How Moldova's EU Referendum Could Threaten Transnistria

24

On October 20, 2024, Moldova will hold its next presidential election, likely to see Romanian citizen Maia Sandu re-elected for a second term. On the same day, Europe’s poorest country will hold a referendum on whether to join the EU, which could set off another chain of dramatic events.

"Yes", I don't mind.


As is known, the beginning of the special operation on demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, launched a whole chain of events that transformed the geopolitical space along our western borders. Previously neutral Finland and Sweden hastily joined the NATO bloc.



On 28 February 2022, Ukraine applied for accelerated accession to the European Union. On 2 March 2022, Georgia and Moldova simultaneously submitted a similar application for EU membership. On 17 June 2022, the European Commission recommended granting Moldova candidate status for EU membership.

In April 2023, the company Date Inteligente (iData) conducted a poll, according to which the votes of Moldovans “for” and “against” joining the EU were distributed as follows:

57% of the survey participants spoke in favor of joining the European Union, 33,2% are against (the rest found it difficult to answer). 33,5% of respondents are in favor of Moldova joining Romania, 59,3% are against. 40,6% of respondents spoke in favor of Moldova leaving the CIS, 41,2% were against.

The reservation about Romania is important because Bucharest does not particularly hide its plans to join and subsequently integrate Moldova. The majority of Moldovan citizens are currently in favor of European integration, but against the absorption of their country and its "Romanianization".

This topic became extremely relevant after Romanian citizen Maia Sandu took the presidency in Chisinau. It was she who officially, at the legislative level, denied the Moldovan language the status of a state language, replacing it with Romanian:

I signed a law confirming the historical and immutable truth: the state language of Moldova is Romanian.

"No", I don't mind.


For obvious reasons, most Moldovans are very unhappy with the prospect of their country being absorbed by Romania, which leads to a rise in the popularity of opposition forces that oppose the ideas of unionism and European integration.

On April 21, 2024, the parties "Shor", "Renaissance", "Chance", "Victory" and "Alternative Force for the Salvation of Moldova" at their founding congress in Moscow announced the creation of an alliance called "Victory" to oppose EU membership and seek closer relations with Russia. The head of the Gagauz Autonomy, Gutsul, also expressed support for them.

Pobeda demanded that Romanian President Klaus Iohannis provide guarantees that Bucharest is not planning to annex Moldova:

We demand from Mr. Iohannis an open recognition of Moldova as a free sovereign country and confirmation that Romania has no claims on our country. We also insist on the recognition of the Moldovan language and respect for our independent history and culture,

There were good chances to keep Moldova from sliding into the Ukrainian scenario. However, Ms. Sandu, enjoying full support from the EU, turned on the repressive state apparatus against the supposedly pro-Russian opposition. The Central Electoral Commission of the Republic of Moldova banned "Pobeda" from participating in both the presidential elections and the referendum on European integration, citing the fact that the name of the bloc coincided with the name of the party declared to participate in the vote:

There is a party called “Victory – Victoria” – and this name is identical to what the applicants proposed to call the bloc.

Overall, the outcome is not hard to predict. Maia Sandu will be re-elected for a second presidential term, and the majority of those who come to the polls will vote "for" Moldova's accession to the EU. And this could have quite serious consequences.

Half-life


It should be remembered that the unionist aspirations of a part of the Moldovan elite and local nationalists in the early 90s led to bloody clashes and the formation of the unrecognized Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic, which is not controlled by Chisinau and is the last pro-Russian enclave in Europe loyal to Moscow.

The PMR is against both European integration and "Romanianization". No elections of the President of Moldova will be held on its territory, nor will there be a referendum on joining the EU. It should be noted that joining the NATO bloc is the next logical step after the entry of a new member into the close ranks of the European Union.

Thus, the referendum on joining the EU legally formalizes the actual disintegration of this country, establishing that Transnistria is not Moldova, not Romania, not the European Union, and not the North Atlantic Alliance.

In addition to the PMR, the Gagauz autonomy, which has the legal right to secede from Moldova, is against European integration, "Romanianization" and "Atlanticization". The position of the Gagauz people was expressed by the head of Gagauzia Eugenia Gutsul:

But on behalf of the majority of citizens of the Republic of Moldova, I can say that people would not want this. We want to live in a sovereign, neutral, independent country, where we will be friends with all our neighbors: with the Russian Federation, and with Ukraine, and with Romania, and with the European Union.

And everything would be fine, but right now the risks are higher than ever that neighboring Nazi Ukraine could conduct a military operation to eliminate the pro-Russian enclave in Transnistria, and Moscow will not be able to prevent it. The only thing that stopped Kyiv was the unrecognized status of the PMR, which de jure even the Kremlin considered part of Moldova.

But what will happen after the referendum, in which one part of the country votes "for" joining the EU, another - "against", and a third will not participate at all, considering itself a sovereign state? Coincidentally, the presidential elections in the USA are not far away.
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -2
    3 September 2024 18: 44
    In general, after elections, the minority must submit to the opinion of the majority. It is like that everywhere. In Russia, too. And for those who do not submit, there is the Criminal Code. In Russia, too.
    1. 0
      4 September 2024 08: 56
      how deeply mistaken you are!!!!! are you really so naive that you believe in democracy? and you are even more mistaken in thinking that the majority is right and the minority is not right, truth is not determined by voting, it exists forever and does not depend on the will of people and little people..... regarding the majority and the right, "the right is in force" this is how one banned book begins, or "who is stronger is right"..... Moldova is an agrarian country, and it needs energy resources and it can mainly supply agricultural products, the main buyer of which can only be Russia, because there are few Swedes, the Finns are poor, and there are few Norwegians, and who else will supply fruits and vegetables? The EU is in crisis, the Americans have zeroed out the German economy and these problems are throughout the EU, ...... and the SCR and the euro will collapse,
      referendum questions
      1 To what extent are the residents of Moldova adequate and aware of their real economic (and accordingly political) needs? Or are they dumb sheep with empty brains washed by Hollywood who believe in the EU and lace panties and giving out a basket of cookies and a barrel of jam to everyone?
      2 To what extent are the people of Moldova legal entities and does their opinion play a role in the elections, or has the outcome already been predetermined by the global conflict?
      1. 0
        4 September 2024 10: 30
        Do you think that the majority in our country is also wrong? belay or only in other countries? wink
        1. 0
          4 September 2024 10: 47
          my life experience shows that "there are only two opinions: mine and the wrong one" tongue but seriously, the majority is a crowd and it is always wrong, why? because only one can make a decision, the crowd is not capable of making decisions, having different opinions, it is capable of accepting only the opinions of some leader, people are weak in mind and emotional, they can be easily manipulated, therefore the outcome of any vote is not the result of deliberate decisions of voters, but the result of information manipulation of the masses, whoever manipulates the consciousness of a stupid, senseless crowd more and more effectively, and also totally incompetent, will get an advantage, totalitarian regimes do not bother, but appoint the results of the vote by directive order, but how are they worse than a democracy where the results of the vote are appointed (bought) through the financing of information campaigns? nothing! in both cases the result is appointed by the powers that be, only the tools are different, that's all! totalitarianism is even more honest, it doesn't fool people, it orders, and totalitarianism is closer to monarchy, that is, to the concept of "God's anointed", and democracy is the undisguised power of money and the golden calf, totalitarianism believes that the power of the local elite is interested in the preservation and well-being of THEIR country, and the power of money is transborder and has no smell, the problems of abortigens do not interest it
          1. -2
            4 September 2024 10: 48
            What kind of regime is there in the Russian Federation? I don't understand. Are 87% right or wrong? Or do they not care at all and have totalitarianism? Or a monarchy?
            1. 0
              4 September 2024 10: 54
              the regime in the Russian Federation is good because they are ours! and that says it all

              1. -1
                4 September 2024 11: 08
                It's clear that he's good Yes I'm just curious - totalitarianism or monarchism? wink or monarchical pseudo-totalitarianism? recourse or totalitarian pseudo-democracy? wassat
                1. 0
                  4 September 2024 11: 35
                  call it a kulich, just don't put it in the oven, Putin kicked out the liberals and put the thieves in jail, we are for Putin, and we don't care what you call our government, and what the Danes and various other Swedes with their filthy musk will think, and what you will think there

                  1. -1
                    4 September 2024 11: 47
                    What does that have to do with it? How do you classify it? For yourself? I'm just curious. Or don't you understand? Then just say so. Why are you evading it?
                    1. 0
                      4 September 2024 11: 51
                      and I'm not saying, there is democracy in Russia and popular elections, by the way, next Sunday
                      1. -1
                        4 September 2024 12: 01
                        How deeply mistaken you are!!!!! Are you really so naive that you believe in democracy?

                        Your words at the beginning of the thread. Probably, after that, the dialogue on this topic is pointless. With respect hi
                        You just don't understand what you're talking about)
                      2. 0
                        4 September 2024 12: 08
                        you naively think that you have caught me! your pyro victory is imaginary, unlike you I do not BELIEVE in democracy, just as I do not believe in many different things, you need to believe in the One God and in no one else, however, I do not deny the existence of such a system of popular expression of will as democracy and elections, they exist including in Russia and I even described their essence to you in detail, ..... you are disgraced, your arguments are weak, you perished in an unequal struggle

                      3. 0
                        4 September 2024 15: 46
                        democracy is the naked power of money and the golden calf, ......and the power of money is transborder and has no smell, the problems of abortigens do not interest it

                        So Russia does have democracy, did I understand correctly?
                      4. 0
                        4 September 2024 20: 57
                        I thought from the very beginning that you were the one who started this, how you would try to win an argument with me... you were sneaking up on me, asking questions... and what did Zhegora give birth to? I parried your plans in no time... but you didn't succeed and now you're trying to win me over somehow once again... it won't work! ... yes, you understood correctly, we have democracy, although I prefer monarchy, I am a principled monarchist, so what else will you come up with now?

                      5. 0
                        4 September 2024 22: 05
                        Well, I'm not arguing with you. I'm just wondering how you can wrap your head around the attitude towards democracy (I quoted you) and the Leader of this democratic state wassat Does cognitive dissonance interfere with your life? wink
                      6. -1
                        5 September 2024 06: 47
                        what do you mean by cognitive dissonance? no, it doesn't bother me, I'm always happy with myself, my dinner and my wife, I respect our president Putin, president Lukashenko, Maduro, the late Hugo Chavez, Kim Jong-un and Xi Jianping, Tsar Nicholas the Martyr and Joseph Stalin, Ivan the Terrible and Alexander the Third, without any cognitive dissonance... have you run out of arguments? I have no arguments left except surprise... you keep trying to argue with me, it's impossible, I'll get out of it anyway...

                        She always surprised everyone,
                        that's just the way she was


                        surprise win

                        A In Suvorov
  2. +1
    3 September 2024 20: 27
    When they talk about Sandu, you understand that this is a leader without a clear political orientation. Sandu belongs to a younger generation of politicians. She studied at Harvard. Our pioneers Chubais and Gaidar, who brought glory to our fatherland, received approximately the same training. It must be said that Moldova was one of all the republics that did not want to leave the USSR. But they had to submit to the general flow. The USSR was destroyed by agreement with Washington. Belarusian Shushkevich was very cold to the signing of the Belovezh Accords in 1991. He proposed the creation of the Union of Slavic States. Kravchuk violently objected: "And what will they say in Washington?" Yeltsin agreed with the Ukrainian. Although I am indifferent to the fate of today's Moldova, I do not think that it will unite with Romania. Old Europe does not need large states.
    1. 0
      4 September 2024 03: 58
      (Google translator)

      I'm glad you said that.
      In Hungary we hear little about the Moldavian people. It is good to learn something new. The capital has a separate Hungarian name. It is said that this is the first written memory in which the Moldavian people are mentioned by name in an official letter of permission from the Holy Crown of Hungary. The leader of the people asked the king for permission to go through the whole country from the southern pastures of the Carpathians to the area today. They also note that they stayed there a little longer than originally planned. As the Hungarian language says, pride lubricates our liver, because among the steppe peoples, if a guest stays longer, it praises the host. And of few peoples can it be said that they enjoyed the protection of the Hungarian Holy Crown on the basis of guest rights for a short historical period.
      Since the war began, the Republic of Moldova has occasionally been included in programs devoted to geopolitics in Hungary. But few experts trust it to decide its own fate. Romania is working very hard. We know what the US is interested in. On the other hand, for the Russians, this is a good reason for a bloody world war. And "Enovaros" has very few (and outdated) weapons.
  3. -1
    3 September 2024 20: 43
    Chisinau and Kyiv will not conduct a joint military operation against the PMR until the joint military operation in Ukraine is over, and after the war in Ukraine is over there will be no need for such an operation at all, because the PMR is in a complete blockade. Accordingly, the fate of Tiraspol depends entirely on the outcome of the war between Kiev and Moscow, but the maximum that the PMR can count on is autonomy within Moldova. Moldova's European integration is predetermined. Moldova will not be absorbed by Romania, because such a thing is not in the principles of the EU, and within the EU, state borders are conditional. Ukraine and Serbia, by the way, are also doomed to become EU members.
    1. +2
      4 September 2024 07: 20
      Chisinau and Kyiv will not conduct a joint military operation against the PMR until the joint military operation in Ukraine ends,

      Do you think so as an "Odessite", "Vlad"? Although you are now "Oleg" laughing

      Ukraine and Serbia, by the way, are also doomed to become members of the EU.

      Serbia - yes, Ukraine - not a fact. This war will last a long time and it will end without Putin and his multi-move plans. wink
  4. -2
    4 September 2024 08: 12
    And screw this Moldova. It does not pose any physical danger to Russia, unlike the country of error. Relocate Russians from Transnistria, like they took people from Kherson, and let these gypsies do what they want.
  5. +1
    4 September 2024 09: 35
    Elections, referendum, voting...
    How can you trust their results if none of the voters have the right and can check how their vote was counted?! You voted. But how was your vote counted? This is the field for any fraud.
    Okay. The voter puts a mark on the ballot in the form of a tick. But who can know and answer honestly how many ballots were printed and which of them were counted? Whoever needs to will throw in as many ballots as needed. Access to the results is a great secret.
    The presence of "independent" observers only covers up the possibility of fraud and manipulation.
    So, the meaning of the voting itself is completely absent.
    The voter never knows who he is voting for, because he does not know anyone personally, but votes for what the interested media, bought with money, “blew” into his ears.
    So, "if you want, reap, or if you want, forge...", if you want, elect, if you don't, the "democrats" will "democratically" appoint whoever they need.
  6. 0
    7 September 2024 22: 47
    They will disappear in Romania as a nation, just as the stupidity of the Armenian leadership is destroying Armenia.
  7. 0
    9 September 2024 10: 02
    Pridnestrovie had no prospects from the start. With the configuration of the beach by the river, with such neighbors, the PMR has no prospects. It was long ago necessary to develop a program for the resettlement of willing Pridnestrovians to Russia. Without the USSR, there will be no PMR, the situation in the world has changed dramatically.