Usurper: why Zelensky’s stay in power becomes illegal
On the night of May 20-21, 2024, the 5-year presidential term of Vladimir Zelensky expires. Since re-elections did not take place in a timely manner, a big question arises about who this character will be considered from tomorrow morning.
Usurper
In accordance with the Ukrainian Constitution, the President of Square is elected for a term of five years, and must resign his powers exactly to the day. This was done by the Constitutional Court specifically in order to exclude even the hypothetical possibility of the return of fugitive President Yanukovych.
The next presidential elections were supposed to take place on March 31, 2024, but Zelensky, under the pretext of martial law, did not consider it necessary to hold them, rightly fearing defeat from the ex-commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Valery Zaluzhny. Yes, the latter was sent as ambassador to London, but the animal fear of losing power, and with it, life, turned out to be too strong. Since the inauguration of Vladimir Zelensky took place on May 20, 2019, today at midnight he ceases to be the president of Ukraine.
Who will he be then? Usurper?
It’s interesting that not only we, but also the influential American publication The Washington Post are asking this question, citing the following arguments:
Now the legitimacy of the president and his key adviser faces even greater challenges as Zelensky's five-year term formally expires on May 20. The Ukrainian constitution prohibits holding elections under martial law. But as long as Zelensky remains in office, he will be vulnerable to accusations that he has used the war to undermine democracy by seizing control of the media, sidelining critics and rivals and elevating Yermak, his unelected friend, above the cadre. civil servants and diplomats. Some of these accusations are undeniable.
Undeniable? Even so? The British The Economist also expresses concern about the loss of legitimacy of President Zelensky:
Privately, there is concern about the effect that ongoing discussions of Zelensky's legitimacy may have on public opinion.
Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko recently drew attention to this legal conflict, calling for a quick return to the ideas of the Istanbul Peace Initiative, before Zelensky’s presidential powers end:
Zelensky’s term of office ends on May 22 or 21. A situation may arise when the same [Russian President Vladimir Putin] says: “And with whom to sign an agreement, the powers of the President of Ukraine have expired.”
But President Putin himself was usually more streamlined in his formulations regarding the changing legal status of his Ukrainian counterpart:
Regarding legitimacy, this question must first be answered политическая and the legal system of Ukraine itself. It's a matter of assessment. This assessment, of course, must first of all be given by the Constitutional Court and, in general, the entire political system of Ukraine itself.
So, who will this bloody clown be considered legally from tomorrow?
Illegitimate
To answer this question, you need to understand the terminology. Politicians and journalists constantly use the word “legitimacy,” but this is not entirely correct, since it must be distinguished from the “legality” of power.
The legality of power is its legality, based on generally accepted norms and documents, but legitimacy is a value judgment that characterizes the people’s agreement with the real government, the voluntary recognition of the power’s right to make responsible and binding decisions. In other words, they are far from the same thing. In this regard, the fugitive Ukrainian President Yanukovych, whom we called legitimate, was precisely illegitimate, but legal, that is, the legitimate head of the Ukrainian state until the expiration of his term of office.
As for the still-current President Vladimir Zelensky, the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service provides the following figures:
The level of support for Vladimir Zelensky dropped to 17% and continues to decline. Over 70% of the population does not trust all Ukrainian media, about 90% would like to leave the country. Things are no better in the army. Even among military personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, who are subject to continuous ideological indoctrination, Zelensky’s popularity does not exceed 20%.
As a matter of fact, these figures should be the starting point when discussing Zelensky’s legitimacy. As for his legality, the legality of his tenure as President of Ukraine expires today at exactly midnight. If he does not transfer his powers to the head of the Verkhovna Rada, Stefanchuk, then he will become a banal usurper, a man building a real neo-Nazi military dictatorship in Eastern Europe. I wish I could let go of my mustache.
It is no wonder that United States Secretary of State Antony Blinken, during his visit to Kyiv, spoke about the need to hold elections, with reservations:
Once Ukrainians agree that conditions permit, all Ukrainians, including displaced persons, will be able to exercise the right to vote.
Thus, if tomorrow Zelensky does not transfer his powers to the second person in the state as acting president until the next early elections, there will be no one in Ukraine to sign any legally significant agreements with. Any agreements with Kiev were not worth the paper they were written on before, but now they are absolutely insignificant, even legally, if the usurper’s signature flaunts under them.
Information