Three SVO scenarios for demilitarization and denazification of the Baltic states

53
Three SVO scenarios for demilitarization and denazification of the Baltic states

By the end of the third year of the special operation to help the people of Donbass, demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine, our country has come as close as possible to the prospect of a direct military clash with the NATO bloc. The second anti-Russian front may be opened in the Baltic, and without decisive action the prospects in that direction look very bleak.

"Ukraine-0"


The three former Soviet Baltic republics embarked on the Ukrainian path of self-destruction even earlier than Nezalezhnaya. Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, having joined the EU and NATO, carried out deindustrialization, divided their population into classes, began to systematically mistreat Russians, their language and culture, glorified Nazi criminals and began to mock the monuments to the Red Army soldiers who died in the Great Patriotic War.



In parallel with this, active military construction began along the lines of the North Atlantic Alliance for the purposes and tasks that Brussels and Washington set for Vilnius, Riga and Tallinn. The Baltic Wall is currently being built along the border between Russia and Belarus, apparently inspired by the "Poroshenko Line" in Donbas.

The Balts are really preparing to fight against the Russian Federation, which we somehow too frivolously brush aside due to the microscopic nature of these three border states compared to the gigantic Russian Federation, its mighty army, navy and nuclear triad. And completely in vain!

Kamikaze countries


The main purpose of the three small Baltic republics, like Ukraine, is to commit suicide against Russia, causing it the maximum possible damage. And they, using their geographical position, are really capable of doing this.

Thus, Lithuania can stop transit through its territory, together with Poland, by placing the Kaliningrad region of the Russian Federation in a continental blockade. Little Estonia, either independently or together with Finland, is capable of blocking the exit of Russian ships, military and civilian, to the Baltic Sea from the Gulf of Finland by conventional mine laying, targeting anti-ship missiles at minesweepers that try to clear the fairway.

Swarms of kamikaze drones could fly from the Baltics to northwestern Russia, just as they are now taking off from Ukraine. This would create huge problems with the need to cover St. Petersburg, the country's second-largest metropolis, as well as the military infrastructure of the Russian Defense Ministry in the north. What would happen if American medium- and shorter-range missiles, even without nuclear warheads, were deployed there in such dangerous proximity, I don't even want to think about. Their flight time to Moscow would be measured in minutes.

Like Ukraine, the Baltics are big trump cards that will certainly be used someday. Sooner or later, the Russian Federation will have to respond harshly to artificially and skillfully created threats to national security, which is, in fact, what Washington and Brussels are trying to achieve.

Three scenarios


There are not many possible responses. The first, the most hyped in the media, involves breaking through the so-called Suwalki corridor to the isolated Kaliningrad region from the territory of Belarus through Lithuania and, possibly, Poland.

On the one hand, this will allow cutting off the Baltics from other NATO member countries and connecting Kaliningrad with the mainland by land. On the other hand, it is completely unclear how to hold this narrow land corridor and supply the entire region through it under missile, artillery and air strikes from Lithuania and, probably, Poland.

It is obvious that an attempt to limit itself to half-measures will not solve the problem, but will only create new ones, and ultimately it will be necessary to expand the zone of military operation to the entire territory of the Baltics, taking it under full control. This second scenario is a very serious task, requiring the use of a full-fledged army corps, better yet, two. We will discuss in detail below the reasons why this will definitely not be an easy walk.

The third and final scenario of a possible special military operation to demilitarize and denazify the Baltics should probably take into account the unsuccessful experience of the first stage of the SVO in Ukraine.

One of the biggest mistakes in planning the special operation was that no attempt was made to cut off Western Ukraine from its Eastern European NATO neighbors, and Kyiv was left with access to the Black Sea through Odessa. As a result, flows of foreign militarytechnical aid is flowing to Nezalezhnaya in increasing quantities, further and further delaying the achievement of the goals and objectives of the SVO declared on February 24, 2022.

If the threat to Russia's national security from the Baltics becomes such that it cannot be ignored, it seems rational to quickly isolate the theater of military operations by cutting Lithuania off from Poland through Suvalkija. Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia will then be able to be supplied only by sea or air.

This means that an A2AD (anti-access and area denial) zone will have to be organized over the territory of three former Soviet republics, striking supply ships and military transport aircraft with anti-ship missiles. The Russian Aerospace Forces will have to knock out the entire military infrastructure of the enemy, demilitarizing it.

The big question is whether it is necessary to introduce large military contingents into its territory to take it under full control. Do we have any that are not involved in the SVO in Ukraine? But the Baltics have someone to fight for, and they can create huge problems for the Russian Armed Forces when conducting a large-scale ground operation, which we will discuss separately.
53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
    2. -17
      1 October 2024 14: 04
      The author said nothing new. The course to seize neighboring countries, as many as possible, was not taken by him and not today.
      1. +17
        1 October 2024 14: 20
        The author said nothing new. The course to seize neighboring countries, as many as possible, was not taken by him and not today.

        That's true. Here your Israel captured the Golan Heights from Syria. Now it has invaded sovereign Lebanon.
        1. -16
          1 October 2024 15: 26
          Neither is a seizure. When Syria wants to sign peace, the Golan Heights will be returned to it. Egypt signed and got Sinai back.
          1. +10
            1 October 2024 15: 44
            when the balts will fulfill the promises given during the separation - then nothing will need to be said or done. 3 main ones: 1. non-bloc status. 2. free access by car and rail to kaliningrad. 3, free shipping in the baltic. today all 3 are violated.
            1. -11
              1 October 2024 15: 58
              They did not take on any obligations when leaving the USSR; nothing of the sort was signed.
              1. +15
                1 October 2024 17: 21
                Show me a document from the Soviet Union where the people of the USSR allowed the Balts to leave the Union, but don't refer to Article 72 of the Constitution of the USSR. There is also the USSR law of April 3, 1990 No. 1409-I "On the procedure for resolving issues related to the withdrawal of a union republic from the USSR", which no one has implemented. Don't forget that
                The USSR Constitution of 1977 was adopted by all the peoples of the USSR, and permission for Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia to leave the USSR could only be given by all the people of the USSR. There is also the Nystad Peace Treaty of 1721 (currently in force), according to which Tsar Peter the Great bought the territories of Estonia and Latvia from Sweden along with people, cattle..., for all time, i.e. according to British law, the territories of Latvia and Estonia are the property of Russia. There are the Helsinki Accords of 1975, which indicate the border of the USSR-Russia, these agreements were signed by the USA, Germany, France, Great Britain - 35 states.
                The Russian Federation-Russia is the heir and successor of Ancient Rus, the Muscovite Kingdom, the Russian Empire, and the Soviet Union.
                Russia did not transfer, sell or donate its territories, as well as its foreign assets, to the former Soviet republics of the USSR.
                The Russian Federation has every right to return the entire territory of the Baltics unilaterally, without asking anyone’s permission.
                1. -13
                  1 October 2024 19: 06
                  where the people of the USSR allowed the Balts to leave the Union

                  And who allowed the Indians to leave the British Empire? The time has come, and the empire has died. No physics prescribes that the Indians lie forever under the English.

                  just don't refer to Article 72 of the USSR Constitution

                  The last thing that would occur to me would be to refer to the laws of a state that denied law as such.

                  Peter the Great bought the territories of Estonia and Latvia from Sweden along with people and cattle

                  I thought the days of selling people like cattle were over. Incidentally, a resident of a country where the majority of the population are descendants of serfs would be better off keeping quiet about human trafficking. Until someone challenges his great-grandfather's release in court.

                  Russia has every right to return the entire territory of the Baltics

                  There is a right - it is the right of might.
                  1. +4
                    1 October 2024 19: 27
                    I can assure you, no one in my family, neither on the male nor the female side, was ever a serf, everyone was free. Unfortunately, I did not see my grandparents, they all died before I was born. Whether you like it or not, no one has yet been able to change history. If you are worried about your fate, then in the event of a third world war, where you live does not matter, unless you are on Mars. I will answer for Russia, in the Russian Federation there is a weak comprador government, but the Russian state is strong. Time will judge. In the world, the one who has more rights is right, here I agree with you
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                    2. +1
                      5 October 2024 10: 19
                      He is right who can defend his rights by force!
                      Rights without force are fiction.
          2. +2
            1 October 2024 19: 11
            Russia doesn't need the Tribalts. Feed several million pensioners - Russophobes? There are no fools.
            As for the fact that Israel will give anything back, I have a hard time believing it.
            All the mess in Gaza is because Israel didn't give a damn about Oslo-2.
            As soon as gas was discovered on the shelf of independent Palestine, independence was immediately forgotten and the deposit was seized.
            And why did Biden forbid Bibi to bomb Rafah, and Bibi doesn't give a damn about him? A promising route for the Suez Canal goes through Rafah. So what, share it with some goyim? Better to wipe them into dust, clear the route, and the rest will run away.
            That is why Biden talked about an independent Palestine, but Bibi did not want to listen to it.
            The discussion was about who would get their hands on the gas and the channel. Biden said to Bibi: "You're taking it beyond your rank!" Although Bibi is the same puppet of the Brits as Zelensky.
            1. -7
              1 October 2024 19: 19
              As for the fact that Israel will give anything back, I have a hard time believing it.

              Why is it hard to believe? I gave an example.
              Egypt signed a peace treaty in 1979 and is observing it. Egypt has recognized Israel. It does not engage in hostile activity. Egypt has received Sinai back. According to the treaty, it promised not to station troops in Sinai and it does not.
              Behave normally and Israel will be your very useful friend.
              1. 0
                1 October 2024 19: 23
                It was a long time ago. Now the world and people are different.
              2. +4
                1 October 2024 19: 33
                I also gave an example. As soon as the smell of gas and big money from the new channel began, Bibi was ready to burn hundreds of thousands of people.
                The world is changing. There are no laws left, not even concepts. Only force.
              3. 0
                10 October 2024 23: 25
                Israel will never be anyone's friend, because it is a militaristic and very aggressive state. And in general, there are NO friends in state politics, only temporary fellow travelers...
            2. -1
              3 October 2024 11: 03
              Quote: boriz
              Russia doesn't need the Tribalts. Feed several million pensioners - Russophobes? There are no fools.

              Thank God, it is not up to you to decide what Russia needs and what it does not need. There are people smarter than you in the relevant positions for this. Since they were Soviet (read - Russian) before, then they are ours. We have had our fill of Europe and that is enough, it is time to go home to our native harbor. Vladimir Vladimirovich will gather all 15 republics into one country, as it was under Lenin-Stalin-Brezhnev. And there will be no need to feed pensioners. They were already assigned pensions as citizens of EU member states. Just do not give them Russian passports and then the EU will be obliged to regularly pay their large European pensions in Euros to their cards. Then - mandatory sale of these Euros at the Central Bank rate. The currency will go to the treasury, and pensioners with rubles will go spend them for the benefit of the Russian economy.
              1. +2
                3 October 2024 11: 25
                and then the EU will be obliged to regularly pay them their large European pensions in Euros on their cards.

                Do you really believe what you wrote? Go and take the 300 billion from them. They stole it without any legal basis.
                When you pick it up, come and tell us about your epic feat.
                Or simply wake up. While you were sleeping, the world has already changed a lot and is changing even faster.
                1. 0
                  6 October 2024 00: 28
                  Quote: boriz
                  Go and take 300 billion from them.

                  Actually, this is possible, but for this you need to have at least some willpower.
                  1. +1
                    6 October 2024 00: 33
                    To do this, it is necessary to achieve certain results in geopolitics and on the battlefield. Which is what Russia is doing.
                    Then they will return it themselves. Without reminders.
                    In the meantime, they have already started to arrest the assets of serious American banks. Also a method.
                    1. 0
                      6 October 2024 00: 35
                      Quote: boriz
                      In the meantime, they have already begun to seize the assets of serious American banks.

                      Have they really started? I just haven't heard or read anything like that anywhere, I'd like to know the source of this information.
                      1. +1
                        6 October 2024 00: 36
                        https://www.rbc.ru/business/02/10/2024/66fd698a9a79475ce0771b11
                      2. 0
                        6 October 2024 00: 43
                        Quote: boriz
                        https://www.rbc.ru/business/02/10/2024/66fd698a9a79475ce0771b11

                        Thank you interesting. hi
          3. +2
            2 October 2024 11: 31
            Neither is a seizure. When Syria wants to sign peace, the Golan Heights will be returned to it. Egypt signed and got Sinai back.

            What are you saying laughing And will you demolish your settlements from there?
          4. 0
            10 October 2024 23: 19
            Israel will never return the Golan Heights, because these heights are of strategic importance to it.
      2. +3
        2 October 2024 16: 39
        Good sir, the problem is not in Russia, but in its neighbors... I am sure that if, for example, Mexico began to behave with the USA the way Ukraine has behaved with Russia all this time and continues to behave with a number of other republics of the former USSR, then they would have grabbed it from the USA long ago and in full and would have hanged Zelensky by now like Hussein and Gaddafi... and ALL NATO and the UN, which is in the pocket of the USA, would have fully approved of this... and your Israel would not have stood on ceremony if Ukraine with its Tyagneboks, who called for killing Jews and Muscovites, were your neighbor... So let's not sing songs about how bad Russia is supposedly and who it captured there... In general, what is happening now is the sad legacy of the CPSU, when for political reasons the borders of the republics, in violation of the USSR constitution, began to be moved without taking into account the historical area of ​​residence of certain peoples, hence the many border conflicts in the post-Soviet space. The conflict between Russia and Ukraine is not the only one on this list, not the first and not the last.
    3. +7
      1 October 2024 14: 19
      This article may serve as a pretext for inciting hatred between the countries of the former USSR. Which will provoke negative consequences for everyone.

      That is, this particular article, and not everything that has happened since 2014?
  2. +5
    1 October 2024 13: 37
    I am sure that if there was a worthy response to every challenge, such a difficult situation might not have existed. A worthy response to every challenge. This should have been started back in the 90s. Lithuania took over the railway. And you don't want the CER. But that was not it. It was necessary to enrich ourselves immeasurably. And even now money plays almost the most important role.
    1. +7
      1 October 2024 15: 12
      I agree, it is necessary to finally separate the national interests of Russia from the personal pocket interests of the profiteering oligarchs, then the attitude towards the situation developing around us will change radically, and the response actions on our part will become more adequate, tougher and more decisive.
      1. 0
        1 October 2024 21: 42
        And how do you propose to separate the national interests of Russia from the personal pocket interests of profiteers who, by virtue of their position, in full accordance with the law, are authorized to speak and make decisions on behalf of the Russian state?
  3. 0
    1 October 2024 13: 57
    Release Strelkov and throw him into Narva. No need to rob the treasury. There are plenty of Russians in the Baltics, there won't be any left without volunteers. And throw in commanders from the SVO to help him. The guys are battle-hardened and, given their experience, won't be whining. soldier
    1. -3
      1 October 2024 18: 45
      The Russians in the Baltics will be the first to hang Strelkov. And if anything happens, they will fight for the European Baltics no worse than the Russians in Ukraine. Russia, especially Russia of 24, has not fallen to... them.
      1. +1
        2 October 2024 18: 50
        So the Baltics didn't fall to them, the youth doesn't want to live in a sprat paradise, and they won't go to fight for it at all, and those who like to scream at rallies won't all run to the front, the example of Ukraine is here, they rush to Sundzha just to get away ... Do you think there will be more volunteers to die for the ideals of the forest brothers in Lithuania, Latvia or Estonia?? And about the Russians, don't confuse Russians with Russian-speaking people, and half of Ukraine doesn't know the language there, if not more
    2. 0
      6 October 2024 00: 37
      Quote: ssimplitsissimus
      And send commanders from the Northern Military District to help him.

      I don’t mind, but these commanders are needed on the fronts of the Central Military District now.
  4. +2
    1 October 2024 14: 51
    Most likely, the biggest mistake in planning the operation was the lack of military planning, it was replaced by political promises of Ukrainian colleagues, and hope for the Crimean option, although the situation had long been different. It is not customary to talk about the goals and objectives of the SVO now, they are smeared. In WWII, the goal was unconditional surrender. What is the goal now, probably the maximum task is to reach the borders of the regions that became part of the Russian Federation.
  5. 0
    1 October 2024 15: 25
    the author is right, the danger of aggression from the Balts exists and they do not hide such plans,

    Article 3
    Any of the following actions, regardless of the declaration of war, subject to and in accordance with the provisions of Article 2, will qualify as an act of aggression:

    a) the invasion or attack of the armed forces of a state on the territory of another state or any military occupation, no matter how temporary it may be, resulting from such an invasion or attack, or any annexation using force of the territory of another state or part of it;

    b) the bombing by the armed forces of a state of the territory of another state or the use of any weapon by a state against the territory of another state;

    c) blockade of ports or coasts of a state by the armed forces of another state;

    d) an attack by the armed forces of a state on the land, sea or air forces, or sea and air fleets of another state;

    e) the use of the armed forces of one state located in the territory of another state by agreement with the host state, in violation of the conditions provided for in the agreement, or any continuation of their stay in such territory upon termination of the agreement;

    f) the action of a state allowing its territory, which it has placed at the disposal of another state, is used by that other state to commit an act of aggression against a third state;

    g) the sending by the state or on behalf of the state of armed gangs, groups, irregular forces or mercenaries who carry out acts of the use of armed force against another state that are so serious that it is tantamount to the above acts, or its significant participation in them.

    Article 4
    The above list of acts is not exhaustive, and the Security Council may determine that other acts constitute aggression in accordance with the provisions of the Charter.

    that is, listed by the author, and repeatedly declared by aggressive criminals posing as the leaders of these Limirofs, the blockade of Kaliningrad or the international waters between Estonia and Finland or the launch of even one drone are called an act of aggression,
    and the Russian Federation can take any measures, including military ones, at its own discretion, by the way, the conduct of the IEP referendums in Crimea is not an act of aggression, as are the holding of referendums in Kherson, Zaporozhye, Donbass, Lugansk, Odessa, Nikolaev, Kyiv, etc.
    NATO's form of reaction to the aggression of the Limtrophs against the Russian Federation, according to Article 1 of the NATO Charter, the Limtrophs automatically lose the right to protection by violating the NATO Charter, and according to Article 5 of the NATO Charter, other NATO countries can provide protection to the Limtrophs only if they deem it necessary..... as a result, breaking through the corridors means stepping back into the same puddle as in Ukraine, as the author correctly said, it was a mistake not to cut off the fascists from the West, which led to a difficult and long s... I think that the order of actions will be as follows,
    1 drone flies from Riga and hits a peaceful tractor on the territory of the Russian Federation, which is recorded by means of objective control and filmed on camera
    2 within one hour the video is broadcast on all information channels with explanations of what constitutes an act of aggression according to the UN Charter
    3 Russia, as a permanent member of the UN Security Council with veto power, lodges a protest
    4 However, our combat experimental units, which ended up in the Pytalovo area by pure chance, have been traveling to Riga for an hour now, and in another two hours they reach the western borders of Latvia.
    5 in the morning a national referendum is scheduled and all residents of Latvia voluntarily vote to hang all the fascist former leaders of Latvia on the Dome Square, and to accept Latvia into the family of free peoples of the Russian Federation, the Minister of Defense of Latvia, shouting "the Russians are coming", manages to jump out of the window like a forestall
    6 the whole world froze before the accomplished fact

  6. -3
    1 October 2024 19: 52
    Well, they just don't behave the way we want them to. They stopped letting the elite into resorts, they don't supply sprats to the same elite...they stopped bringing fertilizers from Batkivshchyna...
    Well, how can you not hit me?
    What are they "really preparing to fight against the Russian Federation"? Hasn't the example of the Ukrainians taught us that we need to surrender immediately? and not "fight"?
    Ah, they are in NATO, it would be embarrassing to surrender right away...
    Well then, logically, everyone can play such games.
    And from "Russia, flocks of kamikaze attack drones may fly out", just weld on canopies for border checkpoints...
    1. +4
      1 October 2024 21: 36
      you've got it all mixed up! Russian sprats are available in all our stores at an affordable price, Russia has always been the producer of fertilizers, not Banderaism, Russia has never been an aggressor for several reasons
      1 we are white fluffy and truthful and peace-loving
      2 we are strong and therefore we are right
      3 We are a permanent member of the Security Council with the right to veto thousands of nuclear warheads, not Estonia
      4 we are Russians God is with us
      5 Estonia is to blame for everything
      and plans to arm against us street aggressive plans and has already insidiously prepared a drone to strike Russia
      b wants to close the Gulf of Finland in violation of maritime law
      in demolishes the monument to the heroes-liberators
      g grossly tramples on the rights of nationalities
      d is in our way, gets in the way on the way to the Baltic Sea, creating a threat to Kaliningrad
      1. -2
        1 October 2024 23: 26
        Well, you are right about everything. Almost.
        Tilka Batkovshchina is from Old Man Lukashenko...
        And the Elite must eat foreign sprats. Otherwise, what kind of elite is she?
  7. -2
    1 October 2024 19: 56
    What's so complicated and vague about it? Can't we cope with 2 Eastons and 3 Labuses?
    1. +1
      1 October 2024 21: 45
      Tallinn in two days?
    2. 0
      7 October 2024 08: 30
      We have already "dealt" with Ukraine in 2-3 weeks, as some stated on 23.02.22.
  8. -1
    1 October 2024 22: 59
    I read the comments, interestingly no one says that the Baltics are needed to ensure security, which is the essence of the article. The main theme: ours - not ours. Apparently the lesson has been learned, we were told that Ukraine is needed to ensure security.
    1. +3
      2 October 2024 07: 28
      you need to read my comment, it is clearly seen there that aggressive like a bandit armed to the teeth Estonia creates dangers for Russia, for example, it wants to arm itself and close off the Gulf of Finland, no one forced them by the tongue to make aggressive statements, demolish monuments, infringe on the Russian language, join the NATO bloc, although useless for the security of Estonia, but aggressive... here is peace-loving Mongolia that has been with us for centuries and is independent, the wise Mongols do not make aggressive plans and we have not touched them for centuries
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. +2
    2 October 2024 12: 35
    Another sermon of defeatism. A hidden call to drain the water and capitulate faster. Apparently, the not very impressive results of the SVO for 2,5 years give grounds for some to reason like this.
    1. +2
      2 October 2024 19: 49
      Nothing surprising, If you measure the distance from the center of Ugledar, for which there are stubborn battles, to the center of Donetsk, it is 49 km. And from Maryinka near Donetsk, from which they could not dislodge the Nazis for a long time, to Ugledar is 26,5 km!!! And the Russian army passed this in 2,7 years of fighting, of course, it is not impressive.
  12. +1
    2 October 2024 19: 41
    Three scenarios from the realm of fantasy...
    Nobody will do anything about demilitarization and denazification of the Baltics, unless after the next elections of a new President, who will be fed up with these mongrels and he will not be soft-hearted and indecisive and will not think for many years...
  13. 0
    3 October 2024 08: 12
    The nonsense of a grey mare, which plays into the hands of the Tribalts, in order to raise anti-Russian hysteria.
  14. +3
    5 October 2024 05: 35
    One clarification - lifting the blockade in the Baltics will be impossible without demilitarizing Finland. So we need to add the Danes to the tribalts and set up our own bases in Helsingfors and the Alands. But otherwise - I agree. Yes
  15. +3
    5 October 2024 10: 41
    First question: Who is to blame for the current situation? Why did we recognize the republics that illegally left the USSR? Why did we withdraw our troops? Who could have really forced us to do this? Why didn't we insist on their neutrality? Why didn't we keep the Suwalki Corridor for ourselves? This could have been done quite realistically. This is a betrayal of Russia's interests. Someone should be convicted even after death for treason. And now the easiest thing is to demand back the lands transferred to Lithuania in 1940 when they joined the USSR! This will be the passage to Kalinin Grad. Someone will say that this is impossible. Everything is possible if there is will! We need to eliminate the threat to Russia. In what way? In any way!
  16. +1
    5 October 2024 10: 46
    for these, tactical nuclear weapons are quite sufficient... Moreover, no one will feel sorry for them! Just wipe them off the map...
  17. 0
    6 October 2024 08: 07
    It is interesting how the author imagines the possibility of cutting off Western Ukraine from Eastern Europe to stop arms supplies. To do this, it was necessary to occupy the entire Western Ukraine. That is why we did not destroy the bridges across the Dnieper. This is a question. I hope there were and are reasons for this that we are not supposed to know about. Since the logic of military operations and the tasks of the SVO speaks about this with obviousness.
  18. 0
    7 October 2024 08: 26
    Yes, I agree, the Baltics are clearly being prepared for war. NATO does not feel sorry for them any more than it does for the Ukrainians. Of course, the Poles will be thrown into their support, just like in Ukraine, which will create even more problems.
  19. 0
    9 October 2024 23: 11
    And so it will be, all the preparations that are underway will have to result in something. The Balts are encouraged by their deep hatred of the Russians from 1945-1991, so we should expect cruelty towards the civilian population. Leningrad will get it again, like 80 years ago, and nothing can be done about it, it is in a completely wrong place, surrounded by enemies. And it is time to move the capital from Moscow deep into the country before it is too late, because there will be little left of the European part in case of serious fighting. We urgently need to build a layered defense line from the Baltic Sea to Kursk; if Belarus does not want to be quickly captured by the Poles, then there too. There will be war, it is inevitable. We can only hope that the Kremlin does not sleep through it, as in 1941.
  20. 0
    Yesterday, 09: 15
    We did nothing to strengthen the position of the Russian-speaking population in the "former" countries in the 90s, much less intervene in the pogroms and murders in the Asian republics. We should have built our policy in the CIS on the serious conclusions of these lessons. But, alas...