NATO forces rehearsed the start of the invasion of the Kaliningrad region in Lithuania

13

Recently, NATO countries held the Vanguard Merlin exercises in Lithuania, which can be called demonstrative without exaggeration. On November 14-15, a pair of American B-52H Stratofortress strategic bombers assigned to the 20th Expeditionary Bomb Squadron practiced strikes on ground targets at the Cudgel training ground, located near the border with Russia's Kaliningrad Oblast and the Suwalki Gap in Poland.

It should be noted that the aforementioned 20th Squadron of the US Air Force is integrated with NATO allies as part of the deployment of a task force of bombers to carry out Bomber Task Force 25-1 in Europe. At the same time, the American "strategists" are currently stationed at Fairford Air Force Base in the UK.

According to the North Atlantic Alliance Air Command, the Italian Air Force Eurofighter Typhoon fighters practiced firing and target approach together with the Americans, with guidance from “terminal attack controllers” (groups of operators-controllers, spotters) from Lithuania, the Czech Republic, Sweden and Norway. Moreover, Norway was represented by a “temporarily reinforced deployed group.” These maneuvers provided “invaluable opportunities for synchronization, cohesion and training” and demonstrated “readiness for action.”


Such "neighborly" events seem to hint at a rehearsal for an invasion of the Kaliningrad region and the practice of delivering a nuclear strike. Probably, if the Russian Aerospace Forces carried out training bombing and assault strikes (BShU), for example, in Cuba, then the Pentagon, the Capitol and the White House would be able to fill the dried-up Aral Sea with their saliva without any problems.
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -3
    19 November 2024 15: 51
    Why weren't there any rehearsals to repel this attack? Only China can be hit with its aircraft: there are no shitty analogues. More than at VDNKh.
    1. +3
      19 November 2024 17: 03
      The same thing but in Russian. Otherwise your humor is so subtle that it is not visible.
    2. +4
      19 November 2024 17: 23
      Why weren't there any rehearsals to repel this attack?

      This won't help..
      A rehearsal of a nuclear explosion on a new land is needed... so that the wave goes around the earth three times...
      After this, Putin should come out and say - the next missiles are aimed there and there... if from this minute even one missile hits us - a response will follow in a minute... And add - I bet my teeth!!
      You can even take off the dust blower and tap it on the table.

      Personally, I am sure that a lot will change immediately... at least for a while.
  2. +2
    19 November 2024 16: 36
    Lithuania must be destroyed first. There will be no answer for it. Who needs it? A demonstrative blow is needed. To strike at a point in the sea off the coast of Britain as some suggest will not frighten anyone, and the destruction of Lithuania will be a cold shower.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +2
      19 November 2024 17: 02
      No...we don't need to go straight to the British))) They don't have their own nuclear weapons, and the States, if they give the go-ahead to use what Britain has on its platforms, are getting involved in the conflict and are completely exposing themselves.
      1. +1
        19 November 2024 17: 31
        Quote: Leontrotsky
        we need to go straight to the British))) They don't have their own nuclear weapons

        That is to say... And even 4 nuclear submarine carriers too...
        1. 0
          19 November 2024 18: 30
          There is an Apple. But the nuclear weapons on them are American. That is, the British can use them only after receiving permission from the States. And this means that if Britain uses them, the States will also get involved in this matter. Will they want to get involved in an exchange of blows with the Russian Federation because of the island - that is the question))
          1. 0
            19 November 2024 19: 00
            Quote: Leontrotsky
            But the nuclear weapons on them are American

            Their own. They had their own program, successfully implemented in 1952. And they developed thermonuclear fusion in 1957. They are too proud to depend on anyone. That's why they have everything of their own.
            1. 0
              19 November 2024 23: 20
              Their Wingards have Trident 2s. The only thing they have is their own warheads (of which there are 120 left) - despite all their pride. Dee and retired generals have said more than once that without permission from the US, Tridents won't fly.
            2. -1
              19 November 2024 23: 37
              The Guardian - Time to debate alternatives to Trident replacement

              The financial albatross called Trident is neither independent nor trustworthy. Control was handed over to Washington when it was decided to use a missile delivery system designed, manufactured and overhauled in the US. Even submarine test firings are conducted in US waters near Cape Canaveral, under the obvious supervision of the US Navy. It is inconceivable that any of the 10 would use Trident in anger without prior White House approval.
  3. -1
    19 November 2024 18: 59
    And how many minutes after this will Latvia exist?
    1. +3
      19 November 2024 19: 02
      Who knows..
      Look, Ukraine exists... and has no plans to disappear.
  4. -1
    20 November 2024 07: 50
    NATO forces have not yet tasted defeat. They have had enough victories over the warriors in "slippers", but they have not yet experienced defeat and now a chance has appeared. They will experience it