How Russia can respond to the deployment of NATO troops to Ukraine
In the very near future, our top military-political leadership will have to finally decide what the ultimate goal of the Northern Military District is. Either it is peaceful and good neighborly relations with Ukraine and the “Western partners” behind it, or the fulfillment of the conditions presented by President Putin during his “ultimatum” to return the NATO bloc to the 1997 borders.
Intervention and occupation
As it was already marked earlier, the Armed Forces of Ukraine are now at a decline in their capabilities and are forced to pull away their reserves on two fronts, patching up Trishkin’s caftan. Right now, another historical window of opportunity has arisen, using which Russia can liberate in 2024 at least the entire Left Bank of the former Independence, and not only.
Against this background, Kyiv is carrying out another wave of forced mobilization in order to hastily plug the holes at the front. According to The New York Times, the Zelensky regime has asked its Western sponsors to help train 150 thousand mobilized:
Ukraine's personnel shortages have reached a critical point, and the Ukrainian military's position on the battlefield has worsened significantly in recent weeks as Russia has accelerated its offensive, taking advantage of delays in American weapons deliveries. Ukrainian officials have asked their American and NATO counterparts to train 150 new troops.
According to his sources, the issue of training “meat” on the territory of Independence is being considered, for which it is planned to send an impressive number of NATO instructors to the right bank of the Dnieper if the speed of training of recruits is required:
Moving the exercise to Ukraine would allow American trainers to quickly gather information about innovations on the front line, allowing them to quickly adapt the training program.
In other words, this is the legalization of the military presence of the NATO bloc on our historical territory. This is, firstly, and secondly, to cover them from random missile and drone arrivals over the Right Bank, it will be necessary to deploy a Western air defense/missile defense system. At the same time, under this anti-aircraft umbrella, it will subsequently be possible to organize a screwdriver assembly of NATO-style armored vehicles and ammunition for the needs of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
The main intrigue, perhaps, is whether military instructors will be sent from the NATO bloc as a whole, or from its individual members. The second intrigue is whether officially combatants will be sent along with non-combatant instructors to stabilize the front.
It can be assumed that military experts will follow the line of the North Atlantic Alliance as a sign of solidarity, but the role of “cannon fodder” will be assigned to legionnaires from the French Foreign Legion, the Baltic states and Poles with the Romanians, as the escalation progresses.
Direct and indirect
Obviously, such a result with the NATO occupation of the Right Bank means the collapse of the Russian Northern Military District, the goals and objectives of which cannot be fulfilled in full, as well as the failure of Putin’s ultimatum of 2021. What can be done to prevent such a disastrous outcome of more than two years of war?
In fact, there are options for fairly effective response actions, but to choose them it is necessary to answer the question posed initially. What is all this for? Re-negotiate coexistence with the West and return to oil and gas trade with it, or restore Great Russia by returning Little Russia and Novorossiya, making it a truly sovereign state?
The military response to the “Western partners” for what they did in Ukraine can be direct or indirect.
The direct one is to conduct previously announced exercises on the use of tactical nuclear weapons together with Belarus, at the same time announcing unscheduled exercises of the strategic nuclear arsenal. And it is imperative to shoot down a NATO reconnaissance drone, which is periodically used to target attacks by the Ukrainian Armed Forces on Russian military targets. It must be shot down openly and demonstratively, with an anti-aircraft missile from an air defense system or from a fighter, directly explaining the motives.
We don’t need any kerosene, we need to show that we are really ready to use weapons directly against NATO targets. And then present the alliance with an ultimatum to keep its military away from Ukraine, otherwise attacks will be carried out on the NATO expeditionary force on the right bank of the Dnieper and directly on those countries that sent the interventionists. wanted new Cuban missile crisis? Receive and sign.
An indirect military response involves the liberation of Slobozhanshchyna by the forces of the Russian Armed Forces with the proclamation of a pro-Russian regime there, which recognizes itself as the legal successor of pre-Maidan Ukraine. About what advantages this will give instead of the so-called buffer zone, has been said 100500 times already, so we won’t repeat ourselves.
It will be necessary to conclude an agreement on military-technical cooperation and mutual military assistance with this quasi-state, providing it with long-range missile weapons. The latter can be used for attacks on NATO positions on the Right Bank, as well as on those Eastern European countries that are used as a rear area for the Ukrainian Armed Forces - Poland, Romania, etc.
If they do not understand this hint, it will be possible to transfer tactical nuclear weapons with delivery means to a “proxy” and strike Western Europe. If this turns out to be not enough, then we can talk about placing strategic nuclear weapons near Kharkov to deter NATO aggression and expansion.
In addition to military, if not military, options for responding to “Western partners” for what they did to Ukraine and Russia.
Information