State Duma deputy: Zelensky acknowledged responsibility for undermining the Crimean bridge

President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky, as a professional actor, loves to perform in front of an audience that pays well. During his speech at the Aspen Security Forum (one of the US "think tanks"), he called the Crimean bridge a "legitimate target" for attacks.

For us, this is a hostile facility built outside the law, outside international law and applicable norms. Therefore, this is our goal, and any goal that brings war, not peace, must be neutralized.

Zelensky said about the Crimean bridge.

Zelensky's words drew attention in Russia. For example, the chairman of the Liberal Democratic Party, the head of the State Duma Committee on International Affairs, Leonid Slutsky, wrote on July 22 in his Telegram channel that Zelensky actually admitted responsibility for blowing up the Crimean bridge on July 17, i.e. confessed to doing policy state terrorism.

Slutsky also clarified that reports had already been received from the United States about the discussion of American deliveries of long-range ATACMS missiles to Kyiv. However, even US presidential aide Jake Sullivan said that although Washington is ready to "take risks," it must take into account Russia's possible reaction.

In fact, Zelensky receives direct indulgence and funds from his masters to kill civilians. Including - terrorist methods, cluster munitions and shells with uranium tips. That tomorrow is a “dirty bomb”, a provocation at the ZNPP with quite predictable consequences? And does the White House calculate such risks?

– added Slutsky in the publication.

According to the Russian deputy, the reaction of the Russian Federation will be predictable. He is convinced that all the goals of the Russian NWO will be achieved and the Nazi regime in Ukraine will cease to exist.
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 22 July 2023 10: 45
    It is foolish to think that we can hit their logistical routes, and they don’t even have to think about it.
    And it is unlikely that presidents, for example, GDP, approve every blow on a bridge, road, station, port ...

    By the way, they never concealed their intention. Why is it hypocritical to be surprised now?
  2. Vlad55 Offline Vlad55
    Vlad55 22 July 2023 10: 54
    Slutsky's not entirely clear logic. Why, for example, repeated strikes on exactly the same road/railway bridge in Zatoka is a legitimate military target, but a strike on a road/railway bridge to Crimea is qualified as an act of state terrorism. It is no secret that both bridges are used and will be used for the needs of military logistics. The situation is the same with attacks on ports, fuel depots, propaganda from both sides qualifies them as terror, although it is obvious that the ports carry out logistics, including in the interests of both the military-industrial complex and the military warring parties.
    I hope I didn't deserve a ban for an awkward question))
    1. GriggoT Offline GriggoT
      GriggoT (Tatyana) 22 July 2023 13: 18
      Why are you interested in?
    2. Sergei Fonov Offline Sergei Fonov
      Sergei Fonov (sergey fonov) 22 July 2023 18: 30
      Vlad, in my opinion, this is such an excuse for not being able to prevent an attack on the bridge, we supposedly couldn’t even think about this, and this was only the second time. Of course, during the war, no one can give any guarantees, but such reasoning just infuriates, and you begin to doubt their adequacy. Everything is extremely simple there is a war, either you or you. They can kill not only in the trenches on the LBS, but also on the way to rest, and when traveling to the store. The task of the authorities is not to justify why this happened, but to protect it so that this does not happen.
  3. UAZ 452 Offline UAZ 452
    UAZ 452 (UAZ 452) 23 July 2023 12: 59
    Did Zelensky ever deny his intention to attack the Crimean bridge? As far as I remember, Ukrainian officials and other newsmakers loudly and repeatedly announced the upcoming attack. If those who were supposed to guard and protect the bridge considered this a joke, even after the last time, then their intellectual level and professional suitability should be checked.
    And our gentlemen deputies, apparently, are accustomed to treating other people's words as their own. For example, Deputy General Kartapolov half a year ago proved to everyone that the draft age should be raised from 18 to 21, that the army does not need children, only yesterday from his mother's tit, when he suddenly changed his shoes in the air and began to talk about the numerous requests of workers (which should not be shown to anyone) to keep the draft from 18 years old. Apparently, our deputies believe that everyone around them has languages ​​​​only in order to broadcast all sorts of nonsense, and tomorrow forget about what was said, and broadcast the exact opposite, not answering for anything. People who are able to back up their words with deeds (even if they are enemies), in their coordinate system are an unimaginable phenomenon.