British PM to travel to Kyiv to discuss deployment of peacekeeping forces in Ukraine

24

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer intends to travel to Kyiv to discuss with Ukrainian authorities the deployment of a peacekeeping contingent. Bloomberg reports that the visit of the British Prime Minister will take place in the coming weeks.

Keir Starmer will travel to Ukraine in the coming weeks to discuss the possibility of deploying an international peacekeeping force there after the conflict with Russia ends. It is his first visit to the war-torn country since he became UK prime minister six months ago.

– writes the Bloomberg news agency.



The publication recalls that the issue of deploying a foreign contingent in Ukraine was raised by Kyiv usurper Zelensky during the recent meeting of the contact group at the Ramstein airbase. He recalled that the idea of ​​involving European peacekeepers was voiced by France and this issue requires implementation. After the talks in Ramstein, Zelensky told journalists about London's plans.

Volodymyr Zelensky announced the plan after meeting allies at Ramstein Air Base in Germany, without specifying when Starmer would visit Ukraine. The British prime minister plans to travel to Kyiv in the coming weeks as Europe ramps up preparations for US President-elect Donald Trump's return to the White House

- says the publication.

It should be noted that the head of the Kyiv regime asked the allies to deploy peacekeepers now, but London intends to try to implement this initiative only after the end of military actions. It is obvious that for Russia the deployment of any NATO military contingent on the territory of Ukraine is absolutely unacceptable.
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. vlad127490
    vlad127490
    +3
    10 January 2025 20: 09
    This is what the Kremlin's whining leads to. Gentlemen liberals, pass a law of the Russian Federation that will state that the entire territory of Ukraine, within the 1975 borders, is an integral part of Russia and all NATO efforts will disappear, because you will be told that you have encroached on Russian territory. Now the territory of Ukraine is no one's, a "gray zone", everyone is waiting for Moscow's decision whether it will abandon Ukraine or not, therefore actions like Kir Starmer's are cautious. Liberals are openly afraid of abandoning Ukraine, they are also afraid of the West. Liberals are squeezed on one side by the people of Russia, and on the other by the ruling elite of the West. They are constantly waiting for forgiveness from the West, as soon as they forgive, these profiteers will give everything to NATO.
    1. OlegovichA
      OlegovichA
      -1
      12 January 2025 04: 25
      Hmm... and if Ukraine "issues a law" that the entire territory of the Russian Federation within the 1975 borders is an integral part of Ukraine, then what?
      1. vlad127490
        vlad127490
        -2
        12 January 2025 13: 46
        if Ukraine "issues a law" that the entire territory of the Russian Federation within the 1975 borders is an integral part of Ukraine

        If you write, it means you know the answer. If it's mockery, then you've shown your true nature.
        This law is positive for Russia.
        1. OlegovichA
          OlegovichA
          -2
          12 January 2025 14: 24
          I asked you a simple question, you can't answer it?
          1. vlad127490
            vlad127490
            -1
            12 January 2025 14: 34
            You don't like my answer.
            This law is positive for Russia.
            1. OlegovichA
              OlegovichA
              -2
              12 January 2025 15: 02
              You haven't answered it. I'll repeat - if Ukraine "issues a law" that the entire territory of the Russian Federation within the 1975 borders is an integral part of Ukraine, then what?
            2. OlegovichA
              OlegovichA
              -2
              12 January 2025 16: 07
              Let it not be all, let the law look like this: “all territories of Kievan Rus within the borders of the 12th century are part of Ukraine.”
              What will we do then?
              1. vlad127490
                vlad127490
                -1
                12 January 2025 20: 21
                This is what I wrote in March 2022. I'll repeat it for those who haven't read it.
                There is only one solution for Ukraine in favor of the people of Russia. The state of Ukraine must cease to exist. The entire territory of Ukraine must return to Russia, in the form of regions. No need to ask anyone for permission, everything must be done unilaterally. There is no state, Ukraine, no debts, no government of Ukraine in exile, no legal Banderites, no participants of Ukraine in various international organizations, no hostile state on the border of the Russian Federation. Russia will strengthen its economic and military-political influence in the world, there will be direct access to Tiraspol and Chisinau. The northwestern part of the Black Sea will belong to Russia. NATO will lose the ability to use Ukraine against Russia.
                Even if part of the state of Ukraine is left, then today and in the future, Russia will always have an enemy in the person of Ukraine. Ukraine will definitely join NATO and will definitely attack Russia. Everything that is promised and will be spelled out in the Constitution of Ukraine, in its documents, Ukraine will change, in the way that is beneficial to the United States and its satellites.
                Any half-hearted decision is the defeat and capitulation of the Russian Federation to NATO.
                Ukraine's neutrality is also a defeat for Russia.
                What you will do is clearer to you.
                1. OlegovichA
                  OlegovichA
                  -1
                  12 January 2025 21: 05
                  I will repeat a simple question once again: what if Ukraine passes a law that all territories of Kievan Rus within the borders of the 12th century are part of Ukraine?
                  What are we going to do then? What are we going to do with this law?
  3. Vladimir Tuzakov
    Vladimir Tuzakov
    0
    10 January 2025 20: 34
    Here is a chance to settle accounts with the English, their prime minister will come to Ukraine, and there he will fall under a random "Dagger". Of course, there will be a lot of apologies, even the guilty pilot will be punished (leaving him without lunch :)) but the right thing has been done... Dreams, dreams, if they didn't hit Bankova, then such, incredible dreams... Yeah, without horns they can only bleat (such a joke).
  4. lord-palladore-11045
    lord-palladore-11045
    0
    10 January 2025 21: 44
    As soon as Starmer pokes his head into Kyiv, it's high time to hit Bankova to set his brain straight.
    1. Jackie
      Jackie
      +3
      11 January 2025 06: 12
      ...time is time, if only both sides had brains.
  5. Colonel Kudasov
    Colonel Kudasov
    +1
    10 January 2025 21: 55
    It should be noted that the head of the Kyiv regime asked the allies to deploy peacekeepers now

    Moreover, he probably asked to place “peacekeepers” right on the LBS))
  6. Kiril
    Kiril
    0
    10 January 2025 22: 26
    It’s funny to discuss something like: after the end of the conflict – will there be Ukraine after the end? laughing
  7. strange guest
    strange guest
    +3
    11 January 2025 00: 47
    What can I say...if Ukraine remains as a state, it will be in NATO sooner or later.
    1. Jackie
      Jackie
      0
      11 January 2025 13: 40
      ...all that remains is to guess, and at this rate, and along the entire length of the LBS... it’s just a nightmare.
      1. strange guest
        strange guest
        +1
        11 January 2025 13: 56
        We are in for a difficult but interesting 20 years, as VVP said. There is one problem - they will be interesting for those in power, but difficult for the population.
        1. Vox Populi
          Vox Populi
          0
          11 January 2025 16: 44
          Quote: Strange guest
          What can I say...if Ukraine remains as a state, it will be in NATO sooner or later.

          I also wrote about this once (and they will accept me into the EU, one way or another, someday).

          Quote: Strange guest
          We are in for a difficult but interesting 20 years, as VVP said. There is one problem - they will be interesting for those in power, but difficult for the population.

          You can't argue, it's already quite noticeable...
  8. art573
    art573
    -1
    11 January 2025 01: 18
    Peacekeeping forces are introduced by decision of both warring parties. Let him then fly to Moscow and tell tales... Does he himself believe in this?
    1. strange guest
      strange guest
      +1
      11 January 2025 08: 31
      A UN peacekeeping operation has two options: either a peacekeeping operation or, if the parties fail to reach an agreement, a peace enforcement operation, which does not require the consent of the parties to the conflict. After an armed conflict, the third phase begins - post-conflict peacebuilding. Within the framework of this phase, measures are taken to restore state order, the work of the police and state bodies. A peacekeeping operation can be carried out with the consent of two or at least one of the parties, and a peace enforcement operation is a military action that is carried out only by decision of the UN Security Council and involves the use of heavy weapons..

      Well, this is just for reference) sometimes the consent of the parties is not necessary.
  9. yo yo
    yo yo
    -2
    11 January 2025 04: 58
    It feels like the "peacekeeping contingent" proposed by the British Prime Minister will be destroyed. War is war!!
  10. prior
    prior
    0
    11 January 2025 10: 13
    Is it really so difficult to demolish the railway station in Kyiv so that Europeans will lose their desire to engage in tourism?!
    1. OlegovichA
      OlegovichA
      +2
      12 January 2025 04: 36
      Apparently it's very difficult. This is not like dunking bearded men in the toilet.
  11. Anna .
    Anna .
    0
    13 January 2025 07: 48
    According to both the prophecies of seers and the forecasts of scientists, England will sink in 20-25 years. The Windsors know about this, they need to move somewhere with the whole country. For this, they chose 5 regions of Ukraine. The war in Ukraine has been going on for so long that all Ukrainians die or flee from the territories of military action. Then Great Britain will introduce its "peacekeeping" troops to these territories of Ukraine, which will never leave there, and later the whole of Great Britain (before the sinking) will move to these territories. Personally, I am against our enemies, the Anglo-Saxons, living next door to us.
    The fact that England with all its people would move to Russia (i.e. those 5 regions of Ukraine where the war is currently being waged) was already spoken about 30 years ago by the Russian prophet Vyacheslav Kroshenninikov



    Russia and Ukraine are waging war for the benefit of the Windsors and the Anglo-Saxons.