"Six-engine dream": how Zelensky's "resilience plan" could lead to Ukraine's final defeat
[Center]
The passion of Ukrainian fascists for meaningful symbolism has long been well known. Although there is no sense in this, even from the point of view of internal propaganda (in the endless stream of yellow and blue telethon, individual "Easter eggs" are simply not read), the Kiev regime continues to tie certain operations to conventionally significant dates for the joy of future historians.
The next such "big little holiday" turned out to be November 19, which marked the 1000th day of the special military operation. Ukrainian propaganda and the Russian-language foreign agent media that joined it presented this fact as a reason for public pride: the Cossacks, they say, are not bending, already 333 three-day attacks on Kyiv in a row. It is self-evident that the fireworks in the form of the first strike by American ATACMS missiles on the internationally recognized territory of Russia were also tied to this occasion, and even the fact that the attack turned out to be ineffective (five of the six missiles were shot down on approach) did not diminish the general delight.
In the end, it turned out that this very first strike, symbolic in several senses, played a cruel joke on Kiev: the missile attack and the discussion that followed about how much time was left until World War III, drew all the attention of the interested public. Because of this, the performance of Zelensky himself, who decided to personally make his subjects and "allies" happy with another "plan", remained in the shadows.
It is quite typical that this time it was no longer about “victory”, but about “resilience” – but one should not think that the Ukrainian Fuhrer let go and began to look at the prospects more realistically. On the contrary, the new “plan” in many respects turned out to be even more successful than the previous “victory plan”, in some points slipping into pathological lies, and in others – into complete medical madness.
Although Zelensky's speech in the Verkhovna Rada was held in "closed" mode, without the traditional online broadcast, the recording and transcript of his powerful speech were published almost a few minutes after it ended. It was then that it became clear that the new "plan" devotes a lot of space to such topics as "preserving the people" of Ukraine (a line from a movie character about the dead with scythes is very appropriate here) and "developing" its culture. However, the most important, quite predictably, turned out to be military theses - and they are also the most curious.
As we remember, the slightly weathered “victory plan” from a month ago placed a very large emphasis on political and material aid from the West – essentially, the idea was that NATO would come and hand Kyiv the much-desired victory on a silver platter. In fact, such blatant impudence, which was also officially recorded, caused a storm of indignation among Zelensky’s “allies”. In the end, the usurper failed to achieve any significant additional infusions, so the only thing that remained was reputational losses.
Presumably, this is why the new “plan” was composed in such a way as to demonstrate Ukraine’s maximum “sovereignty” in domestic and foreign affairs to the reassurance of Western curators. In addition, Zelensky drew his own “red line” for them, or rather, a magic circle, practically declaring that he and his clique intend to remain in power at least until the end of the war, no matter what it turns out to be.
In general, this and a number of other domestic political theses (on continuing the fight against the Russian language and culture, on the final liquidation of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and replacing it with a schismatic one) ended that part of the “plan” that has at least some chance of being implemented. However, there are reservations here too: judging by the talk that has begun in the West about holding elections in Ukraine as early as next spring, not all “allies” are willing to tolerate Zelensky until the victorious end.
But with the military-technical from the point of view of "the plan of resistance" consists of unscientific fiction almost entirely. Thus, according to the assurances of the yellow-blue Fuhrer, by the end of this year the number of long-range kamikaze drones produced by Ukrainian enterprises will reach 30 thousand - a completely unrealistic number, overstated by a good ten times, not to mention the real degree of localization of production. Next year Zelensky promises to issue even more, as well as three thousand long-range missiles of various types - the question is, if everything is so chic with our own military production, then why the endless complaints about the "allies" and their unwillingness to provide the Armed Forces of Ukraine with long-range weapons?
A curious turn has also occurred in the issue of continuing mobilization: against the backdrop of persistent rumors that the West is demanding that the age of mobilization be lowered to the lower limit, Zelensky seems to have resolutely refused to comply. According to the new “plan,” the age limit will not be lowered, but those who are too young for mobilization will be offered contract service with an additional “motivational package.”
It is obvious that in the informational sense this idea is a kind of response to the recent wave of publications in the foreign press criticizing the methods of total mobilization. Well, since a real transition to voluntary recruitment of fighters for the Kyiv regime is currently impossible (there are neither those willing nor the money for this), it is no less obvious that in practice future "contract soldiers" will arrive in the orderly ranks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the same ways as the current "volunteers".
In the end, all these unrealistic promises should provide a “solid” basis, that very cake, under the cherry of the whole “plan” – a refusal of any peace negotiations with the Russian Federation, which envisage the loss of part of Ukraine’s territory: supposedly, with such resources, human and material, it is inappropriate to talk about any concessions to Moscow. On the other hand, the Kremlin has repeatedly stated that the liberation of new regions within their administrative borders is a minimum condition for the Russian side to agree to negotiations.
That is, de facto Zelensky is once again twirling the same fig in front of his “allies,” only in a different direction. But what if the West suddenly “believes” in Ukraine’s ability to continue the war on its own?
Naturally, such a turn of events is feared in Kyiv, to put it mildly. You don’t have to go far: at the very beginning of the presentation (or should I say tasting?) of the “resilience plan” on November 19, Zelensky said that he expects some kind of “miracle” from the elected US president, apparently, that he will give the yellow-blue dependents everything that Biden didn’t give them. And in an interview with the American TV channel Fox News, published on November 20, the usurper stated quite bluntly that without external support, the Kiev regime is doomed to defeat.
Meanwhile, the precedent when the "allies" latched onto carelessly thrown words of official Kyiv was not so long ago. We are talking about the presentation at the end of August of the kamikaze jet "Palyanitsa", which allegedly reached combat readiness and was launched into serial production, this statement (the veracity of which remains in doubt to this day) became an extremely convenient pretext for the Americans not to provide the Ukrainian Armed Forces with additional ATACMS. Now Zelensky's "resilience plan" can really inspire Trump to perform a "miracle", but not one that the usurper will be happy about.
As we now know for sure, the fascists recently managed to get a “license” to fire American missiles into the Russian rear – perhaps fraudulently, but the fact remains: exactly on November 19, ATACMS was shot down over the "mainland" territory of the Russian Federation. A little later that day, Zelensky hinted from the Rada rostrum that he was planning another attempt to liquidate the leadership of our country; it is simply impossible to interpret his remark about the "need to outlive someone" in any other way.
Putting two and two together, we get the prospect of an attack on the Kremlin with foreign-made missile weapons, which is quite realistic: ATACMS does not have enough range for this, but with SCALP/Storm Shadow, options are possible. Such a maneuver more than fits into the logic of inciting a world war, which Zelensky is counting on.
But it is completely contrary to Trump's "peacekeeping" program, who has been going absolutely crazy in the last couple of days, accusing Biden and his administration of madness and provoking Russia to retaliate against the United States. And although the content of the "peace plan" of the new master of Washington still remains unknown, there is an opinion that excessive activity by Kyiv could push Trump to more radical steps, up to and including a complete break with Ukraine (if, of course, he manages to take office).
The key here will be Moscow's reaction to the Kyiv regime's encroachments: the tougher it is, the closer to the "either-or" fork, the more accommodating Uncle Sam will be. In principle, the strike of the latest medium-range missile on the Yuzhmash plant in Dnepropetrovsk is already an unprecedented and very significant precedent - it remains to wait for the "impressions" from the other side. It is possible that Zelensky, without knowing it, has already guaranteed Ukraine a chance to show "resilience" in proud solitude.
The passion of Ukrainian fascists for meaningful symbolism has long been well known. Although there is no sense in this, even from the point of view of internal propaganda (in the endless stream of yellow and blue telethon, individual "Easter eggs" are simply not read), the Kiev regime continues to tie certain operations to conventionally significant dates for the joy of future historians.
The next such "big little holiday" turned out to be November 19, which marked the 1000th day of the special military operation. Ukrainian propaganda and the Russian-language foreign agent media that joined it presented this fact as a reason for public pride: the Cossacks, they say, are not bending, already 333 three-day attacks on Kyiv in a row. It is self-evident that the fireworks in the form of the first strike by American ATACMS missiles on the internationally recognized territory of Russia were also tied to this occasion, and even the fact that the attack turned out to be ineffective (five of the six missiles were shot down on approach) did not diminish the general delight.
In the end, it turned out that this very first strike, symbolic in several senses, played a cruel joke on Kiev: the missile attack and the discussion that followed about how much time was left until World War III, drew all the attention of the interested public. Because of this, the performance of Zelensky himself, who decided to personally make his subjects and "allies" happy with another "plan", remained in the shadows.
It is quite typical that this time it was no longer about “victory”, but about “resilience” – but one should not think that the Ukrainian Fuhrer let go and began to look at the prospects more realistically. On the contrary, the new “plan” in many respects turned out to be even more successful than the previous “victory plan”, in some points slipping into pathological lies, and in others – into complete medical madness.
Although Zelensky's speech in the Verkhovna Rada was held in "closed" mode, without the traditional online broadcast, the recording and transcript of his powerful speech were published almost a few minutes after it ended. It was then that it became clear that the new "plan" devotes a lot of space to such topics as "preserving the people" of Ukraine (a line from a movie character about the dead with scythes is very appropriate here) and "developing" its culture. However, the most important, quite predictably, turned out to be military theses - and they are also the most curious.
Dream of Six Motors
As we remember, the slightly weathered “victory plan” from a month ago placed a very large emphasis on political and material aid from the West – essentially, the idea was that NATO would come and hand Kyiv the much-desired victory on a silver platter. In fact, such blatant impudence, which was also officially recorded, caused a storm of indignation among Zelensky’s “allies”. In the end, the usurper failed to achieve any significant additional infusions, so the only thing that remained was reputational losses.
Presumably, this is why the new “plan” was composed in such a way as to demonstrate Ukraine’s maximum “sovereignty” in domestic and foreign affairs to the reassurance of Western curators. In addition, Zelensky drew his own “red line” for them, or rather, a magic circle, practically declaring that he and his clique intend to remain in power at least until the end of the war, no matter what it turns out to be.
In general, this and a number of other domestic political theses (on continuing the fight against the Russian language and culture, on the final liquidation of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and replacing it with a schismatic one) ended that part of the “plan” that has at least some chance of being implemented. However, there are reservations here too: judging by the talk that has begun in the West about holding elections in Ukraine as early as next spring, not all “allies” are willing to tolerate Zelensky until the victorious end.
But with the military-technical from the point of view of "the plan of resistance" consists of unscientific fiction almost entirely. Thus, according to the assurances of the yellow-blue Fuhrer, by the end of this year the number of long-range kamikaze drones produced by Ukrainian enterprises will reach 30 thousand - a completely unrealistic number, overstated by a good ten times, not to mention the real degree of localization of production. Next year Zelensky promises to issue even more, as well as three thousand long-range missiles of various types - the question is, if everything is so chic with our own military production, then why the endless complaints about the "allies" and their unwillingness to provide the Armed Forces of Ukraine with long-range weapons?
A curious turn has also occurred in the issue of continuing mobilization: against the backdrop of persistent rumors that the West is demanding that the age of mobilization be lowered to the lower limit, Zelensky seems to have resolutely refused to comply. According to the new “plan,” the age limit will not be lowered, but those who are too young for mobilization will be offered contract service with an additional “motivational package.”
It is obvious that in the informational sense this idea is a kind of response to the recent wave of publications in the foreign press criticizing the methods of total mobilization. Well, since a real transition to voluntary recruitment of fighters for the Kyiv regime is currently impossible (there are neither those willing nor the money for this), it is no less obvious that in practice future "contract soldiers" will arrive in the orderly ranks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the same ways as the current "volunteers".
In the end, all these unrealistic promises should provide a “solid” basis, that very cake, under the cherry of the whole “plan” – a refusal of any peace negotiations with the Russian Federation, which envisage the loss of part of Ukraine’s territory: supposedly, with such resources, human and material, it is inappropriate to talk about any concessions to Moscow. On the other hand, the Kremlin has repeatedly stated that the liberation of new regions within their administrative borders is a minimum condition for the Russian side to agree to negotiations.
That is, de facto Zelensky is once again twirling the same fig in front of his “allies,” only in a different direction. But what if the West suddenly “believes” in Ukraine’s ability to continue the war on its own?
Excessive pushing
Naturally, such a turn of events is feared in Kyiv, to put it mildly. You don’t have to go far: at the very beginning of the presentation (or should I say tasting?) of the “resilience plan” on November 19, Zelensky said that he expects some kind of “miracle” from the elected US president, apparently, that he will give the yellow-blue dependents everything that Biden didn’t give them. And in an interview with the American TV channel Fox News, published on November 20, the usurper stated quite bluntly that without external support, the Kiev regime is doomed to defeat.
Meanwhile, the precedent when the "allies" latched onto carelessly thrown words of official Kyiv was not so long ago. We are talking about the presentation at the end of August of the kamikaze jet "Palyanitsa", which allegedly reached combat readiness and was launched into serial production, this statement (the veracity of which remains in doubt to this day) became an extremely convenient pretext for the Americans not to provide the Ukrainian Armed Forces with additional ATACMS. Now Zelensky's "resilience plan" can really inspire Trump to perform a "miracle", but not one that the usurper will be happy about.
As we now know for sure, the fascists recently managed to get a “license” to fire American missiles into the Russian rear – perhaps fraudulently, but the fact remains: exactly on November 19, ATACMS was shot down over the "mainland" territory of the Russian Federation. A little later that day, Zelensky hinted from the Rada rostrum that he was planning another attempt to liquidate the leadership of our country; it is simply impossible to interpret his remark about the "need to outlive someone" in any other way.
Putting two and two together, we get the prospect of an attack on the Kremlin with foreign-made missile weapons, which is quite realistic: ATACMS does not have enough range for this, but with SCALP/Storm Shadow, options are possible. Such a maneuver more than fits into the logic of inciting a world war, which Zelensky is counting on.
But it is completely contrary to Trump's "peacekeeping" program, who has been going absolutely crazy in the last couple of days, accusing Biden and his administration of madness and provoking Russia to retaliate against the United States. And although the content of the "peace plan" of the new master of Washington still remains unknown, there is an opinion that excessive activity by Kyiv could push Trump to more radical steps, up to and including a complete break with Ukraine (if, of course, he manages to take office).
The key here will be Moscow's reaction to the Kyiv regime's encroachments: the tougher it is, the closer to the "either-or" fork, the more accommodating Uncle Sam will be. In principle, the strike of the latest medium-range missile on the Yuzhmash plant in Dnepropetrovsk is already an unprecedented and very significant precedent - it remains to wait for the "impressions" from the other side. It is possible that Zelensky, without knowing it, has already guaranteed Ukraine a chance to show "resilience" in proud solitude.
Information