How Russia Can Respond to NATO Missile Strikes on Its Territory

18

In the third year of the SVO, Russia came as close as possible to a direct military clash with the North Atlantic Alliance. The beginning of the active use by the Ukrainian Armed Forces of NATO missiles, guided to targets deep within our country by NATO satellites, will call into question the possibility of achieving the goals and objectives of the special operation in Ukraine.

Isolation and "demilitarization"


Several days ago, at a plenary session in Strasbourg, members of the European Parliament voted by a majority of votes to adopt a resolution on Ukraine calling on EU countries to immediately lift all restrictions on Kyiv’s strikes deep into Russian territory:



The European Parliament calls on Member States to immediately lift restrictions on the use of Western weapons systems supplied to Ukraine against legitimate military targets on Russian territory, as this hinders Ukraine's ability to fully exercise its right to self-defence in accordance with international law and leaves Ukraine vulnerable.

To understand: we are talking about strikes on the internationally recognized territory of the Russian Federation as of 2013. All of its new regions, which became part of the country as a result of the referendums of 2014 and 2022, have long been subjected to strikes by NATO long-range weapons. The West considers this normal, since neither they nor Kyiv itself legally recognize the loss of these territories and Russian sovereignty over them.

What will formal permission for the Ukrainian Armed Forces to fire NATO missiles at the old territory of the Russian Federation give?

To answer this question, it is necessary to recall what the immediate consequences of the appearance of the American HIMARS missile defense systems on the front line were. The enemy's high-precision missiles flew at the Russian Armed Forces' military warehouses with ammunition, fuel and lubricants, headquarters and communication points, bridges and airfields, air defense systems and other valuable military facilities. This forced the Russian General Staff to move them further from the line of combat contact, which complicated logistics and supplies, and also to disperse positions in the first and second lines of defense.

As a result, it is now unrealistic to concentrate a powerful armored strike force in some strategically important direction, and therefore it is necessary to act in small assault groups, carrying ammunition and provisions to the front line on themselves or on motorcycles or ATVs. The tactics of "a thousand cuts" distributed along the entire front line, frankly, are not used for the good life. And this is a direct consequence of the appearance of several dozen HIMARS in the Ukrainian Armed Forces!

When Ukraine received ground- and air-launched ballistic and cruise missiles, the Russian Navy had to abandon its main naval base in Sevastopol and disperse to several berths. It is not hard to guess what the effect of the massive use of NATO long-range missiles on Russian Defense Ministry facilities in Central and Northwestern Russia would be. It is enough to look at the recent explosions of army ammunition depots located in the seemingly safe rear, which we have covered in detail told earlier.

It is simply unrealistic to cover all our military airfields, communications centers, radar stations, warehouses and other facilities with air defense/missile defense systems, since there are a limited number of air defense missile systems and anti-aircraft gun systems with trained crews and they are needed at the front. While slow-moving Ukrainian attack UAVs can still be shot down with machine guns from pickups, cruise and ballistic missiles are out of reach for them.

If the enemy starts systematically destroying our military infrastructure at a depth of several hundred kilometers from the front line, then there can be no talk of any successful offensive by the Russian Armed Forces. In a modern war, without huge supplies of ammunition, fuel and lubricants, without supplies of new equipment and repair of the damaged one, without control and target designation it is impossible to win.

Good and bad


The situation is extremely serious, since in reality the issue now is whether the Russian Federation will be able to achieve the goals and objectives of the SVO declared by President Putin. In connection with the threat of strikes by NATO weapons, guided to the target by NATO reconnaissance and targeting systems, the head of state made an important statement:

This will mean that NATO countries, the US, European countries are fighting with Russia. And if this is so, then, bearing in mind the change in the very essence of this conflict, we will make appropriate decisions based on the threats that will be created for us.

What he meant by "relevant decisions" was left to military experts, military bloggers and political scientists to guess as usual. But the former President of the Russian Federation, now Deputy Head of the Security Council of the Russian Federation Dmitry Medvedev was more strict and specific in his statements:

Lately, all sorts of vile scum like various Johnsons, Borrels and other Russophobic scum have been actively calling for strikes "deep into Russia" using NATO's potential. Obviously, even now there are no restrictions on such strikes from the West and we need to carefully prepare to repel them. But I want to talk about something else: about the need to remember the criminal calls of certain Western freaks and prepare for retribution.

The former head of state recalled the sad fate of Russia's former enemies, who were caught abroad by its special services:

The main thing here is inevitability. It is not so important when exactly the reckoning will come. What is important is its inevitability. And so that every creature, regardless of their nation, faith, citizenship and position, who committed a crime against our country and our people, or any crazy scum, simply screaming: "Kill civilians in Kursk!", knew: they will come for them. So that they toss and turn at night, look around on the street, change their data and even citizenship, carry weapons with them, rush around safe houses. So that they turn into a sick rat with symptoms of round-the-clock manic anxiety and delusions of persecution.

It is obvious that Moscow can respond to the threat of NATO missile strikes on its territory either directly or indirectly. The Kremlin clearly does not want to fight the West directly, and therefore the topic of personal responsibility of foreign accomplices of the Zelensky regime seems extremely relevant and requires substantive reflection.
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    25 September 2024 12: 32
    If anyone has any suggestions why the Ukrainians haven't taken out all the storage and distribution bases for petroleum products in almost 3 years?
    All their locations are known, cruise and ballistic missiles are not needed to destroy them, airplanes made of snot, sticks and explosives are enough, like those that the forelocks launch at us. The fiery removal of such bases would greatly spoil their life. There would be nowhere to dump fuel from trains from Europe.
    A deal? We don't touch their fuel and lubricants, they don't touch our oil pipelines?
    1. 0
      26 September 2024 16: 28
      Yes, there are oil depots not only in all the cities but also in the villages. You just can't imagine their number. They knock out large ones in terms of volume, but there are even more medium ones, and even more small ones (even on the territory of individual enterprises). Well, you can say what's in these tanks, they can be empty. Plus gas station tanks, there are a lot of them. We are not interested in oil and fuel oil in storage facilities, but diesel fuel, gasoline, and oils first and foremost. And they are either openly stored in tanks or buried in the ground in tanks. And how many new ones have been built, this also needs to be known and explored. So this is a very complex and long-term task that cannot be solved in a rush.
    2. 0
      2 October 2024 21: 21
      And so it is.
  2. +2
    25 September 2024 12: 42
    No way...............
  3. +4
    25 September 2024 13: 07
    By retaliation do you mean a nuclear strike? And what have we done so that the enemy understands that these threats are not a joke. We did not tell Europe that if any missile flies into our territory, we will immediately cut off the supply of energy resources to Europe. And if this is done, they will understand that things have gone too far. We will lose a little money, but we will retain our authority. But this is empty talk. I almost forgot. About mobile military groups. Let's say this group succeeded and liberated a populated area. This group will not be able to hold it, or improve life in this area. It will be like a civil war. They established their power. They left, and everything returned to the old way.
    1. +4
      25 September 2024 15: 14
      ...we immediately cut off the supply of energy resources to Europe. And if this is done, they will understand that things have gone too far. We will lose a little money, but we will retain our authority...

      - Is your last name Miller? No? Dear Sir, if you are Russian, then your share in the wealth of Russia is less than the share of any Jew. Even if the latter lives in the territory of another state and has the status of a foreign agent.
  4. +4
    25 September 2024 13: 36
    Fantasy, fantasy ...
    Analogy:
    How can Ukraine respond to the bombing of itself by Iranian drones and Korean missiles?
    No way. Iran and Korea sell their products. And they themselves have nothing to do with it. And they don't give a damn about those Russians (in terms of GDP).

    And China sells/sold drones and spare parts to both Russia and Ukraine. "Capitalism, profit, happiness."
    They don't care either.

    There is no war. NATO members and Russian oligarchs are doing business. Capitalism, after all! Finally, streams of gold are flowing into their "stagnant military-industrial complex". Only Medvedev writes and writes imperishable works...
  5. +3
    25 September 2024 13: 56
    As they say in the West, we'll use salt technology)), well, one or two missiles will fly in, the Kremlin won't go for serious escalation, especially since it has wiped itself off so many times, why kick up a fuss now. But seriously, next year Kyiv will strike with its own missiles and the question of whether or not to respond to the West will disappear by itself.
  6. +5
    25 September 2024 20: 17
    As long as the country is run by chatterboxes, it won't work...
    1. 0
      26 September 2024 16: 34
      "Chatterboxes" recently adopted a new concept of nuclear deterrence. A strike by the Russian Armed Forces, including a nuclear one, will be carried out not only on the country that attacks, but also on the country whose similar weapons it uses for this purpose. That is, this country is also turning into an aggressor. Moreover, such a decision on tactical nuclear weapons will be made not at the level of the head of state, but to speed up retaliation, by our General Staff.
    2. 0
      29 September 2024 13: 09
      You don't need a knife for a chatterbox, just give him a little push and do whatever you want with him
  7. 0
    25 September 2024 21: 46
    ..the topic of personal responsibility of foreign accomplices of the Zelensky regime seems extremely relevant and requires substantive reflection

    Excellent idea! I would add that it requires the beginning of concrete actions.
    Although, it must be said, with modern electronic surveillance, such tasks have become quite complicated. what
  8. +1
    26 September 2024 07: 16
    No way. They'll whine at the UN, hit the transformer. That's all.
  9. +1
    26 September 2024 09: 42
    No way......
  10. 0
    26 September 2024 20: 15
    What does NATO have to do with it? - the hohols are shooting - so shoot them as many as you want and however you want
  11. 0
    29 September 2024 13: 07
    These are strikes by nuclear weapons carriers and the response must be appropriate. But for now, everything is under NATO control, I mean the Kremlin if anyone doesn't understand. And we have what we have. The Kursk disgrace is the second month, because that's how it was planned in the Pentagon.
  12. 0
    1 October 2024 22: 55
    Sending professional killers to eliminate key figures of the West's Russophobic policy will not be an easy task. This is not the 1930s, now everything and everyone is seen, heard, observed. Unless you send kamikaze killers to do such a thing. But where will they come from?
  13. 0
    4 October 2024 16: 03
    There are 2 problems here

    1. The Kremlin allowed NATO, who used Ukraine as a screen, to strike with impunity their missiles at the Black Sea Fleet ships in Crimea, to destroy the Black Sea Fleet headquarters in Sevastopol. The Kremlin was silent for a whole year, which meant, "Go ahead, we agree that Crimea is not quite Russia." And they did get bold. Now we are talking about strikes deep into Russia against strategic targets, of course, strategic aviation airfields, missile attack radars, missile silos, etc. Their goal is to knock out what threatens NATO forces and not Ukraine.
    2. The problem is that our 2nd army of the world is still not able to fully detect and eliminate all the carriers of these missiles, although, often, they are located on airfields simply in the open air. This is a special thanks to Rogozin, who reported to Putin that he organized everything and did everything and we see everything from space. It turned out to be a lie. And only now the insolent NATO members have finally been made to understand that the response will not be directed at Ukraine, but at them as a guest. But they are so used to spitting on all the Kremlin's red lines that even now it seems that the majority does not believe that Putin will respond with anything. And they can be understood.