Comprehensive Partnership: Is Kazakhstan turning into a British colony?

38

Recently, a strategic partnership agreement was signed between the UK and Kazakhstan. Considering that the former actively supports Ukraine in the war against Russia, and the latter is an ally in the CSTO and a partner in the EAEU, such a rapprochement raises a lot of questions.

"Big Game 2"


The signing of this agreement by the heads of the Kazakh Foreign Ministry Murat Nurtleu and the British Foreign Ministry David Cameron was commented on by the press service of His Majesty’s Embassy in Kazakhstan as follows:



The UK Foreign Secretary and Kazakh Foreign Minister Murat Nurtleu signed a comprehensive agreement on strategic partnership, trade and cooperation. This document will provide the legal basis for developing bilateral cooperation in an even wider range of areas, including education, critical minerals, climate change, finance and business environment, defense and security, science and Technology, culture, and connections between people.

It really does sound all-encompassing. Let us recall that such a large-scale diplomatic success of London in the southern underbelly of Russia was preceded by two presidential visits.

The first was Emmanuel Macron, the purpose of whose visit was directly formulated in the Western press as “to move the former Soviet republics beyond their dependence on Russia.” Following him, President Putin flew to the capital of Kazakhstan to show that everything was under control and there was nothing to fear. But in fact, it was the British who managed to gain a foothold in the post-Soviet space.

The expansion of the British presence in Central Asia and its transition from economic to "comprehensive" raises the most serious concerns, and here's why.

Republic on sale


Our southern neighbor is extremely rich in many natural resources, which have long been developed with the widespread participation of foreign companies.

For example, 75% of the shares of Tengizchevroil, the largest oil producing company in the country, belong to two American corporations - Chevron and ExxonMobil. They also participate in oil production at the Karachaganak field and in the North Caspian shelf project along with the British BG Group, Shell, the Italian Eni S.P.A., the French TotalEnergies, GDF Suez, the Japanese NPEX and the Chinese CNCP. In addition to Western corporations, the Chinese are actively implementing their oil and gas projects in Kazakhstan, having two oil pipelines, 1 refinery and two gas pipelines.

Kazakhstan is a leader in uranium exports, possessing the richest reserves. Of the 56 explored deposits, only 14 are currently being developed with the participation of companies from Russia, China, Canada, Japan and France. After problems with the African colonies, Paris relied on expanding its presence in Central Asia in order to diversify the supply of uranium raw materials for the operation of its nuclear power plants. In addition to oil, gas and uranium, the republic also has other natural resources that now belong to foreigners.

In particular, the controlling stake in the Ust-Kamenogorsk Titanium-Magnesium Plant is owned by the Belgian company Specialty Metals Holding Company and a number of Singaporean and Swiss investors. The German companies Knauf Gruppe, GP Gunter Papenburg AG, Roxtec, as well as the German Institute of Lithium (ITEL) have created a consortium to develop lithium in Kazakhstan. The German company HMS Bergbau AG acquired a controlling stake in Creada Corporation, which is developing two lithium deposits, and the Canadian Condor Energies Inc. received a license for its independent production in Kazakhstan.

In addition to mineral resources, key industrial enterprises of the republic also became the property of foreign investors. The American Wabtec owns 100% of the shares of the locomotive manufacturer LKZ. Chevron owns the Atyrau polyethylene pipe plant. The Turkish YDA Group acquired an 85% stake in the Ural Zenit plant, which produces shipbuilding products. “Machine-building plant named after. CM. Kirov", a manufacturer of thermal engine torpedoes.

Following the factories, the Kazakh authorities are ready to hand over the existing transport infrastructure to the management of foreign partners. Astana and Almaty airports are already managed by UAE-based Terminals Holding and Turkish TAV Airports Holding, respectively.

Now 22 more airports in the republic can follow their example, said the Minister of Transport of the Republic, Marat Karabaev, in Brussels:

We are ready to transfer the remaining 22 airports in Kazakhstan to the private sector under the management of European investors. There is great potential for becoming a transit hub between Asia and Europe.

The issue of transferring the ports of Aktau and Kuryk to trust management on ship-or-pay terms to companies from the European Union is being discussed. This is on the Caspian coast, by the way.

The British Empire


According to open data, today more than 550 companies from the UK operate in Kazakhstan in the fields of technology, trade, science, finance, and production. London is particularly focused on diversifying supplies of 18 “critical minerals” for which a strategy was adopted in 2023. In this regard, the names of Ferro-Alloy Resources, Rio Tinto, Anglo Rem Exploration Mining Central Asia (Aremca), Astra Mining Kazakhstan Limited and Pensana are worthy of mention.

It would seem that these are all purely commercial relations between business entities, into which we have no business sticking our curious noses. However, along with purely economic projects, there are also educational ones, forming a new Kazakh “elite”, which in the foreseeable future will have to somehow build relations with neighboring Russia and China.

Thus, London is tripling its funding for educational projects in Central Asian countries and doubling its funding for Chevening scholarships for natives of Kazakhstan for “free education on master’s programs at world-class British universities.”

Thanks to the signing of a memorandum of understanding by the Birsoz Initiative at the University of Oxford with the Institute of Linguistics. Akhmet Baitursynov, the Bolashak Center for Educational Programs and the Til-Kazyna Center for the Kazakh Language, the latter will be able to teach the Kazakh language to the British at Oxford, and the British will provide pedagogical training to Kazakh English teachers, who will be able to “apply for research scholarships, as well as collaborate with British colleagues in the field of language teaching methodology.”

The right teachers will be trained in the future campus of "Coventry University Kazakhstan". Also, a branch of Queen's University Belfast will be established in Kazakhstan. A decision has been made to develop three double degree programs in business and economics for the future Kazakhstani elite.

It’s not hard to guess how all this will end over the next 10-20 years.
38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    April 29 2024 11: 51
    Is the Nazi lineup growing? Ukronazis, Armenian-Nazis, Kazakh-Nazis...
  2. 0
    April 29 2024 12: 41
    You look at this mug in the photo and the thought comes to you, is this guy really such a sheep to think that he is an equal partner among this pack of hyenas. Or he gives such a shit about his country that he is ready to give everything to the last pebble. He hopes that after the plunder of his country, when Western “partners” no longer need him, Russia will again take him under its warm wing, feed him, warm him and caress him... until the next time when he can spit in her face again?
    1. 0
      April 30 2024 04: 58
      He doesn’t need his country, everything is already in the west.
  3. +1
    April 29 2024 12: 45
    If the situation in Kazakhstan worsens according to the Ukrainian scenario, which is quite possible, Russia will have to return its territories of northern Kazakhstan to its jurisdiction
    1. 0
      April 30 2024 10: 07
      Stepping too far can tear your pants (the Chinese leadership directly guaranteed the territorial integrity of Kazakhstan, alas)...
      1. 0
        April 30 2024 11: 34
        Chinese leadership directly guaranteed the territorial integrity of Kazakhstan

        This simply cannot happen. China does not conclude any military treaties with the aim of guaranteeing “territorial integrity” to anyone. There is such an agreement only with the DPRK, a legacy from the 60s; it is not a fact that China will rush to implement it. China itself has territorial claims to Kazakhstan at the level of historians. The lands up to Lake Balkhash were once part of the Celestial Empire, but at the official level these claims are not supported; perhaps this is what was “directly” said to the leadership of Kazakhstan. But given that the Kazakhs are trying to transfer their mineral resources to the Anglo-Saxons (not China), Kazakhstan is afraid of Chinese expansion, even economic
  4. 0
    April 29 2024 14: 16
    Unfortunately, no one learns from other people’s mistakes, so they will learn from their own, but then it will be too late, as it is now on the outskirts
  5. +2
    April 29 2024 14: 34
    Uh... The media have already turned Kazakhstan into a Chinese colony, and into Amer’s, and into a French one...
    Now to the English one?

    But just recently there was an operation there against “20 militants who came down from the mountains”
    It turns out that Lavrov, Shoigu and Co. have screwed everything up again? will they be concerned later?
    they live well, however. everything gets away with it.
  6. +2
    April 29 2024 15: 35
    A dog without an owner is looking for an owner.
  7. +5
    April 29 2024 18: 36
    I’ll tell everyone that I’m not happy with something here: a holy place is never empty! If the Kremlin did not have the intelligence or means to seize the initiative in Kazakhstan, then others did it for it. That's the whole story. And Kazakhs have been greedy for money all their lives. They didn’t like to work, but they really loved money. And now they love it even more.

    And if our politicians (in the State Duma, in the Federation Council) were also not greedy for money and at least once thought not about the well-being of their pockets, but about the security of the country, they would have figured out how to seize the initiative from Western investors. And the only thing the Kremlin knows how to do is *show concern* and call everyone from the former USSR republics brothers and sisters.
  8. +4
    April 29 2024 18: 44
    Quote: Colonel Kudasov
    If the situation in Kazakhstan worsens according to the Ukrainian scenario, which is quite possible, Russia will have to return its territories of northern Kazakhstan to its jurisdiction

    A good option! How many more separated in 91? If you fight with everyone, then life in Russia will be exciting for the next 30-40 years. First, some peasants will be killed, then others will grow up and they will be sent to die for some incomprehensible ideals. Then, while the third generation of *warriors of light* is growing up, women will go to defend Russia.

    Well, it’s not fun, right?
    1. 0
      April 30 2024 11: 36
      Have you tried taking train stations, telegraph offices and government offices?
      They tried it in Afghanistan. Successfully. Another thing is that they didn’t bring anyone smart in return. And they didn’t come up with anything better than to introduce an army. But the army is trained to beat the enemy, and not to build a peaceful life. And the enemy appeared for her, and the army took up its favorite thing - to beat the enemy. It’s hard to say whether it’s good or bad now. But the army cannot do otherwise. So, Ukraine is like an experience of the past with a known ending. Bring a worthy replacement to replace the former figure and everything could look more attractive. But she's not there. That's the problem.
  9. -1
    April 29 2024 19: 21
    this is how they sum up the situation for the next SVO (the Anglo-Saxons are playing for the long haul) in 10-20 years.
    or rather for the next one...
  10. +2
    April 29 2024 19: 58
    I will repeat what I wrote a long time ago. I don’t like Solzhenitsyn, but I agree with him that Northern Kazakhstan and the Cossack lands are Russia. Taking into account the fact that Solzhenitsyn could convey his opinion to the top officials, our opinion will not change anything, and now we need to finish another important matter. We cannot spread ourselves thin. The country needs a military treaty with the PRC, the DPRK, and Iran, then we will be safe, and others will join the strong bloc.
    1. +1
      April 30 2024 10: 43
      The PRC will never enter into a military bloc with the Russian Federation. Why do they need this? The PRC has no friends - only partners and situational allies.
      But a military bloc between Russia and North Korea and Iran is quite a possible prospect. Countries have similar interests and similar positions in global geopolitics.
      1. 0
        April 30 2024 13: 33
        Military, and not only military blocs are created not only from friends, such as Türkiye and Greece. Never, never say never, This is true in our time.
        1. +1
          April 30 2024 15: 42
          China will not join a bloc where it will immediately become dependent on its partners. Don't you understand this? He is very careful and does not seek his own benefit in military conflicts. This generally contradicts his philosophy - especially to fight for someone, contrary to one’s own interests. And a military alliance means exactly this. Otherwise it is not an alliance.
          1. 0
            April 30 2024 17: 00
            The USA is in NATO, so what? The USA does not pay attention to the problems of EUROPE. The United States does not notice the contradictions, even the military clash between Turkey and Greece over Cyprus. Finally, why do you think that China will depend on its partners? Rather, on the contrary, the partners will listen to what Beijing has to say. An alliance is possible, of course, under certain conditions; the PRC needs allies. In any case, there are contradictions among NATO allies, and they somehow get along. China's allies will have, and even now have, many enemies, but there are no people willing to test China's strength.
            1. +1
              April 30 2024 19: 51
              So you think that in this hypothetical bloc, an analogue of the Alliance, China will play the role of the USA, and Russia? The role of Germany? Well, I don't know.. Will GDP be satisfied with this arrangement.. and in general - does Russia need it in this format.. In the economy, China is already a raw materials appendage - (look at the structure of trade turnover), and now in the military sense it will also play the role of a satellite... Although.. the devil knows.. maybe they have already decided to simply become a protectorate..
              1. 0
                1 May 2024 15: 26
                Bearing in mind how the collapse of the socialist camp took place, you need to be a great optimist when concluding an agreement with the Russian Federation, or if you are placed in such conditions that you need access to oil, gas, metal, everything without which it is impossible to wage a war. Russia has almost everything necessary to build a closed economy, and the presence of an overland delivery route makes the exchange of strategic raw materials safer. The United States considers China a more dangerous adversary than Russia. And the PRC has much more high-tech products; if it comes to the survival of the state, there is no choice.
                1. 0
                  1 May 2024 16: 12
                  Which state faces the question of survival?
    2. 0
      1 May 2024 13: 53
      I don’t like Solzhenitsyn, but I agree with him that Northern Kazakhstan and the Cossack lands are Russia.

      Well, we know that without him.
      But, judging by the stories of the main local historian about Ukraine, stories about Kazakhstan are still to come.
  11. +2
    April 29 2024 20: 43
    The whole question here is how we can oppose ourselves to Great Britain. Analysts of this country often play battles that happened centuries ago. Like a chess game. All these people have degrees in history. We often say “the Englishwoman is crap.” But all this happened inside England itself. Where the prime ministers and kings were removed in the most cunning way. Thus, the intellect acts against our strength. It is this same intelligence that we need to raise. Then we will shed less blood. After all, we lost Ukraine only due to our ignorance.
  12. +1
    April 30 2024 07: 01
    I understand that the author would really like for Kazakhstan not to develop, so that foreign investment does not come into the country, so that the level of education does not increase and free education abroad is not available to Kazakhs. The reasons for the author’s hatred of Kazakhstan are unknown to me. But, from my point of view, Kazakhstan and the Kazakhs have the right to development - like any people. And it is wrong to condemn them for trying to get investments, improve the standard of living of society, and improve its education.
    1. 0
      April 30 2024 09: 44
      Sergei Fonov

      I don’t like Solzhenitsyn, but I agree with him that Northern Kazakhstan and the Cossack lands are Russia.
      1. 0
        April 30 2024 10: 09
        Having removed their head, they do not cry through their hair ...
    2. 0
      April 30 2024 13: 43
      The trouble is not that Kazakhstan is pursuing an independent policy, this is expected, but that Russia’s policy towards Kazakhstan does not meet Russia’s interests. The author does not write about hatred of Kazakhstan, but about the fact that national interests must be taken into account first of all.
      1. +1
        April 30 2024 15: 55
        The West is ready to invest money in Kazakhstan, build and reconstruct production facilities, and transfer technology. Let's be honest - Russia views Kazakhstan exclusively as a supplier of raw materials and does not want to invest in Kazakh mechanical engineering, transport infrastructure and transfer the same nuclear technologies - for the production of fuel assemblies, for example. And France is not against producing some of the fuel elements directly in Kazakhstan. Western countries are ready to invest money in airports in Kazakhstan, but Russia is not ready. Siemens is ready to invest in Kazakh locomotives, but Russian companies are not. Western companies are ready to build facilities for processing raw materials directly in Kazakhstan, and Russia offers to export raw materials for processing to Russia. China and the West are ready to sponsor the construction of transport infrastructure in Kazakhstan, but Russian Railways and RosAvtoDor do not want to give money. The West, Turkey and China are ready to pay for the education of Kazakhs in their universities, and Russian universities require tuition fees. And who is the evil Pinocchio?
        1. -1
          April 30 2024 17: 18
          The West was ready and actually invested money in Russia, after they began to be required to invest money in the development of production, the desire came to almost nothing. There are no competitors for them in Kazakhstan; business money in Western countries is a guarantee. The population thinks that foreign countries will help us. Do we need Kazakhstan on their terms? I think we need it on our terms. How many Kazakhs work in foreign countries, and how many in Russia? How many countries has the West made happy?
          1. +2
            April 30 2024 17: 43
            Come on. The West built our entire food industry, all agriculture - from poultry farms to combines - on Western technologies and investments, all oil production and oil refining was updated, LNG plants were built on our land using their technologies, the entire auto industry was built by them, high-speed rolling stock, equipment for thermal power plants and combined heat and power plants - at factories reconstructed by the West, communications and telecommunications were developed... And you call this - not investing money in the development of industry? Let's be honest with ourselves - at least we did. Now China is not investing. It prefers to sell us ready-made products...
            And the West is ready to invest in Kazakhstan now. But Russia is not ready and does not want to. Why should Kazakhstan be against Western investments?? In the end, it can always "screw" Western partners, just like Russia.
            1. 0
              1 May 2024 15: 34
              Taking into account the fact that the West bought up many enterprises in the 90s, it invested in the development of its production and made logistics cheaper. Several years ago there was a story about Germany prohibiting the sale of medicines in Russia to a pharmaceutical plant located on the territory of the Russian Federation.
              1. 0
                1 May 2024 16: 23
                What difference does it make - whose production? Do you know what joint stock companies are? Is China, for example, worried that factories on its territory belong to foreign manufacturers? Investors invest money in production in whose territory? Do they even care where Google programmers, AI developers, pharmaceutical, auto and other equipment manufacturers sit? The state is concerned that a profitable business operates on its territory, providing well-paid jobs, growth in production with high added value and a large tax base for the state to perform social functions. Kazakhstan, as a state, doesn’t really care which country investors are willing to build such businesses on its territory. Or should he, if businessmen/state corporations from the Russian Federation do not want to invest in his economy, refuse other investors simply on principle? Either Russia or no one? Why does he need this? Vegetate in poverty yourself just to help your neighbor? Well, strange logic... Would you have done this yourself if you were in Tokayev’s place?
                1. +1
                  1 May 2024 18: 47
                  Any business invests money where there will be a return and profit. The state, providing benefits to foreign companies, proceeds from the interests of the country, and the hope that it will receive new technologies, in the form of modern factories. Expectations are not always met. In post-Soviet countries, the interests of the state, officials and oligarchs often do not coincide. Tokayev's logic is simple, it is better to be friends with the strong, you need to keep capital in the strong's banks and buy housing there. As far as we know, only Lukashenko was built in Sochi, and for other countries, as they say, the whole world is in the palm of their hand. However, when you have money in another country, others will determine your circle of friends. Business development in a country where much does not work is an ideal condition. When replacing technological lines in the West, old but working equipment can be used in a country with low social guarantees. Cheap and profitable.
    3. 0
      18 May 2024 18: 23
      The whole question is at what price do the people of Kazakhstan receive from the "Western partners" this very increase in the standard of living and education, trips abroad for internships. Ask yourself, are these beautiful promises worth the fact that the entire oil industry of Kazakhstan is owned by transnational Western companies, energy, mining and rare earth metals - all this is also controlled by the "Western partners". The people of Kazakhstan have been given a "carrot" with promises of a bright future, and in the meantime, their pockets are cleaned out with the nimble movements of trained hands. Nothing new, for conditional "beads" and promises, everything useful and necessary for the comfortable existence of the "Western partners" is exported from the country.
  13. +2
    1 May 2024 09: 46
    Looking at what is happening in Kazakhstan today, the thought comes to mind that we are still not fully able to realize what we lost with the collapse of the Soviet Union.
    1. +1
      2 May 2024 01: 37
      Why does everything always come down to the Union? Only we still have these phantom pains, and if you travel around the CIS countries, it is very noticeable - everyone has long had their own holidays, their own news, agenda, their own life, the USSR there is just some old part of history.
      It was correctly noted above that countries are spinning off not only because of Western/Chinese expansion, they all also have their own national interests, which consist primarily of improving the standard of living of citizens (and not our geostrategies for 30 years in the future, ala tightening our belts in the name of a multipolar world ), focusing on someone who himself cannot really state what he wants is not practical.
      By the way, as of April 2024, according to the World Bank, Kazakhstan’s GDP per capita is already greater than ours, and what should bother them about current politics?)
  14. 0
    6 May 2024 19: 27
    Let them go through the forest. They're hanging out in the Kremlin with all these people. Perceived as weakness. But we need at least one... indicatively, with its face on the table.
  15. 0
    24 May 2024 20: 29
    They don’t need much intelligence to destroy the country, who will be responsible for all this?