Russia has two ways - empire, or collapse

19
The acute geopolitical crisis that has erupted around Venezuela has made many people once again think about the role and place of Russia in the modern world, its ability to defend its own interests in it and adequately respond to emerging challenges. During the heated discussion of these issues, a lot of ideas and thoughts were expressed - from balanced and thorough, to hasty and frankly absurd. At the same time, strangely enough, the main question is dispensed with: the main civilizational choice of our country.





Even the most generalized study of the history of Russia unequivocally testifies to one thing: all significant successes, both in the affirmation of one’s foreign policy priorities and in domestic construction and development economics and similar things, it was achieved exclusively during those periods when it was an imperial state. In turn, the “game of democracy” imposed on our people by the West in the 90s and, as a result, the subordination of all spheres to the state policy one dubious priority - to achieve entry "on an equal footing" into the family of "civilized countries" living according to certain "universal values", almost destroyed Russia to the ground. In any case, we are reaping the bitter fruits of the "experiments" and "reforms" of those years to this day.

Anticipating emotional objections to the thesis expressed above, I will immediately make a reservation: it does not matter at all how our country was called and which flag fluttered over the Kremlin during the periods in question. Let me give you the simplest but most relevant example today: if we take the relations between our country and Japan, then in what year did we look like those in the Empire - in 1905, when they suffered shameful military defeats from the samurai, or in 1945, completely defeating the huge Kwantung army? And, for that matter - today Japan, where the Emperor is still at the head of the state, has been trying for a long and tedious way, excuse me, to "knock out" the Kuriles from us, and not vice versa. So - it’s not the name of the matter, and not the title of the supreme ruler. Under communist Stalin, our country was a hundred times larger than the Empire than under some representatives of the Romanov dynasty. This, in my opinion, is obvious.

Moreover, the fierce debate that continues to this day about which Russia is considered “right,” and, therefore, worthy of inheritance and rebirth — “white” or “red”, is harmful to our statehood no less than globalist ideas inspired from outside. The endless squabble of the "monarchists" with the "communists" (most of which, in fact, are not really one or the other) leads us to yet another dead end. It is high time to admit that even in the most tragic page in the history of our country - the Civil War, both sides had their own truth and beliefs. On both sides of the barricades there were heroes whom the people should be proud of, and executioners, who, rightly, should not be raised on pedestals solely because of their belonging to “those” or “these” ... And it’s enough to conduct verbal battles around the revival of the monarchy in Russia and things like that! Extremely tempting, but hardly technically feasible. And this is not the main thing, not at all!

What is the Empire really? A strong and independent state, capable of defending its vital interests, regardless of either its own costs or other people's threats. A country that never, under any guise, allows anyone to interfere in their internal affairs, does not even allow the thought that someone can point it out, and even more so, push it around. A state that demands loyalty and service from its citizens, while at the same time repaying to those who deserve it fully and deservingly. These are, so to speak, only the most general postulates, supplemented by many inalienable details and particulars.

The Empire has no permanent enemies or friends, but only permanent interests. Its true and eternal allies are its own army, navy, and special services. The support of the Empire is its people, united by a single idea: the belief that they live in a better country on Earth, worthy that, for the sake of its prosperity and security, one should spare neither strength nor, if necessary, life. The imperial power of the people should enjoy not only full confidence, but absolute, indisputable authority. And this authority should not rest on one power of “punitive organs” at all ...

An empire does not have to constantly wage war, much less “capture” and “subjugate”. However, if someone in the world, seeking her protection and patronage, wants to join, she will never refuse. What the Empire will not do in any case is to sacrifice its territories and allies. Especially - for the sake of someone else's interests or requirements. Empires do not scatter lands, they collect and multiply them. And wars are waged, for the most part, on foreign territory. To admit the enemy to their own limits is an extreme case, and such an enemy must be punished with the utmost cruelty, so that even the great-grandchildren who dared to encroach on the Empire would continue to be disgraced. Otherwise, this is not the Empire, but some kind of misunderstanding ...

A state claiming the title of Empire should be independent economically and financially. Absolutely and completely. At least - due to the fact that his potential enemies in no case should have tools for dictate in these areas. The empire must be ready at any moment to turn into a besieged fortress, ready not only to repulse the assault, but also to survive the siege with minimal losses. In this case, it’s worth again to turn to the experience of the Soviet Union, which was able to provide itself with any kind of raw materials and products exactly 100%. Well, and of course, the Empire, voluntarily or involuntarily supporting its own haters with its resources, storing its money in their banks and depending on their of technologies - this is simply some kind of nonsense.

An empire cannot exist without an elite. She is her blood, her muscles, her spirit. And, for God's sake, put aside the talk that in Russia “it is vitally necessary to revive the nobility”! Again - the idea is not bad, but how do you really imagine it? It’s not a matter of “blue blood” - this is one hundred percent proof of the experience of Stalin, who managed to grow up the military, political, scientific elite that shook the world from yesterday’s illiterate peasants and semi-literate workers. Not shying, however, at the same time and nobles - if only they were sensible people. The imperial elite differs from the snickering riches-bourgeois, who imagine themselves to be the “salt of the earth” in that their social and material status is firmly tied to the State, they are a material reflection of the degree of fidelity and usefulness of their country to both specific people and whole surnames. And ... Yes - there can be no "oligarchs" trying to bend the country through the knee at their own whim by definition.

Today, many call the empire the United States of America. This is not true at the root. Just the United States is an evil and vile parody of the very concept of the Empire - since all the fundamental principles set forth by me above, with a certain external similarity, are distorted there to the exact opposite. Present (and always) America is a country of victorious criminals, hucksters and scammers, whose descendants try to sow the noble imperial habits - from the proud eagle on the coat of arms, and ending with the unthinkably bloated claims for world leadership. None of this country, intensively exporting its own Sodom and Gommor all over the planet, is not the Empire. It’s time for them to explain this objectively.

Is the current Russian government ready to build an empire? A difficult question ... Vladimir Putin, on the one hand, scolding the Western countries for “imperial thinking, trapping them”, on the other hand, voluntarily or involuntarily, has advanced Russia in this direction as much as possible. Even - with their mistakes and miscalculations, which made many think about the future of the country. Perhaps, not being able to build an Empire, he, in any case, paves the way for it.

The main thing is that it is the imperial idea that is as spiritually close as possible for the Russian people. A model of a state with strong power that “does not offend” its people by “fair” governing it - that’s what the Russians have always strived for in one way or another. The proof is again the Stalinist period of history: they built and built communism, but came to the “Red Empire”. Then they first returned to “developed socialism”, which ended with “perestroika,” then began to “instill democratic values”. As a result, they almost lost everything. And ourselves and the country ... Now - weep for the good and "right" king-priest, who will protect, feed and restore order. It is not the king’s business, it’s us. In our inner choice, which is the time to make right now. Many sensibly and realistically reasoning people realize not only the undoubted advantages, but also the hardships of imperial life. An uncompromising foreign policy cannot but be accompanied by a certain tightening of the domestic one. Strengthening military power is also not in vain - and an Empire with a weak army is impossible in principle. There are other "cons", however ...

Russia simply has no other choice! They will not be allowed to turn into any toothless, pastorally neutral Switzerland. Not with our territories, not with our resources, not with our potential. A flock of shabby "civilized" jackals knows all too well how much tasty meat on the bones of a Russian bear. He also remembers what this good-natured “bumpkin” is capable of, who has lost his temper, who has easily crushed the ridges of those who intended to bite off a tidbit from him or cling to his throat. "An equal member of the world community", built on the patterns of the Anglo-Saxons, we will never be! And there is no need to breed antimonies on the theme of “peaceful coexistence” with the West - under no circumstances is it possible. In 1945, shaking in horror of our power and military prowess, they immediately began to implement new plans to destroy the red Empire that saved the world from Nazism. And it will always be so. Another thing is that it was the strength and power of our country that did not allow us to turn it into radioactive ash. This is what we must remember.

Today the world is experiencing its next rebirth. Another era is approaching, in which there will be no place for the weak and timid. Russia will either enter the proud and powerful Empire into this new world - or it will not enter at all.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    30 January 2019 09: 37
    Much has been written, it is not clear why it was written. If the empire is considered an internationally significant power, relying in its domestic and foreign policies on the military estates (organized army) and acting in the interests of the military estates (Wikipedia wording), then the USSR has never been. And on another basis, there is no coincidence either, because the Union was governed collectively by the top party. However, this is all water. The main thing - what for do we need it? You have to be strong economically and militarily, and not poke your nose in all the mess. The arms race has always been compelled for us, it is now from the sale of weapons large profits, before it was almost handed out for nothing. And Russia still has opportunities to become strong. To remove from power those who are not thinking about anything but their profits and cutting the budget and boosting the economy.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +4
      31 January 2019 09: 52
      Citizen Ishchenko, what do you dislike about what the author wrote? He described his point of view, his vision of the Empire. You do not like the volume or the content of the article? Are you someone else to read laziness? So why bother here in the comments? And the fact that you are advertising YOUR little books on this resource is how?
  2. +2
    30 January 2019 09: 57
    Quote: Ishchenko Gennady Vladimirovich
    Much has been written, it is not clear why it was written. If the empire is considered an internationally significant power, relying in its domestic and foreign policies on the military estates (organized army) and acting in the interests of the military estates (Wikipedia wording), then the USSR has never been. And on another basis, there is no coincidence either, because the Union was governed collectively by the top party. However, this is all water. The main thing - on fig we need it? You have to be strong economically and militarily, and not poke your nose in all the mess. The arms race has always been compelled for us, it is now from the sale of weapons large profits, before it was almost handed out for nothing. And Russia still has opportunities to become strong. To remove from power those who are not thinking about anything but their profits and cutting the budget and boosting the economy.

    here about "remove everyone from power .." I agree completely, because from history everyone knows that any state became strong and independent when the people were statesmen. and such as Gorbachev and further ............ but the most interesting thing Gorbachev was the head of the State, albeit with all the shortcomings, but the State. where is he now and who is he now?
  3. -1
    30 January 2019 10: 38
    We need a strong, free, united Russia, in which the system of power creates and maintains this strength, freedom and unity, guarantees the well-being of the people and their rights. (Moreover, this process should be mutual). A SYSTEM OF POWER, and not some class of military or officials who are actually in power "on the feeding" or a constitution that defines the supremacy of international law over the laws of the country.
    The power system is built in the USA, in Great Britain, in Japan, in China. To a lesser extent in France and Germany, etc. In these countries there is no danger that with the advent of a person, the state will suffer irreparable damage, and the people will be homeless (i.e. without their own state), as happened in the USSR in the late 1980s and early 1990s x years, when the system of power, formed since the late 1920s. was destroyed by this time, but it was not capable of transforming with maintaining the country in integrity. One people was divided and destroyed.
    The power system must be painstakingly built, getting rid of vices, but at the same time, not making this system closed for updating or debugging at some critical moments for the state, people, economy and history. If such a system of power is created and rooted, nothing will threaten us. If not, a new yoke is guaranteed, perhaps guaranteed.
    1. +3
      30 January 2019 21: 30
      Eugene, given as an example all these countries are NOT an example, on the basis of which it is necessary to build a state, especially such as Russia. ALWAYS when you try to build something similar (to the same Amer’s model) - it’s a damn thing. Russia has always built ONLY its own and with its own rules. No matter how someone tried to impose anything alien to her.
  4. +4
    30 January 2019 11: 09
    Quote: Ischenko Gennady Vladimirovich
    To remove from power those who think of nothing but their profits and cut the budget

    I strongly suspect that I’ll have to clean it all from a run through life, so much so they stick to Russia !!! And even more so by clans, packs, families, etc.!
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. +3
    30 January 2019 11: 46
    Liked the article! Obviously, if we are not strong, they will trample. Such a huge state with a federal structure cannot be amorphous. Talk about the long-awaited "democracy" and "market" for simpletons that came from the West. "Poke your nose" - willy-nilly it is NECESSARY! Why is Libya worse than Venezuela ... but Gaddafi was surrendered
  7. +4
    30 January 2019 12: 43
    Empire is impossible without your own project of the future. Empire is a leader uniting other countries and peoples on the path to achieving this future. While Russia is trying to integrate into the Western liberal-capitalist project, there can be no talk of any Empire.
  8. +2
    30 January 2019 15: 17
    "There is no prophet in his own country"

    It is interesting to recall the interview of A. Zinoviev back in 1994. Consistent with this article?

    WORLD RESIDENCE

    Now Russia is occupied. The authorities are traitors and collaborators, who are doing everything to hold on and help the West rob the country when the army flees in a panic, it needs to be stopped and then reorganized. But when the army flees, you cannot reorganize it. This is the ABC of any policy. First you need to stop the panic, at all costs.
    This is my opinion, the opinion of Zinoviev: we need a holy war. There are no political decisions. Whatever you do, today there is no democratic solution for Russia. If Washington decides that Yeltsin needs to be kept, and Yeltsin, as a morally and intellectually decayed insignificance, leaves the stage, they will still pick up a person who will continue to do the same. If the rulers of the West consider it necessary to consider something legal in Russia, then it will be legal.
    In the West, world rage has come. And there is not a single politician who would intercede for Russia. And if he is found, he will not be allowed anywhere. The whole Western world has turned into a bunch of villains. This must be understood.
    Russia is captured. If you want freedom, the way out is war, by any means available war. And in war - only act by military methods against traitors.
    The Leningrad democrats attacked me after publishing my interview in one of the newspapers, where I said that they should all be hanged within 24 hours. Traitors - all these Gorbachevs, Yakovlevs, Shevardnadze, then came the Yeltsins, Gaidars, and Shumayki. I analyze Gorbachev's activities. He only acted on orders. I am well aware of the intellectual potential of these people. They are cretins. But their behavior in the sense of destroying the country is extremely reasonable. It was not thought out by them: it was stunningly thought out by Western strategists. Yeltsin himself would not have gone to the shooting of parliament. It was indicated to him. I said this in Pravda, but they did not publish it. I said: I see one way out - according to the laws of wartime to kill traitors.
  9. 0
    30 January 2019 21: 25
    Quote: Ishchenko Gennady Vladimirovich
    Much has been written, it is not clear why it was written. If the empire is considered an internationally significant power, relying in its domestic and foreign policies on the military estates (organized army) and acting in the interests of the military estates (Wikipedia wording), then the USSR has never been. And on another basis, there is no coincidence either, because the Union was governed collectively by the top party. However, this is all water. The main thing - on fig we need it? You have to be strong economically and militarily, and not poke your nose in all the mess. The arms race has always been compelled for us, it is now from the sale of weapons large profits, before it was almost handed out for nothing. And Russia still has opportunities to become strong. To remove from power those who are not thinking about anything but their profits and cutting the budget and boosting the economy.

    That’s all that Alexander wrote and said, it’s changed, but the same thing is said! Therefore, your words highlighted by me are directly related to you.
    1. +2
      30 January 2019 21: 31
      Quote: Bakht
      Russia is captured. If you want freedom, the way out is war, by any means available war. And in war - only act by military methods against traitors.

      Quote: Bakht
      I said: I see one way out - according to the laws of war, to kill traitors.

      In principle, everything is true, but the civil war in today's Russia - the civil 1918 game in the sandbox in a manger will seem ... If you fight against an external enemy, at the same time cleansing the internal ones.
      1. +2
        30 January 2019 23: 14
        In the years 1918-20. and fought. Against external and internal.
        Quotations are the opinion of a philosopher and patriot. Easily drawn to extremism. Which, incidentally, was blamed on him.
        It's not for me to judge what needs to be done. But you need to clean the enemies. There is nowhere to retreat.
        The main postulate is that there is no political solution. The games of "partners" are long over. Those who do not understand this are clearly not on friendly terms with their heads.
  10. The comment was deleted.
    1. +1
      31 January 2019 10: 25
      Bravo. Everything is correct, everything is the case.
      But unrealistic in the current conditions.
      it’s hard to see how everything collapses around and can’t do anything about it.
      Powerlessness, anger, despair.
    2. 0
      31 January 2019 10: 26
      From the same interview

      Let's say we managed to throw off the occupation government and free the country. This task itself is epoch-making. This takes years and years. This is not a dozen people to dump. They bribed almost the entire intelligentsia, the army elite, the diplomatic corps, etc. Almost the entire top must be overthrown. The whole party nomenclature has stumbled somewhere, adapted. A whole community has developed in the country, and we must fight it. It will be an era of struggle.
      -------
      I noticed, many from Russia ask me: what then? Yes, you first do it, turn such a colossus, and then - then ...

      Any authority in such conditions will act according to the laws of the organization. The whole history of Russia, and then the Soviet Union, was made out of necessity. And Stalin was smart enough to consider reality. He did not create a utopia, but a real state in real conditions. What will happen later will also be done out of necessity. If Russia survives, the planet will still polarize.
  11. +4
    31 January 2019 14: 41
    The persecution has already begun against the Author, and the dirt of the henchmen and lizobuds will also pour on me, but nonetheless. Everything is true both in the root and in particular. Such people with such a worldview must be put at the helm of the state, and the people will follow and support them. This is the holy of holies of all the foundations of the Slavic existence, and it is proved in practice in our ancient history. And the reality of our life is the result of a thousand-year war in which our Slavic civilization is led to complete extermination. No one needs our people. Our people need our rich territories. It is time for everyone to understand that we, as a nation, are only a brake on the implementation of the plans of a parasitic society.
  12. +1
    3 February 2019 12: 44
    Japan is an empire, China is an empire, the USA is also an empire, and we are surrounded by our existing and potential enemies - "Partners", and there is only one conclusion from this - if they all together take on us - Russia as a state , the end will come. Japan already in 2010-2011 wanted to seize its so-called "northern territories" by force, but it was prevented by the disaster at the Fokushima nuclear power plant, and now they are fueled by the issue of the Kuril Islands, the United States surrounded us with its bases, and China can instantly turn towards Washington - this is the current situation, and we have nothing else to expect, everything is heading for a big war, and hundreds of millions of human lives for them, our "partners", no longer matter.
  13. +1
    3 February 2019 18: 50
    starting from a proud eagle on the coat of arms

    Actually, it’s a bald eagle, which is a scavenger which is few, look at it when it crawls out of the carcass of a bison killed by other predators !!! He will no longer be so white-headed and fluffy - maybe this is the main essence of the Americans, and not the stories that they fill in ?!