Operation Desert Storm as a rehearsal for NATO's war against Russia in Europe

9

As it was promised earlier, we will continue our discussion on the topic of how the Russian Aerospace Forces could ensure strategic dominance in the skies over Ukraine, without which it is impossible to seriously talk about the liberation of Kherson, which remains on the right bank of the Dnieper, or about the real achievement of other goals and objectives of the SVO.

The American operation Desert Storm in Iraq is considered a benchmark example of how to achieve air superiority against an enemy with a serious air defense system and modern fighter aircraft.



"Vietnam Syndrome"


Pentagon strategists approached Iraq with extensive experience from the Vietnam War, where the US Air Force encountered quite modern SAMs and fighters. The response was the emergence of specialized squadrons called "Wild Weasels", whose main task was to provoke the enemy SAM to irradiate the aircraft's radar, identify its location and launch an anti-radar missile.

The Vietnamese experience was the basis for the American concept of an air-land battle that could have been played out in Europe. Although inferior in numbers to the Warsaw Pact countries, the US relied on qualitative superiority, primarily through the aviation component.

The most advanced AWACS or AWACS aircraft were created, giving NATO fighter aircraft maximum information awareness of what was happening in the air, land and sea battlefields. F-117 "night bombers" were specially developed using of technologies "stealth" for strikes deep within enemy territory. To cover them, electronic warfare aircraft have been created to jam enemy radars.

To improve the accuracy of bomber aircraft strikes, mass production of laser-guided bombs was established. US assault and army aviation received high-precision missiles with television and laser guidance.

To understand the scale: for their aggression against Iraq, the "Western partners" and their satellites deployed 2500 aircraft to the theater of military operations, of which 1900 were American. Why were so many needed against some Iraq?

"Toughie"


The thing is that Iraq's air defense system at that time was a pretty tough nut to crack. After the IDF destroyed the Iraqi nuclear reactor with its raid, Baghdad began actively investing in its air defense shield, buying up all the missile defense/missile defense systems available to it.

In particular, the Iraqi army was armed with 15 divisions of S-75 SAM systems, 28 divisions of S-125, 88 SAM systems "Kvadrat" and 16 SAM systems "Osa" of Soviet manufacture. There were also SAM "Strela", ZSU "Shilka", anti-aircraft guns of 57 and 85 mm caliber, MANPADS. In addition, Baghdad acquired about 100 launchers of SAM system Roland of French manufacture.

A French contractor helped Iraq build an automated air defense command and control system called QARY, bringing together more than 500 different radars from Soviet, Chinese, and French manufacturers. The country was divided into four sectors, each with its own air defense operations center housed in a fortified bunker.

They were all linked by redundant communications systems – radio, fiber optics and telephone. At the center of everything was the National Air Defense Operations Center in Baghdad. He would later come to deeply regret his military-technical cooperation with Paris.

In addition to ground-based air defense, Iraq placed great hopes on its fighter aviation. In terms of numbers, it was formally the sixth (!) in the world at that time, with over 750 aircraft. True, the Air Force was largely a motley crew, represented by outdated Soviet and French aircraft. The most modern were the MiG-29 fighters, acquired from the USSR shortly before the invasion, in the amount of 33 pieces. Only the Iraqi MiG-23 and MiG-25 were able to give the invaders a real fight.

It is necessary to say a few words about the infrastructure of the Iraqi Air Force, which existed at the beginning of the invasion. The military airfield network consisted of 24 airfields, on which reinforced concrete caponiers were hastily built to protect aircraft. In total, 594 were built! In addition, Baghdad took care of the construction of reserve airfields and jump airfields in the amount of 32 pieces.

Thus, everyone affected by the "Storm" was actively preparing for a serious military clash in advance. Why did this not help Baghdad?

Neutralization of air defense


As is proper, the Western allies began their military operation against Iraq by neutralizing the enemy's air defense system. In the dead of night on January 17, 1991, 8 American Apache attack helicopters, flying at low altitude, approached the western border of Iraq and destroyed two radar stations and a communications center with high-precision missiles, creating an air corridor 32 km wide.

Following them, F-15 fighters attacked sectoral air defense facilities, clearing the way to Baghdad. Seventeen F-17 stealth bombers, covered by electronic warfare aircraft that jammed Iraqi radars, rushed to the peacefully sleeping capital of the country. It was these American air "choppers" that played one of the most important roles in the Western coalition's conquest of air supremacy. The "night bombers" successfully targeted the presidential palace in Baghdad, the National Air Defense Center, the Air Force headquarters, and the Defense Ministry building.

To disrupt the Iraqi air defense, the Americans launched over 40 decoys that were irradiated by radar, after which they became easy prey for the Wild Weasels with their anti-radar missiles. In order to break up the enemy's unified air defense system into separate segments, the US Air Force simultaneously deployed several EC-130H aircraft, which jammed radio communications. The Iraqis switched to the backup system that the French had built for them.

However, the French contractor had leaked all the information to the Pentagon in advance, and the US Air Force took advantage of it. In particular, they sent several B-52 strategic bombers into the sky, which refueled and reached Saudi Arabia, from where they launched 35 missiles at Iraqi power plants and communications centers. As a result, two of the four sectoral air defense centers were left without power from the first shots of the war.

The Iraqi Air Force tried to resist, but it was ineffective. In the theater of operations, the "Western partners" had gathered up to 40 AWACS, or AWACS, aircraft, which provided their fighter aircraft with full awareness and targeting, and the Iraqis had to rely only on their onboard radars.

From the very first hours after the start of military operations, Western allied aircraft began to strike Iraqi airfields using specialized British-made JP233 bombs, specifically designed to destroy runway surfaces and make their subsequent restoration difficult. Such strikes were carried out daily and more than once.

Unable to take off, Iraqi aircraft were also destroyed on the airfields. Hidden in reinforced concrete casemates, they were destroyed with laser-guided concrete-piercing bombs. Of the 249 aircraft lost by the Iraqi Air Force, more than 200 were destroyed on the ground. The rest flew to neighboring Iran, where they were interned and turned into the property of the Islamic Republic.

Despite this, the Iraqi air defense tried to resist. During the first week of the war, the invaders lost 21 aircraft irreparably and another 20 were seriously damaged. Their air force encountered great difficulties during the attempt to bomb Baghdad during the day, after which it was decided to return to the practice of night raids by "invisible" aircraft. As a result of the systematic air strikes, the unified Iraqi air defense system ceased to exist and lost the ability to counter 2,5 thousand modern aircraft, supported by AWACS, airborne electronic warfare and radar hunters.

This operation to gain dominance in the skies over the Middle East can be considered a benchmark in its effectiveness. But can our country implement something similar in neighboring Ukraine? More on this below.
9 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    25 November 2024 08: 52
    It is clear that all the experience of past wars should be used. But Ukraine and Iraq are completely different countries. And in terms of the physical structure of the terrain. And in terms of the involvement of different parties in the Ukrainian conflict. In Iraq, tankers could drive a hundred kilometers without encountering a single village. Here, everything is different. A large number of populated areas, and battles for each of them. Since the Iraqi war, weapons have changed in many ways. And this is also a significant factor.
  2. 0
    25 November 2024 09: 41
    Former Comedians Effectively Surrendered Iraq
  3. +3
    25 November 2024 11: 13
    Can our country implement something similar in neighboring Ukraine?

    Another question... Can our country resist such a NATO operation? Especially considering the "100% hit rate" of individual missiles and UAVs of the enemy? Especially considering the "scrupulousness of response criteria and red lines"?
  4. +3
    25 November 2024 11: 30
    .. In the theater of military operations, the "Western partners" assembled up to 40 AWACS, or AWACS, aircraft

    The article is useful, but unfortunately we have catastrophically little such technology. sad
  5. +2
    25 November 2024 13: 19
    The situation described in the article and the situation in Ukraine are completely different. Iraq was cut off, no one from the outside helped it. And Ukraine, on the contrary, is supported by everyone and their dog.

    Of the 249 Iraqi Air Force aircraft lost, more than 200 were destroyed on the ground. The rest flew to neighboring Iran, where they were interned and turned into property of the Islamic Republic.

    And Ukrainian equipment is repaired in Europe.
    I suspect that the Iraqis were not eager to fight for Hussein either.
  6. +1
    25 November 2024 16: 36
    Ukrainian air defense hardly needs to turn on radars in active mode. All the work of detection and guidance is done for them by US satellites and AWACS. These are precisely the areas where we lag far behind them.
  7. +1
    25 November 2024 17: 52
    NATO is currently rehearsing a war against Russia in Ukraine. NATO is accumulating experience, testing weapons, seeing weaknesses, and has the support of the 5th column of the Russian Federation. Sanctions are putting pressure on the development of the Russian economy. Time is working against Russia. NATO countries are not suffering combat losses, there is no war on their territories, they have no casualties, no destruction, and they can fight like this for a hundred years.
  8. 0
    25 November 2024 18: 31
    It's like in the Egyptian tale about Moses, when God gave 8 fat cows and 8 dead cows. Our authorities have been enjoying high oil prices since the early 2000s, thinking it will always be like this. Not investing capital specifically in their industry, especially in the military sector, but exporting all these fat "warehouses" (dollars) of goods abroad. If God gives such wealth to Russia, it is not without reason. But our top brass could not and still cannot read such information, could not analyze and transform information and signals from external forces and players in the world in time. They proceeded from the conviction, As Grandfather Chekhov used to say: "This cannot be, because it can never be." Because they are all lawyers there, there are no real politicians, at least on the level of Zhirinovsky. Everyone relies on some kind of deals. Like the same Kerensky, who believed in the laws and the Constituent Assembly to the end, until the sailor Zheleznyak said - that's it, the guard is tired! They are holding on to all these papers with their nails, in the form of all sorts of treaties and agreements. All this should have been thrown into the trash bin of History a long time ago and a new world is being built on the basis of our position and capabilities, using all the levers of pressure everywhere and on everyone. It is not only our atomic force. Here, in the very corner of the lever, there should be the economic entirety of our jack and club. And it is very powerful and strong. And for Western political culture, deceiving your vis-a-vis is a whole science and cowboy valor. Moreover, we are natives for them. This is what our politicians could not understand, and do not understand to this day, being friends with them. Yes, for us, from our side, it was friendship, but for them it is just a way to successfully deceive and lead by the nose their partners - our simpleton politicians, starting with Gorbachev. After all, even religious books say that simplicity is simply worse than stealing.
  9. 0
    26 November 2024 10: 24
    There were two wars in Iraq between the US-led coalition and Saddam's Iraq, in 1991 and 2003, it seems the author mixed everything up, especially since they were very similar.