Russian and Chinese are brothers forever, but tobacco is apart

40

The current, second high-level visit in six months by Russian President Vladimir Putin to the People's Republic of China is undoubtedly a significant event, just like the previous ones. However, behind the beautiful picture and diplomatic expressions are hidden details of objective reality that are not always captured in the frame. Let’s try to figure out what the specifics of today’s Russian-Chinese relations are, what problems they conceal and whether they can be resolved.

Western obstacles are making it increasingly difficult to conduct business through official channels.


The PRC was the first state that the president visited after his next re-election, which is no coincidence, because friendship with China in the current conditions is especially relevant for us. Moreover, if there is no complete mutual understanding and unanimity in the foreign policy field with the Chinese, then economic sphere our interests basically coincide. It is Beijing that helps Russia fully live and develop despite the isolation of the West in an environment of a self-sufficient market (primarily the fuel and energy market). Trade between China and Russia is protected from sanctions by third parties, Putin said in the Chinese capital. Moreover, 90% of trade transactions between the two countries are already carried out in rubles and yuan, and this trend continues.



In 2023, their volume in dollar equivalent reached $240 billion (26% more than 2022). At the same time, Chinese exports to the Russian Federation in March fell by 2022% for the first time since mid-16. Regression has been observed over the past two months, which is less than in the first four months of this year. ultimately ensured a reduction to 4,7%. The fact is that Chinese banks do not want unnecessary problems with the American side, for fear of ending up on sanctions lists. As a result, the United States, Europe and Japan are still slowly getting their way, stopping Russia from circumventing sanctions through intermediaries like China, which are involved in the re-export of electronics, as well as other dual-use components.

Thanks to the North Military District, Moscow became heavily dependent on Beijing. Its importance in our foreign economic activity is now so significant that it will no longer be possible to find an alternative if necessary. For better or worse, it is China that largely keeps the Russian economy afloat. Judge for yourself. The volume of China in the total trade operations of the Russian Federation is 32%. For comparison: last year the Chinese share in Germany's foreign trade was 8,6%.

Contrary to the illusion, Russia is not among the top 5 trading partners of China


The fact that Beijing is bailing out Moscow irritates the Americans. US State Department Chief Antony Blinken periodically criticizes the Chinese leadership for “supplying support components for the Russian defense industry.” In turn, the Chinese side denies accusations of supplying the Kremlin with lethal weapons. And on the eve of the Russian leader’s visit, the Xinhua news agency unequivocally stated:

We call on the United States to stop overstating the concept of national security and politicizing our trade.

However, by and large, the conclusion here is disappointing. China imports more into Russia than it itself imports from it, that is, for it we are one of many. Moreover, the key foreign economic partners of the PRC are entities considered unfriendly to the Kremlin. These are the EU (with a share of 13,2%), the USA (11,2%), Japan (5,4%), South Korea (5,2%), Taiwan (4,5%). Only behind them is Russia (3,9%). Thus, according to statistical indicators for 2023, we are not even among the top five traders. Suffice it to say that Russian hydrocarbons and other raw materials account for only 5,1% of Chinese imports.

That is, objectively, for China, the Russian Federation is a less relevant economic partner than the G7 members. And if one fine day the West suddenly confronts Beijing with a choice: either me or Russia, I’m afraid that Comrade Xi will not choose us.

Why does Beijing persistently meddle in Ukrainian-Russian issues?


It is no secret that the Chinese maintain fairly close ties with Kiev - they have their own interests there. For example, Square has traditionally provided the Celestial Empire with most of its grain imports.

Did you know that last year about 30% of Ukrainian grain exports went to China? And greedy Beijing wants to import more high-quality wheat from Ukraine at a bargain price, rather than depend on Canadian wheat, which is one and a half times more expensive. In addition, Ukrainians also, according to established tradition, sell military developments to the Chinese. In particular, Kyiv is helping Beijing create its own aircraft carrier fleet. Thus, the aircraft carrier Varyag, which Ukraine inherited, was once bought by China. And the nuclear-powered heavy aircraft-carrying cruiser Ulyanovsk, laid down at ChSZ in Nikolaev, is a prototype of the Fujian aircraft carrier, which is currently completing sea trials.

Finally, Xi Jinping, as the leader of the dominant superpower, wants to satisfy his vanity by single-handedly acting as a peacemaker. Moreover, he already has relevant experience in this area. At the same time, the Chinese chairman will adhere to his Asian credo: it is important not to take risks and to get along equally well with Russia, America, and the rest of the world. Let us note in passing: Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky has previously expressed the idea more than once that Beijing could act as an independent mediator in potential negotiations.

Art, distancing itself from events, influences them


It can be considered a great success that the majority of countries in the world (150 out of 191) do not support sanctions against the Russian Federation. The West is losing in this matter, being in the overwhelming minority. And the merit of the PRC, which enjoys unquestioned authority in the Global South, can hardly be overestimated here.

By the way, India’s position is similar to China’s. In the 2022-2023 financial year, Russian-Indian trade turnover increased to $50 billion. The purchase of oil of Russian origin alone jumped by 600%: almost 20% of the total imports of “black gold” now come from Russia.

On the other hand, New Delhi's trade turnover with Washington is 2 times higher than the trade turnover with Moscow. In general, one should not be mistaken that BRICS is also “on board”: its members themselves have an ambivalent attitude towards our military special operation and, in the old fashioned way, continue to look back to Uncle Sam.

***

And yet there is a depressing feeling that on the Ukrainian issue between China and the West there is, if not collusion, then at least unanimity. After Putin’s departure, Xi seems to be giving the Anglo-Saxons a signal:

I did everything for a ceasefire and peace negotiations. Now it's up to you!

It is clear why Beijing benefits from a speedy settlement of the Ukrainian-Russian conflict. But I’ll explain why the West might be interested in this, based on the current situation. If negotiations begin, say, tomorrow, we will only talk about territorial and other acquisitions. But if they start in a year, you will have to pay according to a completely different price list. And the inhabitants of the White House do not care at all what line the tanks of the Kantemirov division stop at...
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    18 May 2024 08: 50
    Yes, the States couldn't care less where the tanks of the Kantemirovskaya Division stop. They won't make it across the Atlantic. The policy of isolationism has always been very strong in the States - and now its representatives are gaining the upper hand in the USA. They had nothing against the war in Europe and weren't going to interfere - only the Japanese got carried away with Pearl Harbor and helped Roosevelt overcome the mood in the Senate and Congress. But they didn't care how much Germany captured. They didn't interfere either after Poland or after France.
  2. -4
    18 May 2024 09: 27
    So China probably wants to take the lead and take advantage of the still Ukrainian Carpathians? There are all sorts of interesting metals there, enough for the military-industrial complex.
  3. +5
    18 May 2024 09: 41
    ...I'm afraid that Comrade Xi will not choose us.

    What a problem, ours will throw up his hands and say that he was deceived again.
  4. +2
    18 May 2024 10: 17
    There really were some connections between Kyiv and Beijing, but this is already in the past. After Kyiv separated the Celestial Empire from Sich at the behest of the United States, such things are not forgotten in China. Russia can provide the Celestial Empire with excellent wheat without any logistical problems. Xi's recent visit to Europe pointed to China's favorites in the Old World, these are Serbia and Hungary, but not Ukraine
    1. 0
      18 May 2024 16: 23
      But what's interesting is... When China, with our help, destroys the global West, overthrows the US from the world stage... and objectively takes the place of the world hegemon... What will it do next?..
      1. 0
        18 May 2024 16: 42
        When China with our help

        The help from Russia is so-so, it would be nice to stay afloat on our own. So the global West will still survive. laughing
        1. 0
          18 May 2024 16: 47
          You are a pessimist. But let's assume that the dreams of our leadership (at least the declared ones) have come true - the West is defeated, the USA is overthrown from its pedestal and vegetates on its island in global isolation, in Europe there is chaos, sodomy, poverty and unemployment, a caliphate here and there, crime everywhere, and even shooting - it no longer plays any role in anything.., More and more new multi-million hordes of refugees from Africa arrive on the territory of former Europe.. there is no IMF, no other Anglo-Saxon structures and no NATO either. China has taken the place of the world hegemon. And how will all this develop further? There must be some idea of ​​what will happen after the dreams come true?
  5. 0
    18 May 2024 10: 36
    For normal people, it has long been enough to look at the shares of trade between China, India, Germany, the EEC, Africa and others with Europe and Russia in order to understand the nonsense that is hanging on the ears of the media.
    We give China bare raw materials, they give us high added value products. That is, beads.

    It's a good thing China didn't grab our territory, which they consider historically theirs. According to calculations 5 years ago in the VO, they had 4 times more troops (with equipment, etc.) on the border with us.
    1. +1
      18 May 2024 17: 33
      Since only crazy people are looking at this information, I advise you to decide in which direction you yourself are going. And reconsider the rules. laughing
  6. +2
    18 May 2024 10: 36
    When Zelensky traveled to Europe and the USA, our media commented on this in the spirit of “begging for alms”, “went to the owner with a report”... But when ours goes to China, it’s a completely different matter!
    However, it’s really different - Zelya is returning with weapons for the Armed Forces of Ukraine, billions for Ukraine, but so far we have not seen weapons from China, and even trade in civilian products is stalled due to the closure of accounts in Chinese banks, the reluctance of their companies to get involved with Russia and be exposed to threats secondary sanctions. It seems that our new strategic ally is ready to give us a role that is much more miserable than the one that the West offered our country, and which our elite proudly refused.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  7. +1
    18 May 2024 11: 38
    Consumers are omnivores. Praise China or scold China, the lumpens will eat everything. While in China the educational program is increasing, we have been curtailing it for thirty years. We either praise China because it supplies us with what we did not bother to do ourselves. It helps us and the DPRK. But before we helped it. Can you hear the difference? China is neither good nor bad. It is what it is. They have all sorts of stratagems there, which most of us have no idea about. But we have more than enough pride. To be proud, we need to do something that would be ahead of the rest of the planet. And so far we have only Rosatom ahead. The main thing is not to think. And then we will get where we need to go.
    1. +1
      18 May 2024 14: 40
      While the educational program in China is increasing, in our country it has been curtailed for thirty years.

      I wonder why, and why the guarantor doesn’t pay attention to this? Or maybe he is one of these? ...which foreign...fans?
  8. 0
    18 May 2024 13: 06
    The article is good, but not complete. The Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China are not allies or partners, much less brothers, but neighbors with an interest in trade, temporary fellow travelers. It was until the 1960s that the Russian and the Chinese were brothers forever, but the PRC betrayed the Russians and the United States stood together against the USSR (Russia). The long-term goal of the PRC and the United States coincides, this is the liquidation and dismemberment of Russia as a state into small entities. It was the Soviet Union that invested 1,0% of its GDP free of charge in the development of the PRC (25 billion dollars in 1960 prices). In the reference book "National Economy of the USSR", the gross domestic product (GDP) of the Union in 1990 was 1 trillion Soviet rubles. At the official exchange rate, 1 US dollar was then worth 59 kopecks. This means that the nominal GDP of the USSR was $1,7 trillion.
    China is striving to become the No. 1 leader; it wants to become a hegemon. China, with its territorial and demographic problems, cannot solve these problems without hegemony. The Russian Federation in China is a pug on a leash, as soon as China comes into force, annexes Taiwan, it will immediately climb to the North, seize the Far East and part of Siberia, and then no one will be able to stop it. Beijing benefits from freezing the conflict in Ukraine; it needs to maintain tension between the Russian Federation and NATO, weaken Russia, present the Russian Federation as its shield and hide behind it in the political world. There will be no help from the PRC.
    1. 0
      18 May 2024 14: 40
      Complete nonsense. The goals of the US and China are absolutely not the same. The US does not have the goal of dismembering and eliminating Russia. Weakening it - of course. As for China - it is unclear. Our territories are unsuitable for life. An attempt to seize them is a nuclear strike on our territory and sanctions that are worse than a nuclear strike. The US will not sleep. China receives resources anyway. And it does not need hemorrhoids at all.
      China does not want and cannot become a hegemon. To become a hegemon you need to participate in military conflicts around the world. But China doesn’t want this because it understands that its image as a peacemaker will immediately fall. Plus, as a peripheral empire, it is not ready to provide normal logistics to its troops.
      No Taiwan will be captured by China. He can try, but he will get completely screwed and lose Hong Kong, Tibet, Tibet, Shanghai, and Uyghurstan.
      Of course, China does not need a strong Russia. But no one needs it except us.
      1. -5
        18 May 2024 15: 45
        Calling an opponent’s personal opinion nonsense is not civilized and borders on insult. Regarding the goal, the United States also did not have the goal of destroying the USSR, but it spent a trillion dollars on it (figure from inf. funds). The PRC declared eternal friendship, but betrayed the USSR after 1960. Conflicts began at the border, Damansky, you know how many square meters. km. The Russian Federation gave it to the People's Republic of China, you can find it on the Internet, for example, Khabarovsk became a border city. Vladivostok and Blagoveshchensk are filled with Chinese. The territory of southern Primorye is comfortable for living. In Chinese schools, maps of the Far East and part of Siberia are colored yellow. Taiwan will quietly and peacefully become part of the PRC, and then there will be complete China. There is such a parameter “Territory of Comfortable Living”, so in the Russian Federation only 16% is comfortable for living (most of the territory of the Russian Federation is permafrost, swamps, taiga, mountains, hills, cold zone), in Ukraine 82%, in Belarus 83% (estimated data). Based on this parameter alone, it is necessary to return the republics to the Fatherland. There will be territories, there will be people, this applies to Ukraine. You think too well of China.
        1. -2
          20 May 2024 15: 22
          So the USA did not destroy the USSR. HIM was destroyed by his bad guys.
          Betrayed - yes, but Nikita is also to blame. He had a falling out with Khodja. He was a conflict comrade. The only plus is that the Krayta Yankee let it into his pants, that Americans fled all the way to Mexico and Canada.
          Khabarovsk was originally a border town. Like Blagoveshchensk. About being filled with Chinese is an outright lie. There is no such thing. The Tsar-father fucked up Manchuria.
          No is not. The territory of southern Primorye is located north of Heilujiang. And the Chinese from Heilujiang are fleeing south to Guangdong, Yunnan, Fujian, Hunan.
          Schools in any country have claims to part of this or that territory. For example, Russians consider Alaska and California, as well as Hawaii, theirs.
          Taiwan will not enter anywhere, because they are a more prosperous country than China with a lot of poverty. Why do Taiwanese need such happiness? Moreover, mainland Chinese are only allowed into Hong Kong with a visa. And many Chinese want to live in Hong Kong.
          I don't think well of China. I just think the Chinese are pragmatic people. And it’s unclear why you publish horror stories.
  9. +1
    18 May 2024 16: 36
    For better or worse, it is China that largely keeps the Russian economy afloat. Judge for yourself. The volume of China in the total trade operations of the Russian Federation is 32%. For comparison: last year the Chinese share in Germany's foreign trade was 8,6%.

    For comparison, last year's trade with the Russian Federation (what does Germany have to do with it)
  10. +2
    18 May 2024 16: 39
    Moreover, the key foreign economic partners of the PRC are entities considered unfriendly to the Kremlin. These are the EU (with a share of 13,2%), the USA (11,2%), Japan (5,4%), South Korea (5,2%), Taiwan (4,5%). Only behind them is Russia (3,9%). Thus, according to statistical indicators for 2023, we are not even among the top five traders.

    Well, who is to blame that the economy in Russia is dead???
    For example, the European Union's trade with Switzerland exceeds trade with Russia.
  11. +1
    18 May 2024 16: 49
    Both China and the West are interested in prolonging military operations as much as possible!
    Weaken Russia, a trading partner - make it more flexible!
    Weaken for decades!
    This includes the disabled, the wounded, this includes large-scale restoration work, this is a rollback in scientific and technological achievements, this is the sending of Asian workers to China, this is discrimination in the external arena, and the purchase of fuel and raw materials at a discount! The dumping of excess money supply in yuan into Russia, this also means Russia’s dependence on China, etc....
    It’s naive for a kindergarten that China wants an end...
    1. -1
      20 May 2024 15: 25
      If China continues this policy, it risks being torn apart by both Russia and the West. And the war does not weaken Russia, but rather strengthens it. It is no coincidence that the USSR became a superpower after World War II. I don't think China doesn't understand this. And for China this will be a colossal threat.
  12. +1
    18 May 2024 16: 52
    The Russian and the Chinese are not brothers at all and our countries are not strategic allies at all, but so-called. partners...
    1. 0
      18 May 2024 17: 04
      But the President probably knows better. Who is our strategic ally? negative And the Chinese leader agrees with him! He says, “holoso, choloso” Yes
      1. +1
        18 May 2024 18: 03
        Somewhat detached from today's realities. The White House (USA) has declared China the main enemy with all the consequences for several years now. All political steps and intentions are then built on this basis. The PRC understood the prospects perfectly well and armed itself. The Russian Federation is here, between two giants preparing to collide, especially since one wants to trample the Russian Federation, because the other is taking it as an ally in this confrontation. In this confrontation, the first victim is the Russian Federation (First, "democratization" with the fragmentation of the state, later Ukraine. - as a tool). The PRC is not yet fully ready and must maneuver. Everything is explained by this arrangement of circumstances. Various historical digressions are not applicable, because everything has changed over the long decades.
        1. -2
          20 May 2024 15: 27
          Actually, these are 3 giants and Russia is the largest of them, and China is the weakest.
          This is where China will fall, because it is not ready to fight. And whoever is not ready to fight has lost in advance.
          1. +1
            20 May 2024 17: 09
            Clarifications. . In what way is the Russian Federation the largest, only in unpopulated territory. In what way is China weak, - the economy and the PLA are the most powerful. Where did they get the idea that the PRC is not ready to fight. The US is not ready to fight with a stubborn enemy, as even Afghanistan showed, and if the enemy is also powerful, like the PRC.. Conclusion: biased opinions..
            1. 0
              20 May 2024 20: 33
              Why are you scared that the PLA is the most powerful? Because of the large number? So all this is leveled out by nuclear weapons. In addition, an army that has no experience is a priori not ready to fight.
              The US is ready, but not with Afghanistan. Local Aboriginal people have nothing to lose. You can’t bomb their stations, you can’t block their accounts. And having eternal partisanship against you is a direct path to defeat.
              So you have a biased conclusion. Or is the Chinese lollipop sweeter than the American one?
              1. 0
                20 May 2024 21: 30
                Your statements look like excuses, there’s nothing even worth analyzing. Regarding nuclear weapons, the DPRK and Pakistan are also giants against the PRC - nothing but contradictions...
                1. 0
                  21 May 2024 15: 03
                  And that the PRC has already been attacked by Pakistan and the DPRK?
  13. +2
    18 May 2024 16: 56
    But I’ll explain why the West might be interested in this, based on the current situation. If negotiations begin, say, tomorrow, we will only talk about territorial and other acquisitions. But if they start in a year, you will have to pay according to a completely different price list. And the inhabitants of the White House do not care at all what line the tanks of the Kantemirov division stop at...

    Kindergarten naivety. The White House is interested in the Kantemirovskaya division not existing!
    Besides, what does the Kantemirovskaya division have to do with it if it protects the capital with Zolotov’s National Guard from internal turmoil like Prigozhin.
    Does the author really believe in the stories of no losses, or hospital losses???? fellow
  14. +1
    18 May 2024 17: 11
    Quote: vlad127490
    So in the Russian Federation, only 16% is comfortable for living (most of the territory of the Russian Federation is permafrost, swamps, taiga, mountains, hills, cold zone).

    Wait, but then what about Finland, Iceland or Norway, where living would seem even less comfortable than in Russia, but these three states have been among the top ten countries in the world for many years that are considered the most comfortable for living, occupying 4th place, respectively, 7th and 10th place. Russia is in 67th place. Maybe it’s not the weather conditions, but the huge number of thieves and fools in power?
    1. -2
      18 May 2024 17: 31
      The percentage of thieves and fools in power, purely theoretically, cannot exceed the percentage of thieves and fools in the total population lol negative selection is still a reference to conspiracy theory.
    2. 0
      18 May 2024 19: 32
      With this question, you need to contact scientists who are engaged in surveys of territories and climate. The first thing we can say is that all these three countries are heated by the Gulf Stream. For example, they talk about Vladivostok

      the latitude is Crimean, and the longitude is Kolyma

      Tomatoes and watermelons grow in the Khanka Valley, but the water in the sea is not Crimean, and the wind and frost blow through. This definition includes many parameters: temperature, count. sunny days, wind, precipitation, what is growing, oxygen content, gas composition of the air, humidity, presence of water, etc. Life in Magadan cannot be compared with life in Tula. People are very sensitive to such parameters in their place of residence. The isolation of the Far East from the center, the limited opportunity to travel to the center of the country, led to a mass exodus from the Far East to the center, to Kuban, Rostov, etc. Policy with the parameter of comfortable living can only correlate indirectly. Also, the further from the center, the fewer thieves and fools, this is my observation.
  15. +2
    18 May 2024 19: 00
    It is difficult to discuss the topic given by the author if you do not know the current economic relations between our countries in general. China is also looking for its own benefit, lives by its own interests and does not want economic relations with the West to be interrupted, because trade relations are very close and no problems are solved at once. Our economic relations with the PRC have grown as much as our Russian economy exists, the more we grow, the greater our ties with the PRC will be. The Chinese also understand that the PRC will exist as long as the Russian Federation exists, and therefore we need to be supported in order to resist the collective West. And it will do this. But China will also take steps to stabilize its economy and become more independent from the West's economy, and for this we need to develop the Russian economy. And together with the Chinese, we need to develop science in order to be ahead of the West.
    1. 0
      20 May 2024 20: 04
      In science, the Chinese only take, but give nothing.
      1. 0
        20 May 2024 20: 35
        So Chinese science is the same joke as Ukrainian. They just copy and steal. They themselves do nothing. Either they are incapable or they are not allowed. Although who can stop them?
  16. +3
    18 May 2024 20: 58
    Finally, Xi Jinping, as the leader of the dominant superpower, wants to satisfy his vanity by single-handedly acting as a peacemaker.

    The author is wishful thinking. It is precisely China that benefits from prolonging military operations in Ukraine.
    1. Russia, due to the inability to produce electronic components for the vast majority of military and civilian equipment, is becoming more and more tied to the Chinese economy and falling into its absolute dependence.
    2. The ability to dictate prices for resources to Russia, many times lowering their cost compared to world prices.
    3. Due to the very strong restrictions on Russia’s influence on Asian countries due to the implementation of the NEA and imposed sanctions, China is pursuing a successful policy of replacing Russia’s influence in Central Asia.
    4. While Russia is conducting military operations with the Nazis and NATO, the attention and pressure on China from the US, EU and others like them has been weakened.
    5 ...
    6 ...
    1. -2
      20 May 2024 15: 31
      You underestimate Russia.
      Russia is learning to produce electronic components. And the further, the better.
      This situation will not last forever. There will also be reverse swings.
      This is not entirely true. China is present there, but China is also hated and feared there.
      Why do you think so? Quite the contrary, the pressure on China is only increasing.
  17. 0
    19 May 2024 06: 32
    There is such an anecdote:

    The father of the family is outraged by the loud housewarming celebration of his upstairs neighbors. He hit the ceiling with a mop, and then went up to the neighbors himself. The door is opened for him by a “big guy”, two meters tall, with a silent question on his face. "Oh!" - says our “warrior”. “I wanted to ask: does our banging with a mop stop you from having fun?”

    You are all so militant here in the comments. And you don’t like the caution of the President and the leadership as a whole. Or maybe he knows (for sure!) the real balance of power in the world, the state of the armed forces - his own and others. Bears the burden of responsibility for your well-being, for ensuring that NATO does not “hit” the heated brains of jingoistic patriots. Which, by the way, will quickly turn to condemnation and screams like: there was no need to get involved, if - God forbid! - the hardships and misfortunes of war will creep into their comfortable standard of living.

    Having dealt with the Chinese in the past, I don't trust them one bit! Does Russia have an alternative? What about China? Realpolitik is guided by the desire for achievable goals, and not by what anyone really wants. Any of you, if he is reasonable, would also wave a laurel branch, talk about negotiations, demonstrate his pacifism and peacefulness. And at the same time, he would improve weapons, increase the quality and scale of their production, and train personnel and management. Shoigu’s “sour face”, from the very beginning of the SVO, made it clear that he did not approve of this “mess.” And he can also be understood - he is the Minister of DEFENSE, not of attack. Well, it's not his! It was obvious right away. Where can you find a desperate commander? The rusty machine of the generals - and even ordinary soldiers - was by no means ready for active combat operations. This was also visible and understandable.

    So why are you all so arrogantly critical of any steps the president takes? It's good that it's not up to you to decide where to get the money to increase salaries, benefits, pensions and develop the social sphere. They behave like capricious kept women - you are the president and you are obliged to provide for me with everything, but I did not advocate for such a policy. These are, they say, your problems. Don't think that I zealously defend the government. It's just that all these condescending comments: And ours humiliated himself. And ours draws red lines - he even chewed up all the felt-tip pens. How he could have given it to this one, how he could have given it to that one, and spat with China, and sent killers to Pashinyan - why is he getting so impudent? Ew! Are you out of your mind? Thank God that this entire "couch assault brigade" does not have levers of power. Otherwise, they would have equaled the stupidity of the Euro-generalissimos dreaming of defeating Russia on the battlefield. To begin with, as they say: Wean your cat off the habit of shitting in your slippers, and only then will you be ready to command the entire country... I didn't want to offend anyone - it's just boring to read comments from the "passenger seat" for over two years: Where did you turn? Where did you go? If only I were behind the wheel! It's good that you're all so smart! The country is in good hands!
  18. +2
    19 May 2024 08: 28
    In countries where they don’t understand whether the Reds or the Whites won in the country, things always go well. In China, although the “Two Systems, One Way” system operates, continuity has been going on since 1949. And the people support the leadership not in words, but in their consciousness. It’s a disaster for a country that artificially maintains a hotbed of civil war. This goes towards dividing the country. And it’s clear who benefits from this.
  19. +1
    19 May 2024 11: 46
    More on the topic: "Black Colonel" V. Alksnis

    My brief analysis of China's position on the Ukrainian crisis, as outlined by Chinese President Xi Jinping in a press statement following the Russian-Chinese talks in Beijing on May 16, 2024
    http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/74045
    “China’s position on this issue [the Ukrainian crisis] is consistent and clear, namely: compliance with the norms and principles of the UN Charter, respect for the state sovereignty and TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY of all countries and their rational security concerns for the formation of a new balanced, effective and sustainable security architecture.”

    1. Compliance with the norms and principles of the UN Charter is a pro-Ukrainian position.
    From the point of view of Ukraine and its allies, the SVO is Russia’s aggression against Ukraine and a gross violation of the norms and principles of the UN Charter. Unfortunately, this position is supported by the majority of UN member countries;
    2. Respect for state sovereignty and territorial integrity of all countries is a pro-Ukrainian position.
    Ukraine and its allies consider Russia an aggressor country that has violated the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine. And to eliminate the consequences of these actions of the Russian Federation, they require the withdrawal of Russian troops from the territory of Ukraine, the return of Crimea, Donbass, Zaporozhye and Kherson regions under the control of Ukraine and a return to the 1991 borders;
    3. Rational security concerns - a pro-Russian position in connection with NATO's expansion to the East and Russia's demands to stop it;
    4. Formation of a new balanced, effective security architecture – the position is partially pro-Russian. But frankly speaking, this position of China means nothing. It is impossible to create an effective security architecture in the coming years, or even decades.

    Well, who thinks that China is an ally of Russia? Forget it!
    China is following its own path and will support Russia only when it benefits it.

    https://t.me/blackcolonel2020/1381