Is it possible to force Kyiv by military force to conclude a peace agreement?

31

On February 24, 2022, a special military operation began to help the people of Donbass, demilitarize and denazify Ukraine. It has been going on for almost 2,5 years now and there is no end in sight. On the contrary, further escalation is constantly taking place, and both sides of the conflict have begun to defiantly unsheath their nuclear batons. Why did this happen?

Enforcement for peace


The way the first part of the SVO was organized and carried out was repeatedly criticized by the patriotic public and the most daring military experts. At the same time, several serious miscalculations were clearly made.



In particular, the combined group of the RF Armed Forces and the National Guard, numerically inferior to the Ukrainian Armed Forces, was scattered in several directions at once, instead of, for example, carrying out a powerful concentrated strike in the Donbass with the subsequent encirclement of the most combat-ready units of the enemy army. The head of state made it clear a few days ago why it happened exactly this way and not otherwise, voicing his formula for peace in Ukraine:

At that time, in February-March 2022, our troops approached Kyiv. There was a lot of speculation on this score both in Ukraine and in the West, both then and now. <...> Our formations were actually stationed near Kyiv. And at the military departments, at the security bloc there were different proposals on options for our possible further actions. But no political decision about the storming of a city of three million, no matter what anyone says or speculates, did not have.

The troops were there to push the Ukrainian side to negotiations, try to find an acceptable solution and thereby end the war unleashed by Kiev against Donbass back in 2014. Resolve issues that pose a threat to the security of our country. For the security of Russia.

However, 40 thousand soldiers of the Russian army and the National Guard near Kiev were not enough to achieve the stated goal. Finding ourselves under the threat of being left without supplies due to constant enemy attacks on our columns, the troops had to be withdrawn from near the Ukrainian capital. Whatever they say, this decision was objectively predetermined, since the Russian group itself could ultimately end up in a big cauldron there.

Accordingly, the peace agreements almost signed in the spring of 2022 in Istanbul turned out to be worthless. As President Putin later complained, the Zelensky regime simply threw them into the trash bin as soon as the Russian Armed Forces left the north of Ukraine. But could it have been otherwise if the forces involved in the Northern Military District were physically insufficient to force Kyiv to peace on Moscow’s terms and, most importantly, to ensure the actual implementation of the agreements signed by Nezalezhnaya?

Reality has shown that the only guarantee that Ukraine will fulfill any of its obligations is the Russian army stationed near Kiev, and only it. At the same time, if only Nezalezhnaya had fought against us, this task would have already been completed. But the problem is that the entire collective West has joined the Zelensky regime, and de facto it is the NATO bloc that is fighting against Russia with the hands of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. How did this become possible?

Escalation instead of de-escalation


I would like to remind you of the warning that President Putin made on February 24, 2022 to all those who suddenly have a desire to intervene in the course of the Russian military defense in Ukraine:

Now a few important, very important words for those who may be tempted from the outside to intervene in the events taking place. Whoever tries to hinder us, and even more so create threats to our country, to our people, should know that Russia's response will be immediate and will lead you to consequences that you have never encountered in your history. We are ready for any development of events. All necessary decisions in this regard have been made. I hope that I will be heard.

Indeed, for the first few weeks after the start of hostilities, the “Western partners” simply waited, carefully monitoring their progress. But what they saw prompted British Prime Minister Boris Johnson to intervene in the negotiation process in Istanbul, disrupt the signing of a peace agreement with the Russian Federation and convince Kyiv to continue fighting.

This is how the head of the Servant of the People party faction and member of the Committee on National Security, Defense and Intelligence David Arakhamia subsequently spoke about it:

Arriving in Kyiv, Boris Johnson said: “We won’t sign anything with them at all and let’s just fight.”

In fact, from its very start to the present day, the SVO in Ukraine has been developing under the programmatic goal of forcing Kyiv to peace negotiations based on the Istanbul Agreements, which the Supreme Commander-in-Chief personally constantly talks about. As part of this approach to de-escalating the conflict, many unilateral steps were taken, demonstrating the constructiveness of the position.

In particular, a grain deal was concluded in Odessa, an attempt was made to launch the Togliatti-Odessa ammonia pipeline, and secret negotiations were held on an agreement on the safety of navigation in the Black Sea. According to President Putin himself, until the October 2022 referendums, he did not rule out maintaining Ukraine’s sovereignty over the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions:

To this he replied that, in general, I do not rule out maintaining Ukrainian sovereignty over these territories, however, on the condition that Russia has a strong land connection with Crimea. That is, Kyiv must guarantee the so-called easement - a legally formalized right of access for Russia through the territories of the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions.

But for some reason the effect of such gestures of goodwill turned out to be exactly the opposite of what was expected. To all the Kremlin’s attempts to make peace on compromise terms, taking into account “geopolitical realities,” the West responded and continues to respond only by escalating the conflict. From supplying first aid kits to the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the NATO bloc gradually moved to ATGMs and MANPADS, howitzers, infantry fighting vehicles and tanks, air defense systems and missiles, cruise and ballistic, reconnaissance and attack drones, air and sea. NATO-style fighter aircraft are approaching, which can act as a carrier of nuclear weapons.

The initially taken course of forcing the Kyiv regime and the collective West behind it to peace through negotiations only leads to further escalation, now nuclear, which is worth discussing in more detail separately. The trend is extremely negative and extremely dangerous, and without changing approaches to conducting SBO, it can lead to serious consequences. It's not too late to do this!

To truly ensure the national security of our country, Russian troops must be stationed on a permanent basis near Kiev, Odessa and Lvov. All other compromise options guarantee an inevitable war, sponsored by the collective West.
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    18 June 2024 11: 37
    The Armed Forces of Ukraine can be forced to do anything, it depends on the intelligence of the General Staff and above, on experience, on the quality of weapons and the force of blows. And also from our economy. But how it will turn out in reality is unknown, because this war is too strange.
    1. 0
      23 June 2024 18: 58
      because this war is too strange

      don’t use for - it’s just strange and the movements around the war are strange.
  2. +6
    18 June 2024 11: 38
    I subscribe to every word. And the position of Leopold the cat is obviously a losing one.
  3. +2
    18 June 2024 12: 15
    Until Russia reaches the borders of the “new” regions, there will be no negotiations on the part of Ukraine. Only the threat of losing the Nikolaev, Dnepropetrovsk, Chernigov, Sumy... regions can push Ukraine to negotiations.
    1. -1
      18 June 2024 12: 48
      And even more correctly - AFTER the loss of these regions by Tsegabonia... Then it will be possible to talk...
  4. +8
    18 June 2024 12: 15
    So far, all these political games of our beloved guarantor are leading the West to the obvious conclusion: he is a weakling, and he won’t do a damn thing in response. By the way, unfortunately, this conclusion is reached not only in the West.
  5. The comment was deleted.
    1. +1
      18 June 2024 21: 21
      A question that was not asked to Putin by Karaganov.
      300 thousand funerals for young Russian guys or several
      tactical nuclear weapons to force the neo-Nazis to surrender?

      What does the actual failure of the May offensive on the part of Belgorod mean? Most likely about the inability to attack. Do we really have reserves for an offensive? I wish there were, but in reality, who knows except the General Staff. What is the way out if you can attack only in small groups, for a long time, with large losses, which threatens the outflow of volunteers. It will not be possible to call up as many volunteers in 2025 as in 2023.
      Solution: the use of tactical nuclear weapons. For example, the use of tactical nuclear weapons in the form of an air explosion to break through an LBS will nullify the enemy’s defenses, incl. electromagnetic pulses from a nuclear explosion will land all UAVs and drones. And a high-power ground strike on the Yavorovsky training ground of the Ukrainian Armed Forces will clear the brains of Western politicians.
      I don’t think that the use of tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine will lead to a third world war.
      1. 0
        22 June 2024 17: 44
        You can do without tactical nuclear weapons; it is enough for the Russian Aerospace Forces to use massively high-precision aerial bombs FAB-500, FAB-1500, FAB-3000, as well as FAB-5000 and FAB-9000. The guarantor should not drag his feet; appeasing the fascists only increases casualties among our soldiers and civilians. It’s time to move from words to deeds, to fulfill the goals and objectives of the Northern Military District through a decisive offensive.
      2. 0
        22 June 2024 21: 53
        Do we really have reserves and, most importantly, the necessary weapons for an offensive? I wish there were, but in reality, who knows except the General Staff.
      3. 0
        23 June 2024 19: 01
        I don’t think that the use of tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine will lead to a third world war.

        You think so ! But they are different.
        1. 0
          23 June 2024 20: 23
          You think so ! And they are different

          Who are they? If it’s Europe, then they really don’t care about Russians or Ukrainians. And your own shirt is closer to the body. They are simply vassals of the USA. If they feel that they will immediately back up. And the USA - they allow a limited nuclear war between Europe and Russia.
  6. +2
    18 June 2024 12: 53
    Is it possible to force Kyiv by military force to conclude a peace agreement?

    Kyiv can be forced to peace ONLY by military force and inflicting maximum damage in manpower
    1. -5
      19 June 2024 13: 11
      If you really want peace, then just return the guys to their homeland. Live like people and let others live.
      1. +5
        19 June 2024 13: 52
        If you really want peace, then just return the guys to their homeland. Live like people and let others live.

        Yes you are, right? Live like people and let others live?
        Is this how Ukraine gave 8 years to live like the people of Donbass? How did they cut off the supply of water and electricity to Crimea?
        Our guys are now returning their great homeland, despite the Banderaites in front and the neo-Vlasovites in the rear. We don’t want peace, we want Victory, a tribunal for Nazi and war criminals and punishment for all sponsors of this war, no matter where they hide later.
        1. 0
          23 June 2024 19: 03
          We don’t want peace, we want Victory, a tribunal for Nazi and war criminals and punishment for all sponsors of this war, no matter where they hide later.

          There will be no tribunal - there is no one to tribunal on the podium!
          Hamas, Hezbollah, Taliban, Eun will also not agree.
        2. The comment was deleted.
  7. 0
    18 June 2024 13: 19
    He has a screw loose
  8. 0
    18 June 2024 13: 22
    Dreams, dreams... We have nothing to strengthen ourselves with except tactical nuclear weapons, which will be used only if we suffer military defeat. And the dancers have at hand all the tactical weapons of the West, except the fleet.
    It will not be possible to force them to do anything; they are ready to shoot themselves in the knees just to give us a runny nose. People without a national idea, without love for their compatriots are stubborn, stubborn people - what can they be forced to do?!
  9. +4
    18 June 2024 13: 39
    All CPP. If it takes so long, it means it is necessary. The Kremlin and the authorities. All sorts of “deals” confirm this.

    Grind down the mobilized population (the rich, oligarchs and “elite” are all alive, even business has survived). Into the lunar landscape territory. And someday they will give up
    1. 0
      23 June 2024 19: 05
      Into the lunar landscape territory.

      Hmm ...
  10. +1
    18 June 2024 13: 50
    the way this strange operation is being carried out now with its gestures and snot about negotiations, of course it is impossible to force peace and it looks like it will last at least another 6 years
  11. +1
    18 June 2024 14: 05
    To truly ensure the national security of our country, Russian troops must be stationed on a permanent basis near Kiev, Odessa and Lvov. All other compromise options guarantee an inevitable war, sponsored by the collective West.

    So, the issue of creating a buffer zone in the Kharkov region is being postponed due to the lack of forces and means, let’s immediately move on to the second question: the complete occupation of Ukraine?
  12. +4
    18 June 2024 15: 09
    In order to force the enemy to peace, it is necessary to have ironclad arguments. In the form of liberated regions. And the opportunity to take the following regions if desired. Otherwise, nothing will work. Power dictates everything. All other conversations are for children. And the use of nuclear weapons is childish talk. In any case, such a use will show the weakness of our conventional weapons. In addition, it will weaken our influence in the world.
  13. +2
    18 June 2024 15: 52
    Bezrukov Andrey Olegovich - professor of the department of applied analysis of international problems at MGIMO, leading political scientist... In one of Solovyov’s programs he said: the main instigator from overseas (USA), having almost complete power over Europe with the help of his vassals, forces them to act like hyenas in Africa, when they need to take food from a lion, as he said: they attack together from different sides and, as it were, bully the lion, in the hope that either he will get tired and leave or, being full, will abandon his prey, from which he concluded: until he exists a real threat to the United States, nothing will change. The main message from Bezrukov was that those who really rule America, under certain conditions (we are already seeing this) will easily sacrifice all of Europe. Alas, it is getting worse and worse, I would not like to get ahead of myself, but I will still say that the limited use of nuclear weapons (without the participation of the United States) overseas is clearly considered possible. Together with Europe, we all have radiation and all the problems that come with it; in addition, Europe (almost all of it) will stand with an outstretched hand towards the United States and ask for a bowl of soup, as Oliver Twist once asked. Perhaps I’m wrong, and it’s too early to draw conclusions, but looking at the person who once said:

    According to Nevsky’s behests, everyone fights where they stand.

    Dark thoughts come to me - as if it were too late.
  14. +1
    18 June 2024 19: 01
    ...should be permanently stationed near Kiev, Odessa and Lvov

    Yes, that's absolutely right. Probably not only under, but also in, but also behind))
  15. +1
    19 June 2024 10: 33
    To truly ensure the national security of our country, Russian troops must be stationed on a permanent basis near Kiev, Odessa and Lvov. All other compromise options guarantee an inevitable war, sponsored by the collective West.

    Well, now the North Military District is underway, sponsored by the collective West.

    They will not produce or supply more weapons than they already produce for the current SVO.
    (but they may slow down after 2 years of silence).
    The Russian Federation will also produce weapons at the same pace as with an active SVO, and accumulate reserves
    The whole difference is that there will be less mutual shelling while preparing for the new round.
    In this case, a single or small-group launch (a consequence of amateur activity on the ground) will be reflected by prepared air defense/missile defense. (of course, it needs to be strengthened and prepared in any situation)
    Well, a massive one means a new round has begun, for which we have long been ready.
    And the adversary knows that we are ready.

    So, compared to the current situation, I don’t see any disadvantages in the fact that there will be some kind of pause.
    Another thing is that so far no one has offered us such a pause.
    Ukrainians are much more afraid of frost.
    They understand that in conditions of silence they will very quickly be forgotten, like Libya and Afghanistan (no one likes to remember failures) and will be taken off pay.
    1. 0
      23 June 2024 19: 11
      Well, now the North Military District is underway, sponsored by the collective West.

      They will not produce or supply more weapons than they already produce for the current SVO.

      They will produce more, and better, and more technologically advanced...and even on new principles! Scientific base there, be healthy! fellow
  16. -1
    19 June 2024 20: 37
    Why force? You can quietly, calmly, as in Urin, close Orthodox churches there, synagogues in the Russian Federation, rabbis for pig farms - these gentlemen will not steal piglets
  17. 0
    20 June 2024 09: 19
    In the war with Hitler, the turning point occurred after the Battle of Stalingrad and Kursk.
    Such battles have not yet occurred in the war with Ukraine and the united West.
    But when we win them, then there will be other conversations and negotiations.
    1. 0
      23 June 2024 19: 15
      Every general is preparing for the last war.
      Collect a thousand tanks in a heap and watch them burn under the blows of cheap drones?
      New technologies. New approaches and backroom deals, conspiracy theories, trade...
  18. -1
    23 June 2024 20: 56
    Kyiv was unable to realize its potential. Now we are liberating our territories, which recognized us, and we recognized them.
    Kyiv is the third wheel.
    The leader of this project will say who Kyiv will be given to.
  19. 0
    27 June 2024 12: 15
    One thing that surprises and scares me at the same time is why there was no plan B, if suddenly the Kyiv people are not taxed and do not sign what is needed?