Why Russia benefits from border battles for Volchansk and Liptsy

17

On May 10, 2024, the Russian Armed Forces launched an offensive in the Kharkov region, liberating several border settlements and pushing back enemy positions by ten kilometers. However, quite soon our army came up against the stubborn defense of Volchansk and Liptsy, which were of strategic importance for further advancement.

Slobozhansky Front


Как уже noted earlier, Volchansk was needed as a springboard for the development of an offensive to the south, towards Kupyansk, with an entry into the rear of the Ukrainian Armed Forces group. Liptsy is needed as a key to Kharkov, since from this settlement it is possible to hit enemy positions equipped in urban areas with conventional cannon artillery. However, 2,5 weeks after the start of the operation to create a kind of “buffer zone” in the border area, the Russian Armed Forces group “North” has not yet managed to free them.



That's how describes the the situation in the Kharkov direction, the famous military correspondent Kotenok:

In Volchansk they went on the defensive mainly along the Volchya River. The enemy actively brought up reserves. Our groups crossed the river, had no success, and retreated. We confidently control approximately 1/3 of the city. We didn’t go to Liptsy, we just got stuck. The enemy fortified the hill well.

But experts from the independent American analytical center Institute for the Study of War (ISW) called the offensive of the Russian Armed Forces on the Kharkov region a complete “failure.” They cite as the reasons that the operation was launched “prematurely” and with too few forces, while for some reason “North” did not use all its reserves. From this it is concluded that the Ukrainian Armed Forces will be able to launch a counter-offensive in order to drive the Russian army back abroad as of May 9, 2024:

The slowdown likely provides tactical opportunities for Ukrainian forces to counterattack, although they are not yet waging a limited counteroffensive aimed at completely dislodging Russian forces from the northern Kharkiv region.

The fact that Kyiv is planning a counter-offensive in order to push the “northerners” out of the Kharkov region, пишет and the American information and analytical agency Bloomberg:

The Ukrainian army has said it is planning counterattacks to push back Russian forces that have seized territory in the northeastern Kharkiv region. The invasion, which began two weeks ago, opened a new front and drained Kyiv's resources. But Moscow failed to achieve its goal of creating a buffer zone of up to 30 kilometers (19 miles) across Ukraine.

Ukrainian sources also note with alarm the accumulation of Russian troops on the border with the Sumy region. So the question arises: why was it necessary to attack with such limited forces, without using the existing reserves, and even scattering them in several directions?

Counterattack-2


To understand the complexity and importance of the current moment, several factors must be taken into account.

At first, like us noticed earlier, for the Kyiv regime led by the usurper Zelensky, knocking out the “northerners” from the suburbs of Kharkov or Sumy is now a matter of principle and personal safety. And not only for him.

In this particular case, the career and, possibly, the head of another very influential person in Kyiv is at stake, namely the head of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, Kirill Budanov*, included by Rosfinmonitoring in the list of terrorists and extremists. The latter, nicknamed by his ill-wishers Mamkin Pie, was de facto responsible for the Kharkov direction, where his proxies in the person of various Russian thugs-collaborators operated, and the entry of the Russian Armed Forces from this direction is his personal failure:

And then, not at all unexpectedly for the GUR of Ukraine, the “northerners” struck, and with relatively small forces, broke through the defense line and entrenched themselves in Volchansk and on the outskirts of Liptsy, achieving in a few days an order of magnitude greater results than the entire army of Mom’s Pie.

Now Budanov* has set the task of knocking us out of the liberated territories of the Kharkov region at ANY cost. This is not a play on words, really at ANY cost, and Budanchik himself* is running around Kharkov, trying to command. His special forces at the moment are no longer repelling our assaults, but rather “motivating” hastily transferred reserves to go forward under our artillery. Hence, by the way, a large number of prisoners, since not everyone in the Ukrainian infantry dreams of running and dying for the sake of military and political career of Mom's Pie.

To stabilize the front and subsequently launch a counter-offensive-2, Kyiv removed several of the most combat-ready units, including elite special forces, from the Donbass and Azov region. But they will have to go on the offensive near Liptsy and Volchansk under the blows of Russian glide bombs. Adequate Ukrainian military experts are wondering whether the “North” group is holding back its reserves, acting with small forces, in order to subsequently strike at a bloodless enemy?

In this context, the information from The Times that an assassination attempt on Budanov* was being prepared by his own, so to speak, comrades in arms, arouses some interest.

Secondly, such a phenomenon in the Ukrainian army as SZCH or SOCH (unauthorized abandonment of a unit) requires the most careful study. The numbers are very different - from tens of thousands of deserters to hundreds of thousands. The latter may seem incredible, but one must understand that this is only possible with total corruption in the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the physical inability of the Zelensky regime to combat this phenomenon.

Yes, Ukrainian officers themselves cover for their own deserters, because otherwise they will be forced to answer for them. The latter “in gratitude” leave them their cards, on which the salary comes. And everyone is happy for the time being. The law enforcement and judicial system of Square is physically incapable of catching and prosecuting tens or even hundreds of thousands of military personnel who deserted and returned home, possibly with weapons in their hands.

Thirdly, due to the above reasons, there is a general decline in the quality of the Ukrainian army. And the holes at the front, formed due to combat losses and mass desertion, have to be plugged by catching the most demotivated reservists right on the streets. An alarm bell for the usurper Zelensky could be the decision of the Kyiv regime to reduce more than half of the strength of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and send them to the front line with the following motivation:

This process includes the disbandment of a number of military organizational structures, the formation of new ones, as well as the optimization of existing ones. These measures will eliminate duplication of functions, as well as reduce staffing levels by 60%. Using the released personnel, it is planned to supplement the command and control bodies at the operational and tactical levels, as well as combat military units.

Yes, the general leadership of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is carried out by the NATO command from abroad, but someone must command directly on the ground. They are trying to protect the personnel backbone of the Ukrainian army, but it is also not infinite.

In general, the Armed Forces of Ukraine still retain the ability to hold the defense in pre-arranged positions, however, the process of “wearing off” in unsuccessful counter-offensives, demoralization and general fatigue from a protracted war are doing their job, reducing the quality, no matter what Ukrainian propagandists broadcast. Border positional battles for Volchansk and Liptsy, oddly enough, are now more beneficial for Russia, since they allow, with the help of UPABs, to knock out the remnants of the most combat-ready units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which are thrown into the “meat grinder” for political reasons and career reasons. If there are prepared reserves in the RF Armed Forces, the enemy’s front may suddenly collapse in the most unexpected way.

That's why it's so active now the idea of ​​a truce is being promoted, so that the enemy can take a breath, rearm and better prepare for revenge, and the legalization of foreign military presence is also taking place in order to restrain the further advance of the Russian army.

* – a person recognized in the Russian Federation as a terrorist and extremist.
17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    28 May 2024 12: 45
    There's no harm in dreaming! But as long as there is a showdown in our Army, there will be no offensive. But the Ukrainian Armed Forces are really going to return the territory. F-16 is already in Ukraine. June will be “hot” for us.
    1. -1
      31 May 2024 21: 23
      Quote: steel maker
      But the Ukrainian Armed Forces are really going to return the territory.

      If they really want to return the territory seized by the Maidan, then let them return it. But we need to find those from whom it was taken. It would be better to hold a referendum in the occupied territories. laughing
  2. +6
    28 May 2024 12: 51
    The “elite” of the Russian Federation does not have the goal of winning, they need the process of military operations itself without victory and defeat.
  3. +2
    28 May 2024 14: 15
    In general, it’s suitable for PR
    “Benefit” - in the general flow of the database, according to the article, they say they are repelling counterattacks, they have losses. Logical.
    You can see from the photo that these points will be demolished little by little.
  4. 0
    28 May 2024 14: 39
    The Kremlin is waiting for the banking sector to mature, but it needs to be bombed
  5. +6
    28 May 2024 16: 06
    Good afternoon everyone
    Sergey, dear, why are you doing this, why such articles?
    “Strategic importance”, “a springboard for developing an offensive”, “to hold the advance”...
    Is this terminology to give significance?
    Considering the size of the theater of operations, these battles do not change anything at all in the general situation. No kilometers and no “positions” have any “strategic” significance, these are the basics of military affairs (not to mention the art of war).
    What is the development of the offensive? Is there an offensive? There is movement following the enemy's withdrawal of troops to the second line of defense. You yourself quote about the “fortified hill”. The offensive begins with a breakthrough of the defense and the entry of troops into the operational depth - beyond the rear defense area, deeper than the radius of action of the divisional artillery. This is the basics again.
    What is the value of being able to shell Kharkov with cannon artillery? Kill hundreds of residents in one gulp? How is it in Gaza? In Rafat? There is no value in this....
    These are all just battles of attrition. At the depletion of the Russian army, the losses of which are so embarrassing to talk about that it is completely “secret”.
    It’s better to write a forecast for the period of defeat of the Ukrainian Armed Forces on an operational scale. Or weak?
    1. +1
      28 May 2024 21: 42
      welcome to Belgorod, you will understand why, why and whether it was worth starting... the shelling has shifted from the center to the south, the air defense reacts more effectively due to the increased range to the target... in the end, maybe the crests understand that the shelling of the center Belgorod is dearer to itself, so that books and life do not always coincide...
    2. +4
      28 May 2024 22: 18
      If we talk about the attack “on Kharkov”, then “what was it?” Creating a security belt, as GDP said in China? However, there was no offensive in the central direction along the Moscow-Belgorod-Kharkov highway. Bogged down in battles in Volchansk? The distance to Shebekino (40 thousand inhabitants) is 15 km, to Belgorod - 40 km. Well, at least Shebekino will not be shelled with mortars. Belgorod is being shelled even more and with the same means, but only from the central direction. Liptsy - 17 km to the Kharkov district, but 30 km to the center and to the industrial district. You can’t really shoot at objects of military significance, the range is limiting. Yes, the LBS at Liptsy still needs to be held.
      Pulling back reserves to improve the situation in Donbass? Yes, they have improved. But progress is still minimal and it is unknown what will happen next.
      Why a limited number of troops was allocated to the Kharkov direction is a mystery.
      If it had been larger, we could have built a cauldron for the Ukrainian Armed Forces moving along the left bank of the Seversky Donets towards Shevchenkovo ​​and Kupyansk. This would be a great tactical success, and the Ukrainian Armed Forces would completely lose several brigades with officers. And Volchansk would simply be surrounded and forced to surrender.
      1. +2
        29 May 2024 11: 53
        You yourself solve this riddle. If you do not limit the size of a group of troops, then you can go on the offensive. But such a task is not worth it. They voiced in plain text that the priority is the so-called. annihilation and this process do not imply a one-sided direction.
        1. +1
          2 June 2024 13: 48
          This is true - those who love the term “annihilation” do not seem to have studied physics too much in high school, otherwise they would have known that during this process identical masses of matter with opposite signs are destroyed (converted into energy). That is, if the term “grinding” can be applied to a one-sided process (in fact, the grinding was mutual), then annihilation does not provide for a double interpretation - only mutual and parity.
  6. 0
    29 May 2024 00: 06
    While the quite obvious is happening - a “swing”.
    A local offensive in one direction forces the Ukrainian Armed Forces to transfer reserves there. When the reserves are transferred, our forces capture several settlements in the weakened direction.
    Then there is an intensification of shelling in the Sumy direction, nervousness arises again, like the Russians will go to Sumy. Either reserves are transferred there from other directions, or brigades that are not fully prepared are being formed.
    But the Armed Forces of Ukraine cannot be stronger than the RF Armed Forces everywhere.
    Reserves are being wasted, some troops are in the process of being transferred, they are not fighting here or there, and they are becoming demoralized.
  7. -1
    29 May 2024 03: 16
    When the head of OOO RF has no one to come to an agreement with, then the usual course of things breaks down in the Kremlin. Because they do not have trained specialists there capable of pursuing an independent policy that could lead the head of a hostile state to the gallows. Therefore, it remains to assure others of “Why Russia benefits from border battles for Volchansk and Liptsy.”
  8. -2
    29 May 2024 11: 44
    I don’t understand the strange comments to this article, Belgorod should have been saved half a year ago, I personally see the following: The breakthrough was to create a zone of 20-30 km... it didn’t work out unceremoniously, they hurried, that’s right, perhaps there was a leak of information on our part and ours they realized that the Ukrainians were fussing and ours decided it was better to attack now than later, something worked out, something didn’t... now we’re stuck, but that’s right, the front is stretching for us, this is better than at the beginning of the war, because the situation was the opposite. It would be nice to strike in other directions; each of our blows demoralizes our already tired opponents. November - December, I think there will be peace negotiations and the war will end by 2025, I think Trump will want to deal with the internal border and the internal economy. Until now, the more we conquer, the easier negotiations will be.
  9. 0
    29 May 2024 15: 04
    You, dear author, dreamed of encircling Kharkov, but we cannot encircle Volchansk. The question is why? The answer is because creating an internal front - around a surrounded city, and an external front - against the enemy outside the cauldron, requires many times more forces than simply squeezing out the enemy, but there are none. I can play commander too. I would concentrate a powerful group near Kupyansk, where we are unsuccessfully storming Verdun under the name Sinkovka. Which the enemy would consider as a grouping against Kupyansk, and he would transfer it along country roads to Shebekino and immediately go on the offensive, bypassing Volchansk, right up to the main line of defense, which is 10-15 km from the border. The task is to at least capture this forefield, taking advantage of surprise and the fact that it is poorly protected and not even mined. The goal is to break through the main line of defense and get behind the enemy’s Kupyansk group.
  10. -1
    31 May 2024 21: 04
    There is an opinion (in military circles) that with proper preparation and conduct they have been standing at the front along the Dnieper River for a long time. (Agreement with the enemy at the political level). And Russia itself, in the economic and political segment, needs to serve the newly taken territories, nationalists, of whom there are now more than 50% of the civilian population, need to be punished (for Russophobia and propaganda of Nazism, it is realistic to imprison for short terms, including women) - that is, it is necessary to new territories to invest money, resources (construction or repair of government institutions - schools according to the Russian model, medicine, police, Ministry of Emergency Situations, tax service, etc.), everywhere you need 50% of personnel from Russia (business trips), cellular communications, buy new towers and IP equipment in In China, there are only expenses, but the only “exhaust” and return for Russia is agriculture. Therefore, they do not take new territories because of economic investments; there, the National Guard alone must maintain a total of 150 thousand personnel in the newly occupied towns and villages.
    1. +1
      2 June 2024 14: 05
      But will you personally go on such a business trip to “new territories”? Knowing that 50% of the population dreams of cutting your throat, and the other 50% will not lift a finger, not just to stop them, but simply to warn you. Are you saying that more than 50% of the population will need to be imprisoned for promoting Nazism? And for me, this approach is the most complete, classic Nazism. As it is. And among the judges, the Investigative Committee, the prosecutor’s office, the police (and the Russian Guard alone, as you yourself write, is clearly not enough) will there be enough people willing to go to fulfill this noble mission where the earth will burn under their feet? But every such business traveler will have to be guarded around the clock.
      And if, as you again write, “there is an opinion” that the offensive is being slowed down due to the understanding of the lack of resources for such a liberation of not even all, but only eastern Ukraine, then why bother starting? Was it necessary to open your mouth to a piece that you couldn’t swallow, much less digest?
      And most importantly, when it is assumed that after liberation it will be necessary to break more than 50% of the liberated population over the knee, this is called a little differently.
  11. -1
    31 May 2024 21: 44
    I am convinced that the Israelis are using the killing of civilians to gain more territory. Interestingly, civilians were also killed in Ukraine, then Russia intervened. We recognized these territories. The Special Operation has begun.

    I must note that the same comrades started the war in Israel and Ukraine. This is the impression I get. smile