In the West, found a new culprit of the attack, for which Gaddafi was responsible
The United States finally believed in its exclusiveness and ceased to portray even the appearance of decency in international relations.
Thirty years after the crash of a Boeing over the Scottish city of Lockerbie, which killed 270 people and seventeen years after Libya was defeated and killed the person responsible for the catastrophe, Muammar Gaddafi, it suddenly turned out that the Scottish prosecutor's office was continuing to investigate the disaster.
Moreover, the prosecutor’s team from the daughter of one of the key witnesses in the case (who died two years ago) allegedly became aware that Iran was the customer of the attack!
Of course, one can be naive and believe that, by coincidence, Iran’s guilt of a terrorist attack thirty years ago was established by Scottish prosecutors precisely when Washington “strengthens” Tehran with charges of all mortal sins to further strengthen sanctions, and possibly finding a reason for the invasion .
However, the fact that the Royal Prosecutor of Scotland Alison di Rollo made this statement not somewhere else, but in Washington, during the events dedicated to the anniversary of the disaster, suggests that this is more likely a pattern.
If this goes on, then in ten to twenty years the same charges can be brought to someone else. For example, Russia.
Why bother inventing something new if the old works?
Thirty years after the crash of a Boeing over the Scottish city of Lockerbie, which killed 270 people and seventeen years after Libya was defeated and killed the person responsible for the catastrophe, Muammar Gaddafi, it suddenly turned out that the Scottish prosecutor's office was continuing to investigate the disaster.
Moreover, the prosecutor’s team from the daughter of one of the key witnesses in the case (who died two years ago) allegedly became aware that Iran was the customer of the attack!
Of course, one can be naive and believe that, by coincidence, Iran’s guilt of a terrorist attack thirty years ago was established by Scottish prosecutors precisely when Washington “strengthens” Tehran with charges of all mortal sins to further strengthen sanctions, and possibly finding a reason for the invasion .
However, the fact that the Royal Prosecutor of Scotland Alison di Rollo made this statement not somewhere else, but in Washington, during the events dedicated to the anniversary of the disaster, suggests that this is more likely a pattern.
If this goes on, then in ten to twenty years the same charges can be brought to someone else. For example, Russia.
Why bother inventing something new if the old works?
Information