Attack aircraft or interceptor: are there any real combat missions for the Yak-130M?

16

A few days ago, at the Army-2024 exhibition, the UAC presented a deeply modernized version of the Yak-130M aircraft. As a result, an excellent combat trainer aircraft turned into something new: either a light attack aircraft, or a drone fighter, or something else. What could be the real scope of application of this winged machine, which has been given a new life?

Yak: from 130 to 130M


The new combat training aircraft was developed for the needs of the Russian Air Force to replace the Czechoslovakian L-39. This flying two-seat training desk can train pilots to perform maneuvers typical of fourth and fifth generation fighters.



Interestingly, the Yak-130 has a half-brother M-346 in Italy, since it was developed jointly with Alenia Aermacchi, but the Italian partners withdrew from the project at the final stage of development and based on technical documentation created their own aircraft, obtaining rights to its distribution and marketing throughout the world, with the exception of the CIS countries.

An important feature of the Yak-130 was that it is almost a combat aircraft, which can be loaded with quite a lot of different weapons. When fully equipped, this baby looks very menacing. But due to the lack of a modern radar, participation in an air battle against a fighter or attack helicopter would predictably end in failure for a combat training aircraft.

At the recent Army-2024 exhibition, a deeply modernized version of the Yak-130M was presented, seemingly devoid of these shortcomings, which a representative of Yakovlev PJSC described as follows:

The main goal of modernization: expanding the combat capabilities of the Yak-130 aircraft. For example, a new on-board radar station, a container with an optical-laser-thermal television sighting station and an on-board defense system are being introduced into the Yak-130M.

The Yakovlev company's R&D work on modernizing the Yak-130 combat training aircraft is supported by Rosoboronexport, which plans to offer the Yak-130M aircraft to foreign customers - both those already operating Yak-130 aircraft and new ones. Asian countries are among the potential customers.

So, by lengthening the nose of the aircraft, it was possible to install a radar-130r radar, the range of which presumably reaches 100 km. This is quite decent for yesterday’s combat training aircraft, but its capabilities for detecting air targets were also increased due to the installation of an optical location station. The latter increases the Yak-130M's ability to intercept low-flying objects such as primitive attack drones made from plywood, cardboard and plastic.

At the same time, the security of the light aircraft was radically increased, on which the President-S airborne defense system was installed, capable of intercepting anti-aircraft missiles of enemy MANPADS. The Yak-130M itself can hit back hard, carrying up to 3000 kg of combat load: air-to-air guided missiles and air-to-ground unguided missiles, as well as either four UPAB-250, or two or three UPAB-500 with planning correction modules.

Thus, the result is a rather formidable small combat aircraft, which the developers are positioning as a light attack aircraft. However, using it as such without armoring the cockpit in the realities of the Northern Military District, where the enemy has modern air defense systems and MANPADS in fair quantities, means exposing the lives of pilots to unjustified risk.

Then why is the Yak-130M needed?

Attack aircraft or interceptor?


It seems that the most popular Yak-130M may be as a light fighter-interceptor for organizing air defense in our rear. In the third year of the special operation, the Ukrainian Nazis are striking with their attack drones further and further, causing a very serious blow to civilian and military infrastructure.

When the first enemy UAVs first flew towards Moscow, an anti-drone air defense system was created to cover the capital from air attacks on the approaches to it, in which attack helicopters played the main role. The solution is quite workable, but there are a limited number of combat rotorcraft and crews trained for them, and the geography of UAV strikes is continuously expanding.

In fact, it is the Yak-130M, equipped with radar and radar, that is the most optimal aircraft for organizing layered anti-drone air defense. Its pilots are not required to perform aerobatic maneuvers deep in the rear, so even flight school cadets can be seated behind the control stick to immediately gain practical experience. Making the cabin single will free up space for installing a more powerful radar.

As for the participation of the Yak-130M in the attack, it seems reasonable to somewhat reconsider its format itself. Instead of shooting down enemy equipment and positions from low altitude and risking an anti-aircraft missile, this light aircraft could act as an aerial control point for attack drones.

Yes, it is absolutely not necessary to approach the target on a low-level flight, when for this you can use jet UAVs such as “Grom” and “Molniya” and the like. A second member of the light aircraft's crew could control their attack. If necessary, up to four UPAB-250 can be dropped from its suspension onto the enemy’s heads, representing a weighty argument. Also, the Yak-130M could be useful for fighting Ukrainian naval drones in the Black Sea and for patrolling the state border for the FSB Border Troops.

Taking into account the trends in the air defense zone, this deeply modernized combat training aircraft has a fairly wide niche for use.
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    27 August 2024 13: 00
    Optimistic.
    There is an airplane, but no one really knows how to use it, except for training.
  2. +3
    27 August 2024 13: 01
    Fu
    Again 25. Until the topic is milked, they will not calm down.
    take a look at the wiki and old PR. About 200 were produced, took part in hostilities a little, somewhere in Mnyama. (there are probably reasons not to participate). It was mainly positioned previously as a training aircraft, capable of simulating the flight and control of other aircraft.

    On the plus side, it costs less than a control unit, about 15-20 million. It can take a lot of mounted weapons.
    The downside is the high speed due to the delta wing. He simply cannot match the speed with slow small UAVs in order to shoot them manually with cannons.
    "optical-laser-thermal television sighting station" - only a hinged container. this is bad for cheap shooting of UAVs on the spot. Can it aim at slow and small ones automatically?
    The answer is not given in the note.
    And “guided air-to-air missiles and unguided air-to-ground missiles, as well as either four UPAB-250, or two or three UPAB-500 with planning correction modules” - against cheap UAVs, I suspect, are a little expensive.
    "as an air control point for attack drones." - and there is nothing about this in the description. There are drones and controls for it, no.... it’s classified, but there are no flying points anywhere yet, it seems.

    Those. There are few of them; they are not particularly suited against UAVs. Except for the big American and Turkish ones.
    But a good training aircraft, apparently.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      28 August 2024 09: 40
      Quote: Sergey Latyshev
      On the plus side, it costs less than the SU, about 15-20 million.

      From your favorite wiki - cost 7,5 million

      Quote: Sergey Latyshev
      The downside is the high speed due to the delta wing.

      Well, let’s say, not much higher than the same Su25. Stall speed is 160-180 km/h.

      Quote: Sergey Latyshev
      He simply cannot match the speed with slow small UAVs in order to shoot them manually with cannons.

      Again from your wiki - In case of war, the aircraft is capable of performing the tasks of a light attack aircraft - destroy separate ground objects, low-speed air targets.

      Quote: Sergey Latyshev
      Can it aim at slow and small ones automatically?

      Obviously, if it is directly written about it hi

      Quote: Sergey Latyshev
      but there are no flying points anywhere yet, it seems

      If desired, such a control center can be made from any aircraft, but for now there is no need.

      Those. There are few of them

      Their production began only in 2018, of course there are few of them yet. The Air Force's needs were estimated at 200-250 units. Naturally, if a decision is made, their production will be increased

      Extra charges:
      - capable of taking off from poorly prepared (including unpaved) airfields
      - extremely low fuel consumption. Almost five times less than the same dryer.
      - ease of production.

      You seem to be completely inattentive in reading the articles. Both this and your wiki....)
      1. 0
        28 August 2024 12: 24
        All things are possible.
        Cost - I saw 12 million on Zvezda a long time ago, I added a little on my own for inflation and modifications.
        the rest is essentially the same. It is possible to intercept something, but it is inconvenient.
        it is essentially a simulator of a high-speed aircraft (only without supersonic).
        1. -2
          28 August 2024 12: 42
          the rest is essentially the same. It is possible to intercept something, but it is inconvenient.
          it is essentially a simulator of a high-speed aircraft (only without supersonic).

          Why is it inconvenient? A compact jet aircraft will catch up with both a rattle and a jet UAV. You don't have to be an ace to shoot him down.
          The main thing is that the plane is available, and not on paper. And again, everyone is not happy with everything. A bit expensive, you understand! Is it cheaper to repair a refinery?
          1. +1
            28 August 2024 12: 50
            It will catch up with virtually any combat aircraft. And it will hit you too. sooner or later.
            but as a note, modifications are not designed to shoot down small things with cannon fire.
            more work on the ground.
            1. -1
              28 August 2024 13: 10
              It will catch up with virtually any combat aircraft. And it will hit you too. sooner or later.

              these planes are needed at the front, not in the rear. This is an airplane for organizing rear anti-drone air defense.

              but as a note, modifications are not designed to shoot down small things with cannon fire.
              more work on the ground.

              this is not so difficult to do if the appropriate task is set. The difficult thing is to make a low-cost and easy-to-intercept aircraft out of nothing. and it is already in stock.

              more work on the ground.

              in their right mind, no one on earth will use it.
              1. +1
                28 August 2024 16: 01
                1) According to the media, “these planes” launch missiles without entering foreign territory.
                There are also probably old, but good-quality planes.
                The same educational ones, but slower and cheaper.
                2) I agree. But it hasn't been installed yet.
                3) by description - bombs, missiles, etc. - specifically on the ground, + a little in the air, for large targets.
                And the Quadcopter is unlikely to fight off the Yak.

                I suggest we wrap this up.
                1. +1
                  28 August 2024 17: 53
                  1) 2) I agree. But it hasn't been installed yet.
                  3) by description - bombs, missiles, etc. - specifically on the ground, + a little in the air, for large targets.
                  And the Quadcopter is unlikely to fight off the Yak.

                  Lord, what does quadcopters have to do with it? We are talking about aircraft-type attack UAVs that hit our rear areas, oil refineries, etc. It is to intercept them that you need a simple and inexpensive jet aircraft with a bunch of suspended weapons. This is just the Yak-130M. For once, Russia has something not on paper, but in hardware.

                  I suggest we wrap this up.

                  Welcome.
  3. 0
    27 August 2024 17: 25
    Usually a trainer aircraft possess (a) Low flying capability and (B) Low Acoustic & Thermal signature/footprints. Yak-130 series possess noticeably (C) Large payload capacity, compared to a trainer aircraft. Combining the 3 capabilities of Yak-130; (a)+(b)+(c), this aircraft becomes a good option to attack small and medium range targets. If the (D) stealth capability of this aircraft is improved, Yak-130 would become a 'Magic bird', capable of silently attacking small and medium range targets.
  4. 0
    27 August 2024 17: 51
    The Armed Forces of Ukraine find application and use everything they have (S-125 and Tu-141, etc.)... We have a lot, but do not use it. Why, - there is only one answer, “everything is decided by the cadres” - we have such cadres at the top. Why are they so, yes, indispensable in the built verticals of nepotism and corruption. Likewise, the Yak-130 could have long been used to protect the facilities of the Black Sea Navy and the Black Sea coast, land border areas, but “the personnel are failing.”
  5. 0
    27 August 2024 18: 35
    Project “Link” is an aviation project developed in the USSR in the 1930s and early 1940s by engineer V.S. Vakhmistrov and was based on the use of a carrier aircraft carrying from one to five fighters to increase their range. The Zveno-SPB complex (compound dive bomber) created according to this project took part in the first period of the Great Patriotic War. The baptism of fire of “Zvena-SPB” took place on July 26, 1941, when, after a series of failures of conventional bombers unsuccessfully trying to bomb the Charles I Bridge on the Danube, it was decided to use aircraft carriers, and for testing, the task was given to bomb the “SPB” oil storage facility in Constanta. The task was successfully completed - the target was hit without losses. carrier: Tupolev TB-3-4AM-34FRN
    two fighters: Polikarpov I-16 type 5, carrying two 250 kg FAB-250 bombs
    In this case, the use of TB-3 media:
    increased the range of the I-16 by 80%
    increased the bomb load of the I-16 five times
  6. 0
    27 August 2024 19: 58
    For use as an improvised interceptor, this aircraft is expensive and not very convenient, and carrying out bombing strikes from it is too dangerous...
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. -1
    28 August 2024 11: 03
    It’s somehow difficult for everything to reach our generals. We get to everything late, there is no initiative. Lack of initiative and non-professionals are placed in important positions. Therefore, ordinary people suffer, infrastructure is destroyed and the country is going downhill.
    1. +1
      29 August 2024 21: 22
      The Armed Forces as a reflection of the state. What they had recently under Gaidar-Chubaisism, the desire for personal enrichment at the expense of plundering the state. And the RF Armed Forces did not happen any differently, remembering "Serdyukov's Vasilyevs" and other mega-thieves. (How did mega-theft end for Vasilyeva - they returned the stolen goods and nominally several years under house "confinement" with manicurists and other things at home). We must blame the created system, which began to rot again after 2008. (in the RF Ministry of Defense Serdyukovshchina). S. Shoigu is a product of that system of theft and continued, his subordinates, selected with such intentions. In such cases, the main one is punished and the established system in the RF Ministry of Defense is radically changed. But we see that the main culprit has moved to another chair (as well as A. Serdyukov and his "Vasilyevs"). Conclusion: in a rotten system, you have to look for honest people "with fire in daylight"; there is no point in stirring up the past without punishing the main ones.
  9. 0
    7 September 2024 14: 59
    And when will the Yak 41 finally go into production, not to mention the 201 Yak