Japan: All four islands are ours

12
While society in Russia is excited by the discussion of the idea of ​​concluding a peace treaty with Japan and fears that part of the Kuril Islands might be transferred to Tokyo's control, the Japanese leadership does not demonstrate peace-loving moods. There is only one thing behind the rhetoric of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who has often visited Moscow, about the prospects for cooperation between the two countries - the desire to get the Kuril Islands.





Speaking to the lower house of the Japanese parliament on January 30, Abe called the islands "northern territories" and stated that Tokyo continues to regard them as their original lands.

He also said that in order to sign a peace treaty with Russia, Japan insists on determining the ownership of all four islands - Iturup, Kunashir, Shikotan and Habomai.

Northern territories are our lands. No changes to this position.

- said Abe.

At present, the Prime Minister noted, the parties are conducting a dialogue based on "all agreements reached to date," but the Japan-Soviet Declaration of 1956 remains the only document ratified by Moscow and Tokyo.

The ninth article of this document assumes the continuation of negotiations on the conclusion of a peace treaty and determines that after its signing, the Habomai ridge and the island of Shikotan will be transferred to Japan

- said Abe.

It turns out that at first glance, there is a certain contradiction in the position of the head of the Japanese government. On the one hand, he calls all the Kuril Islands “his territory,” on the other hand, he relies on a document in which he talked about transferring only Shikotan and Habomai, and even that on certain conditions. Unfortunately, there is really no contradiction. This resembles the predator’s desire to grab at least a person’s finger, so that in the future - bite off the whole hand. Only one question arises: is it possible to have a serious business with such a partner and to trust his promises? For example, solemn assurances that the US military bases will not be deployed on the islands.
  • regnum.ru
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

12 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    30 January 2019 12: 47
    Japan insists on the ownership of all four islands to sign a peace treaty with Russia

    The question is different. And then why do we need this peace treaty ???? To give the islands ??? Or the Japanese who need it (from our government) did not promise a frail pullback ??? Something suspiciously, we started talking that it would be necessary to give the islands and this topic all rises.
  2. +5
    30 January 2019 12: 56
    How many yapas do not feed ....... The Japanese always have a bosom for Russia. You can never tame them. America has long understood this. What idiots had the idea of ​​negotiating with the Japanese? Tell the surname! We have the 5th column in the government. Marching without any fear.
  3. +5
    30 January 2019 13: 02
    is it possible to have a serious business with such a partner and to trust his promises? For example, solemn assurances that the US military bases will not be deployed on the islands.

    What are you writing about? "Army and Navy are our friends" Alexander's words have not lost their relevance for centuries.
  4. +1
    30 January 2019 13: 42
    Quote: Vladimir Khrebtov
    Marching without fear

    They believe that the hemp factories are also theirs - at night, clandestinely from the stolen raw materials "ties" will be wound !!!
  5. DPN
    +2
    30 January 2019 13: 59
    Who are the rulers? The head that should please everyone and he has to wriggle so that the state is calm. What would happen if all of their negative decrees were approved before the election? Abe is also Japanese.
    And these charter flights maintain a tone among residents of both states. We freak out, and the Japanese rejoice that the rulers are NECESSARY, keep everyone in check.
  6. +6
    30 January 2019 14: 06
    This Abe is not a relative of Poroshenko for an hour? One reads the mantra about the Kuril Islands, the other about the Crimea ... It is necessary to remind the Yaps that the island of Hokkaido is originally Russian land, before the revolution there lived Ainu with Russian passports, which the Yapes later evicted and generally arranged genocide for them ....
  7. +2
    30 January 2019 14: 18
    In the cold capital
    Where, like a sakura blossom is snow,
    Kuril drove samurai lips. (FROM)
  8. +3
    30 January 2019 20: 13
    Eh, listen, dear, it was yours - it became ours! And soon Hokkaido is chopping off - get ready to recognize the new Ainu Republic as part of the Russian Federation!
  9. +2
    31 January 2019 13: 30
    send them in the ass. what for us this peace treaty?
  10. wax
    +3
    31 January 2019 15: 16
    What does the native Japanese have to do with it? And what about the border between Germany and Poland, or France and the FRG? There was no point in getting involved in the war to conquer non-native Japanese territories and losing it. If you Japanese are so proud and principled, then what are the Americans doing on your native land? I don’t understand why we need to talk to an American satellite on this topic for "cookies".
  11. +1
    31 January 2019 17: 04
    The Japanese appetites are growing right before our eyes, it has already become obvious that it is time to stop all this stupid fuss around our Kuril Islands legally belonging to Russia, this has gone too far and all further conversations and all kinds of negotiations on the transfer of the Kuril Islands to Japan should be stopped urgently, it only undermines our national interests and at least absolutely does not give Russia any advantages. For seventy years we have lived quietly without this notorious peace treaty with Japan, we will live quite well without it, and just as much, this treaty is simply not worth it.
  12. 0
    31 January 2019 21: 34
    A Huhu is not hoho?