Russia's exit from CERN: time to revive its collider

17 880 9

News the withdrawal of Russia from the so-called CERN stirred up near-scientific community. Putin does not need science, they began to write in the comments in this post. But is it really so?

CERN is a nuclear energy research organization with 22 countries. CERN is located on the border of France and Switzerland and is considered the most advanced laboratory of high energy physics in the world. The accelerator complex is hidden underground at a depth of approximately 100 meters.



CERN employs over two thousand researchers, many hundreds of universities and institutes from 85 countries have delegated thousands of physicists and engineers to participate in CERN scientific experiments. The annual assessed contributions of the participating countries are close to a billion dollars. Possessing the status of an observer country at CERN, Russia allocated in 2017 330 million rubles from the Reserve Fund for the modernization of the Large Hadron Collider.

It is possible that the decision to terminate observer country status and financing could be caused by cooling relations with Western partners, on whose territory the entire project infrastructure is located. In the context of complicated international relations, it is advisable to rely on our own research projects. Perhaps the time has come to remember that in the Moscow city of Protvino the project of its own hadron collider was mothballed from Soviet times.

The Protvino accelerator-storage complex of the Institute for High Energy Physics is almost the size of the Large Hadron Collider CERN. The diameter of the tunnel is 5 meters, the length of its ring is almost 21 kilometers. The depth of the accelerator ranges from 20 to 60 meters. If it were not for the collapse of the Soviet Union and the disintegration processes that followed, the domestic particle accelerator could have been commissioned earlier than the Large Hadron Collider. The Protvino accelerator is still the highest energy in the Russian Federation.

In 1991, problems began with the financing of construction. With great difficulty, over the next years, builders were able to successfully close the ring of the underground tunnel, the injection tunnel was 100% completed. We managed to make the vacuum equipment of the injection channel, the pumping system, the power supply device, and the control and monitoring system using the remaining funds. Heroic efforts brought to completion the Neptune Hall, designed for accelerator targets and test equipment.

In 1994, funding for the project ceased. After the financial crisis of 1998, it was not at all before science. The decision to participate in the international project to launch the Large Hadron Collider made funding for the domestic project irrelevant. Since its successful launch in 2008, the Soviet project has been safely forgotten. The need to protect the abandoned Soviet accelerator and pump water from its tunnels is a burden on the budget.

However, in connection with recent events, the issue of resuscitation of a domestic project may again become relevant. The project can be used to work in the field of basic science; it is supposed to study cancer treatment methods by irradiating tumors with particle beams. It seems appropriate to invest budget funds in financing Russian science and the construction of scientific infrastructure in the Russian Federation.
9 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    10 March 2018 16: 49
    If their scientists can resume the work of their center. We did not come to this collapse ourselves, our "friends" helped us to destroy our science. We will have more scientific workers - for new developments. The West will close the doors to us at any moment, and that we have thrown our money down the drain. They are not reliable partners, they will close our projects by order from the USA. We will only be helpless from powerlessness. When you yourself are engaged in your developments, no one will bother you and will not slip a pig.
    1. +2
      10 March 2018 17: 32
      Quote: ALEXANDER ABDRAKHMANOV_2
      We did not come to this collapse ourselves, our "friends" helped us to destroy our science.

      Just as the Mir station was flooded, they stopped modernizing it or making Mir-2. On the ISS, the service staff are engaged and at the collider they probably wipe the dust after others!
      Science must be pursued in its laboratories, and not in foreign ones, by invitation at certain hours!
      1. SOF
        +1
        12 March 2018 06: 36
        Quote: Starover_Z
        at the collider maybe dust is wiped off after others

        ... the keyword "probably" ...
        Frankly, this CERN, only thanks to our scientific developments, exists ...:
        "From the foreword by R. Hoyer, Director General of CERN. The Russian Academy of Sciences and Russian industry played an important role in the construction of the LHC Large Hadron Collider and in carrying out experiments on it. Examples of this are the colossal ground transportation of an entire automatic line of magnets for the LHC from Novosibirsk or production of the most advanced crystal detectors in Russia.Russia also fully participates in the world computer system Grid at the LHC collider, in which computer centers are integrated into the data analysis system at the Tier 2. In fact, this is nothing new: the Russian Federation has observer status in the Council Since its inception, CERN has taken part in four experiments at the LHC, as well as in a number of other experiments at CERN. Today, more than 800 Russian scientists work at CERN facilities and are ready to reap a rich harvest of their labors, since the era of physics at the Large Hadron Collider has already begun. "
        .... so that ... who the "observer" was there - it was still the grandmother said in two ...
        ... so they started, when we took it and withdrew their application for participation in the project - let them tapericha let them tinker ...
  2. 0
    10 March 2018 19: 13
    So the project is reanimated or just blah blah blah?
  3. BBC
    +1
    10 March 2018 19: 53
    It is high time! Yes, one problem, since then the scientific community has already learned how to "saw" budget money. It would not turn out worse: we will leave from there and here we will "destroy" the remnants, but not create ...
    1. +1
      11 March 2018 08: 32
      Quote: BBC
      It would not turn out worse: we will leave from there and here we will "destroy" the remnants, but not create ...

      We are able to do this. Everything rests on the frames. Moreover, at all levels.
  4. +1
    11 March 2018 10: 28
    What does an observer country mean?
    Did we work on a collider or just give loot?
  5. +1
    11 March 2018 13: 36
    Of course you need to revive the project. And not just to revive, but to do everything with the latest technology, using their own, domestic technology. That in the west
    it’s not ours, which means limited access, theft of technologies and scientific developments (although they are unlikely to be allowed to access them yet). So science and technology should be even if not completely
    internationally, but always its own. The exchange of experience (which can be declassified) can also be made through other channels.
  6. 0
    11 March 2018 13: 36
    Quote: Machete
    What does an observer country mean?
    Did we work on a collider or just give loot?

    And that means watch, watch, but don't go anywhere.
  7. 0
    22 March 2018 15: 07
    Yes, hope for your uncle, but don’t be fooled by yourself.