MW: having received a new engine, the Su-57M will be equal in speed to the MiG-31

54

From 2025, the Russian Aerospace Forces should begin to receive an improved version of the fifth-generation fighter, the Su-57M, which has been undergoing flight tests since October 2022 and will be equipped with a new engine, the AL-51F. Military Watch wrote about this on February 3, providing some details of what was happening.

Although the Russian fighter aircraft industry has consistently missed its stated forecasts for the introduction of new systems into service, the Su-57M will almost certainly begin deliveries before 2027

- says the publication.



At the same time, experts predicted a significant increase in the maximum and supersonic cruising speed of serial multirole fighters Su-57M after they began to be equipped with afterburning turbojet engines (TRDDF) AL-51F, with a thrust of 18000 kgf, which at the development stage were called “Product 30”, and then “ Saturn-30", instead of AL-41F1, with a thrust of 15000 kgf. As a result, the total thrust of the Su-57M will be 36000 kgf (2 engines), which will ensure an increase in the thrust-to-weight ratio at normal take-off weight with a fully filled fuel system from 0,93 to 1,17 kgf/kg.

This provides the possibility of high-energy maneuvering with a steady turn in the pitch plane with an angular velocity of the order of 27-30 degrees / s, which will give the Su-57M additional advantages in close combat (“dog dump”) in conjunction with a thrust vector deflection system, digital emulsion drive, load-bearing layout of the body and developed aerodynamic swells at the root parts of the wing. Moreover, the maximum speed can increase from 2550 to 2950 km/h, which will compare the Su-57M with the MiG-31BM interceptor. The AL-51F engine will increase the flight range of the Su-57M fighter by almost 10%. The rate of climb of the Su-57M will also increase from 330–335 to 370–375 m/s, which will allow the fighter, equipped with Izdeliye-180 and R-37M air-to-air missiles, to quickly occupy a flight level of 13500-18500 m to destroy airborne aircraft. targets at maximum distances of 180 and 250-270 km, respectively.
54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    4 February 2024 12: 32
    Moreover, the maximum speed can increase from 2550 to 2950 km/h, which will compare the Su-57M with the MiG-31BM interceptor

    What, the body of the SU-57 is made of heat-resistant stainless steel?
    One phrase casts doubt on the veracity of the entire content of the article.
    1. -7
      4 February 2024 12: 52
      Yes, even in “Young Technician” they couldn’t write something like this - it’s like they “filtered the market”, to put it politely!
      1. +6
        5 February 2024 20: 14
        What, the body of the SU-57 is made of heat-resistant stainless steel?

        In fact, carbon has much greater heat resistance than steel.. As well as less weight..
        Are vehicles coated with steel or carbon still sent into space??
    2. 0
      4 February 2024 13: 49
      The MiG-31 is almost 50 years old. But technologists do not stand still.
    3. +3
      4 February 2024 18: 17
      Do you know exactly how and from what secret alloy our new super secret plane is made?!
      1. -7
        5 February 2024 08: 24
        New? What if you count?
        1. +2
          6 February 2024 16: 03
          At least count the bills! We don't have a newer plane.
    4. +5
      5 February 2024 15: 31
      Quote: prior
      What, the body of the SU-57 is made of heat-resistant stainless steel?
      One phrase casts doubt on the veracity of the entire content of the article.

      The Su-57 is made using composites.
      The descent vehicle of the Space Union does the same.
    5. +3
      6 February 2024 02: 18
      Mig 31, if I’m not mistaken, is also not made from heat-resistant material, do not confuse it with the MiG 25, MiG 31 with a maximum speed of 3000 km, and the MiG 25 is just made from heat-resistant material, it could accelerate, according to various sources, from 3300 to 3700 km.
  2. -9
    4 February 2024 12: 43
    Can Zaporozhets reach a speed of 140 km/h? Yes, if you lower it from Mount Ararat
    1. -12
      4 February 2024 15: 36
      And without getting a new engine that has no analogue in the world
    2. +3
      6 February 2024 02: 21
      The Su 35 accelerates to 2550 km/h; the Su 57 has a more powerful engine, and in terms of drag it surpasses the Su 35. So perhaps it can accelerate to such speeds.
      1. 0
        8 February 2024 23: 07
        We would rather launch it, God forbid that the statements do not diverge from the deeds!
  3. -24
    4 February 2024 13: 19
    Two-engine heavy aircraft have outlived their justifications - survivability, the need to carry heavy equipment, fuel for 2 engines, etc. . With new powerful engines, the transition to single-engine engines is inevitable, this is facilitated by many conditions of modern aircraft construction - lightweighting of many systems, increasing stealth, etc. Also today it becomes necessary to replace manned ones with unmanned ones with artificial intelligence controls. Over the long decades of building the 5th generation aircraft, the weapon concepts have changed, but our Defense Ministry is just being introduced and is already practically outdated (How long does it take to manufacture the F-22, F-35), and for the near future the need for new concepts is obvious..
    1. -3
      4 February 2024 14: 51
      Sometimes, it is better to remain silent and seem like an idiot than to open your mouth and prove it.
      1. -6
        4 February 2024 16: 34
        Replica. What are these definitions based on? There have been discussions in this vein on aviation platforms for a long time. You have news, or something else you imagined.
        1. -2
          4 February 2024 16: 48
          A lot of things are also written on the fence
          1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 1_2
      -1
      4 February 2024 20: 30
      you can replace two Su57 engines with one, 2 times more powerful engine (36 tons of thrust), but “what for the goat button accordion?” and then make a weak engine for a light fighter? and then they developed one engine (a very expensive and time-consuming pleasure, and it’s not a fact that the output will work at all) and it can be installed on both a heavy and a light fighter.
      a heavy fighter has a larger radius, carries more missiles (can lift a heavy Onyx-Brahmos Dagger), a light one is also needed, it is cheaper, more numerous, works on the front end, repelling a massive attack. Su75 (57) without a pilot (with AI) in conjunction with slave UAVs (carriers of additional missiles) this will be the 6th generation. the concept is the same as in the West, the work is still going on, the main thing is that the GDP personnel don’t all disappear later, he himself has long been unable to distinguish traitors from patriots.
  4. +6
    4 February 2024 13: 26
    The MiG-31 has been in development for over 50 years. After 50 years, the new Russian Federation cannot catch up with the USSR. So much for capitalism.
    1. +5
      4 February 2024 14: 08
      Quote: vlad127490
      The MiG-31 has been in development for over 50 years. After 50 years, the new Russian Federation cannot catch up with the USSR. So much for capitalism.

      but there are so many pretentious statements from someone from the podium about #having no analogues# based on #new physical principles#.
    2. +5
      4 February 2024 14: 49
      The development of the MIG-31 was greatly accelerated by the hijacking of the MIG-25 to Japan - all forces, including the Mikoyan Design Bureau, were thrown into the 31st, even to the detriment of other models - the commotion I remember was mother, don’t worry, and the MIG-23 and MIG-27 were abandoned! And now what - saw the shura, saw...!
    3. +3
      6 February 2024 08: 54
      Don't confuse soft with warm. The Mig-31 is an interceptor fighter with the appropriate weight and size characteristics, and the Su-57 is a multirole fighter. When designing an aircraft in accordance with the purpose of the aircraft, the desired parameters and limitations are laid down. By the way, in afterburner the Mig-31 consumes 1,9 kg/kgf per hour to accelerate to 3000 km/h.
      The Su-57 will certainly be more economical and, what is not unimportant, much more inconspicuous. So hello to the Soviet designers and of course respect for the aircraft that was ahead of its time.
      In general, you can put a cow on a rocket and give it a second escape velocity...
  5. +7
    4 February 2024 13: 43
    ... as they say, don't eat if you don't like it, we like our technology!
  6. +7
    4 February 2024 14: 47
    ... wrote Military Watch, giving some details of what was happening.

    The SU-57 has never been so close to absolute superiority.
    1. -16
      4 February 2024 16: 51
      So it has no analogues in the world, but we make rockets, block the Yenisei, and also in the field of ballet we are ahead of the rest!
    2. -2
      4 February 2024 20: 14
      Yes, the 57th is only in prototypes. The fate of its future is unknown, as is its final price. Maybe it will be so expensive that it will be better to buy three single-engine 75s instead of one. Everything is in the plans.
  7. 0
    4 February 2024 18: 42
    What might the enemies know about our super secret plane and engine?! Only what we allowed them to know. So they have only conjectures and fairy tales. Maybe they will tell us how many Su-57s were delivered to the troops this year?
    I would really like it to be 24, or even more, 36!
    In general, we are waiting for there to be at least a hundred of them. Then the fascists and the bourgeoisie will sing and dance differently in the media, and not only at the front!
  8. 1_2
    0
    4 February 2024 19: 26
    su57 cannot match the speed of mig31, it’s just that the canopy and composite casing will not withstand the heat (400-600 deg). but in general, theoretically, you can make a Su57 with a heat-resistant canopy casing (heat-resistant thick glass with cooling) and get a super fast interceptor (faster than the sr-72 spy). but it won’t do this, because it seems like MIG has been working on Mig41 for a long time.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. -1
        4 February 2024 22: 19
        Replica. Do just that, set an example. Only earlier, with thoughts like yours, we flew away on personal “Jets”.
  9. +2
    4 February 2024 21: 12
    Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
    and over the long decades of construction of the 5th generation aircraft, the weapon concepts have changed, but our Ministry of Defense is just introducing them and is already practically obsolete (How long does it take to manufacture the F-22, F-35)

    Could you remind us - in what year was the Yak-141 built in the USSR, the concept of which today underlies the F-35? Or maybe the drawings and technologies themselves, which, as some say, were “successfully sold in the USA”?
    1. -2
      4 February 2024 21: 57
      Replica. There was such a Harier, the first attack aircraft with the possibility of vertical/short take-off and landing, produced since 1967..., it was not from it that the subsequent Yak-141 was made, because the aircraft was developed since the mid-1970s and made its first flight in 1987. Here, more often than not, ours came second in aviation. Of course, there were some of our own developments, but, as a rule, only a few.
      1. +2
        5 February 2024 12: 05
        The Yak-38, which made its first flight in 1970! Who played harp on whom?
        1. -2
          5 February 2024 18: 45
          Replica. Find the difference - serial production of the Harier since 1967, and the first flight of the Yak-38 in 1970..
          1. D16
            +1
            7 February 2024 10: 27
            The first vertical takeoff and landing flight in the USSR was performed by the Yak-36 on March 24, 1966.
            https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%AF%D0%BA-36
  10. -2
    4 February 2024 21: 41
    Why does he need such speed? No country in the world is chasing such speeds - the Americans even removed their intelligence officers. They didn’t develop it - they decided it was a dead-end direction. Just wondering - why do airplanes need Mach 3+ speed? It is fundamentally? Does it give you a big advantage in some way?
    1. +1
      4 February 2024 22: 12
      Elementary Watson: why 3 M, - so he worked and left, the air defense systems will not have time to react and catch up. (The SR-71 is being built on that). It’s just too expensive, that’s where the obstacles lie.
      1. -2
        4 February 2024 23: 38
        As far as I remember, the Americans reached the world record of 7273 km/h or about Mach 6,7. Back in the early 60s. Neil Armstrong was also a pilot in this test group. But they considered it inappropriate. That means they were wrong.
    2. D16
      +1
      7 February 2024 10: 36
      Just wondering - why do airplanes need Mach 3+ speed?

      More chances to be in the right place at the right time.
  11. -4
    4 February 2024 22: 51
    Acacia number two! The year was 2050. They decided to put the Su-57 on the assembly line in a small batch.
  12. 0
    4 February 2024 22: 53
    Quote: Strange guest
    Why does he need such speed? No country in the world is chasing such speeds - the Americans even removed their intelligence officers. They didn’t develop it - they decided it was a dead-end direction. Just wondering - why do airplanes need Mach 3+ speed? It is fundamentally? Does it give you a big advantage in some way?

    To launch Daggers!
    1. -1
      4 February 2024 23: 11
      For "Daggers" 2 M is enough. But 3 M is completely different.
  13. +2
    4 February 2024 23: 28
    The maximum speed under Mach 3 is doubtful due to temperature restrictions, but raising the cruising speed may make sense.
  14. -3
    4 February 2024 23: 44
    laughing A plane that can't lift itself. Wunderwaffle.
  15. 0
    4 February 2024 23: 50
    Judging by the guesses about the stealth coating - after maximum speed, the stealth coating will have to be changed... and maybe something else...
    And so, yes, it is certainly possible, during a descent-dive, for example, to go home at speed, and then have the plane repaired later...
  16. -1
    5 February 2024 03: 25
    Quote: from article
    the maximum speed can increase from 2550 to 2950 km/h, which will compare the Su-57M with the MiG-31BM interceptor

    In fact, the chemical composition of the MiG-31 hull is: 50% steel, 33% aluminum alloys and 16% titanium, therefore (for now) the steel hull of the Su-57 will not withstand such a load, because not designed for this.
  17. +4
    5 February 2024 10: 23
    I don't know why there is so much negativity about this news, but you should be glad that we have new excellent aircraft. It's all too much to bully anything and everything. Fucking armchair experts. What have you done for your Motherland?
    1. +4
      5 February 2024 10: 37
      Quote: zed042
      Why so much negativity about this news?

      Consequences of information policy.
      Too much news in the future tense.
      Many of which are obviously not feasible.
      Accordingly, most of them are not implemented.
      Hence the persistent skepticism and negativity towards everything in the future tense, which are rather a reason to remember all the previous unfulfilled boasts.

      And what has actually been done is also only disappointing compared to what was stated earlier.
      1. 0
        5 February 2024 12: 49
        Oleg.
        What kind of psisimism (I know the correct spelling)?!
        Are you writing this?
        I wanted to put two pluses, but only one is allowed.
        1. +1
          5 February 2024 14: 26
          Quote: prior
          What kind of psisimism (I know the correct spelling)?!
          Are you writing this?

          It seems to me that journalism and agitation are not the most important industry, so that criticism of it should be perceived as pessimism.
  18. +1
    5 February 2024 22: 14
    It will become the best fighter in Russia's air arsenal.
  19. +1
    6 February 2024 00: 06
    If the engine still has room for modernization, then this is a good option. Don't forget, the West does not invent engines, but modernizes them.
  20. 0
    8 February 2024 16: 54
    Somehow the engine nozzles are still round, I don’t want to aim
  21. 0
    9 February 2024 14: 13
    It won't compare. Author, don't write nonsense.
  22. +1
    5 March 2024 04: 21
    What nonsense? Why does the Su57 need such speed? The Mig31 body is made of titanium. Well, by the way, the Mig31 (as a modification of the Mig25) was created solely for one purpose - to accompany the SR71. Which was withdrawn from service 30 years ago.
  23. The comment was deleted.