The conflict in the Middle East makes the Russian Northern Sea Route a profitable alternative to the Suez Canal


The armed conflict between Israel and the Palestinian group Hamas, which has every chance of becoming regional, since a number of Middle Eastern states may be involved in it, poses a serious threat to the world economics.


The thing is that another Israeli-Arab confrontation could lead to the closure of the Suez Canal - the shortest sea route between Europe and Asia.

Let us remember that this already happened during the Six-Day War, which Israel started in 1967. True, the Suez Canal was then blocked not for a week, but for eight long years. The reason for this was sunken ships and sea mines.

Where is the confidence that the above scenario will not happen again today? Moreover, if Iran is involved in the war, the Strait of Hormuz will also be under threat, which will block huge volumes of oil in the Persian Gulf.

In the case of the most negative scenario, the largest exporters will have to add about 15 thousand miles to their route, increase the delivery time of goods and raw materials by about 2 weeks and, most importantly, work in conditions of high risks, since the route bypassing West Africa no longer looks like safe.

However, there is an alternative option that will allow exporters to significantly save on fuel, freight and hiring a team. This is our Northern Sea Route.

It is widely known that the route from Murmansk to the Japanese port of Yokohama through the Suez Canal is 12 nautical miles, and through the Northern Sea Route - only 840 nautical miles.

Obviously, the Russian trade route is much more profitable. But it has not yet become a full-fledged alternative to the Suez Canal. The reason for this is the climate, which requires the escort of icebreakers and the presence of an ice class on a merchant ship, as well as a limitation in the size of the ship itself in length - no more than 299 meters. In addition, the captain of the vessel must have a special certificate.

Meanwhile, the volume of traffic along the Northern Sea Route is constantly growing. After the departure of some foreign carriers in 2022, their place was quickly taken by Russia’s Asian partners. Test shipments of oil and other goods are already being sent.

In addition, earlier President Vladimir Putin instructed the government to consider the construction of the North Siberian Railway, which, along with the further expansion of the BAM and Trans-Siberian Railway, as well as the construction of new ports on the Northern Sea Route, will dramatically expand the transit potential of Russia, and will force the largest exporters of goods and raw materials to seriously think about a more profitable alternative to the Suez Canal.

  • Photos used: TitkinGrigorii / wikipedia.org
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Dart2027 Offline Dart2027
    Dart2027 16 October 2023 21: 27
    +1
    True, the Suez Canal was then blocked not for a week, but for eight long years. The reason for this was sunken ships and sea mines.

    We need to strain Petrov and Boshirov.
  2. vlad127490 Offline vlad127490
    vlad127490 (Vlad Gor) 16 October 2023 23: 48
    +1
    The Russian Federation has only one safe water route, East - West. This is the strategic Northern Sea Route. Modern technologies make it possible to produce icebreakers and ice-class vessels for year-round navigation. This is a government program and there is no need to include business interests here. In the Russian Federation, business is a freeloader.
  3. strange guest Offline strange guest
    strange guest (Strange Guest) 17 October 2023 07: 07
    0
    An average of 48 ships pass through Suez per day. All year round. I even wonder how many icebreakers we need to build in order to fully ensure such traffic during winter navigation along the Northern Sea Route?
    1. vlad127490 Offline vlad127490
      vlad127490 (Vlad Gor) 17 October 2023 18: 04
      +1
      They travel along the Northern Sea Route in a caravan, as is customary. The purpose of the Northern Sea Route is to ensure Russian transportation, and let the oligarchs carry it along the southern route. The Russian taxpayer is not obliged to support oligarchs and hucksters. Four icebreakers will handle the transportation. The problem is the lack of ice class for cargo ships.
      1. strange guest Offline strange guest
        strange guest (Strange Guest) 18 October 2023 06: 55
        0
        A caravan consists of 4-5 ships, depending on the severity of the ice conditions and the size of the ships in the caravan. There will be even fewer supertankers or container ships - they are too huge. The channel made by the icebreaker quickly becomes covered with ice. So we need a lot of icebreakers for an alternative to Suez. 8-10 just to drive these daily 48 ships. Plus, passage along the Northern Sea Route takes more than one week. The speed of a caravan in ice is significantly lower than the speed in open water. So multiply the number of icebreakers by the number of days.
        1. vlad127490 Offline vlad127490
          vlad127490 (Vlad Gor) 18 October 2023 20: 28
          0
          The icebreaker makes a channel 60 meters wide, and from this width you select the vessel’s displacement. The average speed of the caravan is 14 knots, passage along the NSR is 12 days. The time it takes for the canal to be covered with ice, which is several hours, depends on the weather, so a caravan of 20 ships with an icebreaker ahead proceeds painlessly. The only question is the availability of ice-class cargo ships. In the USSR, there were studies on a nuclear icebreaker with a channel width of 80 meters and a speed of 6 knots with an ice thickness of 4 meters, but that is history. For normal operation of the SMP, a lot of things are needed.
          1. strange guest Offline strange guest
            strange guest (Strange Guest) 19 October 2023 07: 17
            +1
            An article about an alternative to Suez. The transit tonnage of which was 962,7 million tons last year. NSR is now 30 million tons.
            Which provides 7 nuclear icebreakers. Is there an alternative not only in terms of the number of ships, but also in terms of cargo turnover? You can start from the width of the channel (and it is not 60 meters at all - the largest and most powerful nuclear-powered icebreaker today, the Ural, provides an ice-free fairway 37,5 meters wide, and the speed in heavy ice is only 2 knots per hour), but not a single large tanker or large container ship will fit into such a canal (for example, the width of the Myers container ship is 58 meters). This means overload and an increase in the number of ships.
            So, no matter how much we would like to, the NSR will never become a full-fledged replacement for Suez. First of all, for economic reasons. You can spend all the money and build a nuclear icebreaker fleet of 200+ icebreakers. But this will never pay off and will ruin the country.
            1. vlad127490 Offline vlad127490
              vlad127490 (Vlad Gor) 19 October 2023 12: 47
              +2
              You yourself understand that the NSR cannot be an alternative to Suez. If Suez is closed, the ships will go around Africa or through Panama. The NSR is only for the Russian Federation and the PRC can use it if the passage through the Strait of Malacca is closed for them. The article draws attention to the NSR, shows everyone that without fish there is fish. There is no point in investing crazy amounts of money in SMP.
              1. strange guest Offline strange guest
                strange guest (Strange Guest) 19 October 2023 15: 20
                0
                A. Thank you for your realistic and balanced response. I myself have been to the north for work and can imagine the situation very well. It’s just that articles with such headlines are annoying - either people simply don’t understand what they’re writing about, or they’re just being hateful. Russia needs the NSR - it is simply necessary! Will it become an alternative to Suez - never!! Simply for economic reasons. It is very difficult to live and work there - and such a cargo turnover requires enormous funds to ensure safe and economically profitable shipping - this includes port, repair, maritime, rescue, and social infrastructure. And on top of this is the maintenance of a huge nuclear icebreaker fleet plus difficult living conditions. This is not only in Russia - the problems are the same everywhere. And the States in Alaska, and Canada, and Greenland.
                1. Smilodon terribilis nimis 20 October 2023 15: 55
                  0
                  Why never? If global warming reduces or even removes ice altogether, then the situation will be completely different. Is not it? Why don't you take this factor into account?
                  1. strange guest Offline strange guest
                    strange guest (Strange Guest) 20 October 2023 20: 32
                    0
                    Well, in this situation, no one will use the NSR. They will go on the open sea. Why should they pay them extra money? And the conditions are easier than crawling along the fairways and having to be unfastened by pilots. And, by the way, then icebreakers will not be needed at all. And not only icebreakers)))
  4. Elena123 Offline Elena123
    Elena123 (elena) 17 October 2023 21: 16
    +1
    The conflict in the Middle East makes the Russian Northern Sea Route a profitable alternative to the Suez Canal

    - You were probably joking... you can’t transport such a huge amount of cargo across ice floes.
    There is not and will not be an alternative to the Suez Canal.
    1. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 18 October 2023 19: 39
      0
      (Elena) There are always alternatives. The Northern Sea Route has several months without continuous ice cover. It is possible to shorten the NSR by cutting off the bypass of the Kolyma ledge (where the largest ice fields are), that is, to the mouth of the Lena, there up to Yakutsk, transshipment to the railway and to the port (300 km) of the Sea of ​​​​Okhotsk. The time frame will be reduced by at least a third. The main thing is that there should be cargo flows, but today a crisis is beginning in Europe and not only, and additional cargo flows are not expected, but we need to work for the future.
  5. In passing Offline In passing
    In passing (Galina Rožkova) 17 October 2023 23: 38
    0
    This is the very thing that stops the Arabs from supporting the Palestinians. Like a good Indian is a dead Indian... The Northern Sea Route will never be an alternative due to ice class requirements. But the Russians could have moved for themselves, “combed” the North...
    1. Smilodon terribilis nimis 20 October 2023 15: 57
      0
      Is ice class forever or does it depend on the climate? If you don’t know, then you don’t need to talk.
  6. Alexey Lan Offline Alexey Lan
    Alexey Lan (Alexey Lantukh) 17 October 2023 23: 55
    0
    It is widely known that the route from Murmansk to the Japanese port of Yokohama through the Suez Canal is 12 nautical miles, and through the Northern Sea Route - only 840 nautical miles.

    Why from Murmansk to Yokohama, and for example not from Shanghai to Hamburg, since these are larger transport ports. And this extends the NSR by another 4,5 thousand km or 2,5 thousand miles. At the same time, we mainly need ice-class transporters, of which there are few.
  7. Baltika3 Offline Baltika3
    Baltika3 (Baltika3) 18 October 2023 19: 14
    0
    another Israeli-Arab confrontation could lead to the closure of the Suez Canal

    Can not.
    To begin with, this is not an Israeli-Arab confrontation, but the top of Hamas will be slapped, except for those who have already escaped, the sector itself will be destroyed, and everything will calm down for five to ten years.
    And even more importantly, too many important people feed from the Suez Canal in Egypt. This is their Egyptian Gazprom. Who will close it of their own free will?
    1. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 18 October 2023 19: 46
      0
      Yes, it’s not difficult to close the canal, charter something larger (container ship, tanker) and a dilapidated one, and arrange an accident at the right place so that it lands on the bottom on a course at an angle to the canal with a “dead” engine. A container ship that accidentally jumped onto the canal embankment was closed for several weeks, and when it sits on the bottom, and even breaks from old age, (landing the stern, the bow afloat, that’s a bend and a fracture) - a mark for a long time... Where are Petrov and Bashirov , the task is planned...
      1. vlad127490 Offline vlad127490
        vlad127490 (Vlad Gor) 19 October 2023 12: 53
        0
        You can temporarily close any canal, Suez, Panama.... It is not difficult to lay a ship across the canal on the bottom. What is the benefit for the Russian Federation from this?
        1. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 19 October 2023 20: 20
          0
          Without Suez, the NSR will work, because it is a long and far distance from Africa to East Asia. Panama will hit the USA, we will have to go around Latin America, to the Strait of Magellan in the very south...
          1. Baltika3 Offline Baltika3
            Baltika3 (Baltika3) 20 October 2023 16: 42
            +1
            The NSR will work without Suez

            It may even start working when the corresponding infrastructure is ready along its entire colossal length. Pilot stations, provision of ocean tugs, standby medical assistance - so that within an hour by helicopter in a good hospital, docks - at least one or two (where will you take the one who breaks down - back to Murmansk halfway around the world?), icebreakers, all types of communications all over.
            In the meantime, let's send Petrov and Boshirov. Egypt will stink to the skies, not like Israel. And most importantly, they will also catch Petrov and Boshirov and in ten minutes they will receive a confession on camera, while the consul, sleepy, scratches his balls.
            1. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 22 October 2023 12: 23
              0
              You've already made too many requests. The SMP is working, which means the opportunity will expand; as the “play” progresses, new “actors” will appear. Everything is in development - “Moscow was not built right away”, your pessimism is unnecessary and not justified.
  8. Shuev Offline Shuev
    Shuev 3 November 2023 13: 22
    +1
    The conflict in the Middle East makes the Russian Northern Sea Route a profitable alternative to the Suez Canal

    Doesn't do it, not profitable
    Alternative Africa