CSTO, Belarus or North Korea: which of the allies will provide military assistance to Russia?

134

The attack of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the Russian Kursk region, for which the Russian Ministry of Defense for some reason was not quite ready, raises a very serious layer of international legal agreements in the field of security that should have been activated three days ago. What exactly are we talking about, and can our country seriously count on any external allies?

Strictly speaking, Russia formally has at least three allies who could and should assist us in liberating the internationally recognized territory of the Russian Federation occupied by the Ukrainian army.



Allies in the CSTO


The first who should rush to the aid of border Sudzha are our allies, friends and partners in the Collective Security Treaty Organization, which, in addition to Russia, also includes Belarus, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan.

Let us recall that the agreement on its creation was signed on May 15, 1992 in Tashkent. The main purpose of the existence of this organization is stated to be the reflection of security threats, as well as the protection of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the participating states. What obligations it entails for all allies can be judged from Article 4, which we will quote in full:

If one of the participating States is subjected to aggression (an armed attack threatening security, stability, territorial integrity and sovereignty), it will be considered by the participating States as aggression (armed attack threatening security, stability, territorial integrity and sovereignty) to all states parties to this Agreement.

In the event of an aggression (an armed attack threatening security, stability, territorial integrity and sovereignty) to any of the participating States, all other participating States will, at the request of that participating State, immediately provide it with the necessary assistance, including military, as well as support from their disposal of funds in the exercise of the right to collective defense in accordance with Article 51 of the UN Charter.

States parties shall promptly notify the United Nations Security Council of the measures taken under this article. In implementing these measures, the participating States will adhere to the relevant provisions of the UN Charter.

Well, the time to fulfill our obligations has come, since by a direct and open attack of the Ukrainian Armed Forces on the Kursk region of the Russian Federation, its security, stability, territorial integrity and sovereignty over this border territory were jeopardized.

Probably, Belarusian, Armenian, Tajik, Uzbek and Kyrgyz paratroopers, special forces and motorized riflemen are already at a low start, waiting only for the Russian Ministry of Defense to lift them to the Kursk region with its military aviation aircraft. We are waiting, sir!

Belarusian allies


The Belarusian paratroopers, special forces and motorized riflemen, whom we are already tired of waiting for in the Northern Military District zone for the joint denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine, deserve a separate discussion. Minsk's official position on this matter was clarified by President Lukashenko in October 2022:

As for our participation in the SVO in Ukraine, we are participating there. We don't hide this. But we don't kill anyone. We do not send our military anywhere. Our participation is to prevent the spread of this conflict to the territory of Belarus, firstly. Secondly, to prevent an attack on Belarus under the cover of the Northern Defense Forces from Poland, Lithuania and Latvia.

Well, let’s say “diplomat” Lukashenko does not send the Belarusian military to the former territory of Independence, which he is in no hurry to legally recognize as Russian. However, the Kursk region, where the Ukrainian Armed Forces invaded four days ago, is an internationally recognized territory of the Russian Federation, which is not disputed by anyone.

Moreover, Russia and Belarus are members of the Union State, having certain obligations towards each other, including in the military sphere, enshrined in the relevant treaties. For example, in the military doctrine of Belarus, approved by the People's Assembly, a new clause recently appeared, which says the following verbatim:

The Republic of Belarus considers any actions using military force directed against any of the member states of the Union State as an encroachment on the Union State as a whole and will take appropriate retaliatory measures using all forces and means at its disposal.

The Law “On Martial Law” of the Republic of Belarus states verbatim the following:

The Republic of Belarus considers aggression by any state (coalition of states) against one of the CSTO member states as aggression against all CSTO member states and will provide the state against which the aggression was carried out with the necessary assistance, including military assistance.

That is, both within the CSTO and within the Union State, Minsk should have already begun to provide Moscow with assistance in liberating the Kursk region from the invading units of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. So where were the Belarusian paratroopers and motorized riflemen lost? Why are allied obligations not being fulfilled?

Perhaps Russia should withdraw its troops that are part of the regional group of troops guarding the western borders of Belarus from NATO, and redirect them to protect our own border area? In the end, Moscow has already transferred tactical nuclear weapons with delivery systems to Minsk. What else do you need from us?

North Korean allies


Finally, it is worth remembering that at the end of June 2024, Russia and the DPRK entered into a comprehensive strategic partnership agreement, which contains the following: position:

If one of the parties is subjected to an armed attack by another state or group of states and finds itself in a state of war, the other party will immediately provide military and other assistance with all means at its disposal in accordance with national legislation and the UN Charter.

For some reason, I think that on Pyongyang’s part these are not empty declarations, as some are making. North Korea has already provided our country with real support, political, recognizing the DPR and LPR as Russian, and the militarytechnical. For some reason, it seems that if Moscow turns to the DPRK for direct military assistance, it can actually come from there, quickly creating a numerical superiority at the front and making a decisive contribution to the defeat of NATO proxies in the form of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in Ukraine.

The enemy is already on our internationally recognized territory. Where to go next?
134 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    9 August 2024 18: 05
    Belarus definitely won’t. There, according to their constitution, the use of the armed forces is only for the defense of Belarus. and this constitution takes precedence over all other states and between states. acts
    Moreover, in Poland, the escaped oppositionists have a grudge against Lukashenko and are preparing detachments for chaos in the republic. And among other things, weapons for example, there is almost nothing. We ourselves give them a lot. But giving us to them is one thing, but giving them something to us is another.
    The DPRK can only help with equipment and ammunition. The military does not. , perhaps only by some kind of specialists to operate this equipment and train.
    1. -4
      9 August 2024 18: 57
      Lukashenko is not an ally. The constitution in a normal state changes once or twice if necessary Yes
      1. +3
        9 August 2024 19: 02
        Lukashenko is not an ally. The constitution in a normal state changes once or twice if necessary yes

        Lukashenko is not an ally. And the Republic of Belarus, according to the agreement, is an ally of the Russian Federation and must fulfill its allied duty.
      2. 0
        13 August 2024 13: 04
        Do you mean retirement? laughing
    2. +3
      9 August 2024 19: 01
      The DPRK can only help with equipment and ammunition. The military does not. , perhaps only by some kind of specialists to operate this equipment and train.

      On what basis is such a bold conclusion made? Are you an expert on North Korea?
    3. +8
      9 August 2024 20: 07
      No one will provide help. For all these kings, Russia is just a cash cow, like under the USSR. All you can hear from them is - give me money, give me weapons, give me oil/gasoline/gas, help me, write off loans, don’t you dare close the labor market for our barmaleys, etc., etc.
      The Russian leadership, if it is still adequate (which I doubt), needs to spit on such “allies”, leave the CSTO and take care of its own defense, without wasting money on beggars and traitors.
      1. 0
        13 August 2024 13: 06
        How about coordinating your actions? ..no, didn’t guess
    4. 0
      10 August 2024 10: 55
      Belarus definitely won’t. There, according to their constitution, the use of the armed forces is only for the defense of Belarus. and this constitution takes precedence over all other states and between states. acts

      Belarusians will not interfere with Ukraine. Too dangerous for their own safety.
      Both from the opposition and from the Russian oligarchs. Remember how many times they impudently tried to “privatize” Belaruskali and other enterprises.
      The oligarchs in the Russian Federation have not gone away. But if Dad weakens, everything will fall into the greedy hands of the privatizers.
      Here, in the comments, they say that Lukashenko is not an ally. Rave.
      This is one of Russia's most reliable allies.
      1. +2
        10 August 2024 13: 11
        Belarusians will not interfere with Ukraine. Too dangerous for their own safety.

        Will they be in the Kursk region? To restore the territorial integrity of an ally?

        This is one of Russia's most reliable allies.

        How exactly did this manifest itself? in the withdrawal of troops from the southern border so that the Ukrainian Armed Forces go to the Kursk region?
      2. +1
        13 August 2024 13: 07
        Until the first policeman! Proverb...ally
  2. -3
    9 August 2024 18: 41
    CSTO, Belarus or North Korea: which of the allies will provide military assistance to Russia?

    Belarusians have, for example, “Polonaise”. Lukashenko said that Minsk is ready to increase their production, working 25 hours a day. And it’s closer than bringing it from Korea. But Moscow doesn’t seem to have any desire to purchase and use them in war. Probably afraid for the crown. So that it doesn't fall off your head.
    1. +4
      9 August 2024 19: 00
      Polonaises Polonaises, as I understand it, are offered to be purchased at the market price?
      What about personal participation? What about the allied duty to liberate the Kursk region? Didn't you personally, Mr. Russian officer, refer to certain documents where all the obligations of the parties are spelled out?
      Not? Is this different?
      1. 0
        9 August 2024 19: 22
        Quote: Beydodyr
        Polonaises Polonaises, as I understand it, are offered to be purchased at the market price?

        The issue of prices is none of our business. This is the first thing. And secondly, buying from Pyongyang is one thing, but from Minsk is, as you would like to put it, something else?
        Z.Y. I will leave the rest of your nonsense unanswered. I feel sorry for my own time.
        1. +1
          10 August 2024 06: 43
          Z.Y. I will leave the rest of your nonsense unanswered. I feel sorry for my own time.

          Yes, yes, he regrets his time. Someone here promised to go to war in the event of an attack on Russia. What, has the military registration and enlistment office already fled from the safety of Belarus?
      2. +1
        10 August 2024 10: 39
        Beautiful, some Russians are fleeing abroad to escape mobilization, and the Belarusians, whose country is being shot up and down by NATO-transferred weapons, should start fighting, or maybe Russia will first declare war on UKRAINE, and not the North Military District?
        1. +2
          10 August 2024 12: 04
          Beautiful, some Russians are fleeing abroad to escape mobilization, and the Belarusians, whose country is being shot up and down by NATO-transferred weapons, should start fighting, or maybe Russia will first declare war on UKRAINE, and not the North Military District?

          Or maybe some Belarusians will not fight on the side of the Ukrainian Armed Forces?
          Or maybe Belarus will fulfill its duty as an ally and help liberate the Kursk region of the Russian Federation?
          Or maybe Russia should withdraw its troops from Western Belarus and nuclear weapons, and you will defend yourself?
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. 0
            10 August 2024 12: 55
            Or maybe some Belarusians will not fight on the side of the Ukrainian Armed Forces?

            What advice do you have for the fighters of the Russian Volunteer Corps fighting on the side of the Ukrainians?
            1. +2
              10 August 2024 13: 12
              What advice do you have for the fighters of the Russian Volunteer Corps fighting on the side of the Ukrainians?

              Hit yourself against the wall. We'll catch everyone later.
              Nothing to say about everything else?
              1. +2
                10 August 2024 14: 48
                When you catch your own, then everything else will be said about it.
      3. 0
        13 August 2024 13: 10
        Commitments agreed????
        So they have been agreed upon, signed and ratified for participation in the SVO by 24/02/22!
        Until this date...what do you propose?
  3. +1
    9 August 2024 19: 09
    You have to keep your ears open when it comes to Belarusians. They won’t support you, and they won’t provide assistance. And our nuclear weapons were in vain there. It will be hard to sell.
    1. 0
      13 August 2024 13: 11
      Are you sick? They will sell nuclear weapons...
      They don't control him.
  4. +7
    9 August 2024 19: 39
    What a stupid question? This question was already answered a century ago and it remains unchanged! Russia has ONLY two allies, the army and the navy! But in reality today the ONLY country in the WORLD can help! This is North Korea! And period! And the rest of the “allies” just beg, steal, snatch for free from Russia, in short, DRAMOEATS!!!
    1. -2
      10 August 2024 02: 23
      North Korea?
      Isn’t this the one that depends on China like Israel depends on the USA?
      Why not immediately turn to China? Now China is also snatching freebies from Russia in the form of hydrocarbons (for almost nothing), and before that it exported timber, and still exports it today.
      As for the Darmoeds..... watch the video, there people like you explain how many freebies they get from Russia and to whom:



      The media report how in Russia their own generals and other Serdyukovs/Ulyukaevs and governors steal (they wrote that someone’s money was taken out with a Kamaz truck) - where are the “allies” compared to them?

      Russia has ONLY two allies, the army and the navy!

      Are they the ones who carried out a coup in St. Petersburg a century ago in 1917, depriving Russia of Finland and Poland?
      And in October 1993, one of the allies (the army) brought Yeltsin to power, under which Russia lost 14 republics and allies in Eastern Europe, and who are today enemies of the Russian Federation?
      1. -2
        10 August 2024 06: 03
        this is an internal matter. And the king meant external threats, so your example is inappropriate
        1. +3
          10 August 2024 09: 31
          While the tsar (Alexander III, it was he who said - the army and navy allies) had in mind external threats, internal threats turned out to be more dangerous)
          Look at the picture of how the soldiers take him with bayonets, and the sailor chops him with a saber:
        2. +3
          10 August 2024 10: 48
          What and who the Tsar-Empire had in mind is no longer known. But the hope and support of the king and the fatherland ultimately destroyed the empire. This is a fact.
      2. +2
        10 August 2024 12: 15
        Is North Korea dependent on China? But no one can say how exactly this dependence manifests itself? Political dependence? There is not a single Chinese military base in the DPRK; China is not satisfied with the DPRK’s nuclear and missile program, for which, along with the Russian Federation, it imposed and supported sanctions. The DPRK conducts its own policy, conducts nuclear and missile tests when they see it necessary, and China does not dictate to them. In 2017, the Chinese, dissatisfied with the testing of nuclear weapons, massed troops to the border with the DPRK.
        Economic? The DPRK has been under all kinds of sanctions since 2006, under the sanctions of the United States and its satellites since the 50s. North Korea and China seem to have a common land border. The dependence is that they maintain trade relations? Is it okay that the main income of any country is international trade? The DPRK completely closed its borders with the outside world during the Covid pandemic, and trade turnover with China fell through the roof. It seems like the DPRK didn’t collapse after that?
        If the Russian Federation is unable to ensure its security, the DPRK has all the capabilities and means to do so. They do not need to ask China for permission to do this. Stop thinking in stereotypes, learn to think with your own head and not with what the media is telling you.
        1. +1
          10 August 2024 13: 09
          ...sort of...

          Honor an intelligent person, and don’t make arguments out of thin air:
          https://iz.ru/1500316/2023-04-18/vostokoved-rasskazal-o-vzaimovygodnom-sotrudnichestve-kitaia-i-severnoi-korei
          1. 0
            10 August 2024 20: 34
            These are real facts and events that happened, I didn’t make this up.
            Are climate and sanctions making the DPRK seriously dependent? I repeat that during the pandemic, the DPRK completely stopped trade relations with the PRC. That is, there is no economic, much less political, dependence.
            I read it and didn’t hear anything new from an intelligent person. In addition to fabrications about alleged dependence, referring to the geographical location, climate and sanctions. That’s why I say, trust less of such media and unknown nonames.
            Also read at your leisure: https://nvo.ng.ru/concepts/2022-09-29/4_1208_korea.html
            1. +1
              10 August 2024 21: 34
              You suggest not to believe

              similar media

              and at the same time, do you recommend reading the material of a certain obscure Khramchikhin?
              Who didn’t even serve in the army.... if he is an authority for you, then everyone is obliged to believe his “analysts”?
              I repeat: today China is a roof for Pyongyang - in everything!
              And so the parallels in relations are slightly comparable to Russian-Ukrainian ones... slightly!
              1. 0
                11 August 2024 03: 16
                No, I just answered you in the same coin. I'm not saying to believe his analytics, he described his views in more detail, with facts and dates of events. I advise you to use your head.
                The DPRK is an independent state that conducts its own domestic and foreign policy. It has its own borders, its own army that ensures security, and does not obey anyone!!! Except for your government. So why are they dependent on China? Am I missing something? In trading? What about the fact that the whole world trades with each other? I already gave an example with Covid, but someone apparently didn’t understand.
                Roof on everything? Name at least 1 moment where the Chinese cover Pyongyang with their own words???? Or where do the Chinese give orders to the DPRK??? Can't?
              2. 0
                11 August 2024 03: 24
                Who was telling me: honor an intelligent person? Where are just a couple of sentences that supposedly due to sanctions and geographical location, the DPRK depends on China.
                Following your idiotic logic, we can say that Russia depends on China. The Russian Federation is under sanctions, we have a common border with China, trade turnover with China, from household goods, clothing to cars, everything is Chinese.
                If you could name at least one reason for the dependence of the DPRK, but you cannot. You also cannot name what the addiction is. And the climate, sanctions and geography can be adjusted to any country and called dependent. So you better rub your nonsense from the media about being dependent on someone else
              3. 0
                11 August 2024 12: 15
                You can repeat this at least a hundred times, it will not make the DPRK a puppet. Until you name what exactly the dependence is and what orders of China they obey
        2. +1
          10 August 2024 13: 28
          If the Russian Federation is unable to ensure its security, the DPRK has all the capabilities and means to do so. They do not need to ask China for permission to do this. Stop thinking in stereotypes, learn to think with your own head and not with what the media is telling you.

          Yes, North Korea is one of the last truly sovereign countries in the world. And this is our only real ally, unlike some.
    2. 0
      13 August 2024 13: 12
      In reality, North Korea is under guarantee of the Liberation of the Korean Peninsula!!! With approval and guarantees from China (you forgot to add)?
  5. +3
    9 August 2024 19: 40
    And how is this help understood here? Without the consent of two or three parties, the neighboring troops enter our territory? This is complete nonsense. Such things are agreed upon and discussed in each country from the CSTO. At the request of such and such a country...And so on.
    1. -7
      9 August 2024 20: 17
      And you don’t need to coordinate with anyone. It’s just that Old Man’s troops are entering the Chernigov region.
      1. -1
        10 August 2024 00: 48
        Through Sweden? So that you can personally help your (hopefully also your) Motherland?
        1. -2
          10 August 2024 06: 47
          Still, you have a strange understanding of Allied relations within the Union State. Even such stubborn allies as the United States opened a Second Front at one time.
          1. +1
            10 August 2024 09: 35
            Actually, unlike the current situation, at the times you mentioned, Moscow insisted on opening a second front. Now Russia, as its leadership says, requires only one type of help - don’t interfere, we will do everything ourselves.
            1. -4
              10 August 2024 09: 59
              I think that Russia does not want to put itself in an awkward position by encountering an official refusal from the Old Man.
              But Old Man himself could take the initiative - as a loyal ally and support the KhPP.
              Lukashenko, with all his might, wants to slip “between the streams” according to the principle “an affectionate calf sucks two queens.”
              But who knows how it might turn out. The Poles will trample “for their” lands, and some future leadership of the Russian Federation will say - “Well, you can buy the S-600 from us. At market prices.. If you have pennies.. But we can’t help with anything else..”.
              1. +2
                10 August 2024 10: 09
                Fear God! Belarus honestly fulfills its allied duty, covering its western borders. Or don’t you watch TV, because everyone there lies? Putin has spoken about this more than once. And he understands geopolitics better than you and me, and even more intelligently than the leaky local turbo-patriots. And how, I wonder, will a Belarusian division of 15 thousand bayonets help Moscow? Or are you, without hesitation, confident that Minsk will throw its entire army of as many as 70 thousand people into the meat grinder in peacetime? And will these 70 thousand save the father of Russian democracy? So, once again, the Belarusian army is where the current situation requires it and honestly fulfills its duty.
                1. -2
                  10 August 2024 10: 12
                  No need to la la. Belarus has about a million mobile reserves. So an invasion force of about 200.000 could well have been formed in 2 and a half years. And open a second front. Both Putin and the Russians would be very grateful for such an initiative. Even if it’s unauthorized wink
                  Well, in addition to the “S 600”, they could add that Russia honestly fulfills its allied duty and covers the eastern borders of Belarus. From China.
                  1. +1
                    10 August 2024 10: 24
                    Quote: Strange guest
                    No need to la la

                    That's it! What are you whispering about? What mobile reserve? And even more so, a million? Is the country at war with someone? Or is it in a threatened period? And what million in a population of less than 10 million? And the state can support an army of 10% of the working population only in the event of war. And then with maximum tension in the rear. Remember the Americans in World War II? So your favorites, BEING at war with Germany since December 1941, actually started a war with her in June 1944.
                    1. -4
                      10 August 2024 10: 33
                      Well, the Americans fought on the Pacific Front. Objectively, he was the main one for them - Germany did not threaten the States in any way, and the Japs attacked them. This is first of all.
                      We are talking about a corps of 200.000 - a completely feasible task for the Republic of Belarus with partial mobilization. This is secondly.
                      And I understand that Old Man will not do any of this. From the Republic of Belarus an ally is like a bullet from ****. This is third.
                      So, imagine...if Belarusians were normal allies...like the States to Israel...
                      1. +2
                        10 August 2024 10: 39
                        Quote: Strange guest
                        Well, the Americans fought on the Pacific Front. Objectively, he was the main one for them - Germany did not threaten the States in any way, and the Japs attacked them. This is first of all.

                        Yes, that's right. They solved their problems on their site. Which is what I was talking about.

                        Quote: Strange guest
                        with partial mobilization

                        At least give a formal reason that does not violate the country’s constitution?

                        Quote: Strange guest
                        From the Republic of Belarus an ally, like from a **** bullet

                        It turns out that the political officer’s memory is shorter than a girl’s.
                      2. -2
                        10 August 2024 10: 47
                        True to its own allied duty ...The Soviet Government declares that from tomorrow, that is, from August 9, the Soviet Union will consider itself in a state of war with Japan.

                        Here's a good example for you.
                        As for memory, a spoon is dear to dinner.
                      3. +2
                        10 August 2024 10: 55
                        You are absolutely right to use this example. But... The USSR ended the war with Germany. The Second World War continued. The USSR had the strongest army in the world. Stalin understood perfectly well that the conflict would not be protracted, but would bring crazy political dividends. That’s the whole explanation for this act of Moscow, in short.
                        Stalin also banned Washington from using Soviet airfields after the bombing of Japan, and crews and planes that landed on USSR territory were interned. This is a fact. And these are also allied graters.
                        In our case, war has not even been declared.

                        Quote: Strange guest
                        road spoon for dinner.

                        With this spoon, Minsk in 2022, at the suggestion of Moscow with its gesture of goodwill, scooped it up in full. So Moscow turned out to be a good teacher, and Minsk an equally good student.
                      4. -2
                        10 August 2024 11: 00
                        You don't believe in Russia's victory? In vain. Different weight categories are objective.
                      5. -1
                        10 August 2024 11: 02
                        On matters of faith, you have come to the wrong address. Go to church. Well, or to the synagogue. I am confident in Russia’s victory. Just don’t interfere with the Storages in these Swedens of yours.
                      6. -1
                        10 August 2024 11: 46
                        With this spoon, Minsk in 2022, at the suggestion of Moscow with its gesture of goodwill, scooped it up in full. So Moscow turned out to be a good teacher, and Minsk an equally good student.

                        This is for sure - neither add nor subtract!
                        Do you see how commentators here, at the suggestion of Marzhetsky, want Belarus to be drawn into a war with Ukraine?
                        A third of my relatives are Ukrainians and so are many...
                        Many are related to the Poles, I’m from Western Belarus - I know what I’m talking about - should I also fight with them? Whose interests are this for?
                      7. +1
                        10 August 2024 11: 56
                        This is for sure - neither add nor subtract!
                        Do you see how commentators here, at the suggestion of Marzhetsky, want Belarus to be drawn into a war with Ukraine?

                        That is, this is a matter of the author, and not of the allied debt of Belarus, formalized by the corresponding agreement? wink
                      8. +1
                        10 August 2024 12: 04
                        Did I miss something? Russia declared war on Ukraine? Or at least introduced martial law? Oh no!?
                      9. The comment was deleted.
                      10. The comment was deleted.
                      11. -1
                        10 August 2024 13: 23
                        Where is the answer to my question about declaring war? Without this state act, no legal assistance with personnel from even the allies is possible in principle.

                        What are you doing? In order to help liberate the internationally recognized territory of the Kursk region of the Russian Federation, is it necessary to declare war? And without this act you won’t get your asses off the ground?
                        All this will come back to haunt you later, “allies.”
                      12. +3
                        10 August 2024 13: 29
                        Quote: Beydodyr
                        liberation of the internationally recognized territory of the Kursk region of the Russian Federation, is it necessary to declare war?

                        First of all, not you, but you.
                        Secondly, yes, it is necessary. But not now, much sooner, back in February 2022. And if the North Military District begins, it would be in March 2014, when the State Duma gave permission to the President of Russia to use troops abroad. And everyone tensed up, because... understood perfectly well what this wording meant. Then your cypsum infection could be nipped in the bud.
                      13. 0
                        10 August 2024 12: 47
                        Of course, in the author, you don’t know all the nuances of this mess, or does the head of the General Staff of the Russian Federation report to you before the President of the Russian Federation?
                        Regarding the allied debt of Belarus.
                        Near Gantsevichi, 48 km from Baranovichi, there is the Volga radar of the Russian Aerospace Forces, early warning of a missile attack on Russia (early warning system).... yes, the same as the Voronezh-DM in the Krasnodar Territory, which was damaged by the Ukrainian Armed Forces with their drones.
                        In Vileika there is also the 43rd communications center of the Russian Navy, which provides direct and feedback communication between the General Staff of the Russian Navy and nuclear submarines on combat duty in the Atl-o, Ind-o and Pacific oceans.
                        As long as both targets are safe and sound....
                        And if the Republic of Belarus gets involved in the war, the Armed Forces of Ukraine will destroy both of these ATACMS and Storm Shadow facilities, and at the same time they will raze Mozyr with its refinery, from where fuel is supplied to the RF Armed Forces, it is located right on the border with Ukraine, and then Gomel and Brest .
                        In addition, the Republic of Belarus itself represents a barrier with its territory, that is, it acts as a theater of operations between NATO and the RF Armed Forces, giving time to gather with the forces of Russia and fight on its territory, as it has been in all centuries.
                        it is necessary to us?
                      14. -2
                        10 August 2024 13: 21
                        Of course, in the author, you don’t know all the nuances of this mess, or does the head of the General Staff of the Russian Federation report to you before the President of the Russian Federation?

                        Is it the author? smile

                        Near Gantsevichi, 48 km from Baranovichi, there is the Volga radar of the Russian Aerospace Forces, early warning of a missile attack on Russia (early warning system).... yes, the same as the Voronezh-DM in the Krasnodar Territory, which was damaged by the Ukrainian Armed Forces with their drones.
                        The 43rd communications center of the Russian Navy is also located in Vileika
                        providing direct and feedback communication to the General Staff of the Russian Navy
                        with nuclear submarines on combat duty in the Atl-o, Ind-o and Pacific oceans.
                        As long as both targets are safe and sound....

                        And what? Is this your effort or what?

                        And if the Republic of Belarus gets involved in the war, the Armed Forces of Ukraine will destroy both of these ATACMS and Storm Shadow facilities, and at the same time they will raze Mozyr with its refinery, from where fuel is supplied to the RF Armed Forces, it is located right on the border with Ukraine, and then Gomel and Brest .

                        Well, then you’ll cover them as allies, no?

                        In addition, the Republic of Belarus itself represents a barrier with its territory, that is, it acts as a theater of operations between NATO and the RF Armed Forces, giving time to gather with the forces of Russia and fight on its territory, as it has been in all centuries.

                        Awesome screen! We felt this in the Kursk region, when you de-escalated on the southern border, and we were forced to fight on “our territory.” By the way, how many Russian military personnel are there in your united grouping behind you?

                        it is necessary to us?

                        Are we on the market or what? Do the obligations under the alliance agreement mean anything to you? Yes or no?

                        I will be happy to watch how NATO members will hammer you.
                      15. +2
                        10 August 2024 14: 44
                        ...Is this your efforts or what?...

                        And whose, yours Marzhetsky?

                        ... you will cover them as allies, no?...

                        So we’ll cover you while you and the Ukrainians start a showdown.
                        So far, these two GOALS are unharmed, but the Ukrainians have proven using the example of Machulishchi (02.2023 they damaged a Russian A-50 aircraft in the parking lot with a drone) that they can reach them too.

                        ...I will be happy to watch how NATO members will hammer you...

                        Belarusians are no strangers to such stares; this was the case during the Second World War.
                        The Germans rolled in without stopping in 41. all the way to Moscow...
                        But they defended Moscow and Leningrad/Stalingrad and did not allow the Germans to take them, including the Belarusians, among other residents of the USSR......
                  2. +2
                    10 August 2024 10: 47
                    Or maybe the Russians will finally call a spade a spade and form a strike fist? What mobilization potential does Russia have?
                    1. -3
                      10 August 2024 10: 51
                      They will form. And they will hit. And they will win. But what is the use of such allies then? Beg for hydrocarbons at reduced prices?
                      1. +1
                        10 August 2024 11: 01
                        Great, you just need to turn on your brain - the Kursk region and other front-line areas have somewhere to evacuate, but where should Belarusians evacuate the whole of Belarus? it will be shot up and down, as for hydrocarbons, it’s Russia that signed the agreement and is not fulfilling the conditions, study the issue before you blurt out your tongue
                      2. -2
                        10 August 2024 11: 03
                        So at what prices was the contract signed? Worldwide? Don’t be ridiculous, but study the issue yourself.
                      3. +1
                        10 August 2024 11: 08
                        And now attention - Ensuring equal conditions for business entities of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation”, a price lower than the world price is not EQUAL, once again, according to the agreement, Belarus and Russia should have had the same prices for gas and oil for a long time, so no one begs for anything, no need ,, to shaggy grandma,,
                      4. +2
                        10 August 2024 14: 14
                        edvard also asked you a question:

                        ...The Kursk region and other front-line areas have somewhere to evacuate, but where should Belarusians evacuate the whole of Belarus? it will be shot up and down...

                        Answer the person!
                      5. 0
                        10 August 2024 11: 03
                        So you have sunk to the level of a local leaky turbo patriot
                      6. -2
                        10 August 2024 11: 10
                        Not at all. I'm trying to think and analyze. And my thoughts lead me to a sad conclusion - if Belarus does not want to fulfill its allied duty in a situation where there is no doubt about Russia’s victory, fearing some kind of economic troubles for itself now, then it will even more so forget about these obligations if a situation arises when in which Russia will be threatened with defeat and they will try to tear it to pieces. These are the thoughts about the “ally”.
                      7. +2
                        10 August 2024 11: 23
                        Economic troubles? Yes, no less sanctions have been imposed on Belarus than on Russia, and instead of resisting them together, provocateurs appear who drive a wedge. Russia has enough strength to resist Ukraine without the help of 20 thousand Belarusians, but the difference in economic potential is huge, once again for the people who are trying to analyze, but the level of analytics is below par - Belarus will be shot at far and wide, now there is a war of drones, and Belarus does NOT have the opportunity to produce them in the required quantity, the economy is not the same, the entire collective West is helping Ukraine, that is why Ukraine is in a military sense still alive
                      8. -4
                        10 August 2024 11: 46
                        Let's not argue. Let's just come to the conclusion that allies are different...
                        There are people like Australia and Canada, which, with a population of 7/10 million, send their divisions to help in distant Europe, without asking the question - how will these several tens of thousands help on a multimillion-dollar front, especially when it is not clear who will win - and there are others...
                      9. +3
                        10 August 2024 11: 58
                        Quote: Strange guest
                        like Australia and Canada

                        I understand what you're getting at. But both countries mentioned, like New Zealand and others, are former colonies of the British Empire, and now members of the British Commonwealth. The formal head of state is the British monarch. And from here the conclusion is - where should they, the sick, go? The king ordered it!
                        Again, Russia is not at war. This means that there is not even a formal reason for outside personnel to provide assistance.
                      10. -2
                        10 August 2024 12: 06
                        I also understand where you are leading. Not all members of the British Commonwealth sent their soldiers to the German front. This was not an order from the British Crown. It couldn't be. It was the government's decision. This is first of all.
                        But Belarus is not a member of the Union State and not a former part (and a very recent one) of a huge common country/"empire" of the Republic of Ingushetia/USSR? Don't you see any analogies?
                      11. The comment was deleted.
                      12. -2
                        10 August 2024 14: 37
                        ...And again, Russia is not at war...

                        - for the fifth time you point your dirty finger at this fact, but can you say whether the United States declared war on the DPRK, Vietnam, Yugoslavia, Iraq? They tell you in Russian that Belarus, as an ally, is NOTHING compared to Canada and Australia, which were harnessed in all the undeclared wars waged by their ally, the United States.
                      13. +3
                        10 August 2024 15: 04
                        Quote: GR777
                        into this fact

                        And yet, this is the fact that determines everything. And what you cited is an example of a puppet theater. And you can study the history of relations between the USSR and the USA in the Second World War. There they were also allies without the “sort of”. But the USSR never satisfied all of Washington's wishes.
                      14. -2
                        10 August 2024 11: 59
                        without asking the question - how will these several tens of thousands help on a multi-million dollar front, especially when it is not clear who will win - and there are others...

                        Yes, Belarus is still an ally for Russia. Even the air there is so special that some Russian officers begin to tell Old Man why he shouldn’t help Russia liberate the Kursk region. Yes
                      15. The comment was deleted.
                      16. +3
                        10 August 2024 12: 29
                        Why would I be scared to throw mud at a country that, despite my illnesses, gave me a decade and a half of relatively normal life? A country that provided all conceivable and inconceivable education for my children at the expense of the budget? A country that didn’t sell itself for cookies, unlike you sissies? A country that has provided me with a quiet life and old age? Wake up!
                      17. 0
                        10 August 2024 13: 25
                        Why would I be scared to throw mud at a country that, despite my illnesses, gave me a decade and a half of relatively normal life? A country that provided all conceivable and inconceivable education for my children at the expense of the budget? A country that didn’t sell itself for cookies, unlike you sissies? The country that provided me with a quiet life and old age

                        A barrel of jam, a box of biscuits and a bulldog lye

                        Come on!

                        In principle, everything is clear with you. hi
                      18. The comment was deleted.
                      19. -3
                        10 August 2024 14: 42
                        Have you seen the film "Alexander Nevsky"? There was a character who said:

                        Where you went to sleep, there is your homeland.
                      20. The comment was deleted.
                      21. +2
                        10 August 2024 12: 00
                        Canada and Australia are still warriors - to indicate their presence, they seem to have fought in Afghanistan, where the Americans sat in garrisons, and these did not come out of the bunkers
                      22. -3
                        10 August 2024 12: 10
                        At least that's it. At least in the second line. At least in the third with “Polonaises”. Where?
                      23. +1
                        10 August 2024 12: 33
                        Stop fooling around. First, show the decree of the President of Russia or the State Duma on the start of the war. Then ask your provocative questions.
                      24. -3
                        10 August 2024 12: 54
                        Let's not quarrel. You and I just have different ideas about “alliance.”
                        Just as an example - Israel did not declare war on Iran - but the allies covered it with their air defense and aviation, the United States did not declare war on Afghanistan, but the allies supported the United States by sending their armed forces in support.
                        Russia’s allies expect that “she can handle it herself,” that this is “not their war,” that Russia “hasn’t declared war on anyone.” But “if” and “when” then we are UH, shoulder to shoulder, and together forever..
                        Available explained?
                      25. +4
                        10 August 2024 12: 59
                        Quote: Strange guest
                        different ideas about "alliance"

                        There are no ideas of alliance. There are constitutions of states and agreements between them that do not contradict the constitutions. That's all the hell out of every penny.
                      26. -3
                        10 August 2024 13: 16
                        There are no ideas of alliance. There are constitutions of states and agreements between them that do not contradict the constitutions. That's all the hell out of every penny.

                        And what is written there in the military doctrine of Belarus regarding assistance to an ally? The article provides a direct quote, if necessary.
                        Where are the Belarusian paratroopers in the Kursk region?
                      27. +2
                        10 August 2024 13: 20
                        Dear non-reader, where is the law or decree declaring war or at least martial law?
                      28. The comment was deleted.
                      29. +3
                        10 August 2024 13: 36
                        The population of these Australia and Canada will, in any case, remain unharmed due to the remoteness of the theater of operations, unlike the population of Belarus....
                        And contract mercenaries will set off to earn money!
                      30. +3
                        10 August 2024 11: 50
                        Quote: Strange guest
                        I'm trying to think and analyze

                        No, you're not trying. And you stupidly follow the lead of a local turbo-patriotic party
                    2. +2
                      10 August 2024 11: 00
                      Quote: edvard
                      What mobilization potential does Russia have?

                      At least 3-4 million
                  3. -2
                    10 August 2024 12: 05
                    No need to la la. Belarus has about a million mobile reserves. So an invasion force of about 200.000 could well have been formed in 2 and a half years. And open a second front. Both Putin and the Russians would be very grateful for such an initiative. Even if it’s unauthorized wink

                    For starters, at least they did not withdraw their troops from the border with Ukraine, allowing Kyiv to send the Armed Forces of Ukraine to the Kursk region. Allies...
                    1. +1
                      10 August 2024 13: 54
                      ...at least they didn’t withdraw their troops from the border with Ukraine...

                      Is it really impossible to realize that after 2020, without looking back at K-b and his “good”, the father will not take a single step?
                      “Two-three days”, why did you withdraw your troops from Kharkov and Chernigov in 2022, Aniki warriors?
                      Thus exposing AGL?
                      "Allies"?
                      So after all, all of Eastern Europe was Moscow’s allies.... EBN handed them all over wholesale to NATO!
                  4. +2
                    13 August 2024 13: 16
                    Should the issue be agreed upon by 24/02/22????
                    Why have the stars gone wrong? Isn't it fate?
                    Or didn’t you want to cave in front of the Belarusians..?
  6. -2
    9 August 2024 21: 12
    “Naive to the point of horror,” just like your “easily deceived” GDP! wink
    I would rely on North Korea, as faithful to its allied duty, but alas, not on the rest of the “allies”!
    Of all the other post-Soviet republics, only Belarus can help in some way, only it is more or less “pro-Russian” oriented, although school textbooks have long been rewritten in a “Zmagaro-Litvinian” way and the young generation of Belarusian citizens was brought up on them - this is “Maidan” "2020 clearly showed that the older generation, which still partially remembers (not all favorably) about the common Soviet Union, will die out, the president will change and everything will be the same “union” profanation as with the rest of the “brotherly” republics of the ex-USSR (all there will be excuses)!
    With the Minsk “peacekeeping” withdrawal of the “overhanging” Belarusian troops from the Ukrainian border, NATO’s henchmen had the opportunity to free up reserves for the Kursk operation.
    The oligarchic group behind Father, even without the odious Makei, remains thoroughly pro-Western “multi-vector” (in the sense of “uncontested European integration” of the ex-BSSR into the West for the generous “fraternal preferences” of the ex-RSFSR, just like the “no alternative “European integrators,” who were never “pro-Russian-pro-Russian,” Yanukovych and Azarov did, for the sake of Washington curators and “their” corrupt hucksters, they forcibly pulled the country to the West, contrary to the will of the majority of the then Ukrainian residents, their “Persian” voters, hiding behind supposedly “multi-vector “, also deceiving the Kremlin “cunning planner” and his “team of his trusted non-treasury thieves”, Andrei Removich Belousov will not let him lie - “hyper-mercantile honest people of the highest calibre”, whom any Western-like “multi-vector” swindler will fool once or twice) will not allow him (even if he wanted?) to seriously get involved in the war on the side of Russia is “one-sided (the key phrase is “one way”).” An alliance with the Republic of Belarus (either in the CSTO or in the Union State) - open your eyes yourself and raise the GDP eyelids" (otherwise he will later say that "we were deceived again").
    A friend (ally) is in trouble! So check (no, not Lukashenko, why recklessly put an end to the i’s, forcing the “good friend of the Kremlin” to lie and dodge like a snake in such a narrow “space for maneuver” - “yes” or “no”) of the indomitable Comrade Kim Jong Ena is “in lice”, why delay and be deceived by hopes!
    For some reason, I think my instincts tell me that Comrade Kim Jong-un will not be a jerk and will not let you down if you turn to him for help.
    Flag in hand!
  7. +1
    9 August 2024 21: 34
    Marzhetsky - why aren’t you in the battles near Sudzha yet?
    After all, you’re only forty years old+... You’re writing articles here...
    Wasn’t it you who rejoiced at the troubles of Belarus a couple of years ago (your article is under the link):
    https://topcor.ru/20055-belorusskij-front-pochemu-rossija-vyigrala-a-ukraina-i-pribaltika-
    proigrali.html
    At the beginning of the Northern Military District of the Russian Federation, it brought its troops from the territory of the Republic of Belarus to Chernigov and Gostomel (thus throwing Belarusians into the racket, hanging Western sanctions on their necks as accomplices) and then withdrew - like a gesture of goodwill.
    Now, in addition to sanctions, do you also want coffins for Belarusians?
    Question: why and for what should the Armed Forces of the Republic of Belarus fight with the Ukrainians on their territories?
    There will be no oil refinery in Mozyr, just like Mozyr itself, and then Gomel and Brest.
    The Poles will also enter Grodno..... and who needs these hemorrhoids?
    1. -1
      10 August 2024 00: 51
      Quote: Volkovets
      Marzhetsky - why aren’t you in the battles near Sudzha yet?

      They don't deserve it. They have a lot of problems. And glasses with lenses as thick as a finger. At least on paper
      1. -3
        10 August 2024 06: 50
        They don't deserve it. They have a lot of problems. And glasses with lenses as thick as a finger. At least on paper

        Who would say, Mr. Russian officer with 20 years of service. wink What are your excuses for not defending the Kursk region? Is it also health?
        1. +1
          10 August 2024 09: 39
          Mr. Marzhetsky, log back. You are trying with incredible persistence to push everyone into the trenches, while you yourself are sure that you will sit out in the rear. But you may not have time to sit out. Although Banderstadt is in agony, do not forget that a wounded animal is more dangerous than a healthy one
          1. -3
            10 August 2024 13: 26
            Mr. Marzhetsky, log back. You are trying with incredible persistence to push everyone into the trenches, while you yourself are sure that you will sit out in the rear. But you may not have time to sit out. Although Banderstadt is in agony, do not forget that a wounded animal is more dangerous than a healthy one

            I bet you will still answer for this double-dealing hi
            1. -2
              10 August 2024 13: 31
              The Vangovant of you, as a local citizen of Sweden deigned to put it, is like a bullet made of shit.
        2. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
    2. -3
      10 August 2024 06: 46
      Morzhetsky - why aren’t you in the battles near Sudzha yet?
      After all, you’re only forty years old+... You’re writing articles here...

      Why aren't you there yourself?

      At the beginning of the Northern Military District of the Russian Federation, it brought its troops from the territory of the Republic of Belarus to Chernigov and Gostomel (thus throwing Belarusians into the racket, hanging Western sanctions on their necks as accomplices) and then withdrew - like a gesture of goodwill.
      Now, in addition to sanctions, do you also want coffins for Belarusians?
      Question: why and for what should the Armed Forces of the Republic of Belarus fight with the Ukrainians on their territories?

      Good allies! Especially now, when the troops were withdrawn from the border and the Ukrainian Armed Forces went to Sudzha. Have you decided whether you are allies of Russia or not? Do you need Russian oil and gas at a discount, nuclear power plants at our expense and nuclear weapons with delivery systems? If not, this could all be over.

      Question: why and for what should the Armed Forces of the Republic of Belarus fight with the Ukrainians on their territories?
      There will be no oil refinery in Mozyr, just like Mozyr itself, and then Gomel and Brest.
      The Poles will also enter Grodno..... and who needs these hemorrhoids?

      Don't turn on the fool. The article is about the liberation of the Kursk region of the Russian Federation.
      Are you going to fulfill your allied obligations or not?
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +2
        13 August 2024 13: 24
        Should we agree on allied obligations before the SVO, and ask Lukashenko and the Belarusians for consent to the SVO???
        No, not fate..?
        Post factum...like on a leash
  8. -5
    9 August 2024 22: 19
    You just need to mind that smart-ass boulevard, cut off all the benefits for gas and all other energy resources, and make the price the same as for the West and other consumers and send it to hell. Withdrew troops from the border of Ukraine, and what the Russian Federation now has is the Kursk theater of operations.
  9. -2
    9 August 2024 23: 29
    Nobody. You have to count on yourself
  10. +1
    9 August 2024 23: 47
    ..by a direct and open attack by the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the Kursk region of the Russian Federation, its security, stability, territorial integrity and sovereignty over this border territory were jeopardized

    the pepper is clear, this should have been expected sooner or later, and it happened.
    And we also need to stop pretending that everything is going as usual, stop flashing in reports by pressing the buttons of new enterprises and opening transport interchanges, bridges and roads. I would like to finish the war until the fallow capitulation, and then rest on my laurels.
    If you count only on mu-mu and the brilliant General Staff in the form of a golden cockerel, who writes victory reports, then you can wait for the queen of Shemakha
  11. -2
    10 August 2024 01: 04
    It seems that the Tajiks are already helping us. Writes in media reports almost every day
  12. -2
    10 August 2024 01: 06
    And tatata! Excited!!! Now imagine what it was like for us in Karabakh, and then when Azerbaijan invaded sovereign territory??? Did you see yourself in the mirror??? You yourself opened this Pandora's box called betrayal!!!
    1. +1
      10 August 2024 06: 10
      did we have an alliance with Karabakh? I was with Armenia, but it didn’t recognize Karabakh. And by the way, it didn’t ask for help... so don’t mislead the burbot for a snag and pass by
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. -1
      17 August 2024 23: 05
      A nation of traitors accused the Russians of treason - this is nonsense. Didn’t the Armenians detonate a bomb in the Moscow metro back under Brezhnev? Wasn’t it the Armenians who destroyed the satellite communication machine and the Zil paratroopers accompanying it with a ZUshka, I don’t remember in the middle of some filthy Armenian town? It was the FIRST! attack on the Soviet army on the territory of the USSR during perestroika. Wasn’t it the Armenians who began to rock the USSR ahead of the Baltic states? Wasn’t it the Armenians who destroyed the Molokans in Novosaratovka and Novogrigoryevka during the 1st Karabakh war? Wasn’t it the Armenian Dashnaks who attacked Russian soldiers after the February revolution, who were abandoned by the command and fled from Kaukaz to Russia? If you think that we don’t remember anything, you are very mistaken.
  13. -2
    10 August 2024 01: 10
    All this assistance to the allies is intended only for Russia. It is Russia that should help its allies, and not vice versa. Exactly it should. Today's situation will show who the real ally is. So far, no one seems to have offered help. Only if in the form of migrants
  14. -1
    10 August 2024 08: 57
    But it seems to me that a lot depends on how the leadership of the Russian Federation presents this or that event. On the eve of the start of the SVO, a meeting of the Security Council of the Russian Federation was broadcast. Motvienko said something about family ties with the residents of the LDPR, saying how long we will endure. The head of intelligence generally proposed including the LDPR into the Russian Federation. Putin almost fell out of his chair at that moment. In general, this meeting resembled a kindergarten. No one said that Ukraine was preparing a full-scale offensive against the LDPR. If the start of the SVO had been announced precisely as a preemptive action, then it would have looked completely different in the eyes of the world community. It was enough to say something like this: according to intelligence data, the Armed Forces of Ukraine plans to start a war in the LDPR on March 10, it is necessary to thwart the insidious plan. Moreover, Putin has repeatedly said that the situation on June 22 will never happen again. What did they say yesterday? Attack on the Kursk region... And what does this mean for partners? And it doesn’t mean anything. It was necessary for the president to address the international community regarding the attack by Ukraine without declaring war on Russia. Then the partners would have to comb their turnips. The crests gave such an opportunity to change the vision of the situation in the eyes of Europeans... They gave the opportunity to European leaders (I’m sure there are such) to change their attitude towards Ukraine. It’s one thing to help Zelensky, who is suffering from aggression, and another thing to help the aggressor Zelensky. But they had no reason to change this attitude. And now there is a reason. But we just need to inflate this event according to the patterns of European thinking.
    1. +3
      10 August 2024 09: 54
      A little chaotic, but basically correct. Except for one thing. Moscow did not have to start the Northern Military District first under any pretext. We should have waited for Kyiv to strike. Wait, prepare and bring troops to the VSBG (I hope you know what it is). Moreover, according to intelligence data, the Ukrainian Armed Forces were already ready for this, and a date was set. In this case, Moscow would not be an aggressor in the eyes of the world community. Moscow itself provided the collective West with a formal reason to terrorize it. And for the third year now she has been telling her citizens why she started the war. Just look at how Tel Aviv is beating the Arabs to the bones, not being shy in their choice of means. And what do they get for it? Nothing! They are the injured party in October 2024. Are the methods of war not the same? We'll figure it out later! The main thing is to eliminate the threat. Now we will not be able to, as you say, inflate the event according to patterns. It's already late. Everyone has long forgotten about the causes of this war. All that remains in everyone’s subcortex is that Moscow attacked first
      1. +2
        10 August 2024 09: 58
        Agree. If Putin did not allow a repetition of June 22, then it was necessary to concentrate all power on the approach and wait for an attack from Ukraine. The civilian population had to be evacuated in advance. Anyone who does not want to evacuate takes responsibility on himself and is not considered a civilian and must be prepared for his house to be razed to the ground in the first minutes of hostilities.
        1. -1
          10 August 2024 10: 00
          If you are not too lazy to read the archive, I wrote about this a long time ago
      2. -1
        13 August 2024 16: 41
        Moscow did not have to start the Northern Military District first under any pretext. We should have waited for Kyiv to strike.

        would have waited for the complete destruction of the L-DPR
    2. 0
      13 August 2024 13: 32
      Empty!?? Following the departing train...
      Such a case If - does not exist.
      It was necessary to think before and agree on before 24, 02.
      At all these NSDC, CSTO, BRICS and others.
  15. -2
    10 August 2024 08: 58
    Belarus is an ally in political demagoguery. About the DPRK - they do what they can. But “strategic” allies - like China or the former republics of Central Asia - have long been playing on the side of our enemies.
    1. +2
      13 August 2024 13: 33
      China does not guarantee anything it signed up for! Guaranteed.
  16. -3
    10 August 2024 14: 07
    As long as this pothead reigns in Belarus, there will be no help for us. The rest, who are in the CSTO, are even worse, they are only capable of eating ours into three throats. To expect from them, not just help in the war, but in general, at least something useful, is hopeless naivety. But our people themselves do not want military assistance from the DPRK - it goes against their bourgeois guts. And Kim has excellent special forces, which may not be inferior to Wagner, but there is no combat experience yet.
    1. -1
      10 August 2024 16: 50
      Quote: GR777
      As long as this potbelly reigns in Belarus, there will be no help for us

      Oga! The “President of Light” would definitely help you!

      Quote: GR777
      only capable of eating ours in three throats

      Are you plump from hunger? Or are you still looking for Belarusian sour cream and condensed milk in the nearest store?

      And Kim has excellent special forces, which may not be inferior to Wagner, but there is no combat experience yet

      Where then does the confidence come from that it is not inferior? It’s one thing to crumble bricks in public like loaves of bread, and another thing to not be treated under fire like the Russian “five hundredths”.
      1. 0
        17 August 2024 23: 24
        k7k8, don’t you have normal people in Belarus? Only the greedy corrupt fist Butska and the slut Sveta? As for food, this is even ridiculous. We don't care about your food. Remember: Great Russia gives the poor hanger-on Belarus the opportunity of its huge market, moreover, to the detriment of its producers. Our farmers cannot sell their products - they are being stifled by outbids, but here your stores are opening with the support of administrative resources. And also, where did you get the idea that your products are better than ours? There is nothing bad to say about Kim, unlike your belly. His special forces are not bad and, most importantly, there are a lot of them, but our DRGs somehow ended up in the ass - not a single sabotage in 3 years.
  17. -2
    10 August 2024 16: 55
    All this is garbage.
    As profitable as it is, so it will be turned.
    Goblin Tufts is already 2.5 years old. declares that Ukraine attacked Russia.
    That is, the “aggression” has been going on for 2.5 years already, I haven’t heard that even Old Man Crimea, officially, with papers, recognized

    Therefore, they can say that this is the old Northern Military District, there is no war, and missiles have been flying through Belarus for a long time.
    What kind of military assistance is this? We are already helping. Korean missiles are flying, or may fly, through Batkovshchina.
    1. -1
      11 August 2024 19: 25
      Quote: Sergey Latyshev
      Goblin Tufts is already 2.5 years old. declares that Ukraine attacked Russia.

      What does the goblin Latyshev think, doesn’t he agree with this? smile
  18. -3
    10 August 2024 18: 47
    It turns out that the author is 100% right
  19. -3
    10 August 2024 23: 25
    Lukoshenko has always been a cunning fox: he won’t let go of his own and knows how to speak beautifully. As for the DPRK, this is a very problematic alternative. How to carry out combat coordination at the command level and in the troops, not to mention the language barrier? Russia has always had only two allies - the Army and the Navy!
  20. -2
    11 August 2024 12: 29
    Anyone will help, but not the cowardly and calculating Old Man, who always gets out of any problems on the back of Russia. I'm just tired of watching him clownery.
    1. -1
      11 August 2024 14: 21
      If you were a Belarusian, what would you say if the question of the country entering the war with Ukraine arose? And then, according to international standards, this would be aggression, which could lead to Poland being drawn into the war and, as a result, Russia would also have to provide military assistance to Belarus. Belarus provides assistance to Russia by supplying various components for the defense industry.
      1. -1
        17 August 2024 23: 16
        ...Belarus is helping Russia by supplying various components for the defense industry...

        - yeah, for money, at three prices.
  21. -1
    12 August 2024 23: 01
    And the second army in the world is not ashamed to wait for help from tiny Belarus. Maybe he should call his masturbeks for help first. And yes, I'm from Belarus.
    1. -2
      17 August 2024 23: 14
      Thank you, allies, from the residents of Kursk for the withdrawal of your troops from the Belarusian-Khokhlyatsky border.
  22. -1
    13 August 2024 08: 40
    Nobody. Because asking for help is such a shame that Volodya cannot afford, even if thousands of civilians die.
  23. +3
    13 August 2024 13: 01
    The Documents directly state that the country is obliged to coordinate and control its external actions with the relevant CSTO committee. After which it must send a request for permission to begin external actions that pose a threat to the collective CSTO.
    At the beginning of the National Security Council in the Kremlin, the heads of the CSTO countries should have been and are obliged to be present to agree on the conditions and obligations of the parties!
    This was not done! The governments and presidents of the CSTO countries were presented with a fact!
    If you have not agreed and asked permission from the CSTO countries. How and in what way do you consider the participation of the armed forces in an uncoordinated and unapproved operation!
    There is no external control of the armed forces in these countries!
    On orders from the Kremlin, no one even lifts a finger...but after the fact???
    The author incomprehensibly does not separate time and events? What happened before and what happened after.
  24. +2
    13 August 2024 15: 44
    I also think that only North Korea is capable of real help to our country. And, if necessary, they will send at least an entire army of special forces. Moreover, they have it. The logistics are complicated. Korea does not have heavy aircraft, and trains are far away.
  25. -1
    14 August 2024 19: 41
    About RB again.
    Lukashenko explained in 22:

    As for our participation in the SVO in Ukraine, we participate there... But we don’t kill anyone. We do not send our military anywhere....

    Nothing to add here. He only cares about his ulus.
    Just as the fraternal former ones sat on Russia’s neck in Soviet times, so now those remaining in the CSTO, I’m afraid, will not help Russia, especially the Kazakhs.
  26. ksa
    +2
    16 August 2024 16: 46
    So no one attacked Russia. Russia began aggression against peaceful Ukraine. So let her take the rap on her own. All CSTO members think so. And formally they are right.
  27. 0
    16 August 2024 18: 19
    < : > Parlate col ragioniere e poi passate la palla allo spaccaMotagne Patrushev.
  28. 0
    19 August 2024 17: 58
    It was said by our smartest sovereign that Russia has two allies: the army and the navy. Over the past time, more videoconferencing has been added. ALL! The rest are either enemies or temporary fellow travelers.