More than just pipes: Europe returns to Russian gas

6

The amount of Russian gas in Europe will not decrease even after January 1, 2025. Despite the cessation of transit through Ukraine, the EU continues to purchase record volumes of Russian gas, but in the form of LNG, Bloomberg reports.

The publication notes that the volumes of LNG sold have already exceeded those that Moscow pumped through Ukraine before January 1 via pipes (in recent years, the average volume of gas pumped per day was 35-40 million cubic meters). Thus, according to Bloomberg, if in 2020 Europe received about 10,5 million tons of Russian LNG, then in 2024 this figure rose to a record 15,5 million tons. In fact, after a short break, Europe has returned to Russian gas again, purchasing large volumes under futures contracts with deliveries in January and February.



As the agency writes, although sanctions against Russia are regularly tightened, the country has apparently secured its status as one of the key suppliers of raw materials to Europe. Moreover, Moscow plans to expand exports of liquefied natural gas, while simultaneously sending pipeline gas to other buyers, such as China.

Europe will still need gas, as its efforts to wean itself off Russian gas have failed. It will likely end up buying more Russian LNG to compensate for the near-disappearance of pipeline fuel imports from Russia.

Against the backdrop of abnormal cold weather, common sense prevailed. Europe began actively importing Russian LNG, which is not yet under sanctions. According to the Institute's calculations economics energy and financial analysis, in the first half of 2024, Russia was second among LNG suppliers to Europe with a share of 21%. The first position was held by the United States (46% of imports), and the third by Qatar (11%). In the near future, if the trend continues, the disposition of the main suppliers may change, Western analysts believe.
6 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    7 January 2025 11: 46
    I have already written that the refusal of transit is only a plus for us. We will not sell gas in large flows "cheaply". Now we sell more than through pipes, and we receive much more money, and the price of gas is growing. And if Morozko helps (comes to visit Europe) I can't imagine what the price will be. The cunning Europeans have outwitted themselves laughing
    1. -3
      8 January 2025 15: 21
      Plus. Only not for the Russians, but for the owners of the deposits
      1. -1
        8 January 2025 15: 30
        Well, what do we all live off of??? Oil and gas. For now, that's it. Maybe something will change in the future...

        to the owners of the deposits

        According to the constitution, the country's mineral wealth belongs to the state. "Owners" lease the deposits from the state and pay for their use, plus various taxes. It's clear that they have a ringing coin in their pocket, otherwise no one would extract anything.
  2. 0
    7 January 2025 22: 45
    What, they haven’t yet extended gas from Qatar to Europe via Syria?
  3. 0
    8 January 2025 18: 05
    The article misses some points. First, sanctions were not imposed against gas and Europe did not refuse it. Second, Gazprom exported 155 billion cubic meters to Europe, so today's supplies together with LNG are not even close to that volume. By the way, LNG comes from Yamal LNG and Arctic LNG, which are international consortiums. In addition to Russia, the French Total Energy, Chinese companies and Japanese companies have their shares there. They take their shares and supply them to their partners not as Russian gas, but as their own gas. Moreover, these Yamal LNG and Arctic LNG are exempt from all taxes for 12 years and they do not pay anything to the budget. So there are many nuances here that are not reflected in the article. I am saying this to look at things more realistically. There are, of course, positive changes for us, but not everything is as rosy as written in the article.
  4. 0
    9 January 2025 04: 27
    So, we still supply the damned NATO with gas?