now the pace of development of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is an order of magnitude higher, a penny a penny is enough for a shirt, and their society understands what it is fighting for, while in terms of motivation our situation is an order of magnitude worse.
  Our capabilities and advantages are no longer relevant, maybe in 2014 this was true, but in subsequent years this difference has been decreasing, and now the advantage in the field of drones and communications has already leveled out many of our advantages.
  1. Leontrotsky
    
    +2
    
    15 January 2025 01: 35
    
    How did they drive Russia into a dead end with sanctions, when the GDP growth rate for the year is about 3%? The hegemon has about the same, which has no sanctions, and sits at a typewriter. Our motivation is an order of magnitude worse? How many waves of mobilization did we have, may I ask? And how many did they have? That is, we are going with only volunteers for now. And we are confronting Ukraine + NATO. What would Ukraine do and where would it shoot without NATO targeting systems, reconnaissance, communications, heavy and light armored equipment, the same fleet of Soviet aviation that was supplied to it from all over the world. In addition, no matter how many drones you make, they need to overcome the air defense system and reach the target. Tell me, in this regard, how many military reconnaissance satellites does Ukraine have that are capable of providing targeting? And how many communications satellites? And how many AWACS aircraft? Without all this, drones are just unnecessary junk.
2. Leontrotsky
  
  -1
  
  15 January 2025 01: 39
  
  Well, how can I tell you... we are fighting not against Ukraine alone, but against Ukraine + NATO. And we are winning, albeit insignificant, victories. And the war has been going on for so long because we have not yet really hurt either the hegemon or the Europeans. But we can do it)) And with conventional weapons. But this will require full immersion not in the SVO, but in a full-scale conflict. However, it does not necessarily have to be nuclear. But oil depots and ports in Great Britain will be blown up, and not only in Belgorod.
zuuukoo

-1

13 January 2025 20: 49

Quote: Roman070280
This is called warming up the goyim.

This is called realism.
And it is such that from that side it has long been no rarity to see videos where the assault columns of the Russian Federation consist not of BMPs or at least MTLBs, but of UAZs and Zhiguli covered with nets.
In fact, it was for this relatively recent “hyped” order on volunteer transport that they actually issued it.
And the situation is similar in many areas.

Р'РѕС ‚Рё РґСѓРјР ° Р№С‚Рµ.
However, the doors of the military registration and enlistment offices are always open for those who want to take Kharkov and Odessa.

P.S.: And this is not even mentioning some of the problems in the economy that the Central Bank’s 21% rate hints at.
1. Vadim_2
  
  0
  
  13 January 2025 20: 57
  
  The green fly sees shit everywhere.
2. Roman070280
  
  +8
  
  13 January 2025 21: 19
  
  Am I arguing?
  This is how I saw this realism three years ago!!
  So there is no need to "warm me up" much.
  But those who listened to Simonyan and her ilk for three years (and in fact 23) with their mouths open - their ears drooped to the ground from the noodles... and now they somehow need to "explain" what their true goal is, and what we will consider a victory...
  Just yesterday we "hadn't even started"... everyone was waiting for us to start...
3. serivolkf1
  
  -8
  
  13 January 2025 22: 01
  
  However, the doors of the military registration and enlistment offices are always open for those who want to take Kharkov and Odessa.
  
  that's for sure... usually this is something that is strongly desired while sitting on the couch...
4. Sergey Prutkov55
  
  0
  
  14 January 2025 03: 50
  
  All the CIPSO activists simply need to be caught. The Polar Owl is crying for them.
  1. sgrabik
    
    +1
    
    14 January 2025 12: 57
    
    To do this, at a minimum, it is necessary to recreate SMERSH; with our super-liberal laws, it is not possible to establish real order in the country today.
5. sannyhome
  
  +2
  
  14 January 2025 07: 44
  
  Quote from: zuuukoo
  The Russian Federation's assault columns do not consist of BMPs or even MTLBs, but of UAZs and Zhigulis covered with nets.
  
  You have to understand that for a UAV it makes no difference whether it’s a BMP or a buggy in front of you.
  I understand that it is not visible from the couch, but more than 2-3 people do not gather in a crowd and do not ride in the front, because the larger the crowd, the more likely it is that something big will fly in. So yes - not only Zhiguli, but also ATVs and even scooters. It is simply safer.
6. Olga Taschilina
  
  +6
  
  14 January 2025 10: 01
  
  The Central Bank rate is just Nabiullina's nod to the IMF. She considers the IMF her boss and it's hard to convince her otherwise. The lady is in the wrong place. Her place is as a subordinate, and she has pushed herself into being a boss. She can't think independently. And even less can she act.
vlad127490

+21

13 January 2025 20: 49

The injection of Putin's desires through Simonyan is aimed at preparing the population of the Russian Federation for the betrayal of the people by the authorities and it is also a message to the Western elite that the comprador government of the Russian Federation is pro-Western. Will the people, the army of Russia really fall for the candy wrappers of profiteers, capitalists, oligarchs? Then the question arises, for what did Russian citizens die in the SVO in Ukraine? So that the oligarchs could become even richer. The destruction of the Soviet Union did not teach anything.
1. Vadim_2
  
  +19
  
  13 January 2025 21: 01
  
  The experience of "quick pacification" in Khasavyurt showed that instead of one unfinished war, we can get two more (the Second Chechen and Dagestan).
2. Roman070280
  
  -8
  
  13 January 2025 21: 21
  
  Then the question arises, what did they die for?
  
  Well, to be honest, this question has never arisen.
  The answer was not obvious only to a completely stupid person.
  1. vlad127490
    
    +4
    
    13 January 2025 21: 39
    
    why did russian citizens die in the ukrainian military
    
    The answer was not obvious only to a completely stupid person.
    
    How a new deal will be concluded.
    Don't be shy and write right away. Be bold.
    1. Roman070280
      
      0
      
      13 January 2025 21: 41
      
      Why should I be embarrassed? You answered this question yourself above.
  2. serivolkf1
    
    0
    
    13 January 2025 21: 50
    
    can I read your version, for what purpose?
    1. Roman070280
      
      +6
      
      13 January 2025 22: 04
      
      To make the oligarchs even richer
      1. bda lng
        
        -4
        
        14 January 2025 07: 34
        
        It's a bold statement to go to war with NATO to enrich the oligarchs.
        And the most interesting thing is the one who dared to do it!
        If you listen to you, the whole story is about this and nothing more.
        
        Roman070280
        
        +1
        
        14 January 2025 14: 26
        
        And no one entered into a war with NATO... as soon as Kyiv failed to materialize in three days, they immediately started making deals...
3. Sarcastic realist
  
  -5
  
  13 January 2025 22: 24
  
  What, was Putin sent to us from Mars, and not we ourselves who chose him? Now, as he says, so it will be.
  1. Roman070280
    
    +4
    
    14 January 2025 01: 14
    
    Didn't we choose it ourselves?
    
    If necessary, we will also elect Yeltsin... at least twice...
    If THEY need it..
  2. AdeptV
    
    +2
    
    14 January 2025 09: 02
    
    Who chose?
    1. Sarcastic realist
      
      0
      
      14 January 2025 11: 19
      
      Voters.
4. Accidentally
  
  +6
  
  14 January 2025 10: 03
  
  Why did they pass the law on military mutiny????? Fear pierces through the skin
5. sgrabik
  
  +3
  
  14 January 2025 13: 01
  
  I agree 100%, we are primarily concerned with observing the personal interests of the oligarch profiteers, and not the national interests of Russia and its ordinary citizens.
Dormidontov_Dormidont

0

13 January 2025 20: 57

After the annexation, Russia "digested" Crimea in economic terms for about 8 years. Now several more subjects of the Russian Federation have been added, which are also on state subsidies. How long does the SVO have to go before the front line reaches Odessa, or better yet, Lviv? This is if without the use of nuclear weapons. The annexation of new territories is not only a victory on the battlefield, but the economy of their restoration and integration into the Russian Federation
1. serivolkf1
  
  -10
  
  13 January 2025 21: 49
  
  Do you think that's what couch potatoes "petriots" think about? They only want food and entertainment, and who cares about the fact that people are suffering?
  1. guest
    
    +1
    
    14 January 2025 14: 28
    
    Quote from: serivolkf1
    the fact that people are suffering, who cares about that?
    
    Have you ever thought about the fact that people will suffer even more if you capitulate now?
2. vlad127490
  
  +8
  
  13 January 2025 21: 51
  
  It seems you write correctly, but you don't finish the sentence, with a stench, with a subtext, and maybe we shouldn't return Ukraine to Russia. The Great Patriotic War ended on May 9, 1945. In 1947, ration cards were cancelled. The restoration of the national economy after the Great Patriotic War ended in 1954. Maybe it's not about Kyiv, but about Moscow.
  1. Nikolay Volkov
    
    +4
    
    14 January 2025 12: 46
    
    you didn't finish the sentence...in 1958 the FIRST artificial satellite of the earth was launched, and in 1961 the FIRST man into space...
    
    16 years have passed since the end of the Great Patriotic War...
    
    and in the meantime, the nuclear issue was also resolved, which still allows historical pygmies to shake their pathetic little fists without fearing the fate of Milosevic or Gaddafi...
    
    At the same time, these political dwarfs still manage to bark at the titans of history, thanks to whom they are safe and not hanging from a noose like Saddam...
    
    it's definitely about Moscow...we shouldn't forget that these are the direct political descendants of the one who made Kyiv the capital of an independent state. Kyiv became the capital thanks to Yeltsin, and not under Lenin, Stalin or Andropov
3. guest
  
  +17
  
  14 January 2025 00: 41
  
  Quote: Dormidontov_Dormidont
  or better yet to Lviv?
  
  Well, we can somehow live without Lvov, but leaving the left bank and access to the sea to the enemy will cost us a lot of blood in the future.
  1. Sergey Prutkov55
    
    +9
    
    14 January 2025 03: 55
    
    You can't even share the Dnieper with them. You need to drive them away. They'll make a mess. They're enemies!
    1. vlad127490
      
      0
      
      14 January 2025 13: 43
      
      There have been many articles here about water supply to Crimea and Eastern Ukraine. All water supply specialists have reached the same verdict. In order to ensure a stable and independent water supply to the Eastern part, parts of Central, Southern Ukraine and Crimea, it is necessary to return the entire territory of Ukraine to Russia, including its Western part.
      P.S. If anyone wants to write a comment on this topic, then find a lot of articles on the Internet and read them, scientists have described everything in detail there, there are even different scenarios.
      "The Water Carrier" is a poem by Vasily Lebedev-Kumach.
      
      Awesome question:
      Why am I a water carrier?
      Because without water -
      Neither here nor here!
      
      Read on for yourself...
    2. guest
      
      +1
      
      14 January 2025 14: 23
      
      Quote: Sergey Prutkov55
      It needs to be driven away.
      
      I am not against it, I just voiced the minimum task, without achieving which we will have to (the rules do not allow further) in the future.
4. Sergey Prutkov55
  
  +3
  
  14 January 2025 03: 53
  
  CIPSO (military unit A 1277 Lvov) is trying to persuade us to leave Russian lands to the Nazis. And the question arises. What will we get out of this? Or will they get us?
5. Olga Taschilina
  
  +9
  
  14 January 2025 10: 09
  
  Subsidies for Donbass are less than for the entire Caucasus. Donbass immediately started working as soon as the territories were liberated. Moreover, it is capable of paying back all its debts in a short time. This is not Crimea. The whole of Ukraine was holding on to Donbass. What did journalist Gerashchenko say when Donbass reared up? "We will return it, they will work off all our debts to us." So there is no need to pour slop on Donbass. This territory has never been a parasite of anyone. That is why NATO is fighting for it with such fury. Donbass is a very tasty morsel of cheese for the overseas Fox-America.
Vladimir1155

+10

13 January 2025 20: 57

"cool guarantees" started back in the GDR, .... and now NATO in Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, compradors, traitors agree with the enemy to shoot like rabid dogs
1. guest
  
  +7
  
  14 January 2025 00: 43
  
  Well, those compradors who then gave everything up on their own have already gone to hell, without suffering any punishment in this world.
  1. Vladimir1155
    
    -1
    
    14 January 2025 11: 43
    
    we see some of them in the dock and hear "shoot", the overthrow of Putin is being prepared, the arrest of Bastrykin, Krasnov, Kolokoltsev, Medvedev, Sechin, Bortnikov, Patrushev and others. corrupt officials are preparing a coup and Simonyan is not voicing her random personal position (she is not a woman in the market but an experienced politician and a high-ranking official), she is voicing the position of the Judas thieves, bribe-takers, embezzlers preparing the overthrow of power, the redistribution of property, paving the way in advance for Western recognition of the Maidan in Moscow, but it is not clear which option will be chosen, 1917 (Putin's arrest and supposedly voluntary departure), Syria 2024 (Putin sold him out), or the USSR 1991 (officials simply decided that everything will be different now) or Ukraine 2014 (Maidan on Red Square and inaction of security forces)?
Sergey Latyshev

+10

13 January 2025 21: 26

The scam will tolerate everything. And the "elite" is untouchable.
Simonyan, Sobchachki, Friedman, Abramovich, Mutko, Usmanov, Serdyukov, etc.
strange guest

+15

13 January 2025 21: 27

Strange woman. Either to detonate a hydrogen bomb over Siberia, or to leave Odessa and Kharkov to the Ukrainians.
Who are you with, Margarita Simonyan?
1. Sarcastic realist
  
  +8
  
  13 January 2025 22: 26
  
  With the one who pays more.
2. cooper
  
  +2
  
  14 January 2025 04: 50
  
  The lady is raking in the dough.
3. Olga Taschilina
  
  +3
  
  14 January 2025 10: 11
  
  A strange question. Who can an Armenian woman - a settled Jew - be with? Certainly not with Russia!
golden knowledge

+10

13 January 2025 21: 36

If Odessa is a Russian city and Kharkov is left to the fascists - then what was all this for? She is delirious
1. Olives
  
  +8
  
  13 January 2025 21: 44
  
  This question - why did all this happen then - will be repeated by more than one generation of Russian people.
  1. guest
    
    +11
    
    14 January 2025 00: 47
    
    Quote from Olive
    will be repeated by more than one generation of Russian people
    
    Will there still be these Russian people then? The West wants to destroy us and it won't just leave us alone.
2. Roman070280
  
  +1
  
  13 January 2025 22: 09
  
  It's quite logical..
  If it didn't work, we need to roll it back.
  We can't wait until they grind us all up and there's no one left to feed her.
  And what is Russian/non-Russian has nothing to do with the matter at all.
  1. Olga Taschilina
    
    +2
    
    14 January 2025 10: 14
    
    It is logical for an Armenian. Armenia is still neither here nor there. It is going to the EU and is not leaving the EASU. Simonyan has a huge ass. She always tries to sit on two chairs. Her ass does not fit on one chair.
Olives

0

13 January 2025 21: 42

Discovered America
nikanikolich

+8

13 January 2025 21: 42

Strange woman, I used to respect her for her rationality and balanced thinking, but after she blocked me on RT - I don't respect her
1. Roman070280
  
  +8
  
  13 January 2025 22: 10
  
  And Solovyov blocked me... after the very first post..
  The truth is, I never respected him at all.
  1. guest
    
    0
    
    14 January 2025 00: 48
    
    Quote: Roman070280
    And Solovyov blocked me.
    
    Where did you block it?
    1. Roman070280
      
      0
      
      14 January 2025 01: 09
      
      On Twitter, I think... it was about 10 years ago..
      1. guest
        
        0
        
        14 January 2025 01: 29
        
        Quote: Roman070280
        On Twitter, I think... it was about 10 years ago..
        
        Well, it’s unlikely that he personally was hanging around there, most likely one of his employees was.
2. Olga Taschilina
  
  +2
  
  14 January 2025 10: 16
  
  A sneaky woman! She lies everywhere, both to us and to you, and that's how she makes money. But her lies are no longer believed, either there or here.
3. Accidentally
  
  0
  
  14 January 2025 10: 16
  
  And you should be proud - this is the highest award from you know who ???? And I have been blocked on all social networks for a long time since 2011, VK, Facebook, The World is a Small Place, etc. So I received the highest orders from you know who. Although here I am heavily downvoted by trolls. 10-13 times a black screen on the PC. So zero attention. The second interesting event will be within three to four months ... Before that, one priest, a former officer, had a strong influence on me, he recommended that I study the works of Colonel TV Gracheva, a teacher at the Military Academy of the General Staff of the Russian Federation. This turned my whole thinking upside down. In 15 years, she accurately predicted the coronavirus and methods of distribution. The third world war that is beginning, etc. And HOLY Rus' will be, i.e. Ukraine, Belarus and Russia as a whole, a single state.
serivolkf1

-6

13 January 2025 21: 44

ah, that someone expected more than we have now? well, probably those who believe in Santa Claus and other fairy-tale heroes...
1. Roman070280
  
  -3
  
  13 January 2025 22: 11
  
  They are still counting on it..
Moscow

+2

13 January 2025 21: 50

The reality is that Putin only mentions 4 regions (DPR, LPR, Kherson and part of Zaporozhye) + Crimea. There are no stated or justified goals for Odessa, Kharkov, Dnepr, Kyiv, Lvov, etc. The reality is that after 3 years neither the LPR, nor the DPR, nor Kherson, nor Zaporozhye have been liberated... And this is only the first stage of the SVO in the form of liberation of new territories of the Russian Federation. The second stage, Odessa and Kharkov, may not even begin if the Russian Federation receives concessions on the main demands - neutrality, elections no matter with whom, an agreed size of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, a law banning Nazism and guarantees for languages other than Ukrainian. And of course, the lifting of sanctions and the beginning of talks with the US about peace in Europe and control over nuclear weapons. So, Simonyan's predictions are quite realistic.
1. Sergey Prutkov55
  
  +7
  
  14 January 2025 04: 00
  
  This is a geostrategic loss. We need to see the picture as a whole. And in general, we are being squeezed in all directions. And we do not need any concessions from Trump.
2. cooper
  
  +6
  
  14 January 2025 04: 53
  
  No one will lift the sanctions. Maybe just some minor decorative ones.
3. sgrabik
  
  +1
  
  14 January 2025 13: 13
  
  They change their tune right on the go, what they said at the beginning about the goals and objectives of the SVO and what they say now, the difference is obvious.
lord-palladore-11045

+8

13 January 2025 22: 23

Margarita Simonyan is confident that Odessa and Kharkov will remain under Kyiv's control after the end of the Second World War

- If she is Simonyan, then let her go to Karabakh to defend Armenia.
1. vik669
  
  -2
  
  16 January 2025 21: 15
  
  Well, where is the pate, and what's more, with a smell - then don't take it somewhere, but straight to the trash!
  1. lord-palladore-11045
    
    -1
    
    16 January 2025 21: 48
    
    Now I'll ask the camel something - live in the menagerie.
AC130 Gunship

+5

13 January 2025 22: 43

Simonyan is quite the strategist. She recently told the camera that "we will take Kyiv in 3 days"
Anchonsha

+14

13 January 2025 23: 03

What other negotiations, when we have not achieved anything that was assumed when the SVO was declared? As long as the Nazis are in power and have weapons, nothing good will come of such a truce. Well, when we finish off the beast in the western part of Ukraine, then we can talk about peace. Margo has gone off the rails in her reasoning. Trump intends to seize Greenland, Canada, other people's straits, and he will demand peace from us in Ukraine, so that he can continue to be the master there.
1. Olga Taschilina
  
  +4
  
  14 January 2025 10: 19
  
  She understands everything. She's just putting Russia down for the US. What's so hard to understand? The lady's mentality is working. In the US, she's got her own people. But in Russia, she's all alone.
  1. Sergei Fonov
    
    0
    
    14 January 2025 19: 34
    
    Simonyan doesn't make decisions, she voices them. That's all you need to know about her.
mykola kovacs

0

13 January 2025 23: 07

Are there other options? I don't see any. Unless the master of screw-ups mumbles about another "difficult decision" and asks for "understanding" from the supposed people. The main thing is that he doesn't scribble another capitulation on his knee. I don't think that this boss, a simple security guard by profession, whoever they say, could win not only a war, but even the most trivial conflict.
1. cooper
  
  0
  
  14 January 2025 04: 55
  
  Exactly. Exactly.
Krilion

-3

14 January 2025 01: 18

it has begun.. they have long forgotten about their goals, all thoughts are about how to get out of this shit... they will declare anything a victory.. and Ukrainians too..

on the other hand, if someone wants Russia to take both Kharkov and Odessa, they need to go to the military registration and enlistment office and sign a contract.
1. Sergey Prutkov55
  
  +2
  
  14 January 2025 03: 57
  
  CIPSO is trying to persuade us to leave our lands and cities to the enemy. (CIPSO operates from Lvov military unit A 1277 Tanya Romanova) and on all Russian resources. Or are the Nazis no longer enemies?
  1. cooper
    
    +4
    
    14 January 2025 04: 56
    
    Margosha... isn't it tsipso?...
    1. Olga Taschilina
      
      +1
      
      14 January 2025 10: 42
      
      Simonyan is the same Armenia in the EU and in the EASU. And to ours and yours. Keosayan is not there. She is all by herself, like a finger. She is trying to turn the situation in her favor, like with Abkhazia, but she has the brains of a chicken. She doesn't need any Russia even close. She will bury her husband and head off to London.
Valera75

+11

14 January 2025 08: 31

I agree with Roman above that this is a warming up of society. If this is what it is all about, then what about the goals of the SVO about denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine? Although in fact, apart from these two goals, and even then all this is not specified and is vague, there are no others. Well, I do not exclude that she is a chatterbox like Alaudinov who promised the end of the SVO in October. But what if this is a warming up and the president does the same? The entire armed Ukraine, having colossal experience of combat operations, will still not be disarmed and they will promise us not to kill and torture Russian-speaking Ukrainians? Cool! They promised this for 8 years and in 22 they directly said that they had had us like suckers. If we do not take Kharkov, we will betray the residents there and have a headache for ourselves at the border. If we don't take Odessa and Nikolaev, then there will be a threat from the sea and Transnistria will remain an enclave that we won't be able to help, but perhaps with wild concessions in something and paying off the Nazis we will have some kind of logistics corridor. And the gypsy from Moldova didn't promise anyone that she wouldn't terrorize Transnistria, which means Transnistria will be a powerful lever of pressure on us. What's the bottom line:
1) the crests will remain armed and there will be further pumping up.
2) Have access to the sea and then there will 100% be American and maybe other naval bases there.
3) Transnistria will be left alone against the gypsy, and it will be a good lever of pressure on us.
4) There will definitely be another war in the very near future, and it will be bloodier than now.
And since all this looks like betrayal, the people and the SVO participants will consider themselves betrayed by the authorities, which means that the Anglo-Saxons will play on them, and they and the masturbators will start to rock the country from within. There will be tens or hundreds of thousands of people around the country who will drink or get high after the war, and they can be easily recruited and crimes will be committed with their hands. They will recruit, brainwash them, and then go ahead and ask the authorities for their betrayal.
So in my opinion, if we stop and do not finish off the enemy in his lair, in addition, bomb targets in Europe, destroying at least part of the military infrastructure and already specifically convince them what will happen to them, if they open their mouths even once more, then woe will come to us. As I said before and I will say now that everything is just beginning and many interesting things await us, even if we sign some kind of peace, everything interesting will begin right after such a signature.
Mapping

+4

14 January 2025 08: 44

Quote from bda-lng
Maybe it's better not to say what you think, especially on the eve of negotiations. But in essence, she says realistic things. Yes, it is possible to miraculously take one of the large cities. But to take, for example, Odessa by storm, how do you imagine that? The only hope is that Zelensky's regime will suddenly fall with unpredictable consequences.

Then why was it necessary to start the SVO?? How to denazify and demilitarize such a large country as Ukraine without reducing the size of its territory???
Mapping

+7

14 January 2025 08: 46

Quote: Valera75
I agree with Roman above that this is a warming up of society. If this is what it is all about, then what about the goals of the SVO about denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine? Although in fact, apart from these two goals, and even then all this is not specified and is vague, there are no others. Well, I do not exclude that she is a chatterbox like Alaudinov who promised the end of the SVO in October. But what if this is a warming up and the president does the same? The entire armed Ukraine, having colossal experience of combat operations, will still not be disarmed and they will promise us not to kill and torture Russian-speaking Ukrainians? Cool! They promised this for 8 years and in 22 they directly said that they had had us like suckers. If we do not take Kharkov, we will betray the residents there and have a headache for ourselves at the border. If we don't take Odessa and Nikolaev, then there will be a threat from the sea and Transnistria will remain an enclave that we won't be able to help, but perhaps with wild concessions in something and paying off the Nazis we will have some kind of logistics corridor. And the gypsy from Moldova didn't promise anyone that she wouldn't terrorize Transnistria, which means Transnistria will be a powerful lever of pressure on us. What's the bottom line:
1) the crests will remain armed and there will be further pumping up.
2) Have access to the sea and then there will 100% be American and maybe other naval bases there.
3) Transnistria will be left alone against the gypsy, and it will be a good lever of pressure on us.
4) There will definitely be another war in the very near future, and it will be bloodier than now.
And since all this looks like betrayal, the people and the SVO participants will consider themselves betrayed by the authorities, which means that the Anglo-Saxons will play on them, and they and the masturbators will start to rock the country from within. There will be tens or hundreds of thousands of people around the country who will drink or get high after the war, and they can be easily recruited and crimes will be committed with their hands. They will recruit, brainwash them, and then go ahead and ask the authorities for their betrayal.
So in my opinion, if we stop and do not finish off the enemy in his lair, in addition, bomb targets in Europe, destroying at least part of the military infrastructure and already specifically convince them what will happen to them, if they open their mouths even once more, then woe will come to us. As I said before and I will say now that everything is just beginning and many interesting things await us, even if we sign some kind of peace, everything interesting will begin right after such a signature.

All sane people think the same. It's the end for Putin as a politician.
1. Olga Taschilina
  
  +1
  
  14 January 2025 10: 43
  
  He's on his last day. He'll make it.
Pasha_Kosse

+2

14 January 2025 09: 16

And what is this new rhetoric from Ms. Simonyan? It seems that nowhere have we heard from officials that we are, in a hurry, to the negotiating table. Especially along the current front line. Especially with the Ukrainian fascists in the Kursk region...
Or maybe we don't know something, and in fact a new deal is being prepared? Well, then, please announce the whole list.
And, yes, let Ms. Simonyan explain to us in an accessible way what Russia can, in principle, demand “subsequently.”
Conclusion: if Ms. Simonyan, with her experience and in her current position, demonstrates such "freshness of thinking", then she is fulfilling an order. Then let her share the information. Maybe the Prosecutor General's Office will be interested
1. vik669
  
  -1
  
  16 January 2025 21: 20
  
  Stop worrying about today's troubles. There will be new ones tomorrow!
alpha7324

0

14 January 2025 09: 48

With our brilliant leaders - anything... But we won't give up the Moscow region, I have a dacha there...
Glagol1

-8

14 January 2025 10: 38

The shouts of the hurray-patriots lead nowhere. In 1914, Russia was dragged into WW1, then we got 1917. For Russia, the way out now is "no war" according to the Korean scenario. So she is right. It may not sound very proud, but it is a completely acceptable option. The goals of the SVO have already been partially achieved - large territories have been liberated, millions of people have been pulled out from under the oppression and shelling of the Nazis, the Nazi state has been weakened, they have 500 thousand corpses, the same number of cripples, the economy has disintegrated, membership in NATO is not in sight, many have seen the light about the Kyiv junta. We fix the result, at least at 60% of the maximum program, and go to a peaceful life.
1. Leontrotsky
  
  +6
  
  14 January 2025 12: 53
  
  Well, let's start with the fact that there will be no peaceful life. There will be a postponed war. With a rearmed, newly dug in and concreted enemy. I won't be surprised if Ukraine also gets TNW, produced with the help of Western specialists or even independently. In general, if we sum it up like this and stop everything, there was no need to start the SVO.
  1. Glagol1
    
    -3
    
    14 January 2025 14: 27
    
    As for the beginning of the SVO - no one really knows how much disinformation or just garbage was reported to the Supreme Commander that he decided to do so. There were other options, including some pretty tough ones. Now that the full achievement of the SVO's goals is impossible, some are crying, while others are recording the reality.
    1. Leontrotsky
      
      +1
      
      14 January 2025 15: 09
      
      Why did you decide that it is impossible? While the initiative is in our hands, progress on the front is taking place, even if it does not collapse, arms supplies to Ukraine are being delivered to the detriment of Europe, and it itself is breathing heavily. Personally, if my help is needed, I am ready, even at 50+, to take my hunting rifle and join the ranks. The only thing I would like is tough answers to Europe, as real and painful answers to the launches of their shells on our territory. And the Americans can step on their sore spots more painfully. How long can we not give the Houthis bastions so that they finally launch Onyx where they need to.
2. Garry_Z
  
  +1
  
  14 January 2025 13: 19
  
  Fix whatever you want and wherever you want, and our guys will go to the end!
3. vlad127490
  
  0
  
  14 January 2025 14: 10
  
  In order to refer to goals, you need to have them. There is not a single legal document of the Russian Federation on the SVO in Ukraine. References to slogans and inscriptions on fences are welcomed by the people only as humor. No need to stretch the scenario by the ears, as if it were similar, why are you stretching an owl onto a globe. In 1991, a coup d'etat was committed, the liquidation of the Soviet Union, and its dismemberment into small states that are not legitimate and illegal. A coup d'etat is a criminal offense that has no statute of limitations.
  You are suggesting that in the future our children and grandchildren will die at the front for the mistakes and weaknesses of the current generation.
digicon

-2

14 January 2025 11: 18

I think that the SVO is going this way because Russia is conducting military operations with its left hand, since the right hand is on the nuclear button.
DO

+2

14 January 2025 12: 14

I wonder what this lady would "see" in a hypothetical interview about the Zangezur corridor in light of Aliyev's claims...
Victor Kovalev_4

+2

14 January 2025 12: 28
They will give us GUARANTEES, but... as always, in words! And it happened with the letter "Ё" and it happened with the letter "Я"!
so...advice to the WEST:
Leontrotsky

+3

14 January 2025 12: 39

What Margarita said is in fact an admission of defeat by the Russian Federation. And in the long term - a postponed war with an armed, entrenched and concreted enemy. For the sake of such peace, if it will be - what was the point of starting the SVO?
1. Sergey Prutkov55
  
  0
  
  14 January 2025 14: 32
  
  The fifth column in action. NATO in Chernigov and Odessa? Well, well!
2. Glagol1
  
  -7
  
  14 January 2025 14: 37
  
  This is not a defeat, this is an acceptable draw. A defeat would be peace, when the enemy would block Crimea and throw our forces from the left bank of the Dnieper. It is like in chess, if you can’t win, and there are options for a draw and defeat, you go for a draw. And in our case, a draw is quite honorable, so many lands and people have been liberated, and the Nazi state has been dramatically weakened.
  1. Leontrotsky
    
    +5
    
    14 January 2025 15: 15
    
    The Nazis should not be weakened, but rooted out, in my opinion. And if we play a draw now, the victory will have to be achieved with even more bloodshed, in a decade. We have not yet used all the opportunities. We have not even destroyed the banking one. And there are still Rzeszow, English pipelines, American Navy near the Red Sea, underwater cables connecting America and Europe, the Kuril Island that was not given to Mr. Kim for his military base... the sea of reserves has not yet been used.
kriten

+5

14 January 2025 13: 11

The Kremlin is involving its main propagandists in the process of preparing a justification for a treacherous agreement. To betray not only the goals of the SVO, the army and the people, but most importantly the memory of tens and hundreds of those who died to achieve the declared goals. Whether there will be a deal or not, but just in case they have begun to prepare the ground, especially since the Kremlin, like any Russian government, can easily agree to a treacherous agreement, as the Istanbul preparations have shown. Our government has always betrayed the country. Such propagandists will justify it. Just listen to the gingerbread our Western partners are promising.
1. rotkiv04
  
  +1
  
  14 January 2025 13: 47
  
  For this reason, the goals of the SVO were designated at the very beginning - denazification and demilitarization, because the fact that they have been fully fulfilled can be announced at any convenient moment, but this does not cancel the future war.
  1. vlad127490
    
    0
    
    14 January 2025 18: 44
    
    In what legal document of the Russian Federation are the goals of the SVO declared - denazification and demilitarization??? Please do not refer to appeals, slogans, media statements and inscriptions on fences.
    1. rotkiv04
      
      -1
      
      14 January 2025 22: 05
      
      Quote: vlad127490
      In what legal document of the Russian Federation are the goals of the SVO declared - denazification and demilitarization??? Please do not refer to appeals, slogans, media statements and inscriptions on fences.
      
      So even the SVO is not designated by any legal document, and as for the above-mentioned goals, you should not address them to the fences and the media, but to the Kremlin strategist and everyone along the vertical of power
      1. vlad127490
        
        0
        
        15 January 2025 11: 59
        
        You have declared the designation of targets in the SVO in Ukraine. If you do not have a link to a document (decree, law, resolution), then write about the statements of the media, so that everyone understands where the information comes from and how much it costs. Keep the Jewish answers to yourself.
2. Sergey Prutkov55
  
  +1
  
  14 January 2025 14: 35
  
  It won't work to ingratiate yourself with the Western aristocracy. For them, Trump and Musk are upstarts unworthy of being accepted into respectable families. And those from the USSR can only be Mikhail Gorbachevs.
3. Alfa
  
  0
  
  16 January 2025 11: 22
  
  He will say again, as happened with the Minsk agreements: "They deceived us." It seems that they made the agreement, ready to accept that they (the Westerners) would deceive. Somehow everything is uncertain, somehow everything is not decisive. Either from incompetence, or something else. Look, the Americans do not even think about leaving Syria, and ours are already getting ready. That is why foreigners do not have confidence in ours. If the Syrians tried to touch the Americans, they would immediately get a war, and ours ..., either they leave themselves, or they asked. Why run? A strong country is running from a weak one. Are they afraid of losing their image ...? The Americans are not afraid, because they are decisive. Shame on us!
Garry_Z

+2

14 January 2025 13: 13

I think the Odessans won't be happy with this arrangement. And the guys at the front might not understand...
Ezekiel 25-17

+4

14 January 2025 13: 20

She should be included in the list of foreign agents, at the very least.
rotkiv04

+1

14 January 2025 13: 43

And does anyone still doubt this? Putin is doing everything to ensure that this war happens again, but most likely not under his rule, and he will be all in white and a peacemaker
1. Alfa
  
  0
  
  16 January 2025 11: 26
  
  So he has been a peacemaker his entire political life, what is the value of the cancellation of military actions on our part when we were near Kiev. And how many of our guys died there?
pupkov.6464

+5

14 January 2025 14: 12

The program "Time Will Tell" highlighted Trump's phrase from his interview.

I know that Putin WANTS to meet with me to discuss....

My opinion is that the state policy, the information policy of the media, are worthless when I hear or see such "desires for an audience". This makes me feel despondent, confused, angry at the weakness of the hands in which my Motherland has found itself. I, with proud joy and calm satisfaction, would like to know about Trump's confidence only in the fact that Putin is NOT AGAINST their meeting with Trump.
I perceive Simonyan as a parasite harmful and poisonous to the Greatness of Russia. Stupidly or insidiously calculatingly sows the seeds of defeatism, tries to convince the audience that since our army cannot liberate Odessa and Kharkov, it is time for Russia to "tuck its tail between its legs." This is disgusting, even criminally disgusting!
Everyone understands that defeating an enemy means depriving him of the ability to resist. To see victory only as occupying enemy territory is forgivable for an inexperienced youth, but not for a Broadcaster who is not endowed with the right to speak with the voice of the state.
Regarding "guarantees".
Guarantees are "guarantees" when they are backed by fear of violating them. Until a damn nuclear mushroom appears, for example, over a sunken aircraft carrier or the territory of "Rheinmetall", fear will not arise and respect will not appear. All the current "talk" about "guarantees", no matter who it comes from, is all empty words - CHIP.
Our victory is the unconditional surrender of the enemy. Anything else is our defeat.
alexdag

0

14 January 2025 14: 23

pot calls the kettle black...
Sergey Prutkov55

+3

14 January 2025 14: 31

What did such statements smell like under Comrade Stalin?
Andrey Andreev_2

+8

14 January 2025 15: 08

...began to prepare public opinion for the betrayal of surrendering Ukraine...
Oleg Apushkin

+2

14 January 2025 18: 53

This ARAMyanka is a smart woman, she will either propose to detonate an atomic bomb over Siberia, or buy Novorossiya from the West with money stolen from Russia. A pure representative of the 5th column, or Soros in the service of the Kremlin. Such people should be kept away from the press and public opinion, but everything turns out the other way around.
Semyon Sukhov

+1

14 January 2025 18: 57

The girl voices the Kremlin's position. She wouldn't have said anything like that on her own without "instructions". Apparently, someone in the Kremlin was promised that everything they'd earned would be returned to them if the SVO ended like that. And they're already blowing into the commander-in-chief's ears. And they know how to blow, judging by the situation and Russia's "achievements" on the territory of the former USSR, and in the world... Or maybe the country has overextended itself, it's already being bombed all over, journalists and soldiers are being killed...
Mikhail Dadeko

+1

14 January 2025 21: 41

She is partly right, there are not many days left until the third anniversary of the SVO, and you can see the results for yourself, the Ukrainian Armed Forces' drones will soon fly over the Ural Mountains!
obar64

+1

15 January 2025 15: 16

Missed a great opportunity to remain silent. Unflattering analogies come to mind. I perceive everything said as an attempt to test public opinion on the possibility of retreating from previously announced plans and goals. Previously, her erudition and knowledge were of some interest, but after this "corrupt" speech, she lost respect in my eyes.
Ilya 22

0

15 January 2025 19: 16

If Simonyan's thoughts come true and the SVO ends this way, it will be a real geopolitical defeat. I doubt that Putin wants to go down in history as the leader of the country who squandered the opportunity, as they say now, to make Russia great again. History does not often give such chances.
E NOT

0

16 January 2025 07: 39

The expected testing of the waters has begun
Alfa

+1

16 January 2025 10: 03

It turns out that we will not go to Odessa and Nikolaev? No strength or what? And the Americans will do everything so that we get as little territory from the so-called "Ukraine" as possible. All these negotiations are all from the evil one, they (the Americans) will do everything to oppress us and we get as little as possible, and it would be better to remove us from there altogether. They sleep and see such a situation. Only our determination in taking Odessa and Nikolaev can confuse their plans, and for this we need people, otherwise the situation with the so-called "Ukraine" cannot be resolved.
Alfa

0

16 January 2025 11: 59

There is no need to pounce on her. She makes such a conclusion based on the analysis of the situation, because we are not going to Odessa and Nikolaev, we are not going, that is why such a conclusion. And who gives the go-ahead for the movement - the commander-in-chief, and he is silent. There is not enough determination, decisiveness. Look at the Yankees, they climb everywhere and establish their order, they do not even leave Syria, and ours are already rolling up their fishing rods, and what is interesting, ours are not allowed to take equipment out of Tartus, some Syrians, a weak country, whose troops fled when the armed opposition approached. Shame and disgrace! That is why no one in the world trusts ours, because it is not decisive, but indecision at the top.
Rust1981

0

16 January 2025 12: 48

1. Negotiations
2. A deal. It won't cover any of its goals - they'll divide it according to the LBS. IMHO. There won't be any denazification or demilitarization either.
3. The US will take on China, Ukraine will accumulate strength and resources - the West will actively help.
4. China cannot cope on its own and will give in to something. It will be put in its place.
5. The US will have time and strength to continue resolving the Ukrainian issue. By this time, Ukraine will have troops from the young and trained and troops, including powerful air defense, aviation, albeit old, and artillery. Plus a billion of all sorts of UAVs and thousands of operators for them.

What status will we have by that time with the current organization? I am pessimistic. Lots of bureaucracy, plus corruption will flourish again (it is peacetime). The money will go to more biathlons so that our hamsters believe in our power, to useless improvements to some armata or another analog nonsense.
Sanctions will not be lifted after the deal, or only to get resources. Maybe even at a price that is unfavorable for us. So that the money goes to those from the pipeline party, but there is not enough for the military-industrial complex, social services, etc. We will not suddenly have our own microelectronics.
Well, the most serene one won't be getting any younger by that time either, with all the consequences that entails. Who will come after him... That's an interesting question. And what will happen.
Rust1981

0

16 January 2025 12: 59

Quote from bda-lng
Maybe it's better not to say what you think, especially on the eve of negotiations. But in essence, she says realistic things. Yes, it is possible to miraculously take one of the large cities. But to take, for example, Odessa by storm, how do you imagine that? The only hope is that Zelensky's regime will suddenly fall with unpredictable consequences.

Maybe it would make sense to create a bridgehead near Odessa, with a route to the PNR. How did they get into the Kursk region? But here the problem is probably in the delivery of forces and means under enemy fire. There are probably plenty of anti-ship weapons there just for such a case. It is definitely impossible to get through by land - the speed is not right.
It's too late to drink Borzhomichik now. The minister should have been replaced before 22, not during his time. And he should have been focused on this operation. Ukraine holds Kursk land for negotiations. We could also negotiate with land near Odessa. Now other means are needed for the landing, but there are none. The World Cup fleet is really like a suitcase without a handle.
serivolkf1

0

16 January 2025 23: 11

"Petriots" have crawled out of all the cracks... these wishes about (liberating) the whole of Khokhlanda are simply "touching"... I wonder if it happens as Margo "prophesies", what will the fighters of the invisible front sitting on their sofas write? You can blame it all on me, I don't mind...
alexdag

0

17 January 2025 19: 40

Armenian Vanga for Russia, who is interested in her reasoning? Probably Pashinyan...