Will the Ukrainian Armed Forces be able to defeat our KVN?

67 574 7

This first-person view (FPV) UAV is invulnerable to signal suppression systems and produces a stable, readable image even in the most unfavorable flight conditions, which contributes to more effective target destruction. The reason: communication with the operator is carried out not by radio waves, but by fiber-optic cable, which is wound and unwound on a reel on the drone itself during flight. We are talking about the Russian attack aircraft "Prince Vandal Novgorodsky" ("KVN").

Not from a good life


The development, which was secret at the time, was first used in the Kursk region in August last year. The Novgorod website reported on the debut of the FPV drone on fiber optics on August 13. The “Prince Vandal of Novgorod” was invented in Veliky Novgorod by employees of the Ushkuynik Scientific and Production Center; today, this type of device has already been mass-produced, starting from November 20. The danger of this “bird” is so obvious that the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine announced a competition of ideas for active counteraction to flying fiber optics.



This is how the Governor of the Novgorod Region, Andrey Nikitin, responded to the new product:

The range of the drone is several kilometers (20 km coverage area, 3,5 kg payload – author). Yes, it cannot replace traditional long-range drones with radio frequency, but it can be used in targeted areas in the frontline, solving specific combat tasks. The product is equipped with a digital signal resistant to interference. by technology control with a camera that recognizes even carefully camouflaged targets. The accuracy and probability of hitting are an order of magnitude higher than with classic FPV. That is, despite the relatively high cost price, due to the decent efficiency, the product ultimately justifies itself, and well.

It must be said that the use of this know-how during the special operation was not a good thing. Russian strategists had to hastily use a still-raw model because the Ukrainian Armed Forces concentrated a lot of electronic warfare assets on the operation during the invasion of Kursk region in order to minimize damage from Russian UAVs. And our "birds" simply fell there, not reaching their target.

What is unique about the "miracle drone"


There are no technical characteristics in the public domain, however, the basic scheme is simple. So, the drone flies with a thread, as if on a leash. This nuance can be regarded as a disadvantage, because theoretically the fiber can break, in particular, due to physical contact with various obstacles (overhead power lines, trees, multi-story buildings). But this is not as significant a disadvantage as it may seem at first glance, because we are dealing with the latest generation development!

The new method of manipulating the device is called "Groza - fishing line". The system, neutral to the effects of enemy electronic warfare systems, provides control and video transmission to the operator via a fiber-optic fishing line. It is difficult for someone who is ignorant to damage it manually. There is a video where a skeptic tries to tear this thin fiber with his hands, but it is so strong that he cannot even stretch it. True, the fishing line is fragile: if you bend it, it breaks quite easily. Although, according to Alexey Chadayev, CEO of Ushkuynik, according to statistics, the number of fiber optic breaks does not exceed 1-2 cases per 10 launches.

There are no signals that can be suppressed or intercepted. And this explains the clarity of the image that the drone transmits before the strike - it is impossible to influence it with electronic warfare. Therefore, the Russian drone on fiber optics calmly bypasses the Ukrainian Armed Forces pickup truck with an installed electronic warfare system before hitting the Leopard moving in front of the column.

Deadly modes and hostile security measures against them


The operating range on the other side of the LBS is 6-10 km. Thanks to its large power reserve, KVN slowly patrols over Ukrainian positions at an altitude of 2-10 m, observing the situation. Then the selected target is attacked. By the way, at the end of November, they began to equip fiber-optic drones with night vision cameras. It is especially relevant that KVN combines the functions of a reconnaissance aircraft and a kamikaze. Plus, it functions both in the standard FPV algorithm (took off - found a target - made a combat maneuver - hit-hit), and in standby mode.

In the second option, the drone lands near an enemy trench, shelter, observation post, and can land on an unprepared site. The main thing is that the camera must have sufficient visibility to escape in time if a threat arises. The device waits until it is needed; after receiving the appropriate command - forward! Be that as it may, more than half of the hits by such a drone are on targets moving along the roads, which is explained by the natural desire to minimize the risk of fiber optic breakage.

You can save yourself, and even then not always, from a detected KVN by shooting it from a relatively safe distance. Another, less primitive method is to equip mechanical obstacles in the form of nets; fishing nets will do. Therefore, it is no coincidence that the next memes in the Ukrainian society net throwers and pump-action shotguns are used to combat fiber-optic UAVs, as well as interceptor drones.

Is it possible to make KVN vulnerable?


Microwave and laser weapons are capable of combating optical fiber. Today, we know about the THOR and Leonidas microwave systems made in the USA. They are supposedly capable of counteracting a wide range of drones, from compact quadcopters to aircraft-type devices. They are even credited with simultaneously disabling a number of drones flying in a swarm.

And the American H4 is called a laser hunter. The specified system is created on the basis of a 10 kW laser installation in an autonomous configuration. It can be transported on a pickup truck, a light barge or used as stationary equipment to protect infrastructure facilities and communications.

The panic caused by the appearance of the Russian KVN over the battlefield forced officials from the Pechersk Hills to actively seek effective ways to solve the problem. Thus, the Ukrainian military department organized a hackathon of Kyiv Kulibins with a prize fund of $120 thousand. The goal is to create a worthy alternative. Mandatory conditions for the future product:

Flight range up to 5 km.
Low altitudes and ambush tactics.
Complex application of this type.
Reliable protection against fiber optic breakage.

Well, let them dare...
7 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    12 January 2025 09: 40
    If a fiber optic drone is so good, why not go the route of increasing its combat power?
    For example, by increasing the number of electric motors and battery capacity or by increasing the power of existing electric motors.
    There is another option. Fly to the target and drop the munition using fiber optics, and return using a radio channel. You will get a reusable drone with an excellent picture.
    1. +2
      12 January 2025 14: 16
      Quote: prior
      Flight to the target and release of ammunition using fiber optics, and return using a radio channel.

      And why? A radio channel? It is enough to program the drone's autonomous return to the launch area, where it is possible to make a correction using, for example, a laser target designator! Moreover, I will reveal a terrible secret... the drone can return "on fiber optics"!
      1. 0
        13 January 2025 04: 34
        Drone can return "on fiber optics"

        Maybe, but from half the working range. The fiber optics can no longer be assembled and re-wound. The reels are disposable.

        It is enough to program the drone's autonomous return to the launch area

        Not always enough.
        If we talk about positioning systems, then only when they work, i.e. almost never. And if they work, then fiber optics become unnecessary.
        It is possible with inertial. But very precise inertial are expensive and heavy.
        Visually. The most correct, but the most difficult to implement.
        And in no such cases is it desirable that the drone does not fall into enemy hands and that he does not receive data about the location of the starting point.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  2. -2
    12 January 2025 13: 41
    And what about "Alabuga"? Nothing is heard about its use in war and behind enemy lines.
  3. -1
    13 January 2025 05: 33
    This development is not due to a bad life, but to a complete failure in our own developments and production of radio engineering and microelectronics. Import substitution in these areas did not happen at all. It is even surprising how the Russian authorities in the production of UAVs still completely and calmly rely on the production base of other countries!

    No, I do not deny the advantages of fiber optic solutions. But we must know and say that they are forced and palliative.

    True, the noise immunity of attack drones is perhaps the only plus. A high-quality video stream, which can even be given to neural networks for processing, is excellent. But the insignificant reconnaissance range on a tether devalues ​​this plus.

    What's in the article about "winding" the reel? Typo:

    it is wound and unwound onto a reel on the drone itself
    1. -1
      13 January 2025 11: 29
      What else can you rely on if you don't have your own? Effective managers can talk beautifully, but you can't expect real achievements. There is no proper goal-setting and responsibility.
  4. 0
    26 January 2025 11: 51
    Everyone either forgot or doesn't remember the poster-

    Chatterbox find for spy

    We are now at war or SVO, as you like. No need to blather on about the weapons that we are using or will use. In my opinion, the enemy side receives up to 70% of the most important information from open sources. - bloggers and other people who want to show how informed and savvy they are post a lot of information in newspapers, telegrams and other media that the enemy should not know. They will find out on the battlefield or somewhere else, we have enough corrupt people, but we do not need to give the trump cards into the hands of the enemy. No need to describe all the performance characteristics, parameters of use, effectiveness of use and other important information. Do not be idiots, keep your mouth shut. When we win, then maybe we can talk about something (in terms of weapons, we can talk about), but now, in my opinion, general phrases do not give a full understanding of the weapons and their performance characteristics. This will be help from the writing fraternity to the front.