The SBU publishes footage of the strike on a large landing ship of the Russian Navy

The Security Service of Ukraine took responsibility for attack sea ​​drones in the bay of Novorossiysk. Kiev propaganda spread a message from the SBU, which reported on the details of the sabotage near the Russian Black Sea port.

It is specified that the operation was carried out by the SBU together with the naval forces of Ukraine. The terrorists claim that the Olenegorsky Gornyak large landing ship has received serious damage and is temporarily unable to perform combat missions.

In confirmation, the special service published a video filmed by a moving surface drone. The footage shows how an unmanned boat loaded with 450 kg of TNT attacks a Russian large landing ship with about 100 crew members on board.

Previously appeared on the web staff from eyewitnesses, which show that the Russian warship gave a slight roll to the port side. According to preliminary data, the damage is minor and after the repair, the Olenegorsky miner will return to combat duty.

Recall that the SBU regularly takes responsibility for high-profile terrorist attacks committed in the deep rear. The head of the SBU, Vasily Malyuk, reported that the recent sabotage on the Crimean bridge and attacks on ships of the Black Sea Fleet in the Sevastopol region were the work of his organization. Thus, the security service of Ukraine is becoming more and more like ISIS * (recognized as a terrorist organization and banned on the territory of the Russian Federation), and even the attacks of the Russian Aerospace Forces on the buildings of the SBU have not yet stopped its terrorist activities.
31 comment
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vladimir R. Offline Vladimir R.
    Vladimir R. (Vladimir Russian) 4 August 2023 10: 35
    There are 12 foreign ships loaded with grain in the Ukrainian roadstead. Why haven't they sunk yet?
  2. Rhetorical Rita Offline Rhetorical Rita
    Rhetorical Rita (Rhetorical Rita) 4 August 2023 10: 37
    Earlier, there was news (and on this site) that everything was reflected, "lose". Who is lying? I hope the SBU.
    1. Kristallovich Online Kristallovich
      Kristallovich (Ruslan) 4 August 2023 10: 43
      Read the news again.
      1. Rhetorical Rita Offline Rhetorical Rita
        Rhetorical Rita (Rhetorical Rita) 4 August 2023 10: 48
        1. Kristallovich Online Kristallovich
          Kristallovich (Ruslan) 4 August 2023 10: 57

          1. Boa kaa Offline Boa kaa
            Boa kaa (Alexander) 5 August 2023 15: 05
            Watched the video. Yes, the BDK sits "crooked" and much lower than the ordinary, which indicates the intake of a large amount of water inside. Remains afloat, because he has an unmeasured buoyancy margin. Another would have sunk long ago. nichrome command of the Novorossiysk naval base did not draw conclusions from the tragedy of the RKR and the damage to the BDK pr.1171 at the beginning of the NWO. Then, outright stupidity to leave 4,0 tons of displacement on an unprotected roadstead for the night! And no one was embarrassed that 775 of the PKO project had only AK-726, well, at best, AK-176 ... They took pity on the PC - so they got a sopat. And why not put the "deer" in the fence? No, it was necessary to rest one's horn on the "PPDO Guide" and put one on the guard of the outer raid ... At the same time, not particularly caring about whether or not a single boat (and a landing one, too!) Is capable of organizing "all types of security and defense" , as for sure he was driven into a combat order or order ... Therefore, the commander of the base will transfer the arrows to the commander of the BDK. However, he is to blame, since he slipped up and did not provide ...
            For stupidity and carelessness again paid the price!
            A legitimate question arises: where was the naval surveillance system? what did the coastal posts of the NIS do? why didn’t they find a single surface target heading for the BDK in time?
            Disgraceful! And they used to call them the "Royal Navy" ... am
            1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  3. calligrapher Lev_Nikolaevich (Dmitriy) 4 August 2023 11: 07
    Judging by the video, the MBP managed to slip into the blind zone of the ship, where it is no longer possible to fire at it. However, our ship is tenacious, once 450 kg. The TNT equivalent didn't sink it. Only gave a roll. Respect!
    1. strange guest Offline strange guest
      strange guest (Strange Guest) 4 August 2023 11: 56
      A warship is generally hard to sink. If only you are very lucky. Almost a hundred years ago, to sink the Bismarck, it took a bunch of hits and torpedoes and huge shells - each the size of a modern drone. And then, the crew sank it themselves. The same story with Tirpitz. So our BDK was seriously damaged if it took so much water despite the damage control measures. Roll on the deck .. I hope, without loss of l / s.
      1. calligrapher Lev_Nikolaevich (Dmitriy) 4 August 2023 12: 49
        Displacement at Tirpitz order more than the BDK "Olenegorsk Miner". Accordingly, the number of autonomous compartments that maintain buoyancy is also greater. So the comparison is incorrect.
      2. UAZ 452 Offline UAZ 452
        UAZ 452 (UAZ 452) 5 August 2023 11: 49
        Then why is "Moscow" at the bottom?
      3. Boa kaa Offline Boa kaa
        Boa kaa (Alexander) 5 August 2023 15: 17
        Quote: Strange guest
        A warship is generally hard to sink. If only you are very lucky.

        Dill was not aiming there! If they had directed the fire-ship (NPA) not to the midships, where the tank hold is, but to the stern, where the engine room is located, then there would no longer be any need to talk about any "damage" here. "Deer" would definitely go on an excursion to "Moscow". And there would already be no one to tow into the fenced ...
  4. Constantine N Offline Constantine N
    Constantine N (Constantin N) 4 August 2023 11: 13
    it turns out that you need the perfection of a means of detecting small watercraft and their automatic destruction, otherwise large ships will become useless. it seems that even last year these explosive boats were known ... they can be carried in a car and launched somewhere near the port
  5. prior Offline prior
    prior (Vlad) 4 August 2023 11: 16
    Do not try to touch the bridges and the railway in Ukraine!
    We are not like that!
  6. rotkiv04 Offline rotkiv04
    rotkiv04 (Victor) 4 August 2023 12: 10
    the chief in the Kremlin says that one must endure, he endures, but the truth is that he no longer draws red lines
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. rotkiv04 Offline rotkiv04
        rotkiv04 (Victor) 4 August 2023 13: 00
        Quote: prior
        Who turned you Russia into a country of patience, a country of thieves?

        and everyone will suddenly see the light, like after Eltsin when he was president, how everyone carried him in their arms, how everyone admired the fact that he buried the communist system, but now everyone considers it their duty to kick him ... after all, it’s not scary anymore.
        1. UAZ 452 Offline UAZ 452
          UAZ 452 (UAZ 452) 5 August 2023 11: 56
          And in Russia, if we take all its iterations, the whole history, there has not yet been a ruler who, immediately after his death or dismissal, or after the next rewriting of history (which happens regularly in our country, every few decades) would not be mixed with dirt. So none of them, if in their right mind, expects to remain in history as a positive character. So - live and enjoy today, and after us - even a flood.
        2. Sasha Koblov Offline Sasha Koblov
          Sasha Koblov (Sasha Koblov) 5 August 2023 22: 50
          He did not bury anyone, and now all the same people are sitting in the city leadership as in the 90s or their children. Some, of course, have already repainted as edinorosov, but their internal rot remains and stinks ....
  7. KLNM Offline KLNM
    KLNM (KLNM) 4 August 2023 13: 06
    They are hiding behind Ukraine, it doesn’t have such means and specialists, England does everything with its sea drones, and the United States helps to direct and so on, their reconnaissance drone probably flew over the Black Sea again ... Stop hanging noodles for us, it’s time to deal with small-shaven in a serious way, first an ultimatum, if they don’t understand, it’s time to bring Poseidon into their sea bay with conventional explosives, not nuclear ones, so that it is completely enough to destroy it, this will be a clear warning and demonstration, they are unlikely to twitch again, they will put it in their pants ... But none of this will happen , Shoigu will sleep with his eyes open, Peskov will crawl out and express concern, sniff and calm down. The Anglo-Saxons teach us that we can be bombed without fear, carry out terrorist attacks on our territory, launch drones on military bases, ships and even in Moscow .... Our answers do not impress me, if they were worthy, Western cries would be through the roof and certainly would have stopped their terrorist provocations. The fact that our ports are being bombed and so on is serial military work, but we need a super response in order to put it on everyone's ears.
    1. UAZ 452 Offline UAZ 452
      UAZ 452 (UAZ 452) 5 August 2023 12: 01
      They are hiding behind Ukraine, it does not have such means and specialists, England does everything with its sea drones, and the United States helps to direct and so on, their reconnaissance drone probably flew over the Black Sea again ...

      But haven’t they been telling us from every iron for a year and a half that we are at war with Nata? So why are we still surprised every time that the Armed Forces of Ukraine receive Western equipment, have access to Western intelligence and surveillance and communication systems? If anything, then the other side does not think to hide any of this.
      The question is different - what did we count on, if one of the declared reasons for the start of the NWO was Ukraine's desire to join NATO? And if we don’t draw out the confrontation with this bloc at all, then what the hell was it to start?
  8. Alexey Lan Offline Alexey Lan
    Alexey Lan (Alexey Lantukh) 4 August 2023 15: 56
    I have a question: did the landing ship stand? Why didn’t he cover himself with anti-torpedo nets, which have been known since the First World War? If sailors read, let them enlighten.
    1. In passing Offline In passing
      In passing (Galina Rožkova) 4 August 2023 20: 43
      They haven't been to the war yet. Or they like to sleep. It just doesn’t reach that this is a war, although it is called NWO.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Boa kaa Offline Boa kaa
      Boa kaa (Alexander) 5 August 2023 15: 29
      Quote: Alexey Lan
      Why didn’t he cover himself with anti-torpedo nets,

      There are NO "anti-torpedo nets" in service with the Navy, but there are booms that perform this role, blocking the entrance to the fenced part of the naval base's berthing front. On the outer roadstead, a single ship organizes a "universal defense" system, which includes PPDO, air defense, air defense ... You yourself saw how it is organized in the Novorossiysk naval base of the warring (!) Black Sea Fleet. If even after that the caps don't fly, then it's time to "drain the material!", as the pilots used to say... negative
  9. Elena123 Offline Elena123
    Elena123 (elena) 5 August 2023 08: 48
    With China, but without Russia: Kyiv opens an unusual meeting for peace in Jeddah
    Security advisers, diplomats and others - from dozens of countries - will seek agreement on August 5-6 on key principles for a future peace deal that will end the almost year-and-a-half war in Ukraine. Russia will look at them from afar. Leading economies are invited, such as, along with European ones, the USA and Japan, India, Brazil, China, Mexico, Turkey.
    1. UAZ 452 Offline UAZ 452
      UAZ 452 (UAZ 452) 5 August 2023 12: 10
      If China nevertheless participates, then from a little-interested talking shop, this event turns into a very alarming bell for our country. Bell the size of a bell.
      And the reaction of our officials is noteworthy: from the traditional ridicule of the event at the beginning, to presenting as a diplomatic victory the fact that Russia was promised to be informed about the decisions taken. In the sense - will they bring the instructions, the schedule for their implementation, and who will be accountable for this?
  10. Yaroslav the Wise (Yaroslav the Wise) 5 August 2023 09: 08
    NOT Comrade Shoigu! You said that all terrorist attacks on the Black Sea Fleet are carried out because the Ukrainian ports are open. Well, they have now been closed for almost a month, and attacks on the Russian navy continue. And, successfully. (Bravo banderlogs!). So, maybe the reason is not in the Ukrainian ports, but in your subordinates and in yourself?
    1. UAZ 452 Offline UAZ 452
      UAZ 452 (UAZ 452) 5 August 2023 12: 02
      You also say that the reason is who put the builder in the position of the Ministry of Defense.
  11. Dejan Barich Offline Dejan Barich
    Dejan Barich 5 August 2023 11: 54
    According to preliminary data, the damage is insignificant and after the repair, the Olenegorsky Miner will return to combat duty with new commanders, because it’s not good to yawn
    1. UAZ 452 Offline UAZ 452
      UAZ 452 (UAZ 452) 5 August 2023 13: 38
      So at first they stated that both drones were detected and destroyed in a timely manner, no casualties or destruction. The next day - the damage is insignificant ... And what will they say tomorrow? Is the ship beyond repair? I remember that "Moskva", according to initial official reports, received light damage, there were no casualties, and was towed to the port. And then ... we were not lucky with the weather - the calm was not calm enough.
      In our country, if the talking heads are caught in a lie, they are not at all embarrassed, but begin to lie again, but in a slightly different way.
  12. RFR Offline RFR
    RFR (RFR) 5 August 2023 21: 36
    The soldier is sleeping - the service is on ... The tin is full ....
  13. Kirill Prozorovski (Kirill Prozorovski) 6 August 2023 01: 28
    Sadly it's not. They'll fix it. And the fact that it is stated that our ships can absolutely defend against Drones. But it turns out not. Thor is loaded onto the ship, so there is no real protection. Don't knock out the boat. There are no hydroacoustics, no acoustic buoys. And if like a torpedo?
  14. imjarek Offline imjarek
    imjarek (imjarek) 8 August 2023 22: 42
    The helplessness of wingless penguins...