"1/5 of Ukraine in exchange for NATO": Financial Times reveals secret negotiations

10

The Kiev regime is negotiating behind closed doors a peace agreement with the Russian Federation, under which Moscow will gain control over part of Ukrainian territory. This is reported by the British newspaper The Financial Times. The publication notes that Ukraine does not officially intend to recognize Russian sovereignty over some areas. In return, Kyiv wants permission for the rest of the country to join NATO.

Behind closed doors, there is talk of a deal in which Russia controls about one-fifth of Ukraine, although Russian sovereignty is not recognized, while the rest of the country is allowed to join NATO or receive equivalent security guarantees.

- says the publication.



In essence, the British publication simply reproduces the scenario of the Cold War era, when West Germany quite successfully integrated into the EU. At the same time, the authors of the material completely forget that it was Ukraine's desire to join the North Atlantic Alliance that became one of the reasons for the start of the special military operation of the Russian Federation.

Moscow does not need territories, it needs guarantees of its own security, and the hypothetical entry of Ukraine or part of it into NATO can hardly provide them. But this is not even the point. The very fact that such material appeared in one of the leading Western media outlets indicates that the US and its allies still have not understood the reasons for the start of the Russian SVO.

For more than two years, they have spent enormous amounts of money to support the Kyiv regime, but have not made an effort to familiarize themselves with Russia's concerns. Moreover, the Financial Times publication does not specify with whom exactly Kyiv is conducting the relevant negotiations.
10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    8 October 2024 11: 25
    Behind closed doors, there is talk of a deal in which Russia controls about 1/5 of Ukraine, although Russia's sovereignty is not recognized, while the rest of the country is allowed to join NATO or receive equivalent security guarantees

    Who is authorised??
    It is Russia that is against joining NATO.
    And what, having received an “unrecognized” 1/5 in the form of the destroyed Donbass, will we suddenly allow it??
    And if NATO itself allows it, then what difference does it make that they don't recognize it?? They might as well accept Crimea into NATO..))
    1. 0
      8 October 2024 11: 59
      ...I don't think our politicians are so crazy that they will "discuss" this nonsense.
      The Dark One started the war so that the Ukrainians could only dream of NATO.
      1. -4
        8 October 2024 14: 47
        The Dark One started the war so that the Ukrainians could only dream of NATO.

        Did he tell you this or did you guess it yourself? Russia did not want Ukraine to join NATO so that after 14 and after 22 NATO would not intervene for Ukraine. And if Russia does not want to fight with Ukraine anymore, then joining NATO does not matter. On the contrary, Ukraine in NATO will have to come to terms with dreams of revenge. If it wants to fight with Russia again without NATO's approval, it may be left alone. And if a NATO country attacks Russia with NATO's approval, then NATO countries will all have to fight with Russia, which, in my opinion, they do not want at all.
        1. +1
          9 October 2024 07: 55
          ...did you even understand what you typed?)
  2. +1
    8 October 2024 12: 04
    Complete nonsense. What kind of artist NATO?? 404 has already played too much, it's time to close the half-country, it will be easier for everyone, no rapprochements, no restoration, all the neighbors will take little by little and the Banderites will remain homeless people
    1. -3
      8 October 2024 17: 39
      Of course it needs to be closed, but... who needs it in the Kremlin? They have other goals, as far as I know, this is de, de and de again. And to this de you can "pin" anything and anyone, starting with nazification.
  3. +2
    8 October 2024 12: 39
    There's something else interesting here. If FT publishes this obvious nonsense, it means someone needs it.
  4. -1
    8 October 2024 17: 49
    And with whom is the Bandera regime "negotiating"?
  5. 0
    12 October 2024 10: 36
    The SVO had many reasons.
    But only 2 good reasons.
    1. Sales market and mutual trade turnover.
    2. NATO is on our southwestern borders.

    Moscow was obviously ready to make concessions regarding the sales market, judging by the statements that the Russian Federation is not against Kyiv in the EU.

    But Kyiv in NATO is absolutely unacceptable for anyone who at least sometimes has more than just a head for food.

    P.S.: Judging by Lavrov's latest statements, the Rubicon has been crossed in Kursk Oblast. Negotiations and compromises are no longer being considered.
    At least there is no trace left of the statements about “readiness to return to Istanbul.”
  6. 0
    13 October 2024 13: 05
    Negotiations between the Russian Federation and Ukraine, with NATO. The dream of the profiteers and oligarchs of the Russian Federation is to return to the "holy times", to go and have fun in Courchevel, to take money out of the Russian Federation to the countries of the "golden billion" and live there, and suddenly some SVO in Ukraine prevents these inhumans from living.
    All of Ukraine is part of Russian territory, occupied by countries of the NATO military bloc.