How the problem of “transition of power” was solved in Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan

7

One of the features political life in the post-Soviet space is that the national leaders who come to power there try to preserve it in a variety of ways. The problems this creates can be judged by the experience of neighboring Kazakhstan and Belarus.

The Collapse of Elbasy


The most illustrative story in this case is that of the now former President of Kazakhstan, Nursultan Nazarbayev, who ruled the country since the collapse of the USSR in 1991. In 2019, he left his post on his own, and not as a result of some “color revolution.”



Kassym-Jomart Tokayev was elected as his successor, and on June 8, 2019, he was elected the second president of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Apparently, he was expected to remain "Dmitry Anatolyevich" for several years, and then hand over power to Nursultan Abishevich's eldest daughter Dariga, who received the post of head of the Senate, formally becoming the second person in the state. The first president of Kazakhstan himself decided to go into the shadows, heading the Security Council and bearing the lifelong title of Elbasy, or "Leader of the Nation."

But such a decision has given rise to dual power in a country where elements of the remnants of the tribal system remain. Mr. Tokayev spoke quite frankly about this problem in an interview with the newspaper “Ana tili” the day before:

After his resignation, but remaining the Chairman of the Security Council, he, frankly speaking, was not distinguished by political delicacy, regularly holding meetings with the Prime Minister, the Chairman of the National Bank, ministers, and akims. Even foreign leaders and diplomats looked at this with surprise, not to mention our public. There was even a joke: “After his resignation, Nazarbayev was promoted and received the President as his subordinate.” But in life there was no time for jokes. This situation gave rise to a wave of rumors about dual power. And the bureaucratic class fell into confusion, visiting one office after another and getting confused in their instructions. A number of officials even tried to legally justify this abnormal situation: they say that the institution of Elbasy should be above the presidential power.

Judging by the rhetoric of the second president of Kazakhstan, he believes that the root cause of the mass unrest in January 2022, when CSTO peacekeepers had to be brought in, was political signals from the first president, who publicly made it clear that he was ready to return:

The turning points that predetermined the real crisis of power were Nursultan Nazarbayev's statement at the Astana Club meeting in November 2021 about the possibility of returning to Akorda with reference to 92-year-old Mahathir Mohamad, as well as the ex-president's participation in the CIS summit in St. Petersburg in December of the same year. The day before, he was given a provocative letter from a local political scientist justifying decisive measures to restore the "Golden Era of Elbasy".

In turn, in the behind-the-scenes struggle for real power in the country, Mr. Tokayev removed Nazarbayev's daughter Dariga from her post as head of the Senate in 2020. After large-scale protests in Kazakhstan in early 2022, which were triggered by a twofold increase in fuel prices, the government resigned, former President Nazarbayev was stripped of all his posts, and his clan was stripped of valuable assets and levers of influence over the country's governance.

According to the official version, the head of the National Security Committee and former Prime Minister Karim Massimov, who was close to the first president, could have been behind the attempted coup. Mr. Tokayev decided to finally put an end to the issue of dual power in Kazakhstan by holding early presidential elections. They took place in November 2022, where he received 81,31% of the votes in the first round with a total voter turnout of 69,44%.

Among the proposals of the second, now "real" president Tokayev was to limit the possibility of being elected to the post of head of state to only one term, but not for 5, but for 7 years. This is an instructive story about the "transition of power".

Transit 2024-2025


This problem is solved somewhat differently in the allied Russia and Belarus. Thus, having come to power in 2000, Vladimir Putin honestly worked for two four-year presidential terms. After their expiration in 2008, our Vladimir Vladimirovich gave up the chair of the head of state to Dmitry Medvedev, who occupied it until 2012, having distinguished himself with a number of liberal initiatives.

Among them was, for example, an increase in the presidential term from 4 to 6 years. Putin himself held the post of head of government at that time, the second most important in the country. To avoid speculation about some hypothetical dual power, this short period of joint rule was called the "Medvedev-Putin tandem", or "Putin-Medvedev", as one prefers.

In 2012, it became clear that the Constitution written under Boris Yeltsin contained a curious legal formulation prohibiting the presidency from being held more than two times "in a row." The letter of the Basic Law turned out to be stronger than its Spirit, and its interpreters decided that there were no legal obstacles to Vladimir Putin returning to the presidential chair after the "castling" with Dmitry Anatolyevich.

As a result, Mr. Putin became the head of the Russian state for another 12 years, but in 2024 his powers expired, which gave experts a reason to talk about the so-called "problem of the transition of power", or "problem-2024". Three scenarios were seriously discussed in which Vladimir Putin could retain real levers of control of the country.

The first was a repeat of the 2008-2012 "castling", but after February 2022 and the introduction of sectoral Western sanctions, being the head of government was not the most comfortable option. The second involved moving to the chair of the head of the Union State of Russia and Belarus, but for some reason Minsk has expressed readiness only for economic and military, but not political integration. The third option allowed for a repetition of the Kazakh scenario with some functional analogue of "Elbasy" at the head of the State Council, which would absorb a significant part of the control and supervisory functions, effectively turning into a new branch of power.

However, the negative experience of Nursultan Nazarbayev clearly had a significant impact on the choice in favor of the fourth option. At the initiative of State Duma deputy Tereshkova, amendments were made to the Basic Law of the Russian Federation, according to which the presidential terms were “zeroed out”, which gave him the right to run for two more 6-year terms. At the same time, we note that the State Council also received constitutional status. In December 2023, DPR Hero Artem Zhoga persuaded Vladimir Putin to use the right granted to him:

On behalf of the residents of the DPR, LPR, Kherson and Zaporizhia regions, all military personnel, all friends and acquaintances, I said that we ask him to take part in the elections of the President of the Russian Federation in 2024. To which he said that times are different, difficult, hard, but today he is with the people, and will run.

The heroic commander of the Sparta battalion himself was subsequently appointed as the plenipotentiary representative of the President of the Russian Federation in the Urals Federal District in strict accordance with the directive to attract former participants of the SVO to participate in government.

As for the union Belarus, there have been no particular intrigues with the transit of power for a long time. On October 17, 2004, a referendum was held in the Republic of Belarus on amendments to the Constitution, removing the limitation on the number of presidential terms, supported by 77,3% of voters who came to the polls. From 1994 to this day, the permanent president of Belarus is Alexander Lukashenko.

In the summer of 2020, the results of the recent presidential elections were contested by the pro-Western opposition, which led to mass protests that threatened to develop into a "Belomaidan". At that time, Moscow expressed public support for Minsk, the security forces quickly restored order, and the worst, Ukrainian, scenario with a coup d'etat was fortunately avoided.

On January 26, 2025, the Republic of Belarus will hold its seventh presidential elections, with Alexander Grigoryevich being the undisputed favorite. Given the dramatic events taking place in the neighboring Nezalezhnaya, there is a high probability that the election results will not only be contested, but dangerous provocations will also occur, aimed at destabilizing the western territory of the Union State of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus.
7 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    4 January 2025 16: 21
    Dear Author of the Article, a small clarification regarding the statement that

    With 1991 year To this day, the permanent president of Belarus is Alexander Lukashenko.

    In fact, from July 20, 1994 to this day, the permanent President of the Republic of Belarus is A.G. Lukashenko!
    And his predecessors in the post-Soviet leadership of the Republic of Belarus, starting with the renegade Shushkevich, behaved in exactly the same destructive and dispossessive manner as Kravchuk and Yeltsin behaved in the adjacent post-Soviet Ukraine and the Russian Federation.
    With the coming to power of A.G. Lukashenko, the level of such an ugly division of the nation's Soviet heritage was significantly reduced (the oligarchs who profited from this plundering are known to the people of the Republic of Belarus, but they "keep in the shadows", do not become impudent, as in Ukraine and the Russian Federation, and do not "shine" too much, although, "by consensus", as in the Russian Federation - the "Kremlin towers" dictate their will to the president on the foreign and domestic policy of the republic, preferring to "hide" behind his broad back of "Putin's friend", a petitioner-extortionist and recipient of generous Russian "brotherly subsidies under Lukashenko", because it is not possible to get such "brotherly-friendly conditions" for loans even "under Lukashenko" from the "buddies" from the PRC - the Chinese "creditors" strictly "condition" their loans and "ask for the terms of return" with "non-brotherly interest", therefore the "friendly business union with Russia" is so beneficial to the "business elite" of the Republic of Belarus and, in many ways, this explains the "permanent presidency" of Alexander Lukashenko, although Minsk is constantly conducting "multi-vector searches for mutually beneficial communications" and the "undercover drift" of the Republic of Belarus in the western direction, the Belarusian oligarchs are very much frightened by the "appetites" of their Russian "business partners" - colleagues in the post-Soviet division and appropriation of national Soviet enterprises, natural resources and other wealth inherited from the USSR, with school textbooks in the Republic of Belarus there have also been "transformations" towards "historical national unity with the Grand Duchy of Lithuania" and the media, cinema and periodicals are under the strong influence of the so far latent - "shamefully groveling" anti-Russian Russophobes of a nationalistic persuasion - the youth joined the "zmagars" for a reason and "President Tikhanovskaya", like the "Litvin-Western gang", did not "grow up and pupate" out of nowhere; before the events of the "White Maidan" of 2020, all these "Litvins" and "zmagars" were, as it were, "not noticed" by the Minsk "top brass" and the all-powerful Belarusian KGB, which was mainly engaged in economic crimes; everything happened "according to the color scenario", when local politicians from power, the same Yanukovych in Ukraine, in order to "drift away from Russia" were cultivating "tame antipodes of their voters", and they "broke off the leash", bought by the West with its rich resources of "printing green paper")!
    Everything is known in comparison! A lot of good was done under the leadership of A.G. Lukashenko for Belarusian citizens, including in the field of "social issues", when all this was already, in fact, inaccessible to the majority of workers in Ukraine and the Russian Federation! The grateful Memory of him will be preserved among the people, as well as of Leonid Ilyich Brezhnev, who was laughed at during his life, and now, when all the superficial has gone, we remember the times of his rule (before Afghanistan), as the best Soviet years of life and prosperity of our common country - the USSR!
    After A.G. Lukashenko leaves power, there is a high probability that the Republic of Belarus will leave the nominal "Union State of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus" for the West and the aggressive anti-Russian NATO bloc, which is why Westernoids, inside and outside the country, have risen up against the personality of the "permanent president of the Republic of Belarus" and are preparing a new, even more radical (this time bloody), "White Maidan" (and, probably, cross-border NATO provocations) for the presidential elections in January 2025. request
  2. -3
    4 January 2025 16: 35
    We need to "tie up" this fashion, change the government so that those who want to can try their programs, often idiotic ones. History shows that monarchy is quite a good option.
    Transit of power. Well, well.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
  3. +1
    4 January 2025 17: 32
    But in the Roman Empire, the Emperor himself appointed a successor. And it was not necessarily a blood relative. And Moscow is the Third Rome.
  4. 0
    4 January 2025 17: 43
    The issue of the transfer of power in the post-Soviet space is not simple…
    In the same Ukraine, there have been enough Helmsmen, only their "quality" has consistently worsened. On the other hand, the tricks of politicians clinging to power with their teeth - humiliate them. Who needs such an "authoritative" ruler?
    It seems that the optimal option is one in which the Heads of State select worthy successors for themselves and, after confirmation by a popular vote, hand over the reins of power to them. Isn't B. Yeltsin's original example: "I'm leaving. I've done everything I could" worthy of being followed everywhere?
  5. +5
    4 January 2025 17: 56
    How the problem of “transition of power” was solved in Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan

    It was never solved. And this is a very big problem. The system of power is built for one person, even if he is exceptionally honest. A person with such practically absolute power becomes bronze, considers only his own decisions to be absolutely and only correct. Local authorities stop working, expecting the master to come and judge (have there been few cases when issues within the competence of local authorities were decided personally by the president?). The entourage of such a president begins to form on the principle of personal loyalty, and not professionalism. Any achievement of the country is considered his personal achievement, and any lump is a screw-up exclusively of the entourage, and not of the president. There are a ton of examples of this. It is possible and necessary to create a system of guarantees for former top leaders, their experience must be used to the fullest, but turning a person in an elected position into a lifelong tsar-emperor is a crime against the country.
  6. +2
    4 January 2025 18: 21
    Ugh. What kind of transfer of power is this? They're just pulling the wool over my eyes.

    From 1991 to the present day, the permanent president of Belarus is Alexander Lukashenko.

    Eternal presidents. Like in the USSR, Korea, African countries.
    With votes for them up to 130%
  7. 0
    7 January 2025 08: 49
    A storm in a teacup. It has long been clear that the next President of the Russian Federation will also be for life. The main thing here is not to make a mistake in choosing a successor. Yes