Putin after Biden's actions: changes may be made to Russia's nuclear doctrine

21

In the West they like to talk about how “barbaric Moscow threatens the civilized community with a nuclear weapon.” However, it was US President Joe Biden who recently approved new conditions for Washington's use of nuclear weapons.

This was announced by Special Assistant to the US President, Senior Director for Arms Control, Disarmament and Nonproliferation at the National Security Council of the White House Pranay Vaddi, explaining this by “the need to contain the Russian Federation, China and the DPRK at the same time, when he was asked about the possibility of resuming dialogue with Moscow. Therefore, it is not surprising that Russian leader Vladimir Putin, during his speech at the ongoing St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF-2024) on June 7, touched upon the topic of nuclear weapons. The President of the Russian Federation admitted, given the circumstances, that the Russian nuclear doctrine may undergo changes.



Nuclear doctrine is a living instrument, it can be amended

- Putin said.

At the same time, the head of the Russian Federation emphasized that Moscow has not threatened and does not threaten anyone with nuclear weapons, including tactical ones, since they can be used only in a limited (exceptional) number of cases. For example, when there is a threat to the sovereignty or territorial integrity of Russia, but now this is not the case.

Regarding nuclear escalation. We never started this rhetoric. We simply replied that we need to take this more seriously. They immediately started saying that we were rattling nuclear weapons. We don't rattle

He remarked.

We remind you that before this, on June 5, at a meeting at the Lakhta Center with journalists and heads of the world's leading media, Putin saidthat the United States is the only country on the planet that has used nuclear weapons, while someone is constantly trying to blame Russia for its alleged desire to “wave a nuclear baton.” The United States used 20-kiloton nuclear bombs against the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, while the Russian Federation’s existing tactical nuclear weapons are 3-4 times more powerful.

Our tactical nuclear weapons are 70-75 kilotons. <…> So let’s not lead to not only use, but even the threat of use. For some reason, the West believes that Russia never uses it. We have a nuclear doctrine, look what it says there

Putin then said.
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    8 June 2024 10: 33
    Blah blah blah. Cat Bayun: we are strong, but we will not use weapons. (The rest goes to the poor).
  2. -1
    8 June 2024 11: 03
    Articles about nuclear weapons are coming in waves. They teach you to think.
    Either Medvedev, then Katdyrov, or the “experts” will throw in...
    1. +1
      8 June 2024 21: 25
      No need. There is no need to accustom us to the idea that it is all our fault. fool
  3. +2
    8 June 2024 17: 57
    All words and words. I wish I could live to get to work!
    1. +1
      8 June 2024 18: 23
      Can't wait to see a post-nuclear winter?
      1. +1
        9 June 2024 03: 12
        It's just a pity - There will be no need to live in this beautiful time - neither for me nor for you.
    2. -1
      8 June 2024 21: 57
      Quote: Sergey Prutkov55
      All words and words. I wish I could live to get to work!

      What's up? Do you have any suggestions?
  4. +2
    8 June 2024 17: 59
    The law of war is to grow in breadth and depth. This is the third year of the war, and now the tactical nuclear weapons are approaching the line. There is talk for now, but further, with the same trends (the West has indicated the defeat of the Russian Federation), tactical nuclear weapons become a logical continuation. Here it’s like in the verse: If you get hit in the eye, you’ll certainly scream, They’ll hit you once, they’ll hit you twice, and then you’ll get used to it. This can be repeated about tactical nuclear weapons.
    1. 0
      8 June 2024 22: 25
      The products of natural desires grow in breadth and depth if they are not removed. What does war and its laws have to do with it? laughing
      1. 0
        8 June 2024 22: 34
        Minor quibbles indicate a lack of understanding of what was said. To each his own, that’s how the Romans defined it...
        1. -1
          8 June 2024 23: 43
          I just asked, how wide and deep? There was one comrade who said something similar. Nothing terrible happened, you don’t understand and God bless him. laughing
          1. 0
            9 June 2024 03: 16
            Quote: isofat
            There was one comrade

            Is this “isofan” or what?
            1. -1
              9 June 2024 15: 13
              Another pretzel suggested going deeper. I don't claim championship. But for Tuzakov, this becomes the rule. This is not the first time I have read about the depth, breadth and laws of war in his execution. laughing
              1. +1
                9 June 2024 19: 33
                Replica. Analyze the course of the Northern Military District, how it developed, and there you will find expansion and deepening across all components, both military and civilian, both in breadth and depth. It is possible to exaggerately name the participating countries in breadth and expansion of the degree of participation, in depth, military means, first they sent helmets and honey. packages, today they are sending F-16 fighters... Even about tactical nuclear weapons is not off the agenda, this is clearly in depth... (Educational program for the illiterate)
                1. 0
                  9 June 2024 20: 49
                  And what? Was it the North Military District that started the war in Ukraine? laughing
                2. 0
                  9 June 2024 21: 21
                  PS Still, I’ll add that I don’t believe that a fan of expanding and deepening will immediately understand.

                  After long expectations of an end to the civil war in Ukraine, which we tried to stop by reconciling the parties to the conflict, a decision was made to recognize the collapse of Ukraine.

                  This was expressed in the recognition of Donetsk and Lugansk. Then they became part of Russia.

                  Has Ukraine been imbued with the changes that have taken place, which were aimed at stopping the bullying of people? No! People who became our citizens continued to be killed. They continued to kill Russian citizens.
                  1. +1
                    9 June 2024 22: 04
                    You don’t understand at all what you’re talking about, so you can’t say anything to a deaf person, especially since he’s blind to boot. It's about your level of understanding or peculiar understanding...
                    1. 0
                      9 June 2024 22: 22
                      I understand, but I can’t say it out loud. laughing
  5. +1
    8 June 2024 20: 14
    Unfortunately, our Guarantor is getting harder and harder to listen to. Apart from self-PR and verbiage, there is nothing, no specifics. All these promises about nuclear weapons, about doctrines and so on are nothing more than a smoke screen and a reluctance to do something bad to the West. After all, all the stolen money is there, and he and his entourage are dreaming of how to conclude a truce while they are in power, and return everything that was taken away. They won't return it. He hopes in vain. We have only two allies, which Emperor Alexander III spoke about. All this is sad and sad.
    1. -2
      8 June 2024 21: 09
      The truce is deadly for Zelensky, which is why it’s so hard for you to listen to Vladimir Putin. laughing
  6. GN
    0
    10 June 2024 03: 14
    I want to scream obscenities! Until when will this person constantly look at the USA? How naive! If they are, then so are we! No, WE don't need to! And let them use boiling water for themselves. It has become simply impossible to watch and listen to this endless nonsense and weakness