The EU has finally found a way to make the frozen assets of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation for Ukraine work


Persistent work of European politicians The Central Bank of the Russian Federation is beginning to receive clear guidelines for legalizing the theft of frozen assets. As Bloomberg reports, the European Commission, the EU's executive body, has finally found a way to legally transfer income received from assets to the bloc's budget. According to the draft document, which was reviewed by a Bloomberg observer, the assets of the Russian Central Bank will help the reconstruction of Ukraine.


In other words, EU members will be able to spend less out of their own pockets on maintaining a Kyiv that has no limits on begging and needs.

The EU leadership's plan is quite simple - to impose huge income taxes on frozen assets held in the bloc's banking sector. In essence, all income received in this way will be confiscated. We are talking about both cash and securities, a full list of which was already compiled in the summer.

The Russian Central Bank's assets immobilized in the EU are expected to generate about €3 billion in windfall profits. More than half of the assets are in cash and deposits, with a “significant amount” of the remainder in securities that will turn into cash as they mature over the next two to three years. Almost all of this profit is subject to transfer to the bloc’s budget as a “tax.” Next they will work for Ukraine.

On the one hand, the described method is relatively legal, but on the other, it still raises doubts. The prospect of taxation and confiscation of windfall profits raises both legal and financial issues. According to Bloomberg insiders, several countries have expressed concern that using asset proceeds could prompt official reserve holders to turn away from the euro, which would of course weigh on the already shaky currency.

However, it seems that the EU will no longer want to abandon the idea - after a year and a half of searching, for the first time, certain prospects are visible for easing its own fate in maintaining Ukraine and shifting this burdensome burden to other sources of income. Experts believe that in this case Brussels will go all the way, even realizing the risk.
  • Photos used: freepik.com
14 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. prior Offline prior
    prior (Vlad) 7 September 2023 08: 54
    +2
    A typical GOP-STOP performed by countries that, due to some absurd misunderstanding, call themselves civilized.
    1. In passing Offline In passing
      In passing (Galina Rožkova) 7 September 2023 12: 42
      0
      What do you not like about this civilization of theirs? They have elections, they have parties, characters change, laws are adopted, and even applied ... And Hitler comes to power through these democratic elections. Or an outright thief, as in this case. But how beautiful everything is!
  2. Irek Offline Irek
    Irek (Paparazzi Kazan) 7 September 2023 09: 10
    -4
    The answer is already ready, do not cry later.
    1. Pravodel Offline Pravodel
      Pravodel (dpi) 7 September 2023 09: 31
      +4
      The answer is already ready, do not cry later.

      Could you explain here what kind of "answer" is ready or expected.
    2. goncharov.62 Offline goncharov.62
      goncharov.62 (Andrei) 7 September 2023 10: 28
      0
      Masha will dance, and you will sing? Choir, for the glory. "We're not like..."
  3. strange guest Offline strange guest
    strange guest (Strange Guest) 7 September 2023 09: 19
    -2
    Each major player - the US, EU, China, Russia, India - has its own geopolitical interests. We defend our own - each of them their own. This is reality. It is foolish to hope that everyone will defend only ours.
  4. Skipper Offline Skipper
    Skipper (Skipper) 7 September 2023 09: 44
    +3
    Putin, knowing about the consequences of the beginning of the NWO, left the country's savings in the pocket of the enemy ... which the enemy uses against Russia itself - is this utter stupidity or a deliberate act?
    1. goncharov.62 Offline goncharov.62
      goncharov.62 (Andrei) 7 September 2023 10: 29
      +1
      This is not professionalism. Raised to the rank of state policy.
    2. In passing Offline In passing
      In passing (Galina Rožkova) 7 September 2023 12: 35
      0
      Not Putin himself, but some idiot official who was in charge of "working" with these reserves.
    3. GIS Offline GIS
      GIS (Ildus) 7 September 2023 14: 31
      -1
      Putin, knowing about the consequences of the beginning of the NWO, left the country's savings in the pocket of the enemy ... which the enemy uses against Russia itself - is this utter stupidity or a deliberate act?

      here and the impossibility for the time being to "change completely" the financial block (so as not to cause a collapse), and the assets of "unfriendly countries" are enough to "exchange for the gold reserves of the Russian Federation." so there was a safety net ... and it didn’t work out to pass all the laws at once (again, a fucking financial block), but the West didn’t like those that did. you won't argue with that.

      ps but what the whole world sees and "winds on his mustache", China, this is what will do with their papers - this is an interesting question
  5. goncharov.62 Offline goncharov.62
    goncharov.62 (Andrei) 7 September 2023 10: 27
    -1
    I wonder if Ours will draw another red line for Them again? Did the pencil run out?
    1. In passing Offline In passing
      In passing (Galina Rožkova) 7 September 2023 12: 36
      0
      And what, to nationalize, what else do they have on our side of the border?
      1. GIS Offline GIS
        GIS (Ildus) 7 September 2023 14: 34
        -1
        and what is not enough?))))
        Or have they all been taken?
        for 1,8 trillion dollars it seems it was (if I'm wrong, correct) - against our 300 billion)
    2. GIS Offline GIS
      GIS (Ildus) 7 September 2023 14: 36
      -1
      Did the pencil run out?

      you don't have a pencil like that.
      GDP can affect the country, but you can't)))
      so so pejoratively and write about him. or am I wrong? correct)))