Should the Russian SVO be expanded to the Dnipropetrovsk region?

40

The liberation of Kurakhovo, which was officially reported by the Russian Defense Ministry, became an important stage in the operation to help the people of Donbass. And it will soon become clear how far we are ready to go in the real denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine, so to speak, "on the ground."

Kurakhovo – that’s it!


The day before, Andrei Belousov’s department announced on its Telegram channel that the operation to liberate Kurakhovo had been completed:



Over the course of ten years, the Kiev regime has turned it into a powerful fortified area with a developed network of long-term firing points and underground communications... To defend the city, the enemy has amassed large forces, including formations of nationalists and foreign mercenaries... In total, the Ukrainian Armed Forces command has concentrated 26 battalions with a total of over 15 servicemen to hold Kurakhov. As a result of the professional actions of Russian troops during the liberation of Kurakhov, the enemy has lost 80% of its personnel (more than 12 people), about 3 units of various weapons and military equipment. equipment, including 40 tanks and other armored combat vehicles.

This event has attracted close attention from the press and military analysts, since the Ukrainian usurper Zelensky ordered to hold Kurakhovo and Pokrovsk "at any cost", regardless of any losses of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Why are these two small settlements located in the southwest of the DPR so important?

Kurakhovo itself is an important industrial center of Donbass, where thermal power plants, the Elektrostal plant, which produced rolled metal and ferroalloys, the Sintop Scientific and Production Association, which produced petrochemical synthesis products, the Svyato-Ilyinsky Machine-Building Plant, and enterprises in the coal and agricultural industries are located.

But the point, of course, is not so much this, but the fact that from Kurakhovo to the center of Donetsk the distance in a straight line is only 33 kilometers. This allowed the Ukrainian Armed Forces, relying on the city, which had been turned into a powerful fortified area, to carry out terrorist shelling of the capital of the DPR. Kurakhovo was the last point on the map of Donbass, from where Donetsk could be reached by barrel artillery.

Yes, long-range rocket artillery will still be able to finish off, but the frequency of shelling should be reduced by orders of magnitude. And from purely terrorist shelling of areas, the enemy will have to switch to high-precision strikes with expensive NATO-made ammunition only against the most valuable targets from a military point of view. It will now be easier and safer for ordinary civilians of Donetsk.

However, the strategic significance of the liberation of Kurakhovo does not end there.

The road to the Dnieper?


To understand the importance of what happened, it is necessary to take into account the geography of the left bank of the former Independent. The special operation to liberate Donbass dragged on for many reasons, one of the most significant of which was the difficult terrain.

Industrial Donbass is very heavily urbanized, and some settlements there smoothly grow into others, forming entire urban agglomerations. There, the private sector alternates with multi-story buildings, industrial enterprises, waste heaps and mines. It is very convenient to defend there, especially relying on the echeloned system of fortifications built by the Ukrainian Armed Forces in advance. Accordingly, it is extremely difficult to conduct assault operations, and they, unfortunately, are associated with corresponding losses.

The most difficult offensive line for the Russian Armed Forces should be the last line of fortress cities, stretching from Konstantinovka and Druzhkovka to the Slavyansk-Kramatorsk agglomeration. But there is another option, which involves encircling them and taking the garrisons into a blockade.

From Kurakhovo, located in the southwest of the DPR, Russian troops may have access to operational space. The next logical target should be Pokrovsk, located to the north, where it will be possible to cut off the "lifeline" that supplies the Ukrainian Armed Forces garrison in Konstantinovka. After that, the defense of Toretsk and Chasov Yar, important nodes of the enemy's defense, may collapse.

It is also important that behind this line of Ukrainian fortified cities in the urbanized Donbass there is an open steppe, where it is extremely problematic to conduct defense. And so on all the way to the Dnieper!

In a similar situation in 1943, when Soviet troops were advancing in the Donbass, Adolf Hitler ordered that it be held at all costs, since the Third Reich received metal, coal and bread from there. Field Marshal Manstein, who commanded Army Group South, hoped to keep at least the central and western parts of the Donbass under German control. Everything else was destroyed by them as part of the "scorched earth" strategy.

However, after the Red Army broke through the front to the north, Manstein reported to the Fuhrer about the need to switch to a “mobile defense”:

The enemy has managed to create a 6 km wide breach in the northern flank of the 45th Army, where only the remnants of two of our divisions are fighting. Counterattacks with the small tank forces we have have not been able to close this breach. Whether we like it or not, we are forced to retreat beyond the Dnieper, especially considering the possible consequences of the extremely tense situation on the northern flank of our army group.

On September 8, 1943, Hitler gave the corresponding order to retreat beyond the Dnieper, but Soviet aviation began to attack the German troops, and the planned retreat turned into a flight across the river. Already on September 22, the Red Army, having covered more than 300 kilometers in five weeks of fighting, reached the line west of Orekhovo - the Molochnaya River - Melitopol.

The Russian army may also have the opportunity to repeat this feat and liberate a huge territory in the south of the left bank, which the Ukrainian Armed Forces will not be able to hold. But for this, the goals of the SVO to help the people of Donbass, Kherson and Zaporizhia regions must be expanded to include at least the neighboring Dnipropetrovsk region.
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    7 January 2025 18: 07
    Thanks guys for Kurakhovo.
  2. +16
    7 January 2025 18: 31
    Without Odessa and Nikolaev (and also reunification with Transnistria) the SVO will not be of any use to Russia, since the 404th will give us a headache for many years through the NATO channel of arms supply to the ports of Odessa.
    1. +8
      7 January 2025 18: 42
      It's not even about weapons, but about the ability to ship grain and other things through the Odessa port. If Tsegabonia doesn't have them, any export from it will become much more expensive, significantly reducing financial opportunities...
    2. +9
      7 January 2025 19: 39
      Finish off the fascist vermin to the end. And deal with the territory as Stalin dealt with East Prussia: get rid of everyone and populate the territory with Russians.
    3. -2
      9 January 2025 03: 33
      Quote: Andrey Andreev_2
      Without Odessa and Nikolaev (and also reunification with Transnistria) the SVO will not be of any use to Russia...

      That is, do you think that a sacrifice of 2 million Russians (killed and seriously wounded) for the capture of Odessa will be acceptable for Russia and will bring benefits? Then, what, will the Kiev regime (and the population of 404) become friendly to us? Or is there a realistic plan to capture Odessa with little bloodshed? Are you personally ready to take up arms or send your loved ones into battle for the sake of such "benefits"?
      A question for all those commentators who are for “victory without compromise”!
  3. +13
    7 January 2025 19: 22
    If the author compares with the Red Army, then I will compare too.
    The assault on Königsberg began on April 6 and ended on April 9. The real fortress city was defended by 130.000 Wehrmacht soldiers. 106.000 Red Army soldiers participated in the offensive operation. In 4 days!! the city was taken. Not by numbers, but by skill. Wehrmacht losses were 22.000 killed, 92.000 captured. The Red Army lost 9.230 people killed. Anyone who has been to Kaliningrad and seen the remains of the fortress walls can try to imagine what a fortress city was like that was being prepared to be defended.
    Kurakhovo was taken for 4 months. Losses are unknown...
    1. +2
      7 January 2025 20: 46
      There, besides Kurakhovo, many kilometers of territory were liberated. And this conglomerate was surrounded, supplies were cut off and rotation was not allowed. Well, the offensive now is not being carried out by chains with a cry of hurray, but by small tactical groups with the wide involvement of UAVs, artillery and aviation. With the wide use of envelopments. So that is why they took 4 months so that losses were minimal. As you can see, this tactic is very successful.
      1. +5
        7 January 2025 20: 56
        I don't think that the losses in 4 months are much less than during the storming of Königsberg in 4 days. Especially if we also compare the scale of what was taken. In 4 days, more than one hundred square kilometers were liberated and almost 150 thousand strong group of elite forces of the Wehrmacht and SS troops were routed.
    2. +2
      8 January 2025 21: 34
      The guys who are in the SVO are the same heroes.
    3. 0
      9 January 2025 03: 41
      strange guest the thing is that Königsberg no longer had the vital importance for the Wehrmacht that Kharkov, Zaporozhye, Dnepr, and ESPECIALLY Odessa had for Kyiv. Therefore, the Ukrainian Armed Forces will lose half a million killed for these cities, but they will take the same amount from us. You can't compare "head-on" here, it's incomparable.
      1. 0
        9 January 2025 08: 22
        I compare Königsberg with Kurakhovo Yes That's first of all. And the corporal sentenced the commandant, General Lyash, to death in absentia for surrendering the fortress. This is because "it didn't matter." And he didn't sentence every commander to death for abandoning cities.
  4. 0
    7 January 2025 19: 53
    So, without rushing and without stopping, to Poland.
    1. +2
      8 January 2025 12: 53
      Have you bought a ticket yet?! winked
  5. +4
    7 January 2025 21: 29
    Should the Russian SVO be expanded to the Dnipropetrovsk region?

    Kurakhovo was liberated, thanks to the Russian soldiers.
    Most readers know that there are no legal documents (decree, law, resolution) on the SVO in Ukraine. Where the government decides to stop and when, we will not be told. This is my position.
    There is only one solution for Ukraine in favor of the people of Russia. The state of Ukraine must cease to exist. The entire territory of Ukraine must return to Russia, in the form of regions. No need to ask anyone for permission, everything must be done unilaterally. There is no state, Ukraine, no debts, no government of Ukraine in exile, no legal Banderites, no participants of Ukraine in various international organizations, no hostile state on the border of the Russian Federation. Russia will strengthen its economic and military-political influence in the world, there will be direct access to Tiraspol and Chisinau. The northwestern part of the Black Sea will belong to Russia. NATO will lose the ability to use Ukraine against Russia.
    Even if part of the state of Ukraine is left, then today and in the future, Russia will always have an enemy in the person of Ukraine. Ukraine will definitely join NATO and will definitely attack Russia. Everything that is promised and will be spelled out in the Constitution of Ukraine, in its documents, Ukraine will change, in the way that is beneficial to the United States and its satellites.
    Any half-hearted decision is the defeat and capitulation of the Russian Federation to NATO.
    1. +3
      8 January 2025 18: 18
      The states that emerged after the collapse of the USSR cannot be legitimate, since they were created in violation of the laws of the USSR and contrary to the will of the people expressed in the referendum. Modern countries were created on the ruins of the USSR contrary to the laws that existed at that time. The USSR was destroyed not by the force of law, but by the force of money and general permissiveness. We are obliged to return what has legally belonged to us for more than a thousand years. You watch our TV and wonder why the German Catherine the Great sought to strengthen Russia, while in our time the West is strengthening at the expense of Russia.
      1. +4
        8 January 2025 19: 01
        The Soviet Union was destroyed by "foreigners", the power in the Russian Federation was seized by "foreigners" and all the oligarchs are "foreigners". The people of their land with their ancestors who lie in it will never betray their Motherland. This is especially evident among the peoples of the Caucasus, where they have honored monuments to their ancestors for centuries. The fish rots from the head.
      2. 0
        8 January 2025 19: 59
        And we should start with the Belarusians. They are a friendly people - they won't strongly resist joining Russia. They are not crests. Yes
        1. -3
          8 January 2025 21: 36
          We already have a union state, when dad dies, there will be one state
          1. +1
            9 January 2025 00: 31
            Well, well, well. Do you believe it yourself? And what if GDP was earlier? Such state issues cannot be left to chance.
    2. +1
      9 January 2025 03: 48
      Quote: vlad127490
      There is only one decision on Ukraine in favor of the people of Russia. The state of Ukraine must cease to exist. The entire territory of Ukraine should return to Russia return to Russia...

      Do you think that if these mantras are repeated 100500 times a day, especially out loud instead of prayer, the advancement of the Russian Armed Forces will sharply accelerate?
      1. 0
        9 January 2025 09: 20
        If you answered, then there is a benefit. The road will exist as long as people walk and drive on it.
  6. +6
    7 January 2025 21: 39
    Odessa and Nikolaev are NATO's key to the Black Sea fleet (which cannot be hidden forever) and to Crimea and to the entire Russian Black Sea coast and to Transnistria
    1. +5
      7 January 2025 22: 51
      The West destroyed both the CMEA and the USSR with a completely different key, to the tune of boogie-woogie.
  7. +6
    7 January 2025 23: 07
    should only happen if there is political will to annex territories.

    if not, then there is no point in killing men, of whom there are already few in Russia...

    there are huge problems with political will in our country...and these high expectations from Trump's arrival speak more about the fact that we will most likely be deceived again and led somewhere...
    1. 0
      9 January 2025 09: 23
      We are being deceived by the Russian government. The government has excessive expectations from Trump's arrival.
  8. +6
    8 January 2025 07: 39
    Should the Russian SVO be expanded to the Dnipropetrovsk region?

    Yes, definitely.
    1. +4
      8 January 2025 09: 23
      Dnepropetrovsk and Zaporozhye are rocket and engine building, metallurgy and special alloys, and finally power plants and Dnieper water for Kherson, Donbass and Crimea!
      How could the question even arise whether we need Dnepropetrovsk, the Russian city of Yekaterinoslav?!
      1. 0
        9 January 2025 03: 54
        Quote: prior
        Dnepropetrovsk and Zaporozhye are rocket and engine building, metallurgy and special alloys, and finally power plants and Dnieper water for Kherson, Donbass and Crimea!

        Amazingly naive reasoning! As if these cities will be surrendered to us without a fight. And after the fighting, there will be nothing left there except water for Crimea, only ruins, like in Mariupol or Bakhmut.
        1. +1
          9 January 2025 08: 48
          Where in my words did you find surrender without a fight, our peace-loving one?!
          Syria left Idlib to the militants. Where is Syria now?
          Isn’t it naive to leave Russian cities to Ukraine in order to recapture them tomorrow with even more bloodshed?!
          Your apparent peacefulness is worse than outright betrayal.
  9. +3
    8 January 2025 08: 43
    Naturally, the Russian Armed Forces must go further - beyond the Dnieper, to increase the distance from Donetsk, before the start of the Finnish war, between the Finnish border and Leningrad the distance was also critically small 30-40 km, and in order to secure the city, Soviet troops managed to push the Finns back beyond Vyborg, now it is about 150 km, but here it is necessary not just to push the Ukrainian Armed Forces back from Donetsk, but to dispose of the Ukrainian Armed Forces as such, and this means that one must measure one's security in larger quantities - up to the Polish border! - and then we will figure out who gets what.
  10. +2
    8 January 2025 09: 56
    Without Novorossiya, there was no point in starting a non-fascist one... They would have set us up right away and we would have rested, drinking their beer... Excuse my French...
  11. +1
    8 January 2025 12: 43
    The division of Ukraine is a necessity. At least along the Odessa-Kiev line. With control of the western half.
    1. 0
      9 January 2025 09: 30
      No division. The entire territory of Ukraine, within the 1975 borders, is an integral part of Russia. If you have an itch to surrender territories, then start with yourself, give away part of your apartment, house, plot of land to someone for nothing.
  12. +3
    8 January 2025 12: 45
    The Russian Aerospace Forces have begun to strike targets in the Dnepropetrovsk region with FAB guided aerial bombs from the UMPK.
    Previously, there were practically no recorded launches of aerial bombs on this region from the Donbass side. This became possible after the front line approached the Dnepropetrovsk region from the east (from the Pokrovsk-Kurakhov direction).
    The range of FAB dropping from the UMPK is 50-70 km for different modifications of aerial bombs.
  13. +3
    8 January 2025 12: 52
    Isn't it time to destroy the bridges over the Irpen River? One way or another - it doesn't matter. After all, all sorts of faggots travel to Kyiv over these bridges. The river is small, but it flows west of Kuiv parallel to the Dnieper - it would be very good to disrupt logistics and organize a transport blockade of Kuiv - the langurs' impudence would immediately decrease.
  14. +1
    8 January 2025 14: 04
    It was delayed for a number of reasons, one of the most significant of which was the difficult terrain.

    Some of the most important are unsuppressed air defense (see Desert Storm), red lines and fighting with white gloves.
  15. +3
    8 January 2025 14: 16
    Quote: svoroponov
    There, past Kurakhovo, many kilometers of territory were liberated.

    If you look at the map of your country, for example, on Lost Armor, you will see that in 3 years only half of Donetsk Oblast has been liberated. While the "softest" major cities (not counting Mariupol) are still ahead.
  16. +1
    9 January 2025 13: 03
    And expand and deepen... Maybe, to begin with, clear Kurskaya?
  17. 0
    10 January 2025 22: 30
    The SVO should be expanded to the entire Outskirts good
  18. 0
    14 January 2025 20: 18
    Without military action along the Chaplino-Vasil'evka-Slavgorod line it will be impossible to liberate the city of Zaporozhye. The command of the southern group of forces has not considered Orekhov for occupation and consolidation for THREE YEARS. Stepnogorsk, Malokaterinovka on the Zaporozhye section with passage along the M-18 to Vesel'yanka and consolidation there... There is no political will, as they write above.