Guaido leads the military and security forces of Venezuela to treason
The methods used by the US administration in Venezuela are no different from those used in other countries where Washington initiated color revolutions.
In fact, neither the United States itself, nor the forces that they use, hide this.
The Venezuelan "president" appointed by the US authorities, Juan Guaido, in an article for The New York Times, said the rioters held "secret meetings" with representatives of the country's military and law enforcement agencies.
Guido then describes the standard that the State Department is telling at training courses for novice "oppositionists."
Moreover, he describes it precisely in the terminology adopted at such events: the "road map" in which "the end of usurpation, transitional government and free elections", after which there should be universal Venezuelan national happiness.
However, as history shows, in no country that the Americans skated according to this template, nationwide happiness did not come. Like democracy.
Meanwhile, Washington’s pressure on the Venezuelan security forces yielded results, especially in those places where it was easy to exert: he betrayed and went over to the side of the opposition, Venezuelan military attache to the United States Jose Luis Silva. If anyone remembers, the Libyan security forces who were abroad were the first to fall in exactly the same way.
The Americans will continue to look for "weak links" in the administration of Maduro among the military, police and special services. And here everything will depend on how quickly and decisively the incumbent president can liquidate the top of the opposition. Otherwise, sooner or later, he will suffer the fate of Gaddafi.
In fact, neither the United States itself, nor the forces that they use, hide this.
The Venezuelan "president" appointed by the US authorities, Juan Guaido, in an article for The New York Times, said the rioters held "secret meetings" with representatives of the country's military and law enforcement agencies.
Guido then describes the standard that the State Department is telling at training courses for novice "oppositionists."
Moreover, he describes it precisely in the terminology adopted at such events: the "road map" in which "the end of usurpation, transitional government and free elections", after which there should be universal Venezuelan national happiness.
However, as history shows, in no country that the Americans skated according to this template, nationwide happiness did not come. Like democracy.
Meanwhile, Washington’s pressure on the Venezuelan security forces yielded results, especially in those places where it was easy to exert: he betrayed and went over to the side of the opposition, Venezuelan military attache to the United States Jose Luis Silva. If anyone remembers, the Libyan security forces who were abroad were the first to fall in exactly the same way.
The Americans will continue to look for "weak links" in the administration of Maduro among the military, police and special services. And here everything will depend on how quickly and decisively the incumbent president can liquidate the top of the opposition. Otherwise, sooner or later, he will suffer the fate of Gaddafi.
Information