Putin spoke about the fate of PMC "Wagner"

3
During a press conference on December 20 given by Russian President Vladimir Putin, he spoke about private military companies. The head of state gave his assessment of the activities of the famous PMC "Wagner".





According to Vladimir Putin, if private military companies somehow violate the law, then the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation should have questions for them:

If they violate something, the Prosecutor General must give a legal assessment, if not, it has the right to work and push through its business interests anywhere in the world.

Thus, the president actually put an end to the lengthy discussion of the question of the attitude of the Russian authorities to the activities of such structures. If such companies do not violate Russian law, then they are free to engage in their entrepreneurial activities.

Today, private military companies operate around the world, they are in the United States, and China, and the UK. This is a worldwide practice - PMCs protect natural resources, enterprises, VIPs, especially in the underdeveloped countries of Africa and the Middle East.

In Russia, the activities of PMCs became the subject of political speculation on the part of the opposition forces, who accuse PMC fighters of mercenary activity and declare the illegality of their activities.
  • https://medialeaks.ru
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

3 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    20 December 2018 16: 34
    Here, when talking about the opposition, it is necessary to talk about what kind of opposition in question. for in a class-antagonistic society, where there is a class struggle between Labor and Capital, power occupies a kind of middle position between them. And this suggests that the right can be opposed by both the right - Capital, and the left - Labor. And if the left is based on the elimination of social inequality and injustice, suppression and oppression, debauchery and violence, coercion and exploitation, the right against this struggle is fighting to tighten the power of Capital over Labor. And this speaks of both the different interests and needs of the warring parties, and their interests regarding the government. And if after the coup under the undivided power of the liberfashists, the people were impoverished, degraded and dying out, which ensured the growth of millionaires and billionaires, then with the limited power of the people it became better, but they were worse. And if, after the coup in the sacking of the country, they were accepted not only by them, but also by their foreign sponsors and curators, then this was excellent for them, but when it was limited, it was bad. Therefore, they are liberfashists and use any reason to, on the one hand, worsen the situation of the people, and on the other, as the opposition, blame the authorities for everything. And this indicates the need to give the other side the opportunity to work, to express their claims to the class enemy, and to use the Constitution to bring their interests, needs, etc. to the public on the basis of democratic rights and freedoms. freedom of honor and conscience, but not freedom from them, civil rights to work, a decent salary, pension, protection from class violence by both Capital and the government, etc. And if we still have democracy, then in this struggle equal rights and freedoms of man and citizen have all parties involved in social conflicts. Therefore, it is necessary to give the floor and opportunity to speak out not only to Capital, but also to its opponent, who is opposing the authorities for their civil rights and freedoms.
    1. +1
      21 December 2018 12: 50
      Quote: Georgy Davydov
      Here, when talking about the opposition, it is necessary to talk about what kind of opposition is it

      And why is it incomprehensible? The political opposition is that part of the political forces (systemic and non-systemic) that are not members of the ruling coalition. Why this verbose theory of Marxism?
      1. 0
        22 December 2018 11: 15
        So nowhere else to shine with fragments of former knowledge of the foundations of Marxism-Leninism. In a decent society (in a pub, for example) they can and will probably be given a candelabrum in mordelic style. And it hurts! So verbally spread inadvertently. wink