Russia is creating an independent aircraft industry, ahead of China in this matter

30

The first flights of fully import-substituting MS-21 and SSJ-100 aircraft with domestic engines are planned for next year. This event will be a landmark step demonstrating Russia's ability not only to design and build modern airliners, but also to make them entirely from its own components, eliminating dependence on Western suppliers.

The Minister of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation Anton Alikhanov recently said that the PD-21 engine for the MS-14 is already ready and certified, and certification flights with this engine will begin very soon.



By March-April 2025, we expect the first flights of the MS-21 in a fully import-substituting configuration.

– he said in an interview with the Russia 24 TV channel.

Initially, deliveries of the MS-21 to airlines were supposed to start in 2022, but Western sanctions made their own adjustments. The delays are primarily due to the need for complete import substitution of all units and assemblies, including composite materials, which required additional testing and certification. After successful completion of these procedures, the aircraft will be handed over to customers.

Testing of domestic components continues


Each new system installed on the aircraft undergoes rigorous testing, including thousands of hours in the air. The final stage of certification of the fully domestic MS-21 is planned to be completed in 2025, after which the first 10 produced aircraft will enter service.

In parallel, short-haul SSJ-100s equipped with PD-8 engines are also being prepared for flights. If a domestic engine was designed for the MS-21 from the very beginning, then for the Superjet this is a new task associated with large volumes of import substitution. Nevertheless, key technical problems have already been solved, and testing of the PD-8 on a flying laboratory will soon begin. Next year, the engine is planned to be tested on the aircraft itself.

Long-term plans: wide-body aircraft


As part of the strategic development of Russian aviation, work is underway to create a high-thrust engine PD-35, designed for wide-body airliners. It is expected that this project will be fully implemented in the next decade. The main difficulties are associated with the development of new materials and of technologies.

Russia is creating an independent aircraft industry, ahead of China in this matter

Work in this direction is already actively underway, and funding is partially included in the budget. At the same time, the need for such aircraft is relatively small: for every 100 wide-body aircraft there are about 500 narrow-body aircraft, that is, approximately 1 to 5.

Production capabilities and market prospects


To date, 10 serial MC-21 aircraft have been produced in Russia, but their delivery to airlines is postponed until certification is completed. The factories are capable of producing up to 36 aircraft per year, but it will take at least three to four years to reach this volume. If demand increases, production capacity in Irkutsk can be expanded to 80 aircraft annually.

The situation with the Superjet looks somewhat more complicated, since the airliner initially consisted almost entirely of imported components. The MS-21, on the contrary, included up to 50% of domestic components from the very beginning, which accelerated the import substitution process.

Competition and independence


Creating its own line of aircraft of different classes is not only a matter of prestige, but also a vital task for Russia. The world is dominated by American Boeing and European Airbus, while Chinese developments such as the Comac C919, although they look competitive, still largely depend on the import of Western technology. If sanctions are imposed on China, their aviation industry will be paralyzed due to the lack of domestic aircraft engines.

The Russian Federation, having its own technological base, seeks not only to overcome the pressure of sanctions, but also to ensure long-term independence. The MS-21 and SSJ-100 are steps towards creating a sustainable and fully autonomous aviation industry.
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    22 November 2024 12: 29
    Import substitution.
    And the name of the SSJ-100 aircraft is written in Latin!
    No Soviet aircraft used something like this in its name.
    1. -1
      22 November 2024 12: 37
      When a beauty salon in the city is called "Vagina", it makes me laugh, and an airplane that is either out of inertia or with an eye on export, let it be with Latin letters.
      1. 0
        29 November 2024 14: 55
        Maybe this is the last name of the salon owner, and not the one with the stress on a different syllable?
    2. +4
      22 November 2024 12: 37
      It's good that the State Duma is written in Russian.
      1. +4
        24 November 2024 06: 59
        .....with one typo.)
        1. +1
          24 November 2024 08: 06
          Whether there is a typo or not is irrelevant. The people get pleasure from the decisions made. If the people are like that, then the Duma simply must be no better.
          1. +1
            24 November 2024 09: 02
            It is naive to think that the people elect something or someone.
            No government will write laws by which it can be re-elected.
        2. 0
          24 November 2024 20: 26
          As an option - me on re?
    3. +4
      23 November 2024 14: 17
      Probably the name is hidden - SS-Juden 100% frei? Any abbreviations with "SS" look disgusting...
      1. 0
        29 November 2024 13: 17
        Just Fuckap, SS. - this option is more interesting
  2. +10
    22 November 2024 12: 36
    And what were those effective managers babbling about the impossibility of creating aviation in one, separate country? If it weren't for this fifth column in Russia, we would have managed just fine without Boeings and Airbuses.
  3. +7
    22 November 2024 12: 38
    This is all just crap, of course - but I would also like to see on TV mass executions of those who have been stubbornly destroying our aircraft industry for decades...
    1. +4
      22 November 2024 13: 23
      Revenge is a bad feeling, because it will not change the situation. But if you find it hard without it, let's boil the traitors in boiling water.
      1. +8
        22 November 2024 15: 49
        Not revenge - but the highest measure of social protection. Do you feel the difference? Although - about cooking, the proposal is not bad. These - definitely deserve it.
    2. +3
      23 November 2024 14: 14
      The first to be shot will be Dima Medvedev. It was he who denigrated domestic aviation after a series of disasters in private companies commissioned by Western friends and, as a result, promoted the transition to B and A. Thus, the national aircraft industry almost kicked the bucket.
    3. +1
      24 November 2024 07: 07
      ...well, why immediately shoot, and on TV too. Those who watch the box haven't cared for anything for a long time. Wouldn't it be better to confiscate everything "acquired by backbreaking labor"... you could also involve officials from the Automotive Industry.)
  4. +3
    22 November 2024 13: 08
    The main thing is that there won't be another blah-blah. God willing.
  5. +9
    22 November 2024 17: 17
    when you read headlines like this you feel sad, and yet someone believes...
    Designing an airplane is one thing, but producing it in commercial quantities, setting up service for the produced airplanes, and competing in the market with other manufacturers is something completely different....
  6. The comment was deleted.
    1. +4
      22 November 2024 22: 11
      Is this some kind of joke?!

      This is not a joke - this is stupidity. To get ahead of a country that has more of everything, money, people, science, and whose technological level is now approximately the same or even higher - this is impossible. And this must be taken into account.
  7. +5
    23 November 2024 08: 49
    For every 100 wide-body aircraft there are about 500 narrow-body aircraft, or about 1 to 5.

    In order to build a hundred domestic wide-body Il-96-400A aircraft with PD-35 engines, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive modernization of the Voronezh Aircraft Plant. At present, the plant is in a comatose state and somehow produces 1-2 aircraft per year.
    It will take him 100 years to produce 96 units of the Il-400-75....
    The huge funds invested in the reconstruction of the Kazan aircraft plant for the production of the Tu-214, essentially a backup for the MS-21, would have been more logically directed to Voronezh for the Il-96-400 project.
    Why do we need two medium-range aircraft, the MS-21 and Tu-214, which will only "push" around on the limited domestic market if the only plant in Russia capable of producing wide-body airliners is in a semi-fainting state, producing 1-2 units per year, but should produce an order of magnitude more.
    Where will the specialists, machines, and assembly lines come from?
    We need to start now so that by 2030, when serial production of PD-35 engines is established, the Voronezh aircraft plant will be ready to produce 10-12 units of Il-96-400A annually.
    1. +4
      23 November 2024 10: 08
      Currently, the plant is in a comatose state and somehow produces 1-2 aircraft per year.

      - you are an optimist smile , rather 1 board in 1,5-2 years is the real productivity of VASO
  8. +2
    23 November 2024 14: 09
    I remember how Misha Pogosyan in 2008 beautifully rubbed Putin in the TV news what a wonderful plane he had built. Although it was something assembled from imported Lego blocks. In fact, only the body was Russian-made. And the money spent on the development was as for a full-fledged domestically produced plane...
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. +4
    24 November 2024 02: 52
    The country is drawn into a conflict that will end no one knows when and no one knows how. Territories are being shelled and occupied. Millions of migrants are establishing their own rules....

    And they keep trying to sell us hypnotic mantras.
    Anesthesia. Sleep, huge country - while the blood is being collected...
  11. +1
    24 November 2024 08: 45
    We should learn from the Chinese the speed of development and production of aircraft. Civilian ones, they produce more than a hundred today, and we have a piecemeal production. As V. Lenin said, we must be able to "learn, learn and learn again."
  12. 0
    24 November 2024 20: 25
    Bring back the names of passenger planes! Yak, Tu, Il, An... And I won't fly on ssscccss-021 at all.
  13. +3
    24 November 2024 20: 26
    The result of Putin's 25 years of rule, we are somehow bringing 1 plane to mind
  14. +2
    25 November 2024 02: 59
    I wonder when (not if, but when) the state fails to build 2030 (crossed out) 1000 aircraft by 600, will someone be jailed for this? Or will they be honorably relieved of their position in connection with a transfer to another job (naturally, with a promotion)?
  15. 0
    29 November 2024 19: 22
    The Superjet is a prototype of some French Dassault, and the cabin layout is like the Boeing 717-200. Why was it necessary to destroy the Soviet design base for the Il and Tu? Good planes, they should have been made for operation in Russia and the CIS.
    1. 0
      3 December 2024 08: 41
      Why does the carrier need a motley fleet? Foreign cars were better and they were chosen.
  16. 0
    3 December 2024 08: 19
    Well, 5 years ago, I would have believed it. But now, alas. Our lot is to shift deadlines to the right.