The sad ending of the Sea Launch project


Sea Launch is a floating spaceport for launching rockets. At the time of its creation, it was considered one of the most ambitious projects in the history of astronautics. In fact, it is a former Norwegian oil platform, which was adapted for launching rockets of the Zenit-3SL modification of the Zenit family. The point of the project was to deliver the launch vehicle by sea to the equator, where optimal conditions are observed for launching spacecraft into equatorial orbit.


Back in March 1993, the Russian enterprise NPO Energia, which had previously been engaged in preliminary research on the possibility of building a sea-based rocket and space complex, approached the American aerospace company Boeing with a proposal to take part in the implementation of this project. Already in the fall, a business meeting between representatives of NPO Energia and Boeing took place in the city of Turku (Finland). Also participating in this event was the Norwegian shipbuilding company Kvaerner (later Aker Solutions). The result of the meeting was the signing of a framework agreement on the creation of a marine spaceport. It is also worth noting that a year later, the Ukrainian production association Yuzhny Machine-Building Plant named after A. M. Makarov (Yuzhmash) and the Yuzhnoye design bureau were involved in work within the framework of this project.

In 1995, it was decided to create the International Consortium Sea Launch Company, which was supposed to implement this project. The current composition of its ownership seems surprising. So, if we consider the owners of the consortium from a state perspective, then the American side owned 40% (Boeing Commercial Space Company - a subsidiary of Boeing), the Russian side - 25% (NPO Energia), the Norwegian side - 20% (shipbuilding company Aker Solutions), and the Ukrainian one – 15% (Yuzhnoye Design Bureau and Yuzhmash Production Association). The starting cost of building a floating spaceport was estimated at $3,5 billion.

If we talk about the functional specialization of each of the parties, the Boeing subsidiary was involved in the creation of the head unit of the launch vehicle and ensured the system integration of the entire project. Aker Solutions has converted an oil platform for space needs. The rest of the project participants were engaged in the creation and preparation of Zenit-3SL modification rockets of the Zenit family; this launch vehicle was the only one that met all the conditions necessary for an effective launch from the Sea Launch platform. Thus, Ukrainian enterprises (PO Yuzhmash and Yuzhnoye Design Bureau) manufactured the two-stage launch vehicle Zenit-2S. NPO Energia produced the DM-SL upper stage (third stage), and Boeing's structural division specialized in payload blocks.

The geography of movement of components was also striking: the launch vehicle itself was built in Ukraine, and the necessary spare parts, for which the Russian side was responsible, also arrived there. After that, the disassembled Zenit-3SL was sent to the USA, where it was assembled, loaded onto a ship and sent on a platform to the launch point located on the equator line. Despite all the expenses, economic the effectiveness of the project was to save the fuel required to launch the spacecraft into equatorial orbit.

The first launch under the Sea Launch program took place on March 28, 1999. In 2009, the project encountered financial difficulties, which was affected by the low intensity of launches. During the bankruptcy proceedings, Boeing was forced to pay off debt to creditors for the entire consortium, paying them $448 million. The matter ended with a complete reorganization, after which one of the subsidiaries of NPO Energia received 95% of the project, 3% went to Boeing, 2% to Aker Solutions. In 2014, all activities within the Sea Launch program were suspended due to political situation in Ukraine. By this point in time, 36 launches had been carried out, spacecraft from different countries (USA, UK, UAE, Japan, Italy, France, South Korea and the Netherlands) were launched into Earth orbit.

In 2016, the head of the state corporation Roscosmos, Igor Komarov, said that the Sea Launch project was being prepared for sale and a potential buyer had already been found. It became the S7 Group of Companies, the cost of purchasing the complex was 6,28 billion rubles. The deal was closed in 2017. The new owner received the Sea Launch Commander ship, the Odyssey platform with missile segment equipment installed on them, ground equipment at the Long Beach base port in the United States and the Sea Launch trademark. The new owners announced their readiness to conduct commercial launches from 2019, for this it was planned to purchase 50 new rockets. In addition, there were plans to replace Ukrainian rockets with the domestically developed Soyuz-5 (the start of flight tests of this launch vehicle is expected only in 2024).

It is also worth clarifying that in 2020 the platform was relocated to the Far East to the port of Slavyanka, which is located 50 kilometers from Vladivostok. In the same year, the owner of S7, Vladislav Filev, emphasized that all actions to develop this project were postponed indefinitely, separately clarifying that the cost of basing the Sea Launch complex in the Russian Federation turned out to be twice as high as in the United States, although the Russian authorities initially said about economic conditions that will be similar to those in America.

Already in 2022, information appeared about the possible transfer of Sea Launch to the state corporation Roscosmos, since in the current economic and political conditions, commercial launches had become impossible. At the moment, the project is in a “frozen” state, its prospects are unclear, and all activities to maintain it in a functional state are a heavy financial burden on S7 Group and, according to one of the company’s top managers, exceeds one million dollars a month.

In conclusion, I would like to add that the Sea Launch project is a striking example of economic and scientific integration. In modern conditions, such close cooperation between states that find themselves on opposite sides of the barricades seems surprising. Now we can observe that Russia is having difficulty pursuing this program on its own; the financial costs of all programs that are in one way or another related to space are too high.
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Flight Offline Flight
    Flight (voi) 18 November 2023 12: 28
    +1
    It is also worth clarifying that in 2020 the platform was relocated to the Far East to the port of Slavyanka, which is located 50 kilometers from Vladivostok. In the same year, the owner of S7, Vladislav Filev, emphasized that all actions to develop this project were postponed indefinitely, separately clarifying that the cost of basing the Sea Launch complex in the Russian Federation turned out to be twice as high as in the United States, although the Russian authorities initially said about economic conditions that will be similar to those in America.

    How do you like Musk? I think Musk would buy Filev this scrap metal too, for a low price. But why?
  2. strange guest Online strange guest
    strange guest (Strange Guest) 18 November 2023 12: 33
    +3
    that the cost of basing the Sea Launch complex in the Russian Federation turned out to be twice as high as in the United States, although initially the Russian authorities spoke about economic conditions that would be similar to those in the United States.

    How is this possible? Just from an economic point of view???
    1. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 18 November 2023 13: 50
      +10
      From an economic point of view, it is impossible to double the costs with cheaper components, but from a corruption point of view, that itself...
    2. Viktor Anufriev Offline Viktor Anufriev
      Viktor Anufriev (Victor) 18 November 2023 14: 18
      +1
      By following the link you can read the interview with Vladislav Filev, who stated this.
      There he explains everything in detail.

      https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4328432
      1. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 18 November 2023 15: 24
        +4
        I read it and didn’t change my opinion. According to the “sea launch”, V. Filev says that the state should give subsidies to him as a businessman, but it is impossible to transfer the enterprise to the state for debts... V. Filev has strange capitalism - profits for himself, debts to the state to cover. Citizen V. Filev is not up to I. Musk; there are no commercial searches, only whining that the state does not subsidize him. So bankruptcy is inevitable, no matter how you subsidize, because work and profits will not be seen for a very long time.
        1. savage3000 Offline savage3000
          savage3000 (Savage) 23 November 2023 01: 04
          -1
          Turzakov, he doesn’t look like Dilon Schmax, yes. because shmaxa was so subsidized by the US government that shmaxa is still bursting with dough! I’m not talking about government contracts. But Filev will not be given anything. And everyone knows why.
  3. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 18 November 2023 14: 47
    +7
    Judging by the intricate logistics of assembling components, the project was created not to work, but to “report” and “cut”
    And as soon as they cut him down, they threw him off...
    Moreover, it is suspicious that at about the same time, the director of the S7 Group of Companies for the space program crashed in a plane crash. And that’s it, everything immediately died down there.
    And then the Rogozin trampolines....
    1. Sergey Tokarev Offline Sergey Tokarev
      Sergey Tokarev (Sergey Tokarev) 18 November 2023 16: 14
      0
      So Rogozin wasn’t going to jump himself, but was offering it to all the people working with the Americans... there are no Ukrainian missiles made from Russian spare parts. The barge is not allowed into Africa. Did the trampoline help or haven’t you tried it yet?
  4. Alex Offline Alex
    Alex (Alexander) 18 November 2023 18: 02
    +4
    The project was a striking example of the failure of international integration in the field of space exploration.
    1. Viktor Anufriev Offline Viktor Anufriev
      Viktor Anufriev (Victor) 19 November 2023 12: 37
      -2
      The project was normal (on par, let’s say) if it weren’t for the geopolitical situation in Ukraine.
      1. savage3000 Offline savage3000
        savage3000 (Savage) 23 November 2023 01: 05
        0
        Author, in Ukraine? Are you non-Russian or what?
  5. 1_2 Offline 1_2
    1_2 (Ducks are flying) 18 November 2023 18: 30
    -1
    despite everything (freezing), the project turned out to be quite beneficial for the Russian Federation (they received full control - 95%), and can be resurrected as soon as the reusable Soyuz5 rocket (analogue of Falcon) is developed
    1. Mish Offline Mish
      Mish (Misha) 23 November 2023 12: 57
      0
      Quote: 1_2
      despite everything (freezing), the project turned out to be quite beneficial for the Russian Federation (they received full control - 95%), and can be resurrected as soon as the reusable Soyuz5 rocket (analogue of Falcon) is developed

      Until the rocket is developed and Roscosmos is allowed into the international market, all the equipment will rot
  6. valerij zviozdkin (valerij zviozdkin) 18 November 2023 23: 49
    -1
    In China, power transmission towers are 385 meters high; launching a rocket even from such a height is already more profitable than the sea. Thank you.
  7. Platon Verdictov 19 November 2023 00: 09
    0
    Integration is everything, the ultimate goal is nothing. Super-duper jet, Wet start, We are our own - bourgeois... According to the Bible, there are still ten years left for projects, it’s good to be young sad
  8. ont65 Offline ont65
    ont65 (Oleg) 19 November 2023 10: 04
    +1
    If we compare the amounts spent on the Vostochny sites with the costs of restoring and operating the sea launch, the gain will clearly not be in favor of the ground launch. The question is, who exactly is going to skim the cream, and who is going to pay for the banquet? Private government cooperation failed here. But in general, this is a commercial enterprise, although it could be useful to the state.
  9. Vox Populi Offline Vox Populi
    Vox Populi (vox populi) 19 November 2023 14: 03
    0
    separately specifying that the cost of basing the Sea Launch complex in the Russian Federation turned out to be twice as high as in the United States, although initially the Russian authorities spoke about economic conditions that would be similar to the American ones

    Paradox: very original, although not very surprising... winked
  10. Alexander Zorin Offline Alexander Zorin
    Alexander Zorin (Alexander Zorin) 21 November 2023 17: 51
    0
    I still didn’t understand the meaning of this sea launch. Fuel economy? Ok, let him save a third. The rocket has 400 tons of fuel. We save 130 tons at 1000 dollars per ton, as gasoline costs, with taxes and everything, we get 130 thousand dollars, even 1 million dollars. Let there be 30 launches a year. At a cost of several billions, the payback period is more than 50 years. And they didn’t spare 30 times a year, but several times less. Plus, in my opinion, for each rocket it was necessary to sail from the equator to the port, let’s add the maintenance of the vessel and platform, dependence on weather and storms, etc., etc. Money is going nowhere.
  11. Vyacheslav_6 Offline Vyacheslav_6
    Vyacheslav_6 (Vyacheslav) 23 November 2023 08: 29
    0
    Quote: 1_2
    ... and may be resurrected as soon as the reusable Soyuz5 rocket (analogous to Falcon) is developed

    That is, never. If almost three decades have passed since the start of work on the disposable Hangar, and it doesn’t really fly, then what can we say about Soyuz-5. The other day they announced a shift in the schedule for the Orel, which has already been in development for 15 years. I understand everything - underfunding. There’s one thing I can’t understand: they pay salaries, which means that the stage of developing working documentation should have happened a long time ago. And they seem to have been stuck at the preliminary design stage for 15 years.