The latest medium-range missile system "Oreshnik" successfully hit the workshops of "Yuzhmash"

68

Today, in response to attacks by the Ukrainian Armed Forces with Western long-range missiles on Russian territory, Russian troops launched a combined attack on one of Ukraine's most important defense enterprises. This was announced today by Vladimir Putin during emergency appeal to the Russians in connection with the new round of escalation of the conflict.

Among other weapons, the latest medium-range missile system "Oreshnik" was used for the first time during the strike. This system had not been used in combat conditions before, and no reports of field tests were made.



In combat conditions, one of the newest Russian medium-range missile systems was tested, in this case, with a ballistic missile in a non-nuclear hypersonic warhead.

- said Vladimir Putin.

The President stressed that the tests were successful and the launch goal was achieved. However, this information was confirmed eyewitness footage, from which experts tried to guess the type of weapon used. As a result of the arrival of several warheads, one of the largest defense plants in Ukraine, which had been operating since the Soviet era, was seriously damaged. This enterprise was still operating today, producing missiles and other weapons for the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

The development of intermediate- and shorter-range missiles was resumed in response to the actions of the United States, which unilaterally withdrew from the INF Treaty. Due to the fact that Washington not only produces such missiles again, but also deploys them in European and Asia-Pacific countries, Russia took countermeasures and created its own systems.

The missiles of the newest Oreshnik complex fly to the target at a speed of up to 3 km/sec, which makes it impossible to intercept them by any means of missile defense. The President did not rule out the repeated use of these munitions based on the threats to the security of our country.

The targets for destruction during further tests of our newest missile systems will be determined by us based on the threats to the security of the Russian Federation. We consider ourselves entitled to use our weapons against military facilities of those countries that allow their weapons to be used against our facilities.

– the president warned.

In the event of the introduction of a NATO contingent into Ukrainian territory, the locations of Western troops will become priority targets for Oreshnik. At the same time, before the strikes, Russia will warn civilians of the need to leave the affected area.

68 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    21 November 2024 21: 24
    Urgently warn the civilians of Brussels, Berlin, Warsaw, London, Paris... and others to change their locations, otherwise they will be hit))
    1. 0
      22 November 2024 18: 38
      Gdansk, Rzeszow and Brussels with London are enough to be fair...
    2. 0
      23 November 2024 12: 38
      Gundyaev is quietly smoking a chandelier on the sidelines! How decorous! hahahaha!
  2. +19
    21 November 2024 21: 28
    It was tested, which is significant, without a warhead.
    More than a transparent hint that we want to come to an agreement.
    But it's useless.
    The crests won't hear.
    The shock passed, they realized that they had not been killed and were not going to be killed yet, and in joyful hysteria they noted that something serious had flown towards them.
    Well, the “West” doesn’t give a damn about crests.
    The West has already written off this meat and, I believe, was very surprised by the softness of the response.
    So we expect further escalation.
    1. +4
      21 November 2024 21: 47
      What do you mean without combat? If the video doesn't show explosions, then think about where they went? To what depth do unexploded shells and simple missiles go? Remember at least one photo.. the depths there are enormous... and here are hypersonic blocks that go underground for tens of meters... you don't think that today Yuzhmash keeps all its production on the surface, so all the blocks went somewhere deep under who knows what and all the workshops inside were destroyed.
      1. -6
        21 November 2024 22: 27
        Quote: Skipper
        simple rockets

        Simple rockets do not go deep into the ground. Try to drive an empty barrel into the ground with all your might. And don't forget to share your success stories.
        1. +2
          21 November 2024 23: 48
          During the First World War, pilots of flying furniture dropped nails from the height of their flight onto the attacking enemy cavalry - a nail was capable of piercing a rider and horse through and through and going into the ground, although I don’t know to what depth - I haven’t measured it, but the weapon turned out to be quite effective.
          1. 0
            23 November 2024 18: 08
            Firstly, short forged arrows were used against infantry, not nails. And secondly, a barrel is not an arrow, it has crazy aerodynamic resistance, which means that it will gain almost no kinetic energy in free fall. You can conduct a full-scale experiment. It's not difficult.
            1. 0
              23 November 2024 18: 12
              In your article you are told about a rod, not a barrel - do not distort the meaning and facts, in geometric form a nail is practically no different from a rod, and I wrote to you not about infantry but about cavalry, have fun with natural experiments yourself.
              1. 0
                23 November 2024 18: 18
                Do you really think that I’m going to give you a lecture here personally on the structure of combat missiles?
                1. 0
                  23 November 2024 19: 13
                  I'm not interested in your lecture, if anyone is interested in it at all, the article in Russian describes the rod that formed the basis of the "nut" warheads - where in the article did you find a mention of a barrel? - you khokhlokrams keep imagining a barrel of vodka.
                  1. 0
                    24 November 2024 22: 27
                    Dear sir, you don’t even know how to lord-paladorate properly, but you still go there! laughing
                    1. 0
                      25 November 2024 05: 35
                      I can do everything I need, and the rest is not for you to judge. By the way, about forged arrows (in case you don't know this), not only arrows were forged then, but also nails - in those days there were no other technologies for making nails.
                      1. 0
                        25 November 2024 11: 26
                        Quote from: lord-pallador-11045
                        At that time there were no other technologies for making nails

                        Are you sure? Then a flag in your hands and a drum on your back
                        https://uamp.com.ua/takie-neprostyie-gvozdi
                        Stamped nails appeared in the late 18th century.
                      2. 0
                        25 November 2024 11: 31
                        Stamping is like one of the forging options, more advanced, but nothing more, and everything else, including your lecture, is all just show-off.
                      3. 0
                        25 November 2024 11: 34
                        Not read, but condemn.
                        At the end of the 18th century, the first nailing machine appeared. And at the beginning of the 19th century, the modern nailing machine appeared. Both worked on the stamping principle. If you listen to you, nails are still being forged.
                        You can't even swallow what's been chewed up from the Internet.
                      4. 0
                        25 November 2024 11: 42
                        Are you even capable of anything? Such nailing machines were only in large cities among rich merchants, and everyone else forged nails as before by village blacksmiths, and Russia in those days was an agrarian country, so it turns out that most nails and other hardware were made by blacksmiths, so learn to chew on your own, climb the Internet less often and visit museums more often - it is interesting and useful.
                      5. 0
                        28 November 2024 20: 38
                        Quote from: lord-pallador-11045
                        Russia was an agrarian country at that time.

                        The Russian Empire before the First World War was the fifth largest economy in the world. A backward country would not have been able to survive after 8 years of war (the First World War, two revolutions, and a civil war). Including being provided with nails in the required quantity.
                      6. 0
                        29 November 2024 07: 41
                        The Russian Empire may have been the fifth largest economy in the world, but it was an agrarian country, not all merchants had nailing machines and therefore, as a rule, nails were forged by blacksmiths by hand, especially since Russia is a very large country, and nails were not always available in all volosts, so it was easier to forge them locally, and for this reason they were not affordable for everyone, and for the same reason, peasant huts and other wooden real estate were built using the "without a single nail" technology, sometimes during the construction of taiga farmsteads and winter huts, housing is still being built using this technology.
                      7. 0
                        29 November 2024 08: 39
                        Quote from: lord-pallador-11045
                        Not all merchants had nailing machines

                        I understand you. But one thing is unclear - what do merchants, specialists in trade, have to do with manufacturers, specialists in metalworking and production? It is clear that you are stuck in the times before the industrial revolution, but why boast about it?

                        Quote from: lord-pallador-11045
                        The Russian Empire may have been the world's fifth largest economy

                        Not "maybe it was", but it was.
                      8. 0
                        29 November 2024 09: 14
                        Unlike you, I haven't stopped anywhere, I just know history and reality, and why shouldn't I show it off? - and no one has limited merchants in anything - production and trade don't interfere with each other.
                      9. 0
                        29 November 2024 11: 11
                        Yes, I understand! Everyone around is a goat. . And only you, D'Artagnan, all in white.
                      10. 0
                        29 November 2024 11: 15
                        Well, finally you understood everything correctly (this is irony, by the way), I just don’t consider myself a genius and I might not know something, and therefore I’m not so categorical in my words, it’s strange that it offended you so much.
                      11. 0
                        29 November 2024 11: 18
                        Quote from: lord-pallador-11045
                        I just don't consider myself a genius

                        There are no geniuses here. But there is no need to make a fool of yourself. Just as it is not proper to flaunt ignorance.
                      12. 0
                        29 November 2024 11: 33
                        And what kind of laughing stock can there be in an honest confession? - You are the one who is trying to rise at someone else's expense and is bragging about it.
                      13. 0
                        29 November 2024 08: 24
                        The technology of construction "without a single nail" is quite applicable in the taiga not only among Russians, but also among taiga peoples - Yakuts, Nenets, Chukchi, etc.
        2. 0
          22 November 2024 09: 46
          How then did the Kinzhal destroy buried and concreted command posts more than once in this SVO?
          1. 0
            23 November 2024 18: 11
            Once again - it is the warhead that reaches the target, not the entire missile. It is this that can go deep due to the kinetic energy it has gained. Of course, if the impact site is not a rock massif.
            1. 0
              24 November 2024 02: 23
              Well, it depends on which one. If we are talking about Oreshnik and ICBM - then yes. But if about PKR-Dagger or Onyx - I'm sorry, I don't agree.
              1. 0
                24 November 2024 21: 35
                Quote: Leontrotsky
                I do not agree

                You are right to disagree. The stages of the RSD and ICBM do not reach the target. The warheads, decoys and USN, as another decoy, reach the target. That is, they are all modular - according to Tsiolkovsky's design. But all the other small things you mentioned reach the target without separating the stages. And there is only one stage. But many of our local experts do not know this and firmly believe that 15A14 (18,18M,18M2) and 15Zh58 (45,53) reach the target in one piece.
        3. +2
          22 November 2024 12: 17
          I have to disappoint you - just now Andrey Klintsevich, so to speak, on air exposed your brilliant barrel theory.)))) And he said the following. That an IRBM, which Oreshnik is, having a speed of about 10 Mach and a warhead weighing several tons, carries kinetic energy directly proportional to the square of the speed, multiplied by the mass and divided in half. In this case, according to him, even explosives are not needed - a colossal explosion is created anyway (like when a meteorite falls, only on a smaller scale), causing colossal destruction, including at depth (the warhead penetrates there!!!). Where, according to him (that is, to the lower floors of Yuzhmash) all production moved. (That is why during the previous hammering, even with a dagger, because its warhead weighs about 450 kg - the kinetic energy was not enough).
          Railguns that fire steel pellets were cited as an example.
          and do not require explosives - destruction is achieved precisely due to destructive
          kinetic ejection forces. So with the barrel, it's up to you, but you, professor, have gone too far.
          I can add from myself that, foreseeing your scientific research, I conducted an experiment on this topic. About 10 years ago, I decided to grow cucumbers in an old barrel at my dacha, because it had become leaky. I filled it to the brim with earth and began to grow crops. But at the end of the year, I had to change the location of the barrel, because loaded with earth, it sank into the ground by 10 centimeters. This is the squiggle that turns out))))
          1. +1
            22 November 2024 18: 40
            Be careful there! What if it's kinetic, I mean (the barrel)...
            1. 0
              23 November 2024 12: 54
              I promise))))) Next year I'll plant zucchini in it. What if it gets even deeper?))) Then I'll give it to the Ministry of Defense with a clear conscience))))
          2. 0
            23 November 2024 18: 13
            Quote: Leontrotsky
            because loaded with earth, it sank into the ground by 10 centimeters

            You yourself explained everything with the word "loaded". In your opinion, the rocket flies on the Holy Spirit, without using fuel?
            1. 0
              24 November 2024 02: 28
              It does. But everything here depends on the range of use. (Now we are talking exclusively about cruise missiles). The same dagger is used at a range of up to 1000 km. But if the target is located at 500 - then, accordingly, half of the fuel tank contributes to the kinetic component. But this does not apply to the Oreshnik. All of its booster fuel tanks (in which the bulk of the fuel is concentrated) are unfastened even before the moment the breeding panel comes into action. And only the cones fly up to the target. So in the case of both ICBMs and MRBMs, how much fuel was on board at the time of launch does not matter.
              1. 0
                24 November 2024 21: 37
                Quote: Leontrotsky
                exclusively about cruise missiles).

                You should have said so right away. And I wouldn't have to argue with you about the RSD/ICBM.
              2. 0
                24 November 2024 21: 39
                Quote: Leontrotsky
                So in the case of both ICBMs and MRBMs, how much fuel was on board at the time of launch does not matter.

                Exactly? You're telling this to an old rocket scientist who graduated from the best rocket and nuclear school in the Soviet Union? There, the amount of fuel is calculated and filled with an accuracy of up to a kilogram.
    2. 0
      22 November 2024 19: 54
      Quote from: zuuukoo
      without warhead.

      Non-nuclear does not mean without a warhead.

      And in other respects, yes - the West doesn't care, football fans have organized a flash mob asking to bomb the stadiums of their teams' opponents. And no one feels sorry for the Ukrainians.

      We need to hit the cities on the Thames and the Potomac, not on the Dnieper, then it will make sense, but otherwise...
    3. 0
      23 November 2024 12: 40
      soft Kremlin power is our everything or is it better to see from the bunker!
  3. +1
    21 November 2024 21: 41
    In combat conditions, one of the newest Russian medium-range missile systems was tested, in this case, with a ballistic missile in a non-nuclear hypersonic warhead[/quote
    - said Vladimir Putin.

    Kyiv was wrong to call for testing new weapons on its territory. And regarding medium range - well, the Atakms is also medium range. So they exchanged blows.
    1. 0
      21 November 2024 22: 10
      If only it were like Miami... but it's not a fair exchange..((
    2. +6
      21 November 2024 22: 31
      Quote: Bulanov
      Atakms is also medium range

      What the hell is that for? Firstly, the average range is from 500 km. Anything less is called "shorter range". Secondly, international law prohibits the export of ammunition with a range of more than 300 km. And the West, at least for the sake of appearances, will nominally comply with this (although, of course, they are not averse to causing trouble on the sly).
  4. +8
    21 November 2024 22: 08
    Maybe it would have been worthwhile to use similar products earlier (if not in a single copy), without waiting for long-range missiles to fly into our rear, "kindergarten" honestly, they screwed us over there, and that's why we are here! fool
    1. -2
      21 November 2024 22: 28
      Maybe it would have been worthwhile to use such products earlier (if not in a single copy), without waiting for long-range missiles to fly into our rear,

      Of course it was worth it! At least one of them should have been equipped with a low-yield nuclear warhead, for example 0,5 kt, aimed at a target outside a populated area, for example a long bridge over the Kremenchug Reservoir. The demonstration would have been more confident.
  5. +1
    21 November 2024 22: 25
    Well, here is the transcript of "Yaroslavna's lament" regarding the use of ICBMs against "Yuzhmash" both by the Kakels and by our turbo-patriotic... cordons. It turned out to be quasi-ballistic aeroballistics. Many idiots here furiously downvoted me when I tried to explain to them the absurdity of using ICBMs, but it turned out to be impossible to convince or enlighten the fools.
    1. 0
      21 November 2024 22: 39
      and if you eat hazelnuts and follow the AUG?
      1. -1
        21 November 2024 22: 44
        The range is not enough if you shoot from the mainland. The average range is 500...4500 km (the range in different sources is different). And the power of the warhead to destroy a strategic aircraft carrier is too small (if it is non-nuclear).
        1. +3
          21 November 2024 22: 53
          but supersonic...
          there's enough kinetic energy there.
        2. +2
          22 November 2024 13: 05
          Well, let's start with the fact that, with all due respect to Oreshnik, this is not an anti-ship missile. This means there will be problems when firing at a moving target. Unless you strike areas with a nuclear version, taking into account the EMP as a damaging factor.
          But again, the AUG is a mobile thing, with a speed of 20 knots, yes, it moves.
          And until you reintroduce the BR PZ, there is no point in using it.
          And the range of 5000 is quite sufficient, if we mean the approach of the AUG to the shores of the Russian Federation.
          Especially if such a product is mobile, like YARS, for example.
          Modern anti-ship missiles have a range of 600-800 km (Onyx), from 1000 to 2000 (Dagger) (I have seen different figures in different sources), 1000 km (Zircon). But again, I repeat, IRBMs are a horror for stationary targets.
          As for aircraft carriers, he graduated from the Naval Academy in Peterhof, served on ships of the Northern Fleet for more than 10 years, and repeatedly participated in missile firings (with Granites and Basalts).
          One Onyx may be enough for the mothership (warhead weight is 450 kg). But, of course, not for flooding, but to prevent it from solving the combat mission. Let's not forget that its weight (Onyx) is about 8 tons. Plus, the fuel may not be used up when approaching the target, which will significantly increase the kinetic capabilities of the anti-ship missile. If it hits the upper deck, it is guaranteed to sag. This means that takeoff and landing will become very difficult, if not impossible. If the side is hit (Onyx can attack both from a height of 10 km and while flying 10 meters above the water surface), to eliminate the list, the ship will have to be leveled by flooding the compartments and leveling the list associated with the ingress of seawater. And with a list, as you understand, takeoff and landing are also impossible. That is, the combat mission will be disrupted with a high probability. Two or three Onixes (and they can attack as part of a group, exchanging targeting commands) can easily destroy the aircraft mother, especially if one of them gets into the reactor area.
          And this is not such an impossible task. When you conduct exercises, there are always SAR and aircraft ships scurrying around.
          They probe the ship, creating an ER image. We do the same. And such information, sewn into the ROM of the anti-ship missile, makes it possible, especially when attacking in a group, to distribute targets and strike at its most vulnerable places.
          So 3-5 tons of explosives, under the fantastic condition that the IRBM would definitely hit the aircraft carrier, would be more than enough to make it go underwater.
          1. 0
            23 November 2024 18: 00
            Why did you write this to me? You tell this to Vasya
      2. +2
        21 November 2024 23: 12
        Targeting is necessary.
  6. 0
    21 November 2024 22: 53
    And in some way I am internally similar to him,
    It was as if I had drunk living water from him!
    I leave the forest very pleased:
    The hazel tree gave me a drink and spiritual strength!


    an excerpt from a poem by B. Uspensky
    1. 0
      23 November 2024 13: 19
      And it came over me too...and so I took the pen in my hands and lines appeared from under it. Not Uspensky, of course...but

      Oh, my spiritual world was thirsting for healing!!!
      I dug up a hazel tree in the forest with a shovel,
      I attached wings, a tail and at some point,
      He, like a bird, soared upward, like a rocket.
      He flew like a God, in a gilded chariot,
      And suddenly he jumped to the ground, for some unknown reason,
      There is Scholz and his friend Macron with some girl,
      We solved a range of big and small problems.
      It struck like thunder, splitting into parts,
      He brought the fox as a messenger to Borel's garden,
      But for some reason, the next morning, without washing my face,
      I am immensely happy about this fact, my friend.
      Even though death came to that house and the soil turned to ashes,
      But the wind of change came from all the cracks,
      I also found peace - because with that wonderful wind,
      Removed in an instant all the Scholzes and...
  7. +1
    22 November 2024 00: 48
    I hope Yuzhmash cannot be restored?
    By the way... the Ukrainian Fuhrer was supposed to return 3 billion dollars to the Chinese for Yuzhmash?
    It was the Chinese who bought it, and the Ukrainian Fuhrer, having received the money, screwed them, declaring that they had nationalized the plant and it was no longer subject to sale... lol
    1. +5
      22 November 2024 02: 01
      In Dnepropetrovsk there is "Yuzhmash", and the "Motor Sich" plant in Zaporozhye (this is for which the "95 sq." clowns received a deposit of 3 billion "Baku" from the Chinese, but the Washington masters of the American colony "Ukraine" ordered their "Ukrainian" puppets to cancel the deal, although the Chinese had already taken out a sufficient amount of technical documentation and equipment, and also lured experienced designers and workers to highly paid work in the PRC).
  8. +5
    22 November 2024 06: 10
    These "shots" cannot win the war...

    everything will be decided on the ground and by infantry. whatever SHE takes, that will be ours...

    but it looks like we're having huge problems with the infantry...yesterday I listened to Montyan and Grubnik, then Max Klimov...

    MY conclusions: either we will have to negotiate on unfavorable terms (a truce under the current LBS is more likely a defeat than a victory), or carry out mobilization...

    P.S. UrapUtrietam, please don't write nasty things about Grubnik...just go and listen to Solovyov and Ko...nothing will convince you otherwise
    1. 0
      22 November 2024 20: 36
      Hurray, patriots can't be offended. They are like children, they love their dad because he is their dad.
  9. -1
    22 November 2024 06: 24
    not a nuclear-capable Sarmatian on the territory called Poland, but just a hazelnut with a landmine on Yuzhmash, but it’s already something
  10. -2
    22 November 2024 06: 40
    Beauty at its best...!!!
    1. 0
      22 November 2024 08: 28
      More like this
      1. +1
        22 November 2024 09: 47
        Experts claim that "Oreshnik" is the grandson of "Pioneer" (RSD-10)...!!
        1. 0
          22 November 2024 11: 10
          Quote: sodium20
          Experts claim that "Oreshnik" is the grandson of "Pioneer" (RSD-10)...!!

          And why not. Most likely, "Oreshnik" was not made from scratch, but something was taken as a basis. Apparently, it was created in a short time.
  11. +1
    22 November 2024 08: 06
    I have a dacha on the edge of the forest... I bought a dacha abandoned by its previous owners... I got tired of cutting down the hazel, which the locals call hazelnut (but most likely it is hazel)! It is a "multi-trunk tree"! So I believe that missiles with a cluster (or for ballistic missiles, with a separating ...) warhead (WH) were used! Yes wink
  12. 0
    22 November 2024 08: 14
    It's one of two things! Either the "reworked" previously promised "Zmeevik"! Or the also long-promised "Super. Iskander" (2-stage!) A kind of "Dagger" returned to earth!
    1. +1
      22 November 2024 08: 23
      Or an improved Pioneer.
      1. 0
        22 November 2024 22: 29
        I mentioned the "Pioneer" when I was discussing that along with one and a half ton and three ton aerial bombs, heavy warheads of ballistic missiles would show good results... For example, I mentioned the South Korean "Hyunma-5", capable of "throwing" 1 ton 3.000 km or 8 tons 300 km...! According to a number of characteristics, the RSD-5 "Pioneer" "suits" the "Hyunma-10"!
        1. 0
          22 November 2024 22: 36
          For its time, it was a magnificent ballistic complex. Yes, the KVO was a bit big, but for three thermonuclear warheads of 150 kilotons, it was not significant.
  13. -2
    22 November 2024 08: 22
    The hard workers got a good job at Yuzhmash laughing
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. The comment was deleted.