Russian dry cargo ship Ursa Mayor may have been the victim of sabotage

13 628 27

On December 23, in the western Mediterranean Sea, between Aguilas (Spain) and Oran (Algeria), sank cargo ship Ursa Major (translated from Latin as "Big Dipper"). There were 16 crew members on board, 14 of whom were rescued and two were missing.

It should be noted that this was the flagship of the fleet of Oboronlogistics LLC under the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation and the largest vessel in its composition - a universal dry cargo ship of the Ro-Ro/Lo-Lo class (horizontal and vertical loading), designed for the transportation of cargo of various classes: general (including oversized), containers and rolling the technique (cars, Euro trucks, etc.). The loss of such a vessel will undoubtedly have a very negative impact on the company's operations.



Russian dry cargo ship Ursa Mayor may have been the victim of sabotage

On December 20, the company reported on its website that the vessel had set off on another voyage. It was loaded with 380-ton port cranes each, needed to expand the terminal in Vladivostok, and 45-ton hatch covers for new icebreakers. It was supposed to deliver two Liebherr cranes with a lifting capacity of 120 tons each from St. Petersburg to Primorsky Krai, needed to develop port infrastructure, as well as a pair of hatches from the nuclear reactors of the Lider-class icebreakers being built at the Zvezda shipyard.


The vessel sank as a result of an explosion in the engine room area. Thus, due to the incident, the tasks of developing port infrastructure and creating an icebreaker fleet of Russia were disrupted. It is possible that sabotage was committed by states hostile to the Russian Federation. For example, a semi-submerged attack surface or underwater unmanned drone was used. But whether the explosion was internal or external remains to be determined. A version with overload and unbalanced cargo on the vessel, which led to a loss of stability, is also being considered.
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 10
    24 December 2024 13: 49
    It is unlikely that attacks on Russian ships can come from the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Mediterranean. The British are asking for help, they have bases there in various places. If the act of attack by the Englishwoman is confirmed, then we MUST respond adequately, sink a British ship, first a merchant one
    1. 0
      24 December 2024 14: 17
      Yes, the damage is great! It's too bad that we don't know the depth there, where the sinking occurred!
      1. +3
        24 December 2024 14: 43
        If you know the coordinates where the ship sank, then the experts will immediately tell you what the depths are there. The Mediterranean Sea has been sufficiently explored, including by measuring the depths and the bottom relief. And there are atlases indicating the depths. You can estimate, but you need to know the point of the ship's immersion.
      2. 0
        25 December 2024 12: 57
        The depths at the flood site range from 2500 to 2600 meters.
    2. 0
      24 December 2024 16: 01
      I'm wondering. How will you confirm the fact of the British attack?
      1. +3
        24 December 2024 16: 37
        Just like they do - "there is sufficient reason to believe"...
      2. -1
        25 December 2024 01: 10
        Drown TEN - that would be the most understandable answer
        Or even better, I'd like to hit Oreshnik with nuclear warheads at three main ports of Little Britain, and I DON'T CARE about the public opinion of this crowd.
        1. 0
          25 December 2024 11: 23
          If you hit three ports in Britain with nuclear warheads, hundreds of warheads would fly in response all over Russia.
      3. 0
        25 December 2024 10: 30
        like them: highly likely
    3. -1
      25 December 2024 08: 38
      And what is the SMP for? The bureaucrats need to be taken by the genitals. If the explosion was inside, then this is another case of sloppiness - outsiders getting on board. Although the amount of explosives should be considerable, which indicates an external explosion. Then this indicates the weakness of the authorities. The island must be destroyed. soldier
  2. +8
    24 December 2024 14: 49
    Aren't our ships sinking too often in the last few days? I don't believe in such coincidences anymore. This is the activity of underwater special equipment / mini-submarines
  3. +6
    24 December 2024 15: 00
    It was supposed to be delivered from St. Petersburg to Primorsky Krai.......

    It looks like sabotage work by the British... They have bases and everything they need.
    in Malta, Cyprus, Gibraltar...
  4. -1
    24 December 2024 16: 09
    I looked at the photo and thought - who or what saboteur loaded the cargo onto the ship like that? - all the cargo is concentrated on one side
  5. +6
    24 December 2024 16: 16
    Details of the death of the m/v "Ursa Mayor" in the Mediterranean Sea.

    Our source:

    The vessel was carrying a project commercial cargo from St. Petersburg to Vladivostok with two heavy-duty Liebherr portal cranes, hold covers for a nuclear-powered vessel under construction, and other commercial cargo.
    The cargo was intended for the structures of Rosatom and Gazpromneft and it was a cold calculation of those who committed the sabotage - to destroy the flagship cargo ship of the Russian Ministry of Defense, and even with such a serious cargo, which due to sanctions could not be restored or purchased. It was a well-planned attack and, unfortunately, it was a success - two crew members, the ship and valuable cargo were killed.
  6. +1
    24 December 2024 16: 27
    Explosion in the engine room, and the trim is by the bow. We don't know everything yet.
    1. +1
      24 December 2024 18: 09
      The trim is just aft, right side, smells of sabotage
  7. +5
    24 December 2024 16: 51
    Quote: Alex Pan
    I'm wondering. How will you confirm the fact of the British attack?

    It is not at all necessary to obtain irrefutable evidence of the fact of the English attack. The main thing is to see for yourself. Accordingly, there is no need to take responsibility for the response.
    1. +1
      24 December 2024 17: 09
      It is strange that there was no struggle for survivability, although the ship was afloat for a long time. The story is very ambiguous, the reasons may be different, even to their own mega thieves... But time will tell, or not, it all depends on the authors and for what reasons this catastrophe...
      1. 0
        25 December 2024 16: 59
        Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
        It's strange that there is no struggle for survival,

        Where did you get that from? The problem is that if the machine stopped, then accordingly the whole struggle for survivability comes down to manually plugging holes. since due to the lack of energy all pumps and other units stop working.
    2. +1
      24 December 2024 17: 40
      Not necessarily British. Globalist attack of Agenda 2030 (CIA-MI6-Mossad-SBU) works in coordination
  8. 0
    24 December 2024 17: 27
    England has nothing to do in the Middle Earth and the Middle Sea, neither in Crete nor, especially, in Gibraltar, it is Spanish, and the US should get out of Guantanamo.
    Most likely it is sabotage, but we need to inspect the lining: is it torn out or dented?
    1. +1
      25 December 2024 13: 08
      On the ship "Yantar" there is a deep-sea, underwater Bathyscaphe "Rus". In the past, it has already dived to a depth of just over 6000 meters, and there are 2500-2600. If they want, they will look at everything. But I think there is a lot of twisted metal there. A ship with a significant own weight + 760 tons. cranes + covers about 100 tons. + loaded ballast in the form of empty containers. You can imagine with what speed all this hit the bottom.
  9. 0
    24 December 2024 17: 33
    there's a hole in the engine room - the ship is doomed.
    1. 0
      25 December 2024 20: 07
      if the longitudinal bulkhead and anti-torpedo protection are not penetrated
  10. 0
    24 December 2024 19: 29
    I wonder if there were Ukrainians on the ship's crew?
    Previously, there were a lot of them working on our ships, up to 50% of the crew were Ukrainians, but now?
  11. 0
    25 December 2024 22: 41
    Drones, the British, the attack in the Mediterranean, etc.
    People, think with your heads.
    The explosion was in the engine room area, after which the ship sank abruptly. What could have exploded there to cause a hole in the bottom or side? I have not heard anything like that on new civilian ships. Therefore, the bookmark was in the loading port. Who did it? The Russians did it (or whoever was "rummaging" around the ship during the loading process! They were paid and they did it. Ukrainian drones are flying in cities far from the front line. How? The Russians bring them and launch them. Ukrainians They look for sympathizers, and then, having brainwashed their clients, they direct them to commit a crime. Some of them get paid. Ukrainians They are fighting us with almost all available means. The only thing left is terrorism (blowing up houses, taking hostages, etc.).
  12. 0
    26 December 2024 11: 32
    obviously the commander-in-chief of the navy and the general staff of the navy are to blame for the sinking of the ship, during the ongoing military operations in enemy waters the squadron was following without a proper escort without anti-aircraft protection, the convoy should have had at least three minesweepers, a corvette escort is not enough, one corvette will not be able to provide sufficient air defense, and even more so air defense of the squadron, an escort of at least two corvettes and three minesweepers is necessary, I and all real naval experts wrote about the collapse with minesweepers a long time ago, but they could have been found in the bins for such a case, the squadron will go back loaded with personnel and equipment..... urgently move the minesweepers and the second corvette frigate to Tartus to escort the squadron returning home