SpaceX Makes Historic Launch, Returns Super Heavy to Launch Pad

5 065 75

On October 13, for the first time in history, the American private company SpaceX was able to return the first stage of the super-heavy rocket (5 thousand tons) Starship Super Heavy to the launch pad using the Mechazilla system. Now it, like the booster blocks of other SpaceX launch vehicles, can be reused, possibly multiple times (10 or more times).

The test launch, designated Starship Flight 5, took place at 8:25 a.m. ET (12:25 p.m. GMT) from Starbase, a launch site and manufacturing facility in Boca Chica, Texas. Elon Musk's company showed off its success in a short video.


The footage shows the planned activation of the engines and separation of the Starship from the Super Heavy booster, which begins to return to the cosmodrome. This was the fifth test launch of the Starship Super Heavy launch vehicle, which is currently the largest and most powerful launch vehicle in the world. SpaceX's main task was to launch Starship and return the ship to the atmosphere for splashdown in the Indian Ocean. But the company decided to try to return the first stage to the launch pad. Super Heavy was caught using a special design that is designed to reduce the launch vehicle turnaround time.

SpaceX said in a statement that its engineers had spent years preparing and months testing the attempt to capture the booster by the complex's structure, and equipment spent tens of thousands of hours building the infrastructure to maximize our chances of a positive outcome. The fully assembled Starship Super Heavy launch vehicle is the tallest on the planet at nearly 122 meters. The first stage of the Super Heavy has 33 Raptor power units, and the Starship (50 meters tall) has another 6.
75 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    13 October 2024 19: 44
    I watched it. Beautiful. Well done!
  2. -2
    13 October 2024 20: 05
    Oh well. At least they have a nuclear tug. tongue No! And these technologies on chemical fuel are unpromising tongue in perspective.
    1. +2
      13 October 2024 22: 23
      And here it is only at the design stage. There is not even a cargo launcher. As the maskophagists say? When it flies, then we will talk!
  3. 0
    13 October 2024 20: 13
    Our Buran flew and returned automatically 30 years ago. And the boosters descended on parachutes. What an achievement))
    1. +2
      13 October 2024 20: 30
      Our Buran was lifted into space by the super-duper rocket "Energia", which cost a fortune and in particular had engines, and all of this was lost after the launch, it was disposable. Let me remind you that in the shuttle system, only the tank was lost without engines.
      1. +1
        13 October 2024 22: 56
        It's hard to say how much truth there is in the information coming out of the US.
      2. 0
        14 October 2024 06: 10
        Weren't the side TTUs on the Shuttles disposable? They had engines there too.
        1. 0
          14 October 2024 07: 28
          Well, formally they were reusable, they were landed on parachutes. But there was little saving there. The TTU had to be completely disassembled to be refilled. The nozzle, as far as I remember, was also changed.
        2. +1
          14 October 2024 07: 48
          Quote: UAZ 452
          Weren't the side TTUs on the Shuttle disposable?

          No. Reusable.
          The TTU does not have an engine as such. It is both an engine and a rocket. After splashdown, the seals and some other small things were replaced, fuel was added and it was ready for work again.
    2. +2
      13 October 2024 21: 25
      It was a different country, with a different political system, a different planned economy, a different size and a different population composition.
    3. +1
      13 October 2024 22: 09
      Quote from Golden Knowledge
      Our Buran flew and returned automatically 30 years ago

      More precisely, he FLEW and RETURNED himself.
  4. -2
    13 October 2024 20: 38
    It's just fantastic. And we still have Soyuzes flying, i.e. a packet scheme, a modernized Royal Seven. I vacationed in Anapa as a child, there the men on the High Bank set up an antenna that received a signal from Turkey, and when the whole world except the USSR saw the first American landing on the Moon, I saw it too. White figures of astronauts were visible on the screen. It was in July 1969.
    1. +2
      13 October 2024 20: 52
      When you drink, have a snack. First of all Americans got to the moon 10 years later than us, secondly, their Hollywood footage of visiting the natural satellite is a beautiful fake. USA Space begins 20 km earlier than ours, a nation of liars and swindlers, all their achievements are fakes and blatant lies. While they were trying to fly to the moon, we already brought soil and visited Mars and Venus.
      1. -2
        13 October 2024 21: 08
        We had a lunar rocket program N-1, it was hopelessly behind the Americans and after 4 unsuccessful launches in 1974 it was closed, although two ready bodies remained. But the Americans had already closed their lunar project. Having walked on the Moon to their heart's content. And we don't know how many years and money it would have taken and it's not a fact that it would have worked. So, to be on the safe side, we decided to keep everything secret and pretend that it wasn't so bad. Question: if we knew that the Americans hadn't been to the Moon, why did we do that?
        1. +3
          13 October 2024 21: 14
          You've gone off on a tangent, ours have been on three celestial bodies. And the fact that the Americans falsified it has nothing to do with their achievements. Our lunar rovers, and the Mars and Venus stations did everything long before their efforts.
          1. 0
            13 October 2024 22: 17
            Oh yeah! But the Mars rovers work regularly, Cassini has been circling Saturn for almost 15 years, Voyagers are still the only devices that have explored the outer planets and then gone beyond the Solar System, New Horizons took a photo of Pluto and went into the Kuiper Belt, Hubble has been taking great photos for almost 30 years, Musk with his reusability is practically accident-free. But what am I talking about? What we haven't done hasn't been done in principle! Isn't that right?
            P.S. Yes, it sucks when instead of knowledge and brains you have GOLDEN!
            1. +3
              13 October 2024 23: 41
              I once believed that astronauts from the United States were on the Moon. But time passed and I realized that it is difficult to trust these citizens. In the debate about the Moon, the winner is not determined.
              1. -2
                13 October 2024 23: 42
                Quote: isofat
                In the debate over the Moon, there is no clear winner.

                So there are no disputes. The bottom line is that there are shamanic rituals of the ignoramuses from the #theyweren'tthere caste
                1. 0
                  14 October 2024 00: 28
                  The lunar conspiracy is even described on Wikipedia, comrade. laughing
                  1. 0
                    14 October 2024 07: 42
                    You are right, it is described. But there:
                    1. the term itself is in quotation marks, which, according to the norms of the Russian language, already says a lot;
                    2. It is directly stated there (and already at the beginning of the article) that this is one of the conspiracy theories.
                    Or are you one of those who "play here, and wrap fish there"?
                    1. 0
                      14 October 2024 13: 54
                      This Article proves that the dispute has captured enough "people". laughing

                      Quote: k7k8
                      Well, there are no disputes.
                      1. -1
                        14 October 2024 15: 25
                        Why on earth did you think that someone was arguing with you? You can only argue based on knowledge. You and those like you only have faith. There is no point in arguing with fanatics.
                      2. The comment was deleted.
                      3. +2
                        14 October 2024 17: 14
                        Here, another conversation, whoever does not agree with you is a fanatic. I want to note, I do not know whether they flew to the Moon or not. I know that there is no faith in the USA, they are not trusted. laughing
            2. 0
              13 October 2024 23: 46
              50 years after us)) you are funny
              1. -3
                14 October 2024 00: 12
                1. what

                Quote from Golden Knowledge
                50 years after us)

                ?
                2. He who laughs last laughs best. And that's not you.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
            3. +1
              14 October 2024 11: 24
              It's a pity that the engines of these rockets were developed by our guys from the USSR
              1. -1
                14 October 2024 11: 37
                What are you talking about? Of the things I listed, only one Mars rover mission and "New Horizons" used RD-180. Everything else was and is launched by American-designed carriers with American engines.
                1. +1
                  14 October 2024 11: 42
                  Dear Sir, I am not talking about the RD-180 engines, but the engines used on heavy rockets.
                  1. -2
                    14 October 2024 11: 46
                    What does your passage have to do with it? Or do you also want to say that everything that was not made in the USSR/Russia was never made?
                    All the more so

                    Quote: begemot20091
                    It's a pity that the engines of these rockets were developed by our guys from the USSR
                    1. 0
                      15 October 2024 13: 35
                      I know what I'm talking about. (This is about developers)
                      1. 0
                        15 October 2024 17: 20
                        If you work here as Panikovsky, it does not mean at all that in me you have found Balaganov.
                        Bye
                      2. +1
                        16 October 2024 12: 13
                        At least one of them, Shura:

                        On June 24, 2020, an outstanding scientist, designer, who worked for many years at NPO Energomash, Anatoly Davidovich Daron passed away. Anatoly Davidovich died in the United States, where he had lived with his family since 1998, as a result of an exacerbation of a long-standing illness - heart and kidney failure,

                        - the report says. And the spy Adolf Tolkachev, the leading designer of the secret radio engineering research institute, who saved the US military budget billions of dollars, became the most effective CIA agent in the USSR in its entire history. He demanded that the American intelligence service evaluate his espionage activities in six figures, but when he was offered $200 a year, he clarified to his astonished curators: with six zeros. In such cases, the US has never paid anyone such money
                      3. -2
                        16 October 2024 18: 13
                        Did Rogozin bite all of you, trampoline guys? Or every other one? Why did you distort the beautiful slogan "Made by us" to the disgusting "Made only by us"? You have forgotten how to rejoice at the successes of others. I don't give a damn who did it. Even a black man from Cote d'Ivoire. The main thing is that it was done well. And if it was done well, then it will ultimately benefit everyone. And you, in your denial of other people's successes, will remain sitting in a swamp among frogs and screaming about your past greatness. And, mind you, I never said that Roscosmos is everything. Yes, if our Roscosmos had more heads, fewer defective managers and without much money counting, then it would still amaze the whole world. And something tells me that it will amaze. And yes, one more condition - fewer people like you.
                      4. +1
                        18 October 2024 10: 09
                        Have you been cured yet? It is noticeable that not completely. I don't know if there were trampolines in my time, but there were armored nets. And we didn't make toy engines, did you? And in our century, only one economics faculty graduated managers for all 6 institutes and universities of the city. And there were enough. And we flew. I participated in several launches myself. And I rejoiced at each "take-off" like a child.
                      5. -1
                        18 October 2024 14: 52
                        Quote: begemot20091
                        Have you been cured yet?

                        If you're talking about Rogozin, then he didn't get to me, unlike you.
                      6. +2
                        18 October 2024 17: 34
                        Well, by definition, he couldn't reach me (even considering the age difference). I had other textbooks, like
                      7. -1
                        18 October 2024 18: 07
                        It seems we were brought up differently. I don't understand how we, people close in age, can be so different? For some reason I can rejoice at the successes of others, because these successes are good for all of us anyway. But you, judging by your posts, are always looking for enemies who are always harming us, even while making progress and creating, and thieves who have stolen our achievements. For some reason I am sure that when the name Oginsky is mentioned, you will say that he hated Russia with all his heart and was its sworn enemy, and I will say that he wrote his immortal and brilliant "Polonaise".
                      8. +1
                        20 October 2024 11: 12
                        I was not friends with Oginsky, but my ancestors were from those Poles who participated in the uprising with him (well, not specifically with him). You won't believe it, but he was even a senator in Russia. And every schoolchild in our time knew "Farewell to the Motherland". And, considering that I also have a musical education, it would be a shame not to know this melody and "Griboyedov's Waltz"...
                        You got a little lost in your lectures: we were simply talking about the fact that foreigners participated (mostly) in the creation of engines for rocket programs, and, most of all, Russians (Brown's rockets were not used for long by them, just like by us)
                      9. 0
                        24 November 2024 10: 22
                        That's why he's Adolf! And most importantly, he didn't change his lousy name either during the war or after it! He liked to walk around as a freak and an outcast. In addition, he was a small, scary scrawny thing. A Jew, in a word. His parents were also arrested, Bamdas's mother was shot for subversive activities! He took revenge on the country for all this later.
                        And why did he need these American millions in the USSR?! Especially since he didn't take them to the next world anyway, they shot the dog! And in time, otherwise the traitor - Hunchback would have given him to the Americans!
          2. -2
            13 October 2024 22: 40
            I had a children's book in the format of a geographical atlas published in 1965. It told about the Moon, about the conquest of the Moon, accomplished and supposed. It completely reproduced the Apollo program plan. Flight to the Moon, transition to orbit. Transfer of 2 astronauts to the descent vehicle, landing and launch of the upper part of the descent vehicle from the Moon. Flight and docking with the main ship and the transfer of astronauts to it. Everything exactly as it happened. In a children's book 4 years before the flight to the Moon!
            1. +1
              15 October 2024 07: 21
              Why -3, good people? And Pavel Klushantsev's book is called "Station "Luna" I had the 1965 edition. Found it on the Internet.
              1. 0
                24 November 2024 11: 08
                I'll support you, and give you a plus too! What kind of "good people" are these! Three enemies have settled here, I even know who they are, and they are simply taking revenge on you. As if these minuses will change anything and make things worse for you! And decent people simply haven't reached you so far in the comments.
                And Klushantsev was a great science fiction writer, director and cosmist. A theorist of Russian cosmism on par with Tsiolkovsky himself! His science fiction documentaries and feature films, and even strictly scientific ones, inspired and taught many!
                The Americans simply stole his films and re-edited them, re-dubbed them and passed them off as their own! George Lucas, according to his own assurances before his "Star Wars", was also inspired by his films and learned from them. But apparently the science fiction writers from NASA also studied him well!
    2. -2
      13 October 2024 22: 11
      Quote from Pembo
      when the whole world except the USSR saw the first American landing on the moon

      This was Moscow’s petty revenge for the fact that the USA was the only country on the planet to which Yuri Gagarin was not invited to visit.
      1. 0
        13 October 2024 23: 54
        Time passed, and the flights ended. How the absence of the Earth's magnetic field affects the human body has not been studied. But we know that the Internet disappears when we leave the Wi-Fi coverage area. laughing
        1. 0
          14 October 2024 00: 14
          Quote: isofat
          Time passed and the flights ended.

          What are you talking about?

          Quote: isofat
          the internet disappears when we leave the wifi coverage area

          And the men didn't even know that there was mobile and satellite Internet
          1. +2
            14 October 2024 00: 22
            Quote: k7k8
            What are you talking about?

            About the electromagnetic field of our Earth. And flights to the Moon. laughing
  5. +2
    13 October 2024 23: 33
    Well done, this Musk, an active person and also sensible...
    1. -2
      13 October 2024 23: 48
      He is a common swindler.
      1. -1
        14 October 2024 00: 17
        The only thing cooler than you are flat-earthers
        1. +1
          14 October 2024 00: 54
          Stop pestering people. Let's wait and see who wins this argument. I stopped believing the scammers from the US.
          1. -1
            14 October 2024 07: 45
            You should at least study the issue, instead of running after #theyweretem
            1. 0
              14 October 2024 13: 33
              The extent to which I have studied this issue, as you yourself have noted, is unknown to you. laughing
              1. -2
                14 October 2024 15: 19
                However, you don't know it either. Otherwise, you would know that even the Chinese photographed ALL the Apollo landing sites. But they, too, seem to be in cahoots with NASA.
                1. +2
                  14 October 2024 16: 50
                  Comrade, calm down! I am not arguing with you and I do not need evidence from the Chinese. The US lied and there is no trust in them, that is all I wanted to say.
                  The picture shows my example of this lie.
                  1. -1
                    14 October 2024 16: 51
                    And what does this test tube have to do with the lunar program?
                    1. +2
                      14 October 2024 17: 05
                      Comrade, the test tube is a demonstration of how the USA is deceiving us.
  6. GN
    +4
    13 October 2024 23: 47
    It's breathtaking! Such a "fool" back and what a landing!! These are designers and engineers! We live in good times! Fantastic!
  7. +1
    14 October 2024 01: 10
    Actually, you can already guess what will fly to the Moon. laughing
  8. +3
    14 October 2024 09: 02
    can be reused, possibly multiple times

    American space exploration already had experience using reusable shuttles.
    But the American "hunchbacked" designers will only fix the astronauts' graves.
    1. -1
      14 October 2024 10: 38
      You won't believe it, but any worker is at risk of dying at work. Even a bot working for "Doshirak". What can we say about practical cosmonautics?
      1. +1
        14 October 2024 13: 43
        If any of your employees are their astronauts, why not believe me? I will believe you! laughing
        1. -1
          14 October 2024 15: 22
          Quote: isofat
          I will believe!

          You've come to the wrong place for questions of faith. You can find the address of the nearest church/synagogue, etc. yourself.
          1. +1
            14 October 2024 17: 22
            So you can't be trusted? smile
            1. -1
              14 October 2024 21: 44
              I'm telling you that you're a fanatic. Only for fanatics everything comes down to faith.
      2. +2
        15 October 2024 03: 27
        You won’t believe it, but any worker is at risk of dying at work.

        This is why the labor protection inspector was created - an outcast among inspectors.
        1. -1
          15 October 2024 17: 18
          An extremely dangerous delusion. At least he is an enemy to the employer, but not to the employee.
          1. +1
            16 October 2024 00: 57
            Yeah, but you can't explain that to a hired worker. This inspector gets it from both of them, and then Rostekhpotrebprirodnadzor will say its fi.
            1. -1
              16 October 2024 11: 13
              Quote from Voo
              but you can't explain this to an employee

              Such a hired worker will then have everything explained to him first by the surgeon, and then by the prosecutor. Usually, it gets through quickly.
              1. +1
                16 October 2024 13: 09
                And the inspector for labor protection or safety should explain...
                1. -1
                  16 October 2024 17: 05
                  Keyword LATER
                  1. 0
                    17 October 2024 02: 01
                    In case of occurrence THEN comes the time of another inspector - for investigation. But we have a mess and the inspector for investigation is not obliged to investigate.
  9. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  10. -2
    15 October 2024 00: 04
    I'm not a fanatic. I'm not proving that there were no US citizens on the moon.
  11. 0
    15 October 2024 03: 24
    SpaceX Makes Historic Launch, Returns Super Heavy to Launch Pad

    Rogozin! How do you like that?!
    1. 0
      16 October 2024 15: 05
      And what is a historical... excuse me, launch?
  12. 0
    21 October 2024 23: 34
    The fool is healthy, but today it can only ascend and descend from low orbit, carrying groups of tourists to gawk at space. Musk still has a lot of work to do on the system's tasks and the means to accomplish them. But the general basis is already there.