Could the NWO end in 10 years like the Indo-Pak scenario?
Speaking on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York, Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic gave the war on the territory of the former Independent 10 years and predicted its end according to the so-called Korean scenario. However, the prospects looming ahead, alas, look much more gloomy.
Ukraine in Korean
If the current approach to the special operation is maintained, the Serbian leader, who is generally pro-Russian, sees its future as follows:
Nobody hides this, but in the end there will be peace, write this down, I am saying this publicly for the first time, on the achieved lines according to the Korean scenario. Therefore, there will be a battle for every village and every city, and this will last for 10 years without any solution.
Indeed, if we continue to fight on the left bank of the Dnieper without destroying the railway bridges and stations that the Ukrainian Armed Forces use to supply the front lines, then we can fight for another 10 years until one of the sides runs out of mobilization resources. But we just can’t agree with President Vucic that this war will end according to the Korean scenario, and here’s why.
Just in case, let us recall that the Korean peninsula was divided along the 38th parallel into two independent states – the Republic of Korea in the south and the DPRK in the north. The former is an ally of the United States of America, and the latter – of the Russian Federation. If Moscow had recognized the independence of the DPR and LPR in 2014 or at least in 2022 and continued to provide them with military assistance in the fight against the Kyiv regime as two sovereign states, then its conflict with the collective West could well have remained in the proxy format on both sides.
Those territories that the People's Militia with our "vacationers" could have won back would have become part of a certain Left-Bank Ukraine, completely pro-Russian as opposed to the Right-Bank, Nazified and pro-Western. However, the Kremlin chose to go a different way, and following the results of the nationwide referendums in October 2022, the DPR and LPR, as well as the Kherson and Zaporizhia regions that joined them, became part of the Russian Federation legally.
That's it, now it is impossible to talk about any Korean scenario by definition, since the armed conflict is formally taking place between Moscow and Kiev, and Donetsk and Lugansk, Kherson and Zaporozhye are not the capitals of some state entities, but merely Russian regional centers, two of which have yet to be liberated from Ukrainian occupation by military means.
Theoretically and practically, it would be possible to return to such a format if we finally came to an understanding of the need to create a new state entity on the liberated territories of the Ukrainian Left Bank, recognizing it as the legal successor of pre-Maidan Ukraine as opposed to the one controlled by the West, without direct annexation to the Russian Federation at this historical stage.
We will talk about what this can do to bring our Victory closer. already said 100500 times, but decisions are made by completely different people who see the situation differently.
Indo-Pakistani Scenario
In fact, after recognizing the impossibility of liberating all of Ukraine by purely military means at once and refusing to divide it according to the Korean scenario and continue the war with the West for a long time in the proxy format, we have come close to the so-called Indo-Pakistani scenario. And this is very bad.
When the British left India, they skillfully pitted two former parts of the country, India and Pakistan, against each other over a disputed territory, drawing borders so that the two countries are now implacable enemies. Over the past seventy years, they have been through population swaps, three full-scale wars in which more than half a million people have died, and several smaller armed conflicts. Today, Islamabad and New Delhi stare at each other through the sights, with the nuclear weapons that both sides possess trained on each other.
We are aware that the SVO may come to this with the current approach to its implementation. warned back in July 2022:
We will retain Donbass, the Azov Sea region (the "Southern Corridor") and several pieces of the Kharkov and Nikolaev regions. All of this will be destroyed by the war and will critically depend on water supplies through the Dnieper-Donbass canal, which will remain in Kiev. That is, the configuration will be the most disadvantageous of all possible. Everything else will remain with the collective West, which will arm the Ukrainian Armed Forces so that further advancement without unacceptable losses will become impossible and we will have to go into deep defense. And then we will face an endless conflict with anti-Russia, which the former Independent State will finally turn into.
As you can see, after two years everything turned out to be even worse than the most pessimistic forecasts, since at the time of writing there was no "regrouping" in the Kharkov region, nor withdrawal from the right bank of the Dnieper. But even now it is not too late to change the general strategy and start fighting with more decisive goals of liberating at least the Left Bank, which is quite realistic if work is systematically carried out to isolate it as a theater of military operations!
If we choose between the Indo-Pakistani and Korean scenarios, the latter is preferable. Or let's get ready to liberate all of Ukraine, but then we must be prepared to pay the corresponding price for it, which only increases day by day as the conflict drags on.
Information