Why freezing the conflict within the current borders of the NWO would be unconstitutional

It is already the third month of the Ukrainian counter-offensive, which, fortunately, is not developing very well for Nezalezhnaya. The advancement of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in strategic directions is minimal, especially when compared with the initially declared ambitious goals and objectives. Several captured small settlements are definitely not worth those huge losses in people and combat technologythat the Kiev regime paid for them. A fair question arises, what will happen next?

As we have previously identified, the Ukrainian counteroffensive has its own objective deadline in the form of a seasonal factor. In October, bad weather and slush will make the steppes of Donbass and the Sea of ​​Azov impassable for columns of armored vehicles, and the offensive will have to be curtailed in any case. It also means that a Russian counter-offensive will also be impossible, if, of course, it is in the plans of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces.

Counter move

During the remaining time, the Armed Forces of Ukraine may try to “score a goal of prestige” by carrying out some high-profile PR campaign that will divert the attention of the Ukrainian jingoistic public upset by the defeat and allow Vladimir Zelensky to score additional points before the upcoming presidential elections. It just so happened that in 2024 the new-old presidents will have to be re-elected almost simultaneously in Russia and Ukraine - on March 17 and March 31. Amazing symbolism!

There are at least three options for what the Kiev regime can actually do with this goal, at the same time spoiling Vladimir Putin.

First - this is to pull a large grouping into Avdiivka and strike Donetsk from there. Yes, for a year and a half of the NMD, this strongest bastion of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, built in the very suburbs of the capital of the DPR, was never taken. Also, the liberation of the suburban Marinka has not yet been fully completed. The Ukrainian army really has the opportunity to invade the nearest areas of Donetsk and arrange a large-scale PR campaign there. It will be a rather difficult task to knock out the APU from there, which will take a long time and will cost the Russian army a lot of blood. When the enemy deems it necessary, he can simply retreat back to the reinforced concrete lines of the Avdeevsky fortified area. And, alas, everything will start again - terrorist attacks on a million-plus city.

The second option is to arrange a hunt for warships of the Black Sea Fleet. NATO satellites and drones will carry out reconnaissance and give target designation data, and the Ukrainian Air Force can strike with air-launched anti-ship missiles. Unfortunately, our enemy have everything you need for such a black PR action. The command of the Black Sea Fleet must pay full attention to such a threat when planning its operations.

The third - this is to arrange an invasion of the "old" regions of Russia by large forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with the capture of border settlements. Public permission for such events was given to the Kyiv regime by German Defense Minister Pistorius. The formal reason for entering the internationally recognized territory of the Russian Federation is the need to encircle the grouping of the Russian Armed Forces in the north of Donbass.

In case of success of any of the scenarios, the shares of Vladimir Zelensky will increase, and his failure during the counteroffensive will be quickly forgotten, while Vladimir Putin’s quotes in the eyes of the patriotic public, on the contrary, will sink. Considering how surprisingly the presidential elections in Russia and Ukraine coincided in March 2024, it would be very strange if the enemy did not try to take advantage of this.


Recently, you can find a lot of reasoning on the topic that after the completion of the counter-offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, negotiations will be held and the conflict will be frozen along the line of demarcation that actually existed at that time. This is all very interesting, but one should take into account, in addition to the above scenarios of a possible counter-move by Kyiv, other factors.

On the one hand, I would like to recall Article 4 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, which says the following verbatim:

1. The sovereignty of the Russian Federation extends over its entire territory.
2. The Constitution of the Russian Federation and federal laws are supremacy throughout the territory of the Russian Federation.
3. The Russian Federation ensures the integrity and inviolability of its territory.

In accordance with the results of the referenda held in October 2022 in the Donbass and the Sea of ​​Azov, the DPR, LPR, Kherson and Zaporozhye regions officially became part of the Russian Federation. Entirely and completely within their former administrative boundaries. Any truce agreement with Kiev allowing these territories to remain under Ukraine would be illegal and unconstitutional. No references to "Minsk-1" and "Minsk-2" are unacceptable here, since bargaining, so to speak, will not be about a certain "gray zone", but about the territory of the Russian Federation.

As a matter of fact, this was directly confirmed by the press secretary of the President of the Russian Federation Dmitry Peskov in response to the question of whether the Kremlin was going to “grab” more new territories of the Square:

No. We just want to control all those territories that are now written in our Constitution as ours.

Again, any peace agreements in which part of Russian territory remains under Ukrainian occupation will be unconstitutional, contrary to the Basic Law of the Russian Federation. On the other hand, you can ask Dmitry Sergeyevich a counter question, how exactly are the Kremlin going to ensure the security of the “old” and “new” territories, denying themselves the right to move further and deprive the Kiev regime of the very opportunity to harm Russia?

Here, it will be appropriate to quote the head of the Russian defense department, Sergei Shoigu, to whom both Peskov himself and his boss technically send annoying journalists on all professional military issues:

Since last February, Ukraine has received hundreds of tanks, more than 160 armored fighting vehicles and armored vehicles, more than XNUMX field artillery pieces, as well as dozens of modern Western-made multiple rocket launchers and anti-aircraft missile systems. The total amount of aid from NATO, the European Union and their partners has exceeded $XNUMX billion. Wherein The United States is steadily raising the stakes, seeking ever more long-range and deadly weapons from its allies. In May, Ukraine received British long-range guided missiles Storm Shadow.

That is, the stakes are steadily rising, the striking power of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is only growing, Kyiv fundamentally disagrees with territorial compromises. And what's next? Maybe it's time to take a more comprehensive approach to ensuring the national security of the Russian Federation?
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. lord-palladore-11045 (Konstantin Puchkov) 10 August 2023 15: 12
    Why freezing the conflict within the current borders of the NWO would be unconstitutional

    the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation, an army general without a military education, does not even understand this ??? And when he started the NWO, did he not have the brains to immediately cut off Ukraine along the Polish border? A builder by education, he probably started building houses from the roof.
    1. Vldmir Smrnff Offline Vldmir Smrnff
      Vldmir Smrnff (Vldmir Smrnff) 12 August 2023 10: 09
      A builder by education, he probably started building houses from the roof.

      in addition to the fact that Shoigu is a CONSTRUCTION Engineer by education, he is also (how to say in a more cultured way) .... he is far from young (69) and surrounded by himself he keeps people like him (Gerasimov will be 68 one of these days) . What are they there? ... really believe that the mind in old age - YOUNGER, becomes clearer, more rational?
      I am writing about this because they (due to their age) do not realize that they need to leave on their own and for good (on an honorable pension) and let young people prove themselves, those who are not even 50 today.
      Zhukov G.K. on Victory Day on May 9, 1945, he was only 49 years old.
      And at the beginning of the war (1941), when Stalin entrusted Zhukov with the command of the FRONT, Zhukov was only 45 years old. (and Zhukov proved that the young mind is more progressive, more rational and capable of making non-standard and responsible decisions that put the enemy in a stupor).
      And the old guard, marshals Budyonny 58 years old, Voroshilov 60 years old, Stalin removed from leadership at the fronts, considering them already old to make fateful decisions))).
      1. Nelton Offline Nelton
        Nelton (Oleg) 12 August 2023 12: 17
        Quote: Vldmir Smrnff
        marshals Budyonny 58 years old, Voroshilov 60 years old, Stalin removed them from leadership at the fronts, considering them already old to make fateful decisions))).

        He did not remove himself in his old age, until the last, even in trifles, he did not give independence to his ministers.

        And they were removed from the command of the fronts according to real results, but with the opportunity to improve, and not by age.
        1. Egeny Offline Egeny
          Egeny (Eugene) 17 August 2023 06: 50
          Well, what do you all judge by "whiskers, paws and tails" ...
          Who can enlighten me: why is everyone talking about the Ukrainian "counteroffensive"?
          Are we advancing? We are on the defensive. Kupyanskoe direction does not count.
  2. Vlad55 Offline Vlad55
    Vlad55 10 August 2023 15: 25
    Ah, Mr. Marzhetsky, you are all about the same)) What do you want from the Kremlin? Well, it is impossible to jump above your head. Moscow would be glad to carry out your plans, the eye sees, but the tooth is numb. Opportunities were undoubtedly in the spring of 22, incorrectly placed priorities led the Russian Federation's military-strategic deadlock to today's military-strategic impasse, neither Kyiv nor Moscow has any other way out except freezing. You have to start from reality.
    1. Sergei Fonov Offline Sergei Fonov
      Sergei Fonov (sergey fonov) 10 August 2023 16: 05
      The fighting will continue, Kyiv will not agree to the status of a loser, Russia too, everyone has elections on their noses, going to the polls as a winner is one thing, but as a loser is another. Most likely, they will prepare for active actions in 2024 in order to show determination in the struggle for the interests of the country in 2024. No cardinal changes have happened yet, the capture or surrender of one or another settlement does not change the overall picture.
    2. guest Offline guest
      guest 10 August 2023 17: 14
      Quote: Vlad55
      there is no other way out except for freezing, neither Kyiv nor Moscow.

      Brad, there is a way out, but you need to have the courage and act without regard to the "partners":
  3. unc-2 Offline unc-2
    unc-2 (Nikolai Malyugin) 10 August 2023 16: 25
    Amendments to the Constitution were adopted even before the start of the NWO. And they voted for the borders that were at that time. But that's not the point at all. Someone really wants to aggravate the situation to the point of impossibility. Some do not understand the danger because of short-sightedness. Others plunged into metaphysics. I would like to remind the zealots of metaphysics that our Planet has spent most of its life without a person at all. And if you follow the dogmas of religion, the Almighty made a lot of efforts to create all the conditions for human life on our Earth. But He will not forgive the destruction that a third world war can bring. So thrill-seekers do not want to get into a good extraterrestrial life. God is apolitical. Everyone is the same for him. When will we return to reality?
  4. vlad127490 Offline vlad127490
    vlad127490 (Vlad Gor) 10 August 2023 23: 44
    There is only one decision on Ukraine in favor of the people of Russia. The state of Ukraine must cease to exist. The entire territory of Ukraine should return to Russia, in the form of regions. There is no need to ask permission from anyone, everything must be done unilaterally. There is no state, Ukraine, no debts, no government of Ukraine in exile, no legal Bandera, no Ukrainian participants in various international organizations, no hostile state on the border of the Russian Federation.

    Russia will strengthen its economic and military-political influence in the world, there will be direct access to the EU countries. NATO will no longer be able to use Ukraine against Russia. The northwestern part of the Black Sea will belong to Russia.

    Even if part of the state of Ukraine is left, then today and in the future, Russia will always have an enemy in the person of Ukraine. Ukraine will definitely join NATO and will definitely attack Russia. Everything that is promised and will be spelled out in the Constitution of Ukraine, in its documents, Ukraine will change, in the way that is beneficial to the United States and its satellites.
    Any half-hearted decision is the defeat and capitulation of the Russian Federation to NATO.
    1. Andrey M Offline Andrey M
      Andrey M (Andrey M) 15 August 2023 22: 20
      It is certainly good .... but can you imagine the scale between the achievements of the NWO in 1,5 years and what you are describing? This is .... well, how to say, for example, to say that by 2024 we definitely need to fly to Alpha Centauri and return. And there is not a single real opportunity (except for the use of tactical nuclear) to realize what you propose