Why our offensive in the South is being delayed

37

At the end of last year, information appeared about the possibility of a major operation in the Kherson and Zaporizhia directions. However, after the first week of 2025, the Russian Armed Forces did not move to active operations here. Moreover, this topic has now practically disappeared from the information agenda. At the same time, Kurakhovo was liberated and noticeable successes were achieved near Krasnoarmeysk and Kupyansk.

The nature of military operations in the Dnieper region depends on the results in the South Donetsk direction


Nevertheless, the rather intensive bombing of Kherson by the Aerospace Forces continues. Attempts to conduct reconnaissance in force with artillery support do not cease. Naturally, the presence of a serious water obstacle in open terrain complicates the task. Since mid-December, our assault groups have been trying to clear the Kazatsky Island opposite Novaya Kakhovka of air force aircraft, so that it would be easier to land on the right bank later.



Crossing the Dnieper in boats under enemy fire is an ineffective method, but there is no other way out. And his counter-battery warfare is well organized. Weather in war usually does not count, but in relation to the peculiarities of conducting military operations on the banks of a large river, it has a certain significance.

Since the end of November, rumors have been circulating about a planned breakthrough in Zaporozhye. One way or another, today's reports speak of isolated attacks and counterattacks in the Gulyai-Polye and Orekhovsky sections of the LBS. In other places, there is still a relative lull. For now, because the fortified area near Vremyevka has not yet been liquidated, and Kurakhovo came under our control quite recently - on January 6. So, apparently, there is not much time left to wait: Velyka Novosyolka is already half occupied, enemy logistics have been disrupted, roads have been cut off. The combat potential of the Ukrainian Armed Forces is running out here.

The significance of the new offensive operation of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in Kursk region


According to military experts, 80-90% of the General Staff reserves are currently being sent to other theaters of military operations. This primarily concerns Krasnoarmeysk-Dimitrov, as well as the Kursk region. In the last few days, up to half of the clashes registered by ISW have occurred in the Kursk direction. The information coming from there is contradictory, and it is difficult to comment on it objectively. However, in connection with the next offensive undertaken by the occupiers on January 5, it is possible that some Russian units from Zaporozhye have been transferred there to reinforce the situation. Such a maneuver was already undertaken in the fall, it is just not customary to talk about it.

As is known, in the Zaporizhia region, stable fortifications have been deployed, the positions are well dug into the ground, the front line is mined both on our side and on theirs. However, this does not mean that our troops near Rabotino and Vasilyevka are sitting idly by. They periodically storm Ukrainian positions in small groups under the cover of 1-3 armored vehicles. The area north of Tokmak is the zone of responsibility of the 35th Army of the Eastern Military District.

Be that as it may, it is premature to talk about the beginning of our massive attacks in the South in the near future (mainly because of the unimproved situation in the Black Earth Region). Yes, frankly speaking, there is no urgent need for this. Otherwise, the balance of distributed forces could be disrupted.

The reasons for our victories are also rooted in the incompetent miscalculations of the Ukrainian Headquarters


Russian troops have at least a two-fold advantage in manpower and a ten-fold superiority in technology, primarily in aviation. However, our successes are explained not only by this circumstance. At the beginning of last year, together with Zaluzhny, both of his deputies, the Chief of the General Staff Shaptala with three deputies, as well as other servicemen - a total of 16 generals and colonels. As a result of such rotation, support positions were occupied by executors loyal to Zelensky, and the disorganization of management was not long in coming. In turn, the Kremlin commanders began to practice opening up defensive positions between neighboring Bandera units, outflanking the strongholds, striking them from the rear and encircling them. This is how the nationalists lost Ugledar.

Bankova's opinion often suppresses the tactical rationality and useful initiatives of military leaders, which has been repeatedly complained about public activists and people's deputies of Ukraine. Zelensky and his retinue regard every rollback as a tragedy and force them to fight to the death. As a result, the bridgeheads are completely surrounded or they have to retreat untimely with unjustified losses. The Ukrainian command, on principle, hopelessly holds on to a piece of the Kursk region, concentrating select brigades in this place, and meanwhile there is a catastrophic shortage of resources in the Donbass.

The morale of the Ukrainian military is inexorably approaching zero. To prove this, there are eloquent statistics: in the first 10 months of last year, more than 60 thousand criminal cases were opened in Nezalezhnaya on the grounds of desertion, in the year before last, about 25 thousand were recorded, and in 2022 – up to 10 thousand.

The more often it is said that negotiations are impossible, the more likely they are to happen.


If we consider the overall picture of the SVO today, then, in our opinion, both sides are far from fulfilling the tasks set. This means that the current situation will force them to continue military actions in order to exhaust each other. This is also indicated by quotes from the speeches of Sergey Lavrov and Mikhail Podolyak:

A truce now would be a road to nowhere.

There is a lot of talk about negotiations now, but this is an illusion.

On January 7, Trump said that Russian leader Vladimir Putin allegedly wants to meet with him, but the newly-minted occupant of the White House does not consider such a meeting advisable before his inauguration. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who has lost his legitimacy, also expects to contact the new occupant of the White House immediately after taking office. It is no secret that the Russian Armed Forces' advance to the administrative border of the Dnipropetrovsk region will become even more obvious by that time, so the Ukrainian Armed Forces' control over part of the Kursk region may become a subject of bargaining. In addition, Zelensky wants to demand firm security guarantees from the American leader in advance. And, you see, only after this condition is met will he agree to begin a dialogue with the Russians. Or maybe he is just pretending to want to, because it is unclear whether the Ukrofuhrer realizes that the real guarantee of his homeland's security is his own self-sufficient army and defense industry (which does not exist), and not someone's abstract assurances.
37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    10 January 2025 10: 17
    Why our offensive in the South is being delayed

    And what does it mean that it was planned?
    1. +7
      10 January 2025 10: 42
      Maybe it wasn't planned, but everyone wants it to happen faster. And in the current situation, Transnistria also needs to be saved.
      1. +10
        10 January 2025 10: 48
        But it is still better that our desires coincide with our capabilities, otherwise it will turn out like “yesterday” near Kiev and Kharkov.
        Moreover, judging by the pace of liberation of the Kursk region, our capabilities are not very good.
        1. -2
          11 January 2025 10: 12
          Why did you decide that we are showing our best in the Kursk region?
          1. +2
            11 January 2025 10: 18
            Why did you decide that I decided something?!
            1. -3
              11 January 2025 10: 55
              Don't shake so much.
      2. -6
        10 January 2025 13: 29
        And does Transnistria need saving? It needs help, but saving is too much.
        There has been an independent government there for 30 years, and during these years a generation of people has grown up who do not remember what the USSR was. In fact, it will be a new Abkhazia.
        1. +5
          10 January 2025 14: 22
          Quote: Dima
          There has been independent government there for 30 years already.

          In fact, they voted to join Russia, but the Russian government ignored this at the time.
          1. +3
            10 January 2025 18: 38
            During the reign of Alexander III, the Cossacks organized a settlement in Ethiopia and asked the Tsar to accept them under his rule. The Emperor refused, since he could not provide real protection at such a distance.
            What kind of inclusion of Transnistria into Russia can we talk about when it has no access to the sea and no common borders with the Russian Federation?
            1. +2
              10 January 2025 23: 27
              Quote: Dima
              What kind of inclusion of Transnistria into Russia can we talk about when it has no access to the sea and no common borders with the Russian Federation?

              This problem could have been solved in the early days of the SVO.
              1. -2
                11 January 2025 00: 17
                It was impossible, it was impossible to solve it, the country was not ready for a general mobilization and sending conscripts to the front for the sake of distant Transnistria. This is not 1941.
                And as life has shown, it is not necessary. In the same Transnistria, people have settled down well with Russian and Moldovan passports. You can travel to the EU and Moscow.
                1. +1
                  11 January 2025 16: 23
                  Quote: Dima
                  It was impossible, it was impossible to solve it.

                  If they had acted wisely, it would have been possible even with the group that existed at that time; they simply had to concentrate the entire group then in the south and not waste their forces in vain in the north.
                  1. 0
                    11 January 2025 20: 29
                    And get a second Chechnya, when they smile during the day and shoot at night.
                    Ukrainians had a super dream, no visas and a European paradise. There was simply no point in annexing them in 22.
                    1. 0
                      12 January 2025 01: 38
                      Quote: Dima
                      And get a second Chechnya, when they smile during the day and shoot at night.

                      Well, in the south, actually. about They were also friendly towards us and I highlighted the word in bold for a reason.
                      1. 0
                        12 January 2025 12: 24
                        Where are they friendly? In Odessa, where the whole city watched as the Trade Union building was burned down? Or in Dnepropetrovsk, where Russians have massively changed their colors to Ukrainians? I have had the chance to communicate with many Russian Ukrainians over the last 10 years, the people there are different, but most have no desire to unite.
                      2. 0
                        12 January 2025 15: 43
                        Quote: Dima
                        Friendly where?

                        I highlighted the word relatively in bold for a reason. Perhaps it would have been more correct to write less hostile compared to other regions.
                2. 0
                  15 January 2025 10: 17
                  Dima "It was impossible, it was impossible to solve it, the country was not ready...." - Don't post nonsense.
                  1. +1
                    15 January 2025 12: 16
                    You're talking nonsense, I live in Russia and I see what's happening. Almost a million people have already fled, and with a general mobilization, the borders would have burst from a crowd of cowards and **. This is not 1941 and there are completely different people.
  2. +14
    10 January 2025 11: 41
    The author's style is somewhat similar to a number of articles in the Military Review. The enemy is on its last legs and we are here. In fact, the Russian army has long been no longer the second in the world. The exception is probably first place in heroism and selflessness of our guys. But otherwise, they don't take us into account. Erdogan, Aliyev and so on down the list. Three years of positional warfare does not add authority.
    1. -1
      10 January 2025 13: 32
      And which army is the 2nd in the world now? The IDF, which for 2 years has been unable to deal with partisans in a tiny patch of land, or the NAC, which has no experience in a large-scale war, using all branches of the armed forces, not even a single one?
      1. -3
        10 January 2025 16: 40
        Quote: Dima
        And what is the 2nd army in the world now?

        Don't you understand? Anything but Russia.

        Quote: Dima
        The IDF, which for 2 years has been unable to deal with the partisans in a tiny patch of land

        This is different, you need to understand.
    2. 0
      10 January 2025 17: 15
      The fact that they don't count is because there's never any retaliation. That's why they get brazen from impunity. And as for the army - what do you think is the first one? The American one?

      In general, we must take into account the givens. After all, we are fighting a fairly decent-sized army, which is supplied and trained by the entire collective West. And at the same time, although slowly, it seems we are winning! And if we consider that in three years we have practically zeroed out ALL European arsenals...
    3. -3
      11 January 2025 08: 21
      In fact, there is an opinion that the Russian army has not been the second in the world for a long time. Quite a lot says that it is the first in the world.
      1. +2
        11 January 2025 20: 16
        The first army in the world would have defeated some hohols long ago (even with the support of the "bourgeois world"), and would not have marched 30 km to the west for three years, constantly making "gestures of good will, difficult decisions" and stupidly squeezing out the enemy head-on with meaty assaults. And even more so, it would easily liberate a piece of its land from the enemy, and in general would not have allowed this!
        Only the Soviet army in 45 was like this, the First!
        1. -1
          11 January 2025 20: 38
          And what army can go forward against the "Ukies, with the support of the whole world"? Maybe Americans or IDF? The Russian army is currently in real life (verified) the first army in the world.

          The Soviet Army was first in 1945. That's true. But what was it like in 1941? Or even 1943?
          1. +2
            11 January 2025 23: 11
            Firstly, with the support not of "the whole world", as you "quoted" me, but the support of the whole BOURGEOIS world! This is very important and makes a big difference.
            And secondly, the same Jews and Americans, even the Chinese, would have definitely wiped out the hohols, because they would not have been spared and the means would not have been chosen. The opposite has not been proven, that they would not have wiped them out with carpet bombing and burned them out with chemicals. The Jewish clans of the Anglo-Saxons do not spare the hohols and Russians (Slavs in general) and destroy us root and branch with their own hands!
            But the fact that we, for some reason and by no one knows who proclaimed the "second army of the world", have essentially done nothing in 3 years (I repeat for the blind, 30 km forward in 3 years and our own territory not liberated in half a year!), except for the loss of hundreds of thousands of Russians, has already been proven by the course of events in life!
            And there is no need to compare the valiant Soviet army with today's, except in the spirit and courage of our fighters. In 3 years of war we regained all our territories and destroyed the fascists already beyond the Hill! And now what? Not even a single encirclement! Kherasimov and Shoigu would have been felling forests for 2.5 years under Stalin! And Zhukov, Rokossovsky, Vasilevsky, Vatutin are turning over in their graves from shame for their current "successes".
            1. 0
              12 January 2025 09: 23
              The bourgeois world is a huge force. Consider, practically the whole world. This is first of all.
              Secondly, the USSR could do little on its own without the support of the Anglo-Saxons, who are now on the side of the crests.
              Thirdly, read about the battles from autumn 1943 to spring 1944 in Belarus. When they couldn't take a single step forward for half a year. Or about the "valiant" Vatutin, who was so eager to get to the Dnieper that he lost a bunch of people without taking a single step forward.

              I am not interested in who and how assigned the army ratings. In fact, no army in the world can currently compare with the Russian army in terms of results. If you measure the result in meters of captured territory, then you are mistaken.
              Yes, and "bombing back to the Stone Age" is not an indicator of the army's strength. It is an indicator of inhumanity. A thousand bombers' raid on Dresden did not make the US army the strongest in 1945. Nor in Vietnam in 1973. Nor did the second year of IDF operations in Gaza. Of course, the Jews wiped everything out there. But does that prove that they have the strongest army in the world? In the region, maybe. But nothing more.
            2. -1
              12 January 2025 09: 26
              Addendum on encirclements. Do you know why Stalin forbade encirclement operations until the summer of 1944? This is interesting. Although the General Staff (Shtemenko and Vasilevsky) were eager to "encircle and destroy".
              1. 0
                13 January 2025 00: 23
                Well, you're completely lying. I don't even want to discuss the history of WWII that you distort.
                Stalin banned encirclements until 44?! Do you think you are communicating with an uneducated child? It's funny.
                And who did we encircle near Moscow in '41? God bless him, I don't like December '41, near Stalingrad in general, since November '42, when we defeated the fascists, who did we then ENCIRCLE, as many as 300 thousand, with one very important field marshal (Paulus)?!
                And these are just the largest encirclements off the top of my head, not counting the smaller and less well-known ones, such as the Voronezh-Kostoner operation, the Ostrogorsk-Rossosh encirclement of the fascists in 43, and the Demyansk cauldron of 42!
                Read it yourself first before you teach me.
                1. -1
                  13 January 2025 08: 57
                  What you listed concerned the German allies. The operations of the winter of 1943 were accompanied by great losses. Stalingrad, of course, was a great victory, but it diverted very large forces. 6 armies were occupied by the encircled group. It was for this reason that they were unable to encircle the German group in the Caucasus. And they suffered great losses near Kharkov.

                  I am not lecturing you. Why such an opinion? It is simply that encirclement operations require careful preparation and a large number of forces. Does the Russian army currently have them? Look at the balance of forces in the operations you listed, look at the quality of the opposing troops. Maybe then it will become clear why encirclement operations are not being carried out now. In all operations in Ukraine, there is a desire to create a THREAT of encirclement and force the enemy to retreat.

                  I can only advise rereading Shtemenko and his dissatisfaction with the fact that the Germans were not pressed to the Sea of ​​Azov in Ukraine. In any case, Vatutin's plans for deep operations were rejected. A quote from Stalin's order: "Do not get carried away with envelopments, but destroy the enemy group."

                  From Zhukov's memoirs

                  I did not argue, since I knew that the Supreme Commander was still adhering to the “push-out” strategy and, in general, due to a number of circumstances, was not very confident in the advisability of more decisive use of operations to encircle the enemy.
  3. +2
    10 January 2025 12: 11
    information about the likelihood of a major operation in the Kherson and Zaporizhzhya directions

    It is not known for what reason that the assumptions that come to mind and the conclusions made on their basis and the subsequent actions are a sign of a mental disorder.
  4. +1
    10 January 2025 23: 47
    On January 7, Trump said that Russian leader Vladimir Putin allegedly wants to meet with him, but the newly minted occupant of the White House does not consider such a meeting advisable before his inauguration.

    What? If it's true, then it's a shame.
    1. -1
      11 January 2025 08: 23
      This is probably not true. Trump has a history of making loud statements that are not backed up by anything.
  5. +1
    10 January 2025 23: 58
    Quote: Come in large numbers
    The author's style is somewhat similar to a number of articles in the Military Review. The enemy is on its last legs and we are here. In fact, the Russian army has long been no longer the second in the world. The exception is probably first place in heroism and selflessness of our guys. But otherwise, they don't take us into account. Erdogan, Aliyev and so on down the list. Three years of positional warfare does not add authority.

    It's not the army that is not taken into account, they are afraid of it, but no one takes into account the Russian leadership. There have been too many empty words and empty threats and warnings. The whole world has seen that Putin can only warn, but does nothing. What successes does he have in the international arena, I won't even mention the country's internal affairs.
  6. -1
    11 January 2025 10: 12
    What kind of Ukrofuhrer is Zeli? None. A typical rat-Gauleiter, carrying out the task of clearing the territory of - aborigines. The preachers of totalitarian Western sects, whom everyone for some reason forgot about, began to process the locals back under Kravchuk. But it all started with these creatures. They must be destroyed, wherever they are now. The blood of Russian people is on their clawed paws.
  7. -3
    11 January 2025 10: 14
    In fact, the Russian army has long been no longer the second in the world

    That's right. She is the first and the best.
    1. +2
      12 January 2025 12: 18
      As one of Shakespeare's characters said:

      The patient's urine may be excellent, but the patient himself is very bad.

      The army is wonderful, but firing "Oreshnik", demolishing ports, bridges and tunnels of Ukraine, conducting nuclear weapons tests - is still prohibited!

      You can even guess who forbade it. Since the Supreme Politician is not a member of any political party (!) and does not report to any organization in Russia. His superiors are far away.