London begins 'mega-trial' over Western-made airliners stuck in Russia

24

A multi-billion-dollar legal battle over who will foot the bill for hundreds of planes stranded in Russia will begin in London this week, the Financial Times reports. The publication emphasizes that the owners are trying to get payments from insurance companies in one of the most complex and expensive cases heard in the High Court.

Groups including AIG, Chubb and Lloyd's of London are facing what one litigant called a "mega-trial" over insurance claims they refused to cover for owners of Boeing and Airbus planes stranded in Russia after February 2022

- explains the publication.



According to The Financial Times, in total, the aircraft owners are demanding about $3 billion from insurers.

Although the trial has not even begun yet, British media are predicting that the process could result in the biggest losses ever for the aviation insurance market.

Since the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, more than 500 planes worth about $10 billion have been stuck in Russia

– The Financial Times reminds us, emphasizing that Western lessors managed to return part of this fleet, but the majority of the planes remained in the Russian Federation and continue to fly on Russian airline routes.

The publication emphasizes that the interests of insurance companies in this process will be represented by the most famous lawyers in commercial disputes in England. The publication also provides the most likely arguments that the defendant's side will use.

The lawyers will point out that the conflict between Russia and Ukraine is expected to be resolved, depending in part on the outcome of the US elections. They will also point out that the wording of the insurance policies means that lessors are not covered.

- notes the publication.

As the British press suggests, this process will not be easy even for the judge who will hear the claims of the lessors. After all, he will have to determine which insurers are liable and under what types of policies: military or “all-risk” insurance.

To do this, the judge will have to determine the legal “cause” of the losses – whether the planes were seized by the Russian state or stolen by airlines.

- emphasizes the newspaper.

As noted in the publication, the largest leasing companies are not yet ready to comment on the prospects of their claims. For example, AerCap, which is demanding compensation for damages for more than 100 aircraft, is using various options to compensate for its losses. In particular, some time ago this leasing company entered into settlement agreements with a number of Russian airlines, thus returning about $1,3 billion.
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    1 October 2024 10: 56
    Life is everyday.
    What was more impressive was that even before the SVO, the patriotic owners of Norilsk Nickel were suing each other for it in London, and after the start of the SVO, they are again suing for it in London... (I came across a mention of it)
  2. +1
    1 October 2024 11: 03
    According to The Financial Times, in total, the aircraft owners are demanding about $3 billion from insurers.

    Wow... some pennies for several holdings at once...
    It's a different matter when Romka and Boriska went to court there for 5,5 billion... Know ours!!
  3. +11
    1 October 2024 11: 18
    Damn, why isn't there a MEGASUD in Russia due to frozen assets?
    1. -10
      1 October 2024 11: 23
      Because the planes were someone's...
      If your plane were stolen, you would immediately go to court.
      1. +4
        1 October 2024 11: 29
        Quote: Roman070280
        Because the planes were someone's...

        So the assets are also someone's.
        And how much in total, besides assets? Ships, deposits, apartments, land plots, etc.
        1. -4
          1 October 2024 11: 37
          So the assets are also someone's.

          Whose?? request

          And how much in total, besides assets? Ships, deposits, apartments, land plots, etc.

          Those who needed it got everything back.

          In Europe, sanctions have been lifted against two Russian billionaires: Mikhail Fridman and Petr Aven. This was reported by a RIA Novosti correspondent from the building of the EU General Jurisdiction Court in Luxembourg.

          With regard to businessmen, the EU Council regulations are cancelled "in the part in which they concern the mention of the said persons," the court chairman said. At the same time, The EU Council will be obliged to pay the costs and expenses of the court, as well as those of Friedman and Aven, related to the consideration of the case on exclusion from the sanctions lists.

          A French court has ordered the release of a 17-metre yacht belonging to billionaire Alexei Kuzmichev, who was hit with EU sanctions in March. In its ruling, the court cited customs officials' violation of procedures for boarding the vessel. The second yacht was released in October Kuzmicheva, also blocked in France
          1. -2
            1 October 2024 13: 29
            Quote: Roman070280
            Those who needed it got everything back.

            Do you know how many ordinary citizens, not oligarchs, had apartments in the West? Thousands. Spain, Italy, France were especially popular. And they all lost them.
            1. -3
              1 October 2024 13: 32
              And who should care? The owners of the planes themselves went to court.

              Or will Putin puff himself up for ordinary citizens?? Maybe he should also return 300 billion to ordinary citizens?? As it came, so it went..
              1. -2
                1 October 2024 13: 34
                Something has taken you off track. Reread the article and my first comment, everything is there.
                1. -5
                  1 October 2024 13: 38
                  That's what I answered you in the second comment.
                  What exactly is written there that is not clear?
                  The planes are someone's... their OWNERS/OWNERS are going to court because of them. They are suing for their personal/blood money.
                  Is everything clear up to this point??
                  Should I explain further??)
            2. +7
              1 October 2024 15: 45
              Ordinary citizens, they don't have apartments in the "west". Don't talk nonsense, "ordinary guy".
              1. -2
                1 October 2024 16: 52
                Oh, come on. Russia is a very expensive country. I have friends who can't afford a one-room apartment in Moscow, they live in a rented apartment, but they have (or rather had) a small house on the coast of Italy.
                You simply don’t know the price range abroad, otherwise you wouldn’t be writing nonsense.
                1. -2
                  1 October 2024 18: 43
                  "sunny house", you're delirious!!!
                2. -5
                  1 October 2024 23: 00
                  So let them go to court. At least to Basmanny. What's the problem? Here the airplane owners themselves filed a lawsuit. The key word is - themselves.
                  1. 0
                    3 October 2024 17: 16
                    The key thing here is that the owners of the planes have filed a lawsuit against their own and want to rip them off for an insurance claim. What's the point of filing a lawsuit in any Russian court regarding private property abroad? And there's no point in filing a lawsuit there. Because there's no court there, only a trial.
      2. +1
        3 October 2024 17: 07
        But no one stole the planes. They were still ready to pay for them according to the contract. Unilateral termination of the contract without reason is the lessor's problem.
        The assets were stolen and they still haven’t come up with any reason.
    2. 0
      3 October 2024 17: 12
      And who to sue? In London, it's a get-together. That is, who will be the one left holding the bag. Who should Russia sue in its own courts over assets?
    3. 0
      4 October 2024 11: 56
      Who to sue? In England, insurers sue aircraft owners, who will pay for the damages. And in Russia, who will they sue? Will Nabiullina sue herself?
  4. +1
    2 October 2024 10: 10
    Ukraine stole about 15000 railway gondola cars and tank cars from us. It is still unknown who owes whom.
  5. +1
    3 October 2024 02: 37
    The court of London keeps the intrigue in the matter of declaring the winner, unlike the court of Basmannog, where the most miserable bookmaker will be in the black. This is how the court was formed.
    1. 0
      3 October 2024 17: 19
      What intrigue? They are sorting it out among themselves. If the Russian Federation had been represented there, everything would have been known in advance.
      As with the same Valieva, where they simply ignored evidence of innocence.
      1. 0
        4 October 2024 01: 21
        Is it true? And in Basmanny, the interests of the VB are considered? And I hardly remember the British athletes. So, no need for blah-blah. If Berezovsky and Abramovichevsky had stopped by the Basmanny court to resolve their cases, who would have gotten everything?
  6. GN
    0
    3 October 2024 09: 41
    Pirates and highway thieves don't know or can do it any other way!! Only when their face hits the asphalt the question immediately arises: What for?? For this very thing!! Well, they're stupid!!
  7. 0
    3 October 2024 12: 29
    From a legal point of view, the position of leasing companies is impeccable - these are not military risks, but the most common force majeure due to decisions of state bodies. A military risk would be an official declaration of war and the property /aircraft/ getting into the combat zone. So the insurers have only one option - to drag out the litigation with the help of known tools, and this is real, in the hope of ending the conflict and settling this issue, after which they can bring a settlement agreement to court and kill the penalties and fines with it. We'll see! The case is interesting, but obvious to me.