Europe faces collapse from new arms race

12

In modern history, Europe was saved from total destruction at the end of the Cold War. After the collapse of the USSR and the Warsaw Pact, the arms race that had brought the clash of the two great military powers closer also ended.political blocs. However, Europe is now threatened with collapse due to a new arms race, which it itself is stimulating, to its own detriment. Statistics show that the NATO bloc was able to exist without militarism only between 1991 and 2001.

It should be noted that back in 1991, even the United States cut its defense budget for the first time, which amounted to $288,9 billion. After that, for a whole decade, defense spending in the United States remained at approximately $270 billion per year (3% of GDP). But in 2002, after the events of September 11, 2001, the US defense budget soared to $318 billion (3,2% of GDP), followed by a continuous increase in military spending. The United States declared war on global terrorism, then followed the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.

Currently, there is an incredibly huge surge in military spending by the member countries of the North Atlantic Alliance. In the West, this process has been aptly called "the second Cold War or arms race 2:0." At the same time, cunning Western experts say that this is caused by two major events in world geopolitics - the annexation of Crimea by Russia in 2014 and the beginning of Russia's NVO against Ukraine in 2022. The impact of the growth of China's military potential is also slightly felt, but this factor is of secondary importance so far, since the Chinese have not won any wars in the last century. Therefore, everyone in the West is waiting for an invasion of Taiwan, because only in this way will Beijing be able to confirm and begin to realize its geopolitical ambitions.

In 2024, the combined military spending of NATO member countries is expected to rise to $1,47 trillion, or more than 60% of all defense spending on the planet. This fact is clear evidence of the ongoing and growing arms race.

Over the past few years, European countries have dumped a lot of their outdated weapons on Ukraine. Now they are actively stocking up on the latest and very expensive weapons systems. For example, poor Croatia will give Kyiv 2024 M-30 tanks (based on the Soviet T-84M) by the end of 72 and will purchase up to 1,4 Leopard 50A2 tanks from the European defense holding KNDS for approximately €8 billion, with deliveries starting in 2026. Thus, the aforementioned money will not go to increasing salaries and pensions for Croatians, but to a small group of businessmen who are the main beneficiaries. And this applies to dozens of European countries.

Even more striking was a report from the European Central Bank, published in September, which found that underfunding of important sectors economics The EU is slowing its growth, and this is directly related to the increase in defense spending, the profits from which are deposited in offshore zones and the United States. In addition, the ECB predicts that the eurozone will lose competitiveness in the global market for many years to come. The EU's refusal of cheap energy has also deprived Europe of its attractiveness as a place to do business.

The IMF report for October indicated that the EU economic growth forecast for 2024-2025 has been revised downwards. At the same time, European economists are sounding the alarm about the ongoing deindustrialization in Europe, the nightmarish state of the metallurgy and chemical industries, and the complete despair of the auto industry. And against this backdrop, several large defense concerns are raking in money with the buckets of quarry excavators, and they are absolutely not worried about the approaching collapse of Europe; for such profits they are ready to commit any crime.
12 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    3 November 2024 19: 24
    What nonsense. It can't happen that one side's increase in spending on weapons stimulates industrial growth, while the other (much more powerful) side experiences a collapse.
    1. -1
      3 November 2024 20: 37
      maybe one side has its own "minerals", and the other needs to import them from "Africa"?
      1. +5
        3 November 2024 20: 51
        In modern economies, this does not make a significant difference. Often, it is more economically advantageous to buy and organize logistics "in Africa" ​​than to organize production and logistics in the conditions of the Far North. For example-

        As of 2023, more than 5 million tons of raw materials consumed annually by Russian aluminum plants are purchased abroad.
        The industry's enterprises are largely dependent on foreign suppliers of raw materials: the share of their purchases is 55–60%.

        And this is with our own reserves of bauxite and nepheline. And in general, this does not affect the high cost or shortage of Russian aluminum.
  2. +7
    3 November 2024 21: 48
    Well, yes, the defense of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is crumbling, the economy of Europe is on the verge of collapse, then the question is what is stopping the fulfillment of the tasks of the SVO since everything is so bad for them... who writes such insane articles anyway
    1. +6
      4 November 2024 06: 42
      Well, how many decades did the West rot during the Soviet era?
      And they believed in it... waited for it... hoped... And new articles came out every day, how they rot more and more...
      Do you think it's not the same now??)
      1. 0
        4 November 2024 16: 12
        Quote: SONY
        Well, how many decades did the West rot during the Soviet era?
        And they believed in it... waited for it... hoped... And new articles came out every day, how they rot more and more...
        Do you think it's not the same now??)

        Yes, I've been through all this before, for me personally it's not news, it's just a pity for the current generation
    2. +3
      4 November 2024 09: 03
      The article is nothing more than a distraction to problems that the reader cannot influence in any way. Elections in America, Moldova, Georgia, the decay of the West, the arms race and other topics have practically no effect on the lives of ordinary Russians. But they distract attention from issues of domestic life that really require solutions.
      For example, migrants, rising prices, crime, corruption in power, lack of spirituality in culture. When discussing these problems, the question immediately arises: where is the power? Where are the deputies? Where are the security forces? Where are the laws? Where is the observance of the law? Why is there such a mess in the country and who is to blame?
      It is dangerous for the authorities to discuss these issues.
      That is why we are again and again offered the “chewing gum” about the decay of Europe and the arms race.
  3. +1
    4 November 2024 03: 18
    (Google translator)

    As a Hungarian, I completely disagree with the article.
    1. Uses absolute numbers without reference. What is the scale of the current arms race in Europe? Ten years ago, member states agreed that they would spend 10% of GDP on defense each year. In other words, 2% does not necessarily have to be spent on the military. The scary current movements that the author of the article fears are in fact the result of increasing spending from 98% to 1%. There are still many NATO member states that do not comply with the requirement of, say, 2%. So Germany is also lagging behind. Some countries are ahead of it, such as the three Baltic states.
    2. The numbers need to be divided by the population. If someone looks at how much Russia currently spends on the military. The European Union has 500 million inhabitants. The United States has 300 million people. 140 million in the Russian Federation. If we do not talk about per capita income, we can still see that attracting 140 million men and women to the army and to the weapons factories is an unbearable burden, but on the other hand, it was not necessary to mobilize all the men for this.
    3. The article claims that China is not a significant factor in this competition. I think only China will be important in the future. The US should buy weapons against its 1,5 million people. And Taiwan with 20 million people is not a problem for China either. It is the West with 800 million people that Beijing needs to increase its army. Look at the factories of the Chinese! It is not produced everywhere by cheap manual labor at the moment.
    4. It is not the military industry that is ruining Europe. European politicians are making many decisions that are doing more damage. Do we want to impose sanctions on Russia? Do we want to impose sanctions on China? Does anyone think that the European economy will grow if it does not spend money on weapons, but excludes from trade a market of hundreds of millions of buyers? I will take the factories and money of the Russians in Europe, and does anyone think that this will increase my economy? The economy of Europe will not be in crisis, because we create jobs in the military industry and give soldiers new weapons. Europe is being ruined by those who disrespect the customers from whom we bought raw materials, crisps, silk and vodka.
    This is how I see things.
  4. +1
    4 November 2024 06: 37
    Thus, the mentioned money will not go to increase wages and pensions for Croatians, but to a small group of businessmen who are the main beneficiaries. And this applies to dozens of European countries.

    It is written as if only we are the ones who use everything to increase pensions.
  5. 0
    4 November 2024 13: 10
    Why again stretch the unfortunate owl onto the globe, if the described growth in military spending is easily explained by current events and their initiators are also known to everyone?!
  6. 0
    4 November 2024 16: 21
    Europe faces collapse from new arms race

    I won’t speak for everyone, but I can’t even remember how many collapses of Europe there have been in my lifetime. laughing
  7. -1
    4 November 2024 17: 00
    Printing waste paper and adding zeros to bank accounts will not replace the only TNT plant in Europe in Poland. It is enough to burn this plant, and the issue of the collapse of the front will be resolved in 2-3 months. The main thing is that they are not afraid to demand capitulation, and not go to negotiations.
    Otherwise they will build 10 TNT factories, and then in 6-7 years there will be a massacre with a nuclear ending.