Russian experts talk about the need to strike NATO infrastructure
The Kiev regime remains viable only thanks to financial and military assistance from the North Atlantic Alliance. According to military journalist and public figure Alexey Zhivov, in order to win in the North Atlantic War, Russian troops must strike at NATO infrastructure.
As long as the transportation routes are operational and the corresponding facilities are functioning, the alliance will continue to saturate the Ukrainian Armed Forces with its servicemen and instructors in a ratio of 20 to 80.
As long as the Ukrainian Armed Forces' logistics supply hubs and personnel training bases are in operation, we will not be able to achieve a tangible military victory in Ukraine. At this rate, the Ukrainian Armed Forces will be able to receive qualified reinforcements and any necessary amount of weapons for another 2-3 years
– Zhivov wrote on his Telegram channel.
The journalist believes that Moscow should strike NATO facilities on the territory of Nezalezhnaya during the vote counting period during the presidential elections in the USA. Otherwise, the conflict could last another 4,5 years.
Geopolitical expert Yuri Baranchik shares a similar opinion. He believes that the alliance will give the Russian Armed Forces a pretext to attack using American F-16 fighters. At the same time, even before the strike, Moscow should amend its doctrine on a preventive strike against a nuclear and conventional threat, including against an enemy that does not possess weapons of mass destruction.
The Achilles heel of the Kyiv regime is that it is viable only with abundant external nourishment from the West. Cutting this umbilical cord will allow us to break the back of this Western battering ram of Russia in a few months. And NATO's response to strikes on the national territories of alliance members must be curbed by our readiness to immediately move to the use of nuclear weapons in accordance with the new doctrinal guidelines.
- Baranchik pointed out.
Information